Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Subst Abus ; 41(3): 365-374, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31295052

RESUMEN

Background: Patients with substance use disorders (SUDs) are more likely to experience serious health problems, high healthcare utilization, and premature death. However, little is known about the contribution of SUDs to medical 30-day readmission risk. We examined the association between SUDs and 30-day all cause readmission among non-pregnant adult in-patients in the US. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study using 2010-2014 data from the Nationwide Readmissions Database. Our primary focus was on opioid use compared to stimulant use (cocaine and amphetamine) identified by ICD-9-CM diagnosis codes in index hospitalizations. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate adjusted odds ratios and 95% CI representing the association between substance use and 30-day readmission, overall and stratified by the principal reason for the index hospitalization. Results: Nearly 118 million index hospitalizations were included in the study, 4% were associated with opioid or stimulant use disorder. Readmission rates for users (19.5%) were higher than for nonusers (15.7%), with slight variation by the type of substance used: cocaine (21.8%), opioid (19.0%), and amphetamine (17.5%). After adjusting for key demographic, socioeconomic, clinical, and health system characteristics, SUDs and stimulant use disorders increased the odds of 30-day all-cause readmission by 20%. Conclusions: Reducing the frequency of inpatient readmission is an important goal for improving the quality of care and ensuring proper transition to residential/outpatient care among patients with SUDs. Differences between groups may suggest directions for further investigation into the distinct needs and challenges of hospitalized opioid- and other drug-exposed patients.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos Relacionados con Anfetaminas/epidemiología , Trastornos Relacionados con Cocaína/epidemiología , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/epidemiología , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
2.
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) ; 60(6): e411-e421, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32778516

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this systematic review was to assess the literature regarding access to, and utilization of medication for type 2 diabetes (T2D) and pre-post improvements in diabetes outcomes for adults enrolled in clinic- or pharmacy-based medication assistance programs. DATA SOURCES: The databases searched were PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, Embase, Ovid HealthSTAR, PapersFirst, and OpenGrey. STUDY SELECTION: Databases were searched from the beginning of each database to Feburary 29, 2020. Articles were included if (1) the population of interest was adults 18 years of age or older with a T2D diagnosis, (2) the study addressed access to medication for diabetes patients in a clinic- or pharmacy-based setting, and (3) the study was conducted in the United States. DATA EXTRACTION: Data extracted from the selected studies included location of study, patient inclusion criteria, sample size, medication assistance program description, and reported diabetes medication access and medication related adherence outcomes. RESULTS: Eleven articles met the inclusion criteria for the study. The mean reduction in glycated hemoglobin level following the use of medication assistance programs ranged from 0.45 to 0.8. Across studies, the mean number of antihyperglycemic medications used by patients in medication assistance programs ranged from 1 to 1.9. Medication adherence was reported at 45% across studies that reported adherence measures. CONCLUSION: Among the 11 studies identified that assessed access to medication for adults with T2D using clinic- or pharmacy-based medication assistance programs, study findings indicated that many of these programs showed some positive changes in medication access and diabetes-related outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Farmacias , Farmacia , Adolescente , Adulto , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Estados Unidos
3.
JBI Evid Implement ; 20(4): 262-268, 2022 Dec 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36375015

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Proper bowel preparation is essential to successful colonoscopies. The quality of bowel preparation is often poorer in the inpatient settings compared with outpatient settings. This can result in repeat procedures and increased hospital length of stay. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this evidence implementation project was to assess and improve compliance with best practice recommendations for bowel preparation prior to colonoscopy. METHODS: The project was done in three phases for patients hospitalized at a tertiary adult hospital: the initial audit; clinical practice change that included providing patients with both oral and written education about bowel preparation; and a follow-up audit. RESULTS: The baseline audit showed that the hospital was already fully compliant with two out of four best practice criteria. For two criteria with poor compliance rates at baseline, we improved compliance for criterion 1 (giving patients both oral and written education about bowel preparation) from 8 to 40%, while compliance rate for criterion 4 [using 2 l polyethylene glycol - (PEG) or adding ascorbic acid to 4 l PEG] remained at 0% at the end of the intervention. CONCLUSION: The JBI evidence implementation program provided a structured approach to analyze colonoscopy bowel preparation practices and develop strategies to align policies with the best practice recommendation of providing written education about bowel preparation. However, there is need for more conclusive evidence to identify the most ideal inpatient bowel preparation formulation.


Asunto(s)
Catárticos , Colonoscopía , Adulto , Humanos , Colonoscopía/métodos , Polietilenglicoles , Cooperación del Paciente , Centros de Atención Terciaria
4.
BMJ Case Rep ; 14(4)2021 Apr 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33879465

RESUMEN

Considering the rising global burden of diabetes and its complications, effective interventions for addressing barriers to diabetes self-management are needed. Diabetes distress, a psychological barrier to diabetes self-management, has become increasingly recognised in the literature, but effective and feasible ways of addressing it in routine primary care settings are not known. We present the case of a middle-aged non-Hispanic white American woman with poorly controlled diabetes (haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c): 13.9%) and elevated diabetes distress (baseline Diabetes Distress Scale Score: 2.53) who participated in a health coaching intervention. After the 5-month programme, which included eight 45 minute long sessions with a trained health coach, the patient achieved and sustained a 0.8-point reduction in diabetes distress, an improvement in insulin adherence and a 3.6-point reduction in HbA1c. This case demonstrates a novel approach to managing diabetes distress that entails providing patients a safe, nonjudgemental space to express their feelings and explore challenges with diabetes self-management.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Tutoría , Automanejo , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/terapia , Femenino , Hemoglobina Glucada/análisis , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Atención Primaria de Salud , Autocuidado
5.
Diabetes Educ ; 46(4): 335-349, 2020 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32780000

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The purpose of this systematic review is to assess evidence of a relationship between health literacy and medication engagement (formerly referred to as medication adherence) among adults with diabetes mellitus in the United States. METHODS: Literature searches were conducted in PubMed, Ovid Medline, CINAHL, Embase, PsycInfo, and Scopus from the inception of each database to April 2020. Studies were included if they met all of the following criteria: (1) conducted in the United States, (2) the population of interest was adults ≥18 years with a diagnosis of type 1 or type 2 diabetes, (3) medication engagement was an outcome variable, (4) a direct and not a mediating relationship between health literacy and medication engagement was assessed, (5) a quantifiable measure of association was reported, and (6) a full-text journal article or dissertation was available. Quality of published evidence was graded according to Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklists appropriate for the respective study designs identified. RESULTS: Thirteen articles from 11 unique studies were retained in the review, most of which used a cross-sectional design. Four out of 11 studies found a direct positive association between health literacy and medication engagement. Two of the 4 studies with positive findings had significant methodological shortcomings. CONCLUSIONS: There is some evidence that health literacy is associated with medication engagement among adults with diabetes in the United States. Properly designed and executed longitudinal studies are needed to better elucidate the relationship between health literacy and medication engagement among adults with diabetes.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus/tratamiento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus/psicología , Alfabetización en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Cumplimiento de la Medicación/psicología , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estados Unidos
6.
Ann Epidemiol ; 52: 77-85.e2, 2020 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32771457

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Annually, 1%-2% of hospitalized patients are discharged against medical advice (AMA), positioning them at an increased risk of readmission, morbidity, and mortality. Our study aim was to examine 30-day all-cause readmission rates and estimate readmission odds among AMA discharges in the United States, across clinically distinct diagnostic subgroups. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, serial cross-sectional analysis of data from the 2010-2017 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Descriptive statistics and 30-day all-cause readmission rates for hospitalizations among adults aged 18 years or older were estimated by major diagnostic subgroup, discharge disposition, and patient and hospital characteristics. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated using multipredictor logistic regression. RESULTS: We found the AMA discharge to be an independent predictor of hospital readmission within 30 days, with a 25.6% readmission rate and an overall adjusted likelihood of readmission that was almost double to quadruple that of routine discharges. Furthermore, although hospitalizations experienced decreased odds of readmission after the Hospital Readmission Reduction Program implementation (October 1, 2012), our results demonstrate that the Hospital Readmission Reduction Program did not modify the impact of an AMA discharge on readmission. CONCLUSION: These findings have implications for practice, policies, and interventions aimed at improving care quality, preventing AMA discharge, and reducing hospital readmissions in inpatient settings.


Asunto(s)
Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Alta del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Pacientes Desistentes del Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Negativa del Paciente al Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo
7.
J Health Care Poor Underserved ; 31(2): 503-518, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33410786

RESUMEN

Cost-related medication non-adherence (CRN) is a major population health concern in the United States, especially for patients with chronic conditions. It is associated with disease progression and increases the likelihood of emergency department utilization and hospitalization, thereby increasing overall health care expenditures. In this paper, we describe the prescription medication safety net in the United States and assess its reliability. We also introduce Dispensary of Hope (DoH), a charitable medication distribution network, as a reliable medication access program that is capable of filling gaps in medication coverage for low-income and uninsured Americans. Our critical assessment of the medication safety net in the United States suggests that an expansion of DoH could reduce CRN in the United States, improve chronic illness care, and help health systems achieve the triple aim of improving patient experiences and population health while reducing cost.


Asunto(s)
Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Pacientes no Asegurados , Gastos en Salud , Humanos , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Pobreza , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estados Unidos
8.
JMIR Res Protoc ; 8(4): e12166, 2019 Apr 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30938687

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Diabetes distress (DD), a type of psychological distress specific to people with diabetes, is strongly associated with difficulties in performing self-care and inability to meet glycemic targets. Despite increased recognition of the need to manage DD, interventions that are both feasible and effective for reducing DD in routine care settings are not yet known. A pilot study showed that health coaching (HC) has some efficacy in addressing DD, but no adequately powered study has implemented a pragmatic research design capable of assessing the real-world effectiveness of HC in reducing DD. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to describe the rationale and design of an ongoing clinical trial, Coaching and Education for Diabetes Distress trial, that seeks to assess whether HC effectively reduces DD among primary care patients with diabetes and whether HC is more effective than an educational program targeting DD. METHODS: The 2-arm randomized controlled trial is taking place at an academic family medicine practice in Houston, Texas. Both arms will receive usual care, which includes education about DD. In addition, the intervention arm will receive 8 HC sessions over a 5-month period. The primary outcome measure is reduction in DD over a 6-month period. Additional outcome measures include changes in hemoglobin A1c and self-care practices (medication-taking, dietary, and physical activity behaviors). RESULTS: As of March 2019, screening and recruitment are ongoing, and the results are expected by July 2020. CONCLUSIONS: HC is feasible in primary care and has been successfully applied to improving chronic disease self-management and outcomes. This study will provide evidence as to whether it has significant value in addressing important unmet psychological and behavioral needs of patients with diabetes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03617146; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03617146 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/76Va37dbO). INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/12166.

9.
J Diabetes Complications ; 31(11): 1571-1579, 2017 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28893494

RESUMEN

AIMS: Information on the burden and risk factors for diabetes-depression comorbidity in the US is sparse. We used data from the largest all-payer, nationally-representative inpatient database in the US to estimate the prevalence, temporal trends, and risk factors for comorbid depression among adult diabetic inpatients. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis using the 2002-2014 Nationwide Inpatient Sample databases. Depression and other comorbidities were identified using ICD-9-CM codes. Logistic regression was used to investigate the association between patient characteristics and depression. RESULTS: The rate of depression among patients with type 2 diabetes increased from 7.6% in 2002 to 15.4% in 2014, while for type 1 diabetes the rate increased from 8.7% in 2002 to 19.6% in 2014. The highest rates of depression were observed among females, non-Hispanic whites, younger patients, and patients with five or more chronic comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of comorbid depression among diabetic inpatients in the US is increasing rapidly. Although some portion of this increase could be explained by the rising prevalence of multimorbidity, increased awareness and likelihood of diagnosis of comorbid depression by physicians and better documentation as a result of the increased adoption of electronic health records likely contributed to this trend.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Adaptación/epidemiología , Trastorno Depresivo/epidemiología , Complicaciones de la Diabetes/psicología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/psicología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/psicología , Transición de la Salud , Trastornos de la Personalidad/epidemiología , Trastornos de Adaptación/terapia , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Estudios de Cohortes , Comorbilidad , Estudios Transversales , Trastorno Depresivo/terapia , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/epidemiología , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/terapia , Complicaciones de la Diabetes/complicaciones , Complicaciones de la Diabetes/epidemiología , Complicaciones de la Diabetes/terapia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/terapia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/terapia , Trastorno Distímico/epidemiología , Trastorno Distímico/terapia , Femenino , Hospitalización , Humanos , Reembolso de Seguro de Salud , Masculino , Trastornos de la Personalidad/terapia , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
10.
Int Health ; 8(2): 108-15, 2016 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26060220

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Health aid to Nigeria increased tremendously in the last decade and a significant portion of the funds were earmarked for HIV-associated programs. Studies on the impact of HIV-specific aid on the delivery of non-HIV health services in sub-Saharan Africa have yielded mixed results. This study assessed if there is a spillover effect of HIV-specific aid on childhood vaccinations in Nigeria. METHODS: Multivariate logistic regression models were used to estimate the effect of aid disbursements in a previous year on the receipt of vaccines at the individual level in a given year. Estimations were done for approximately 11 700 children using data from demographic and health surveys conducted in Nigeria in 2003 and 2008. RESULTS: US$1 increase in HIV aid per capita was associated with a decrease in the probability of receipt of vaccines by 8-31%: polio first dose decreased by 8%; polio final dose by 9%; diphtheria-pertussis-tetanus (DPT) first dose by 11%; DPT final dose by 19%; measles by 31%; final doses of polio and DPT plus measles vaccine by 8%. CONCLUSIONS: HIV-specific aid had a negative spillover effect on immunization services in Nigeria over the study period. Donors may need to rethink their funding strategies in favour of more horizontal approaches.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por VIH/economía , Infecciones por VIH/terapia , Programas de Inmunización/economía , Cooperación Internacional , África del Sur del Sahara , Niño , Países en Desarrollo , Vacuna contra Difteria, Tétanos y Tos Ferina/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Vacuna Antisarampión/administración & dosificación , Nigeria/epidemiología , Vacunas contra Poliovirus/administración & dosificación
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA