Is transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) effective for chronic low back pain? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been used to reduce pain in range of chronic pain states. The aim of this review is to evaluate the effectiveness of tDCS on pain reduction and related disability in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain (CLBP). A computer-based systematic literature search was performed in five databases according to PRISMA guidelines. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed the effects of tDCS on pain and related disability in patients with non-specific CLBP were included. Modified Jadad scale and Cochrane's risk of bias assessment were used to determine the studies' quality and risk of bias. Meta-analyses were performed by calculating the standardized mean difference (SMD) at 95% confidence interval (CI). Nine RCTs (411 participants) were included in the systematic review according to inclusion criteria, while only five studies could be included in the meta-analysis. The primary motor cortex (M1) was the main stimulated target. The meta-analysis showed non-significant effect of multiple sessions of tDCS over M1 on pain reduction and disability post-treatment respectively, (SMD = 0.378; 95% CI = - 0.264-1.020; P = 0.249), (SMD = 0.143; 95% CI = - 0.214-0.499; P = 0.434). No significant adverse events were reported. The current results do not support the clinical use of tDCS for the reduction of pain and related disability in non-specific CLBP. However, the limited number of available evidence limits our conclusions on the effectiveness of these approaches.

Delphi-Based Expert Consensus Statements for the Management of Percutaneous Radiofrequency Neurotomy in the Treatment of Lumbar Facet Joint Syndrome.

INTRODUCTION: A modified Delphi strategy was implemented for obtaining recommendations that could be useful in the management of percutaneous radiofrequency treatment of lumbar facet joint syndrome, as the literature on the argument was poor in quality. METHODS: An Italian research team conducted a comprehensive literature search, defined the investigation topics (diagnosis, treatment, and outcome evaluation), and developed an explorative semi-structured questionnaire. They also selected the members of the panel. After an online meeting with the participants, the board developed a structured questionnaire of 15 closed statements (round 1). A five-point Likert scale was used and the cut-off for consensus was established at a minimum of 70% of the number of respondents (level of agreement ≥ 4, agree or strongly agree). The statements without consensus were rephrased (round 2). RESULTS: Forty-one clinicians were included in the panel and responded in both rounds. After the first round, consensus (≥ 70%) was obtained in 9 out of 15 statements. In the second round, only one out of six statements reached the threshold. The lack of consensus was observed for statements concerning the use of imaging for a diagnosis [54%, median 4, interquartile range (IQR) 3-5], number of diagnostic blocks (37%, median 4, IQR 2-4), bilateral denervation (59%, median 4, IQR 2-4), technique and number of lesions (66%, median 4, IQR 3-5), and strategy after denervation failure (68%, median 4, IQR 3-4). CONCLUSION: Results of the Delphi investigations suggest that there is a need to define standardized protocols to address this clinical problem. This step is essential for designing high-quality studies and filling current gaps in scientific evidence.

Ultrasound-guided pulsed radiofrequency of the saphenous nerve for knee osteoarthritis pain: a pilot randomized trial.

Aim: Knee osteoarthritis is a degenerative disease complicated by pain and functional limitation. Newer pain-relieving interventions include pulsed radiofrequency (PRF), but studies on its efficacy have limitations including lack of control group and retrospective design that prevent sound conclusions. Materials & methods: We conducted a blind prospective randomized sham-controlled crossover pilot trial according to the CONSORT guidelines, to evaluate the efficacy of ultrasound-guided saphenous nerve PRF in gonarthritis pain. Results: Sixteen patients completed the study. Pain and function significantly improved after real PRF (numerical rating scale mean difference = 3.31), which was superior to sham PRF over time for pain (3 months) and function (6 months). Conclusion: PRF of the saphenous nerve is an alternative to relieve pain in gonarthritis. Our results provide data to support a sample size calculation for future trials. Clinical trial registration: NCT04454710.

Lay abstract Aim: Knee osteoarthritis is a degenerative disease associated with severe pain and functional limitation. While treatment options exist to manage knee arthritis symptoms, few have achieved very good results. Newer pain-relieving treatments include pulsed radiofrequency (PRF), where electrical pulses are delivered to the painful nerves to change the way electrical signals are transmitted and reduce pain, but studies on its efficacy have limitations that prevent sound conclusions. Materials & methods: We conducted a study specifically designed to reveal efficacy of PRF over a sham (fake) treatment in patients affected by severe knee arthritis by targeting one single nerve involved in transmitting pain signals from the knee. Results: Pain and function significantly improved after real PRF, which was superior to sham PRF over time for pain (3 months) and function (6 months). Conclusion: PRF of the saphenous nerve is an alternative to relieve pain in knee arthritis.

Bibliometric Network Analysis on Rapid-Onset Opioids for Breakthrough Cancer Pain Treatment.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Proper breakthrough cancer pain (BTcP) management is of pivotal importance. Although rapid-acting, oral and nasal transmucosal, fentanyl formulations (rapid-onset opioids, ROOs) are licensed for BTcP treatment, not all guidelines recommend their use. Presumably, some research gaps need to be bridged to produce solid evidence. We present a bibliometric network analysis on ROOs for BTcP treatment. METHODS: Documents were retrieved from the Web of Science (WOS) online database. The string was "rapid onset opioids" or "transmucosal fentanyl" and "breakthrough cancer pain". Year of publication, journal metrics (impact factor and quartile), title, document type, topic, and clinical setting (in-patients, outpatients, and palliative care) were extracted. The software tool VOSviewer (version 1.6.17) was used to analyze the semantic network analyzes, bibliographic coupling, journals analysis, and research networks. RESULTS: 502 articles were found in WOS. A declining trend in published articles from 2014 to 2021 was observed. Approximately 50% of documents regard top quartile (Q1) journals. Most articles focused on ROOs efficacy, but abuse and misuse issues are poorly addressed. With respect to article type, we calculated 132 clinical investigations. The semantic network analysis found interconnections between the terms "breakthrough cancer pain," "opioids," and "cancers." The top co-cited article was published in 2000 and addressed pain assessment. The largest number of partnerships regarded the United States, Italy, and England. CONCLUSION: In this research area, most articles are published in top-ranked journals. Nevertheless, paramount topics should be better addressed, and the implementation of research networks is needed.

Perioperative evaluation of myasthenia gravis.

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is the prototype of antibody mediated autoimmune disease and results from the production of autoantibodies against the acetylcholine receptor (AChR) of the neuromuscular synapse. Adequate preoperative evaluation of the myasthenic patient must be carried out carefully. Age, sex, onset and duration of the disease as well as the presence of thymoma may determine the response to thymectomy. Specific attention should be paid to voluntary and respiratory muscle strength. The preoperative preparation of MG patients is essential for the success of surgery. It depends on the severity of clinical status and changes if myasthenic patients receive anticholinesterase therapy. Myasthenic patients may have little respiratory reserve, and hence depressant drugs for preoperative premedication should be used with caution and avoided in patients with bulbar symptoms. The anaesthetic management of myasthenic patient must be individualized in according to the severity of the disease and the type of surgery required. The use of regional or local anaesthesia seems warranted whenever possible. General anaesthesia can be performed safely when patient is optimally prepared and neuromuscular transmission is adequately monitored during and after surgery. Adequate postoperative pain control, pulmonary toilet, and avoidance of drugs that interfere with neuromuscular transmission will facilitate tracheal extubation. Myasthenia gravis is a disease with many implications for the safe administration of anaesthesia. The potential for respiratory compromise in these patients requires the anaesthesiologist to be familiar with the underlying disease state, as well as the interaction of anaesthetic and non-anaesthetic drugs with MG.