Mechanism of a transcriptional cross talk between transforming growth factor-beta-regulated Smad3 and Smad4 proteins and orphan nuclear receptor hepatocyte nuclear factor-4.

We have shown previously that the transforming growth factor-beta (TGFbeta)-regulated Sma-Mad (Smad) protein 3 and Smad4 proteins transactivate the apolipoprotein C-III promoter in hepatic cells via a hormone response element that binds the nuclear receptor hepatocyte nuclear factor 4 (HNF-4). In the present study, we show that Smad3 and Smad4 but not Smad2 physically interact with HNF-4 via their Mad homology 1 domains both in vitro and in vivo. The synergistic transactivation of target promoters by Smads and HNF-4 was shown to depend on the specific promoter context and did not require an intact beta-hairpin/DNA binding domain of the Smads. Using glutathione S-transferase interaction assays, we established that two regions of HNF-4, the N-terminal activation function 1 (AF-1) domain (aa 1-24) and the C-terminal F domain (aa 388-455) can mediate physical Smad3/HNF-4 interactions in vitro. In vivo, Smad3 and Smad4 proteins enhanced the transactivation function of various GAL4-HNF-4 fusion proteins via the AF-1 and the adjacent DNA binding domain, whereas a single tyrosine to alanine substitution in AF-1 abolished coactivation by Smads. The findings suggest that the transcriptional cross talk between the TGFbeta-regulated Smads and HNF-4 is mediated by specific functional domains in the two types of transcription factors. Furthermore, the specificity of this interaction for certain target promoters may play an important role in various hepatocyte functions, which are regulated by TGFbeta and the Smads.

Physical and functional interactions between members of the tumour suppressor p53 and the Sp families of transcription factors: importance for the regulation of genes involved in cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis.

In the present study, we have investigated mechanisms of transcriptional co-operation between proteins that belong to the tumour suppressor p53 and Sp (specificity protein) families of transcription factors. Such mechanisms may play an important role in the regulation of genes containing binding sites for both classes of transcription factors in their promoters. Two of these genes were analysed in the present study: the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p21Cip1 gene and the PUMA (p53-up-regulated mediator of apoptosis) gene. We found that Sp1 and Sp3, but not Sp2, co-operate functionally with p53, p73 and p63 for the synergistic transactivation of the p21Cip1 promoter in Drosophila Schneider SL2 cells that lack endogenous Sp factors. We also found that Sp1 strongly transactivated the PUMA promoter synergistically with p53, whereas deletion of the Sp1-binding sites abolished the transactivation by p53. Using p53 mutant forms in GST (glutathione S-transferase) pull-down assays, we found that the C-terminal 101 amino acids of p53, which include the oligomerization and regulatory domains of the protein, are required for the physical interactions with Sp1 and Sp3, and that deletion of this region abolished transactivation of the p21Cip1 promoter. Utilizing truncated forms of Sp1, we established that p53 interacted with the two transactivation domains A and B, as well as the DNA-binding domain. Our findings suggest that Sp factors are essential for the cellular responses to p53 activation by genotoxic stress. Understanding in detail how members of the p53 and Sp families of transcription factors interact and work together in the p53-mediated cellular responses may open new horizons in cancer chemotherapy.