A novel therapeutic cytomegalovirus DNA vaccine in allogeneic haemopoietic stem-cell transplantation: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus reactivation occurs within 6 months in 60-70% of cytomegalovirus-seropositive patients after allogeneic haemopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT), mainly due to immunosuppression associated with the procedure. Pre-emptive antiviral therapy reduces incidence of cytomegalovirus disease but can be toxic. To reduce the potential for disease and subsequent need for such antiviral drugs, we aimed to assess safety and efficacy of a cytomegalovirus therapeutic DNA vaccine compared with placebo. METHODS: In this exploratory double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group, phase 2 trial, up to 80 donor-recipient pairs and 80 unpaired recipients undergoing allogeneic HSCT were planned for enrolment at 16 transplant centres in the USA. Eligible recipients were cytomegalovirus-seropositive, 18-65 years old, without high-risk primary disease, T-cell depletion, previous vaccination for cytomegalovirus, or autoimmune diseases. We randomly allocated participants in both parallel groups in a 1:1 ratio to receive a cytomegalovirus therapeutic DNA vaccine (TransVax; Vical, San Diego, CA, USA) or placebo before conditioning and at 1, 3, and 6 months after transplantation. The vaccine contains plasmids encoding cytomegalovirus glycoprotein B and phosphoprotein 65 formulated with poloxamer CRL1005 and benzalkonium chloride. Randomisation was done by sequential allocation based on Pocock and Simon's method, and stratified by site, donor-recipient HLA matching status, and donor's cytomegalovirus serostatus. The primary outcome was the occurrence rate of clinically significant viraemia resulting in initiation of cytomegalovirus-specific antiviral therapy in the per-protocol assessable population. We assessed rates of adverse events in all participants who received at least one dose of vaccine or placebo. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00285259. FINDINGS: We randomly allocated 108 participants (94 HSCT recipients and 14 paired donors) between June 29, 2006, and Dec 11, 2009. Enrolment of the paired arm was halted in February 2008 for logistical reasons. Safety was assessed in all participants; the efficacy population was restricted to 74 unpaired recipients. Groups were balanced for demographic and clinical variables. 19 (48%) of 40 vaccine recipients required cytomegalovirus-specific antiviral therapy, compared with 21 (62%) of 34 controls (p=0·145). However, during follow-up vaccine significantly reduced the occurrence and recurrence of cytomegalovirus viraemia and improved the time-to-event for viraemia episodes compared with placebo. The vaccine was well-tolerated; only one participant discontinued after an allergic reaction. Incidence of common adverse events after HSCT (eg, graft-versus-host disease or secondary infections) did not differ between groups. INTERPRETATION: We show proof of concept for an immunotherapeutic cytomegalovirus vaccine (TransVax) for clinically significant viraemia in the HSCT setting. The reported safety and efficacy outcomes support further development in a phase 3 trial, notwithstanding a lack of significant reduction in the use of cytomegalovirus-specific antiviral therapy compared with placebo in this phase 2 trial. FUNDING: Vical and US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.

Phase 1 clinical trials of the safety and immunogenicity of adjuvanted plasmid DNA vaccines encoding influenza A virus H5 hemagglutinin.

BACKGROUND: Development of vaccines against highly pathogenic avian influenza virus H5N1 subtypes posing a pandemic threat remains a priority. Limitations in manufacturing capacity and production time of conventional inactivated vaccines highlight the need for additional approaches. METHODS: We conducted two double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 1 studies involving a total of 103 healthy adults who received two intramuscular injections of Vaxfectin-adjuvanted plasmid DNA vaccine or placebo 21 days apart. Vaccine cohorts received either a monovalent vaccine containing an A/Vietnam/1203/04 H5 hemagglutinin-encoding plasmid or a trivalent vaccine with plasmids encoding H5, NP, and M2 proteins in doses from 0.1 to 1mg of DNA/injection. RESULTS: All doses were well tolerated without vaccine-related serious adverse events or discontinuations. In the monovalent cohorts, hemagglutination inhibition (HI) titers of > or =40 and 4-fold rises from baseline were achieved in 47-67% of subjects and H5-specific T-cell responses in 75-100%. Trivalent cohorts had lower HI response rates (< or = 20%), but 72% of subjects achieved T-cell and/or antibody responses to one or more antigens. CONCLUSIONS: Vaxfectin-adjuvanted monovalent H5 DNA vaccines were well tolerated and induced HI response rates and titers in the reported range of inactivated protein-based H5 vaccines, suggesting that adjuvanted DNA vaccines with rapid vaccine production could be useful for pandemic control.

Switching immunosuppression medications after renal transplantation--a common practice.

BACKGROUND: The rate of change to immunosuppression discharge regimens over time is unknown. We examined the frequency of changes to initial drug treatment regimens and factors associated with a drug change following renal transplantation. METHODS: Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data from adult recipients who underwent primary renal transplantation between January 1998 and December 2002 were analysed. The Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to determine the frequency of regimen changes for the most common immunosuppression discharge regimens, type of change, and to examine switching between the calcineurin inhibitors tacrolimus (Tacro) and ciclosporin United States Pharmacopera (USP) modified (CsA). Cox proportional hazard regression was used to examine recipient, donor and transplant characteristics associated with a drug change. RESULTS: The majority of patients experienced a change to their discharge regimen post-transplantation, and more changes were observed within higher-risk sub-groups of patients. Switching from CsA to Tacro was more common than Tacro to CsA. Significant factors associated with a drug change included those associated with graft loss. CONCLUSIONS: Significant immunosuppression regimen changes occur during the first 4 years post-transplantation. It is possible that early graft survival benefits proven in prospective clinical trials may not translate into long-term success in clinical practice, possibly in part because efficacious regimens are not necessarily maintained long-term.

Differential effects of donor age in liver transplant recipients infected with hepatitis B, hepatitis C and without viral hepatitis.

The variable impact of specific risk factors on survival outcomes based on pre-transplantation diagnosis was analyzed in adult liver transplant recipients reported to the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients: 778 with hepatitis B (HBV), 3463 with hepatitis C (HCV) and 7429 without viral hepatitis. Graft and patient survival for the HBV and no viral hepatitis groups did not differ significantly. The HCV group had significantly lower graft (p = 0.0019) and patient survival (p < 0.0001) than the no viral hepatitis group. Patient survival was significantly lower (p = 0.0011) for HCV compared to HBV patients; differences in graft survival approached significance (p = 0.0561). Donor age, which was not a risk factor in patients with HBV, was the strongest predictor of graft loss and death in patients with HCV, starting with donors >40 years. Donor age >60 years was the strongest predictor of graft loss and death in patients without viral hepatitis. The risks of graft loss and death were reduced for patients on tacrolimus-based immunosuppression with mycophenolate mofetil, regardless of disease etiology. There are clear differences in risk factors for poor outcomes based on underlying liver disease, particularly with regard to the impact of donor age.

Mycophenolate mofetil combination therapy improves long-term outcomes after liver transplantation in patients with and without hepatitis C.

To evaluate the impact of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) on long-term outcomes of tacrolimus and corticosteroids, we analyzed data reported to the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients for 11,670 adult patients (3463 with hepatitis C [HCV]) who underwent primary, single-organ, liver transplantation between 1995 and 2001. Patients who were discharged from the hospital on tacrolimus-based immunosuppression with (n = 4466; n = 1323 HCV) or without MMF (n = 7204; n = 2140 HCV) were included in the analysis. Recipients treated at discharge with MMF, tacrolimus, and corticosteroids had significantly increased patient survival (81.0% vs. 77.0% at 4 years, P < 0.0001) and graft survival (76.4% vs. 72.9%, P < 0.0001), and lower rates of acute rejection (29.0% vs. 33.4%, P < 0.001) as compared to recipients treated at discharge with tacrolimus and corticosteroids alone. A trend toward lower rates of death from infection was observed (6.1% at 4 years for MMF vs. 7.1% at 4 years for tacrolimus and corticosteroids, P = 0.0508), but this result did not reach statistical significance. In multiple regression analyses, MMF triple therapy at discharge was associated with a reduced risk of death (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.77, P < 0.001), graft loss (HR = 0.81, P < 0.001), acute rejection (HR = 0.89, P = 0.002), and death from infectious complications (HR = 0.80, P = 0.007). Outcomes were similar for the cohort with HCV.In conclusion, the addition of MMF at discharge to tacrolimus-based immunosuppression is associated with improved long-term outcomes after liver transplantation in patients with and without HCV.

Mycophenolate mofetil vs azathioprine in a large population of elderly renal transplant patients.

BACKGROUND: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has been shown to decrease acute rejection episodes after kidney transplantation, and has been associated with better graft and patient survival vs azathioprine (AZA). Previous studies reported a higher risk of death due to infection in elderly recipients treated with MMF-based immunosuppression. METHODS: We analysed 5069 elderly ( > 65 years of age) primary renal allograft recipients treated with either MMF or AZA reported to the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients between 1988 and 2000, and compared rates of acute rejection, late acute rejection, graft survival, death-censored graft survival, patient survival and death with a functioning graft. RESULTS: In Cox proportional hazard models, MMF was associated with lower rates of late acute rejection with 12 (RR = 0.72, P = 0.11) and 24 months (RR = 0.50, P = 0.028) of continuous therapy. In univariate analysis (Kaplan-Meier), MMF was associated with improved patient (P = 0.0003) and graft (P<0.0001) survival vs AZA, and trends toward improved patient and graft survival in multivariate analyses. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate the efficacy of MMF-based immunosuppression in elderly transplant recipients and do not suggest an increased risk of death compared to treatment with AZA.

Sirolimus with neoral versus mycophenolate mofetil with neoral is associated with decreased renal allograft survival.

To evaluate the association between a regimen of cyclosporine microemulsion (CsA) + sirolimus (Rapa) treatment versus CsA and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and renal allograft survival, we analyzed 23 016 primary recipients reported to the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients between January 1, 1998 and July 26, 2003. Univariate Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models correcting for demographic and clinical covariates were used to estimate the relative risks for CsA+Rapa versus CsA+MMF-treated patients reaching study endpoints. Subgroup analyses were conducted for recipient ethnicity and donor type. CsA+Rapa was associated with significantly lower graft survival (74.6% vs. 79.3% at 4 years, p = 0.002) and death-censored graft survival (83.7% vs. 87.2%, p = 0.003) compared to CsA+MMF. In multivariate analyses, CsA+Rapa was associated with a significantly increased risk for graft loss, death-censored graft loss and decline in renal function (HR = 1.22, p = 0.002; HR = 1.22, p = 0.018 and HR = 1.25, p < 0.001, respectively). Similar results were obtained in recipient ethnicity and donor type subgroups. In summary, CsA+Rapa was associated with significantly worse graft survival and death-censored graft survival compared to CsA+MMF, and likely reflects full-dose CsA +Rapa. Outcomes regarding alternative strategies of Rapa utilization with reduced CsA, with alternative agents or with no calcineurin inhibitor cannot be extrapolated from these data.