RESUMEN
AIM: To define biome-scale hotspots of phylogenetic and functional mammalian biodiversity (PD and FD, respectively) and compare them to 'classical' hotspots based on species richness (SR) only. LOCATION: Global. METHODS: SR, PD & FD were computed for 782 terrestrial ecoregions using distribution ranges of 4616 mammalian species. We used a set of comprehensive diversity indices unified by a recent framework that incorporates the species relative coverage in each ecoregion. We build large-scale multifaceted diversity-area relationships to rank ecoregions according to their levels of biodiversity while accounting for the effect of area on each diversity facet. Finally we defined hotspots as the top-ranked ecoregions. RESULTS: While ignoring species relative coverage led to a relative good congruence between biome top ranked SR, PD and FD hotspots, ecoregions harboring a rich and abundantly represented evolutionary history and functional diversity did not match with top ranked ecoregions defined by species richness. More importantly PD and FD hotspots showed important spatial mismatches. We also found that FD and PD generally reached their maximum values faster than species richness as a function of area. MAIN CONCLUSIONS: The fact that PD/FD reach faster their maximal value than SR may suggest that the two former facets might be less vulnerable to habitat loss than the latter. While this point is expected, it is the first time that it is quantified at global scale and should have important consequences in conservation. Incorporating species relative coverage into the delineation of multifaceted hotspots of diversity lead to weak congruence between SR, PD and FD hotspots. This means that maximizing species number may fail at preserving those nodes (in the phylogenetic or functional tree) that are relatively abundant in the ecoregion. As a consequence it may be of prime importance to adopt a multifaceted biodiversity perspective to inform conservation strategies at global scale.
RESUMEN
Understanding how biodiversity and ecosystem functioning respond to changes in the environment is fundamental to the maintenance of ecosystem function. In realistic scenarios, the biodiversity-ecosystem functioning path may account for only a small share of all factors determining ecosystem function. Here, we investigated the strength to which variations in environmental characteristics in a Neotropical savanna affected functional diversity and decomposition. We sought an integrative approach, testing a number of pairwise hypotheses about how the environment, biodiversity, and functioning were linked. We used structural equation modelling to connect fire frequency, soil fertility, exchangeable Al, water availability, functional diversity of woody plants, tree density, tree height, and litter decomposition rates in a causal chain. We found significant effects of soil nutrients, water availability, and Al on functional diversity and litter decomposition. Fire did not have a significant direct effect on functional diversity or litter decomposition. However, fire was connected to both variables through soil fertility. Functional diversity did not influence rates of litter decomposition. The mediated effects that emerged from pairwise interactions are encouraging not only for predicting the functional consequences of changes in environmental variables and biodiversity, but also to caution against predictions based on only environmental or only biodiversity change.
Asunto(s)
Biodiversidad , Incendios , Plantas , Suelo , Clima Tropical , Agua , Modelos TeóricosRESUMEN
Intraspecific trait variability plays a fundamental role in community structure and dynamics; however, few studies have evaluated its relative importance to the overall response of communities to environmental pressures. Since fire is considered a key factor in Neotropical savannas, we investigated to what extent the functional effects of fire in a Brazilian savanna occurs via intra- or interspecific trait variability. We sampled 12 traits in communities subjected to three fire regimes in the last 12 years: annual, biennial, and protected. To evaluate fire's relative effects, we fitted a general linear mixed models with species as random and fire as fixed factors, using: (1) all species in the communities (i.e., considering intra- and interspecific variabilities); (2) 18 species common to all fire regimes (i.e., intraspecific variability only); and (3) all species with their overall average trait values (i.e., interspecific variability only). We assessed the relative role of intra- or interspecific variability by comparing the significance of each trait in the three analyses. We also compared the within and between fire variabilities with a variance component analysis. Five traits presented larger intraspecific than interspecific variability, and the main effect of fire occurred at the intraspecific level. These results confirm that it is important to consider intraspecific variability to fully understand fire-prone communities. Moreover, trait variability was larger within than among fire regimes. Thus, fire may act more as an external filter, preventing some of the species from the regional pool from colonizing the cerrado, than as an internal factor structuring the already filtered cerrado communities.
Asunto(s)
Ecosistema , Incendios , Plantas , Biodiversidad , Brasil , Monitoreo del Ambiente , Modelos TeóricosRESUMEN
This study assessed the impact of altitude, precipitation, and soil conditions on species richness (SR), phylogenetic diversity (PD), and functional diversity (FD) standardized effect sizes in subtropical Brazilian Atlantic Forest tree communities. We considered specific trait information (FDs) for FD, reflecting recent adaptive evolution, contrasting with deeper phylogenetic constraints in FD. Three functional traits (leaf area-LA, wood density-WD, and seed mass-SM) were examined for their response to these gradients. Generalized least squares models with environmental variables as predictors and diversity metrics as response variables were used, and a fourth-corner correlation test explored trait-environmental relationships. SR decreased with altitude, while PD increased, indicating niche convergence at higher altitudes. Leaf area and seed mass diversity also decreased with altitude. For LA, both FD and FDs were significant, reflecting filtering processes influenced by phylogenetic inheritance and recent trait evolution. For SM, only the specific trait structure responded to altitude. LA and SM showed significant trait-environmental relationships, with smaller-leaved and lighter-seeded species dominant at higher altitudes. Soil gradients affect diversity. Fertile soils have a wider range of LA, indicating coexistence of species with different nutrient acquisition strategies. WD variation is lower for FDs. SM diversity has different relationships with soil fertility for FDs and FD, suggesting phylogeny influences trait variation. Soil pH influences WD and LA under acidic soils, with deeper phylogenetic constraints (FD). Environmental factors impact tree communities, with evidence of trait variation constraints driven by conditions and resources. Subtropical Atlantic forests' tree assemblies are mainly influenced by altitude, pH, and soil fertility, selecting fewer species and narrower trait spectra under specific conditions (e.g., higher altitudes, pH). Functional diversity patterns reflect both phylogenetic and recent evolution constraints, with varying strength across traits and conditions. These findings highlight the intricate processes shaping long-lived species assembly across diverse environments in the Southern Brazilian Atlantic Forest.
RESUMEN
Interspecific synchrony and trait-based differences between species are likely to be related to each other. Therefore, we investigated interspecific synchrony patterns in a fish community under prolonged drought conditions, using a trait-based approach. We hypothesized that trait-similarity would predict interspecific synchrony among fish populations. We also expected that a general synchronous pattern for the whole community would be high during a severe drought context, indicating low stability. The study was conducted in a semi-arid reservoir between 2010 and 2017, which encompassed a five-year period of severe drought. We considered species differences in body length, gonadosomatic index, relative condition factor, and trophic level and found that interspecific synchrony was negatively related to species differences in body length. This result can be related to species requirements in terms of habitats and food resources. We also found a significant level of community-wide synchrony, with important implications for community stability during periods of prolonged drought. In conclusion, our results indicated a strong effect of environmental filtering in fish population dynamics over time. We highlight the importance of a trait-based approach to shed light on understanding ecological processes driving population dynamics.
Asunto(s)
Sequías , Ecosistema , Animales , Peces , Dinámica PoblacionalRESUMEN
The assumption that traits and phylogenies can be used as proxies of species niche has faced criticisms. Evidence suggested that phylogenic relatedness is a weak proxy of trait similarity. Moreover, different processes can select different traits, giving opposing signals in null model analyses. To circumvent these criticisms, we separated traits of stream insects based on the concept of α and ß niches, which should give clues about assembling pressures expected to act independently of each other. We investigated the congruence between the phylogenetic structure and trait structure of communities using all available traits and all possible combinations of traits (4095 combinations). To account for hierarchical assembling processes, we analyzed patterns on two spatial scales with three pools of genera. Beta niche traits selected a priori - i.e., traits related to environmental variation (e.g., respiration type) - were consistently clustered on the smaller scale, suggesting environmental filtering, while α niche traits - i.e., traits related to resource use (e.g., trophic position) - did not display the expected overdispersion, suggesting a weak role of competition. Using all traits together provided random patterns and the analysis of all possible combinations of traits provided scenarios ranging from strong clustering to overdispersion. Communities were phylogenetically overdispersed, a pattern previously interpreted as phylogenetic limiting similarity. However, our results likely reflect the co-occurrence of ancient clades due to the stability of stream habitats along the evolutionary scale. We advise ecologists to avoid using combinations of all available traits but rather carefully traits based on the objective under consideration. Both trait and phylogenetic approaches should be kept in the ecologist toolbox, but phylogenetic distances should not be used as proxies of traits differences. Although the phylogenetic structure revealed processes operating at the evolutionary scale, only specific traits explained local processes operating in our communities.
RESUMEN
Red Lists of threatened species play a critical role in conservation science and practice. However, policy-making based on Red Lists ignores ecological and evolutionary consequences of losing biodiversity because these lists focus on species alone. To decide if relying on Red Lists alone can help to conserve communities' functional (FD) and phylogenetic (PD) diversity, it is useful to evaluate whether Red List categories represent species with diverse ecological traits and evolutionary histories. Additionally, local scale analyses using regional Red Lists should represent more realistic pools of co-occurring species and thereby better capture eventual losses of FD and PD. Here, we used 21 life-history traits and a phylogeny for all Brazilian birds to determine whether species assigned under the IUCN global Red List, the Brazilian national, and regional Red Lists capture more FD and PD than expected by chance. We also built local Red Lists and analysed if they capture more FD and PD at the local scale. Further, we investigated whether individual threat categories have species with greater FD and PD than expected by chance. At any given scale, threat categories did not capture greater FD or PD than expected by chance. Indeed, mostly categories captured equal or less FD or PD than expected by chance. These findings would not have great consequences if Red Lists were not often considered as a major decision support tool for policy-making. Our results challenge the practice of investing conservation resources based only on species Red Lists because, from an ecological and evolutionary point of view, this would be the same as protecting similar or random sets of species. Thus, new prioritization methods, such as the EDGE of Existence initiative, should be developed and applied to conserve species' ecological traits and evolutionary histories at different spatial scales.
Asunto(s)
Aves/fisiología , Conservación de los Recursos Naturales/métodos , Animales , Biodiversidad , Aves/genética , Brasil , Especies en Peligro de Extinción , Extinción Biológica , FilogeniaRESUMEN
Plant-pollinator coextinctions are likely to become more frequent as habitat alteration and climate change continue to threaten pollinators. The consequences of the resulting collapse of plant communities will depend partly on how quickly plant functional and phylogenetic diversity decline following pollinator extinctions. We investigated the functional and phylogenetic consequences of pollinator extinctions by simulating coextinctions in seven plant-pollinator networks coupled with independent data on plant phylogeny and functional traits. Declines in plant functional diversity were slower than expected under a scenario of random extinctions, while phylogenetic diversity often decreased faster than expected by chance. Our results show that plant functional diversity was relatively robust to plant-pollinator coextinctions, despite the underlying rapid loss of evolutionary history. Thus, our study suggests the possibility of uncoupled responses of functional and phylogenetic diversity to species coextinctions, highlighting the importance of considering both dimensions of biodiversity explicitly in ecological studies and when planning for the conservation of species and interactions.
Asunto(s)
Biodiversidad , Extinción Biológica , Filogenia , Fenómenos Fisiológicos de las Plantas , Plantas/clasificación , Polinización , Animales , Modelos Estadísticos , Procesos EstocásticosRESUMEN
We tested the hypothesis that streams in deforested areas shelter different fish communities to nearby forested areas, and that these disparities are due to environmental parameters that limit or benefit different species according to their functional traits. We compared the community composition of three south east Brazilian streams flanked by riparian forest with three nearby streams in deforested areas. The following functional traits were considered: diet, habitat use, water flow preference, size, and hypoxia tolerance. Differentiation between forested and deforested streams corresponded with the different contributions of three functional groups. Species reported in the literature to be hypoxia tolerant, and exhibiting a variable combination of the other traits prevailed in deforested streams, although we did not find substantial differences in oxygen levels between forested and deforested streams. In forested streams, benthic species associated with a high water flow and an insectivorous diet were dominant. Changes in streams induced by deforestation which are associated with habitat availability, food resources, and physicochemical conditions appear to restrict the occurrence of specialized species and instead benefit tolerant generalists.
A hipótese de que as alterações ambientais causadas pelo desmatamento nos riachos podem restringir a ocorrência de espécies a partir de suas características funcionais foi testada. Comparamos a composição das comunidades de três riachos do sudeste do Brasil providos de floresta riparia nas suas margens com três riachos da mesma região com zona ripária desmatada. Os seguintes atributos funcionais foram considerados: dieta, uso de hábitat, preferência por fluxo, tamanho e tolerância à hipóxia. A diferenciação dos riachos, em especial entre os riachos florestados e desmatados, foi maior do que o esperado ao acaso e correspondeu à contribuição diferencial de três grupos funcionais. As espécies indicadas na literatura como sendo tolerantes à hipóxia e que apresentaram combinação variável das outras características foram mais abundantes nos riachos desmatados, embora não tenhamos observado diferenças substanciais nos níveis de oxigênio dissolvido entre os riachos florestados e desmatados. Nos riachos florestados predominaram espécies de hábitos especializados, bentônicas, associadas com alta velocidade de água e dieta insetívora. As alterações nos riachos provocadas pelo desmatamento relacionadas com a disponibilidade de hábitat, recursos alimentares e condições físico-químicas restringem a ocorrência de grupos de espécies especializadas e beneficiam espécies tolerantes e generalistas.
Asunto(s)
Animales , Nivel de Oxígeno/análisis , Peces/anatomía & histología , Peces/crecimiento & desarrollo , Brasil , Cambio AmbientalRESUMEN
As comunidades são assembléias de espécies co-ocorrentes que interagem potencialmente umas com as outras. Elas são resultado não apenas de uma série de processos ecológicos ou "regras de montagem", mas também de processos evolutivos passados e contínuos. Nos últimos anos, as regras de montagem têm recebido maior atenção dos ecólogos e dois processos diferentes têm sido explorados: os filtros ambientais e a similaridade limitante. Como os processos envolvidos na formação das assembléias parecem variar de uma forma dependente de escala, espera-se que tais regras de montagem tenham diferentes efeitos ao longo de diferentes escalas espaciais. Compreender essa relação entre os processos ecológicos e as escalas espaciais nas quais eles atuam tem sido um grande desafio entre os estudiosos. Nesse contexto, a incorporação de dados filogenéticos e funcionais às abordagens clássicas de diversidade tem estabelecido a base de uma emergente área de pesquisa em ecologia de comunidades, impulsionando o desenvolvimento de muitas ferramentas para detectar a subjacente estrutura das assembléias e, portanto, inferir os processos de montagem responsáveis pela formação das assembléias. Aqui, demonstramos como a utilização de diferentes medidas de diversidade filogenética e funcional juntamente com o uso de diferentes modelos nulos pode ser uma abordagem promissora na solução de paradigmas ainda pouco compreendidos, discutindo como tais métodos podem aumentar o poder preditivo dessa crescente área de pesquisa.
Communities are assemblages of co-occurring species that potentially interact with each other. They are the result not only of a series of ecological processes or "assembly rules", but also of past and ongoing evolutionary processes. In recent years, the assembly rules have received increased attention from ecologists and two different processes have been explored: environmental filtering and limiting similarity. As the processes involved in the formation of the assemblages appear to vary in a manner dependent on scale, it is expected that such assembly rules have different effects over different spatial scales. Understanding this relationship between ecological processes and spatial scales in which they act has been a great challenge among scholars. In this context, the incorporation of phylogenetic and functional data to diversity classical approaches have established the basis for an emerging area of research in community ecology, promoting the development of many tools to detect the underlying structure of the assemblages and, therefore, to infer the processes assembly responsible for the formation of the assemblages. Here, we demonstrate how the use of different measures of phylogenetic and functional diversity along with the use of different null models can be a promising approach in solving paradigms still poorly understood, discussing how such methods can increase the predictive power of this growing area of research.
Asunto(s)
Filogenia , Variación Genética , Ecosistema , Ecología , BiodiversidadRESUMEN
Embora a diversidade pareça ser o conceito ecológico mais intuitivo, nenhuma definição consensual foi formulada. As medidas tradicionais de diversidade, que levam em conta apenas o número de espécies e suas contribuições relativas, têm se mostrado estimativas pouco preditivas da estrutura e do funcionamento das comunidades. Medidas de diversidade que incorporem informações sobre as relações filogenéticas das espécies ou suas características funcionais podem ser melhores do que as medidas tradicionais para muitas finalidades. Apresentamos uma pequena revisão das propriedades e aplicações de algumas medidas de diversidade. Enfatizamos aqui duas abordagens recentes e promissoras, as diversidades filogenética e funcional, que têm se mostrado mais sensíveis para detectar respostas das comunidades às mudanças ambientais. Na diversidade filogenética, as relações de parentesco entre as espécies são levadas em conta, enquanto que na diversidade funcional traços que devem ter relações com o funcionamento das comunidades são considerados. Discutimos ainda os desafios e as perspectivas para o uso dessas duas abordagens na ecologia.
Although diversity seems to be the most intuitive ecological concept, no consensual definition has been stated. Traditional diversity measures, which take into account only the number of species and their relative contribution, have little predictive power about the functioning of communities. Diversity measures that include information on phylogenetic relationships among species or their functional traits should be better than the traditional measures. We present a short review of the properties and applications of some diversity measures, emphasizing two recent and promising approaches, the phylogenetic and functional diversities, which have been shown to be more sensitive to detect responses of communities to environmental changes. In phylogenetic diversity, species relatedness is taken into account, whereas in functional diversity traits related with community functioning are considered. We also discuss challenges and perspectives for the use of these two approaches in ecology.