Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 12 de 12
Filtrar
1.
J Endocrinol Invest ; 47(7): 1719-1732, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38190029

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of high thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) levels on human granulosa-luteal (hGL) cells. METHODS: hGL cells were isolated from follicular aspirates derived from patients undergoing IVF treatment without any thyroid disorder (serum TSH 0.5-2 mU/L). Cells were cultured at 37 °C in DMEM, supplemented with 5% FBS. The cells were treated with 1 nM LH and increasing concentrations of TSH. At the end of culture, conditioned medium and cells were collected to analyze progesterone production, cell viability, and mRNA levels of genes involved in the steroidogenesis process. Human ovarian tissues were analyzed for TSH receptor (TSHR) expression by IHC. RESULTS: The expression of TSHR was detected in human corpus luteum by IHC and in hGL by RT-PCR. In hGL cells, TSH treatment did not modulate progesterone production nor the expression of steroidogenic genes, such as p450scc and HSD3b 1/2. However, TSH induced a dose-dependent increase in cell death. Finally, TSH did not affect LH-induced p450scc and HSD3b1/2 expression while LH partially reverted TSH negative effect on cell death in hGL. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated TSH levels in hypothyroid women may be associated with impaired CL functioning and maintenance. These findings open a new line of research for the importance of the treatment of women with thyroid dysfunction that could contribute to the onset of infertility.


Asunto(s)
Cuerpo Lúteo , Tirotropina , Humanos , Femenino , Tirotropina/metabolismo , Cuerpo Lúteo/metabolismo , Cuerpo Lúteo/efectos de los fármacos , Progesterona/metabolismo , Células Cultivadas , Receptores de Tirotropina/metabolismo , Receptores de Tirotropina/genética , Hormona Luteinizante/metabolismo , Adulto , Células Lúteas/metabolismo , Células Lúteas/efectos de los fármacos , Supervivencia Celular/efectos de los fármacos
2.
Hum Reprod ; 38(12): 2400-2411, 2023 Dec 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37879843

RESUMEN

STUDY QUESTION: Is embryo culture in a closed time-lapse system associated with any differences in perinatal and maternal outcomes in comparison to conventional culture and spontaneous conception? SUMMARY ANSWER: There were no significant differences between time-lapse and conventional embryo culture in preterm birth (PTB, <37 weeks), low birth weight (LBW, >2500 g) and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy for singleton deliveries, the primary outcomes of this study. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Evidence from prospective trials evaluating the safety of time-lapse incubation for clinical use show similar embryo development rates, implantation rates, and ongoing pregnancy and live birth rates when compared to conventional incubation. Few studies have investigated if uninterrupted culture can alter risks of adverse perinatal outcomes presently associated with IVF when compared to conventional culture and spontaneous conceptions. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This study is a Swedish population-based retrospective registry study, including 7379 singleton deliveries after fresh embryo transfer between 2013 and 2018 from selected IVF clinics. Perinatal outcomes of singletons born from time-lapse-cultured embryos were compared to singletons from embryos cultured in conventional incubators and 71 300 singletons from spontaneous conceptions. Main perinatal outcomes included PTB and LBW. Main maternal outcomes included hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (pregnancy hypertension and preeclampsia). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: From nine IVF clinics, 2683 singletons born after fresh embryo transfer in a time-lapse system were compared to 4696 singletons born after culture in a conventional incubator and 71 300 singletons born after spontaneous conception matched for year of birth, parity, and maternal age. Patient and treatment characteristics from IVF deliveries were cross-linked with the Swedish Medical Birth Register, Register of Birth Defects, National Patient Register and Statistics Sweden. Children born after sperm and oocyte donation cycles and after Preimplantation Genetic testing cycles were excluded. Odds ratio (OR) and adjusted OR were calculated, adjusting for relevant confounders. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: In the adjusted analyses, no significant differences were found for risk of PTB (adjusted OR 1.11, 95% CI 0.87-1.41) and LBW (adjusted OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.66-1.14) or hypertensive disorders of pregnancy; preeclampsia and hypertension (adjusted OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.67-1.45 and adjusted OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.62-1.53, respectively) between time-lapse and conventional incubation systems. A significantly increased risk of PTB (adjusted OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.08-1.60) and LBW (adjusted OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.08-1.72) was found for singletons born after time-lapse incubation compared to singletons born after spontaneous conceptions. In addition, a lower risk for pregnancy hypertension (adjusted OR 0.72 95% CI 0.53-0.99) but no significant difference for preeclampsia (adjusted OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.68-1.12) was found compared to spontaneous conceptions. Subgroup analyses showed that some risks were related to the day of embryo transfer, with more adverse outcomes after blastocyst transfer in comparison to cleavage stage transfer. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: This study is retrospective in design and different clinical strategies may have been used to select specific patient groups for time-lapse versus conventional incubation. The number of patients is limited and larger datasets are required to obtain more precise estimates and adjust for possible effect of additional embryo culture variables. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Embryo culture in time-lapse systems is not associated with major differences in perinatal and maternal outcomes, compared to conventional embryo culture, suggesting that this technology is an acceptable alternative for embryo incubation. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): The study was financed by a research grant from Gedeon Richter. There are no conflicts of interest for all authors to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.


Asunto(s)
Hipertensión Inducida en el Embarazo , Preeclampsia , Nacimiento Prematuro , Embarazo , Femenino , Niño , Recién Nacido , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Nacimiento Prematuro/epidemiología , Nacimiento Prematuro/etiología , Hipertensión Inducida en el Embarazo/etiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Imagen de Lapso de Tiempo , Semen , Fertilización In Vitro/efectos adversos
3.
Hum Reprod ; 38(4): 762-775, 2023 04 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36824049

RESUMEN

STUDY QUESTION: Can chromosomal abnormalities beyond copy-number aneuploidies (i.e. ploidy level and microdeletions (MDs)) be detected using a preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) platform? SUMMARY ANSWER: The proposed integrated approach accurately assesses ploidy level and the most common pathogenic microdeletions causative of genomic disorders, expanding the clinical utility of PGT. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Standard methodologies employed in preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) identify chromosomal aneuploidies but cannot determine ploidy level nor the presence of recurrent pathogenic MDs responsible for genomic disorders. Transferring embryos carrying these abnormalities can result in miscarriage, molar pregnancy, and intellectual disabilities and developmental delay in offspring. The development of a testing strategy that integrates their assessment can resolve current limitations and add valuable information regarding the genetic constitution of embryos, which is not evaluated in PGT providing new level of clinical utility and valuable knowledge for further understanding of the genomic causes of implantation failure and early pregnancy loss. To the best of our knowledge, MDs have never been studied in preimplantation human embryos up to date. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This is a retrospective cohort analysis including blastocyst biopsies collected between February 2018 and November 2021 at multiple collaborating IVF clinics from prospective parents of European ancestry below the age of 45, using autologous gametes and undergoing ICSI for all oocytes. Ploidy level determination was validated using 164 embryonic samples of known ploidy status (147 diploids, 9 triploids, and 8 haploids). Detection of nine common MD syndromes (-4p=Wolf-Hirschhorn, -8q=Langer-Giedion, -1p=1p36 deletion, -22q=DiGeorge, -5p=Cri-du-Chat, -15q=Prader-Willi/Angelman, -11q=Jacobsen, -17p=Smith-Magenis) was developed and tested using 28 positive controls and 97 negative controls. Later, the methodology was blindly applied in the analysis of: (i) 100 two pronuclei (2PN)-derived blastocysts that were previously defined as uniformly euploid by standard PGT-A; (ii) 99 euploid embryos whose transfer resulted in pregnancy loss. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: The methodology is based on targeted next-generation sequencing of selected polymorphisms across the genome and enriched within critical regions of included MD syndromes. Sequencing data (i.e. allelic frequencies) were analyzed by a probabilistic model which estimated the likelihood of ploidy level and MD presence, accounting for both sequencing noise and population genetics patterns (i.e. linkage disequilibrium, LD, correlations) observed in 2504 whole-genome sequencing data from the 1000 Genome Project database. Analysis of phased parental haplotypes obtained by single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-array genotyping was performed to confirm the presence of MD. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: In the analytical validation phase, this strategy showed extremely high accuracy both in ploidy classification (100%, CI: 98.1-100%) and in the identification of six out of eight MDs (99.2%, CI: 98.5-99.8%). To improve MD detection based on loss of heterozygosity (LOH), common haploblocks were analyzed based on haplotype frequency and LOH occurrence in a reference population, thus developing two further mathematical models. As a result, chr1p36 and chr4p16.3 regions were excluded from MD identification due to their poor reliability, whilst a clinical workflow which incorporated parental DNA information was developed to enhance the identification of MDs. During the clinical application phase, one case of triploidy was detected among 2PN-derived blastocysts (i) and one pathogenic MD (-22q11.21) was retrospectively identified among the biopsy specimens of transferred embryos that resulted in miscarriage (ii). For the latter case, family-based analysis revealed the same MD in different sibling embryos (n = 2/5) from non-carrier parents, suggesting the presence of germline mosaicism in the female partner. When embryos are selected for transfer based on their genetic constitution, this strategy can identify embryos with ploidy abnormalities and/or MDs beyond aneuploidies, with an estimated incidence of 1.5% (n = 3/202, 95% CI: 0.5-4.5%) among euploid embryos. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Epidemiological studies will be required to accurately assess the incidence of ploidy alterations and MDs in preimplantation embryos and particularly in euploid miscarriages. Despite the high accuracy of the assay developed, the use of parental DNA to support diagnostic calling can further increase the precision of the assay. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: This novel assay significantly expands the clinical utility of PGT-A by integrating the most common pathogenic MDs (both de novo and inherited ones) responsible for genomic disorders, which are usually evaluated at a later stage through invasive prenatal testing. From a basic research standpoint, this approach will help to elucidate fundamental biological and clinical questions related to the genetics of implantation failure and pregnancy loss of otherwise euploid embryos. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No external funding was used for this study. S.C., M.F., F.C., P.Z., I.P., L.G., C.P., M.P., D.B., J.J.-A., D.B.-J., J.M.-V., and C.R. are employees of Igenomix and C.S. is the head of the scientific board of Igenomix. A.C. and L.P. are employees of JUNO GENETICS. Igenomix and JUNO GENETICS are companies providing reproductive genetic services. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.


Asunto(s)
Aborto Espontáneo , Diagnóstico Preimplantación , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Diagnóstico Preimplantación/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Aborto Espontáneo/patología , Estudios Prospectivos , Pruebas Genéticas/métodos , Blastocisto/patología , Aneuploidia
4.
J Endocrinol Invest ; 46(6): 1079-1085, 2023 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36633791

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Infertility, which is defined as the inability to conceive after at least 12 months of regular unprotected sexual intercourses, affects about 15-20% of couples worldwide and a male factor is involved in about half of the cases. The development of assisted reproductive technology (ART) made it possible to conceive also to individuals affected from severe oligospermia or azoospermia. However, the impact of the male factor on embryo development, implantation, prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities, genetic and epigenetic alterations, and clinical and obstetric outcomes is still controversial. PURPOSE: This narrative review examines the indications, minimum access criteria, and outcomes by individual ART technique in relation to the male factor.


Asunto(s)
Azoospermia , Infertilidad Masculina , Infertilidad , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Infertilidad Masculina/diagnóstico , Infertilidad Masculina/etiología , Infertilidad Masculina/terapia , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas , Azoospermia/genética , Aberraciones Cromosómicas , Infertilidad/terapia
5.
J Endocrinol Invest ; 46(1): 15-26, 2023 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35945393

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: We herein aimed to review the new insights into the impact of impaired thyroid function on male and female fertility, spacing from spontaneous pregnancy to ART, with the objective of providing an updated narrative revision of the literature. METHODS: This narrative review was performed for all available prospective, retrospective and review articles, published up to 2021 in PubMed. Data were extracted from the text and from the tables of the manuscript. RESULTS: Thyroid dysfunction is frequently associated with female infertility, whereas its link with male infertility is debated. Female wise, impaired function is detrimental to obstetric and fetal outcomes both in spontaneous pregnancies and in those achieved thanks to assisted reproduction technologies (ART). Furthermore, the reference range of TSH in natural pregnancy and ART procedures has recently become a matter of debate following recent reports in this field. On the other hand, the impact of thyroid function on the male reproductive system is less clear, although a possible role is suggested via modulation of Sertoli and Leydig cells function and spermatogenesis. CONCLUSION: Thyroid function should be carefully monitored in both male and female, in couples seeking spontaneous pregnancy as well as ART, as treatment is generally immediate and likely to improve chances of success.


Asunto(s)
Infertilidad Femenina , Infertilidad Masculina , Infertilidad , Embarazo , Masculino , Femenino , Humanos , Glándula Tiroides , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios Prospectivos , Infertilidad Masculina/etiología , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas , Infertilidad Femenina/etiología , Infertilidad Femenina/terapia , Infertilidad/terapia
6.
J Endocrinol Invest ; 45(8): 1527-1534, 2022 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35366160

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate in a population of patients with erectile dysfunction (ED): (a) the prevalence of a previously unknown endocrine/glycemic disorders; (b) the correlation between ED severity and endocrine/glycemic disorders. METHODS: 1332 patients referred for ED from 2013 to 2020 were included. The ED diagnosis was made using the International-Erectile-Function-Index-5 questionnaire. ED severity was considered according to presence/absence of spontaneous erections, maintenance/achievement deficiency. All patients were subjected to search for sociodemographic and clinical characteristics: age, ethnicity, marital status, previous use of PDE5i, previous prostatectomy, diabetes mellitus (DM), prediabetes, endocrine dysfunctions. RESULTS: The mean ± SD age was 54.3 ± 13.7 years. The 19.1% (255/1332) of patients were already in treatment for prediabetes/diabetes or endocrine dysfunctions. Among the remaining 1077, the prevalence of previously unknown endocrine and glycemic disorders was 30% (323/1077). Among them, 190/323 subjects (58.8%) were affected by hypogonadism, with high estradiol level observed in 8/190 (4.2%). The prevalence of new glycemic alterations was 17.3% (56/323) [specifically, 32/56 (57.1%) DM, and 24/56 (42.9%) prediabetes]. A thyroid dysfunction was observed in 40/323 subjects (12.3%) and hyperprolactinemia in 37/323 (11.5%). Patients with new diagnosis of DM showed more severe form of ED compared to the total group {difficulty in the achievement of erection: 46/56 [82.2%, vs 265/1332 (19.9%), p < 0.05]; absence of spontaneous erection 23/56 [41.1%, vs 321/1332 (24.1%), p < 0.05]}. CONCLUSION: ED is an early marker of endocrine/glycemic disorder, and a previously unknown dysfunction was found in more than a quarter of patients. A newly diagnosed DM is associated with ED severity, especially in elderly man and in presence of hypertension.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Disfunción Eréctil , Hipogonadismo , Estado Prediabético , Adulto , Anciano , Biomarcadores , Glucemia , Disfunción Eréctil/diagnóstico , Disfunción Eréctil/epidemiología , Disfunción Eréctil/etiología , Humanos , Hipogonadismo/complicaciones , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estado Prediabético/diagnóstico , Estado Prediabético/epidemiología
7.
J Assist Reprod Genet ; 39(4): 873-882, 2022 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35119549

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Few studies explored whether prolonged cryo-storage after vitrification affects embryo competence and perinatal outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims at highlighting any putative impact of cryo-storage duration on cryo-survival, miscarriage, live birth and major malformations. METHODS: A systematic review was performed using MEDLINE (PubMed), ISI Web of Knowledge, Scopus and Embase databases up to June 2021. Data were combined to obtain a pooled OR, and meta-analysis was conducted using a random effects model. Out of 1,389 screened abstracts, 22 papers were assessed for eligibility, and 5 studies were included (N = 18,047 embryos). Prolonged cryo-storage was defined as > 12 months (N = 3389 embryos). Subgroup analysis was performed for untested vitrified cleavage stage embryos (N = 1739 embryos) and for untested and euploid vitrified blastocysts (N = 13,596 and 2712 embryos, respectively). RESULTS: Survival rate, miscarriage, live birth and major malformation rates were all similar in the two groups. CONCLUSION: These data further support the safety of long-term cryo-storage of human embryos beyond 12 months. This is reassuring for good prognosis patients with surplus embryos, couples seeking a second child from supernumerary embryos and women postponing the transfer for clinical or personal reasons.


Asunto(s)
Aborto Espontáneo , Vitrificación , Blastocisto , Criopreservación , Femenino , Humanos , Nacimiento Vivo , Embarazo , Índice de Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos
8.
Hum Reprod ; 36(2): 305-317, 2021 01 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33313697

RESUMEN

STUDY QUESTION: What is the global variability in recurrent implantation failure (RIF) definition, investigation and therapy, currently offered to patients undergoing IVF? SUMAMRY ANSWER: Definitions, diagnostic investigations and treatments offered to RIF patients differ widely amongst assisted reproduction healthcare professionals and clinical guidelines on RIF are urgently needed. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: RIF affects around 10% of patients undergoing IVF worldwide. There is no consensus on the definition of RIF, its diagnostic investigations or the therapeutic options, which leads to inconsistencies in clinical practice. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A cross-sectional study of clinicians and embryologists was conducted between May and June 2020. The survey included 43 questions aimed at understanding participants' background and their current practice with regards to defining, investigating and managing RIF. The questions were designed by the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) Special Interest Group (SIG) on implantation and early pregnancy following three consensus meetings. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: A total of 8579 ESHRE members from 6916 IVF centers were invited to participate using two global email calls based on their pre-specified interest in implantation and early pregnancy. SurveyMonkey and SPSS were used for data collection and analysis, respectively. Furthermore, differences were reported in the answers of European and non-European professionals, as well as between public and private settings and among clinicians clustered according to the average number of RIF patients treated per year. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The final data set included 735 clinicians and 300 embryologist or IVF-biologists. The majority defines RIF based on the number of failed embryo transfers (ETs) with the most common threshold adopted being three ETs both fresh and frozen. More than two-thirds take lifestyle factors into account, mainly drugs, smoking and BMI. The highest consensus on which diagnostic investigations should be performed was reached for anatomical malformations and gynecological aspects focusing on hydrosalpinx, Asherman's syndrome, endometrial thickness and endometriosis. Concerning treatment of RIF patients, the highest consensus was reached for preconceptional therapies, including BMI adjustment, smoking and endometritis followed by therapies during IVF procedures. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The response rate was relatively low, but comparable to other surveys. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: A consensus on definition, diagnosis and treatment of RIF would help to reduce costly, time-consuming and poorly validated approaches. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No external funding was used. B.T. received support from Bayer for Clinical trials concerning endometriosis and Ferring for clinical trials concerning ovarian stimulation. She received reimbursement for travel expenses from Astropharm, Ferring. Dr Kade and is a shareholder of Reprognostics. She is a board member of the Austrian Society for Obstetrics and Gynecology (OEGGG), the associate head of the 'Reproduktionsmedizinische Zentren Baden-Württemberg' (RZBW), a member of guideline group of the German Society for Obstetrics and Gynecology (DGGG) and an editorial board member of the following journals: American Journal of Reproductive Immunology (AJRI), Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. All the other authors declare no conflict of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.


Asunto(s)
Implantación del Embrión , Transferencia de Embrión , Austria , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Inducción de la Ovulación , Embarazo
9.
Hum Reprod ; 36(7): 2050-2061, 2021 06 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34021342

RESUMEN

STUDY QUESTION: What is the clinical validity and utility of preconception Expanded Carrier Screening (ECS) application on the management of prospective parents? SUMMARY ANSWER: The high detection rate of at-risk couples (ARCs) and the high proportion opting for IVF/preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) treatment demonstrate the clinical utility of ECS in the preconception space in IVF and general population. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: About 2-4% of couples are at risk of conceiving a child with an autosomal recessive or X-linked genetic disorder. In recent years, the increasing cost-effectiveness of genetic diagnostic techniques has allowed the creation of ECS panels for the simultaneous detection of multiple recessive disorders. Comprehensive preconception genetic screening holds the potential to significantly improve couple's genetic risk assessment and reproductive planning to avoid detectable inheritable genetic offspring. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A total of 3877 individuals without a family history of genetic conditions were analyzed between January 2017 and January 2020. Of the enrolled individuals, 1212 were gamete donors and 2665 were patients planning on conceiving from both the IVF and the natural conception group. From the non-donor cohort, 1133 were analyzed as individual patients, while the remaining ones were analyzed as couples, for a total of 766 couples. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: A focused ECS panel was developed following American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology ACOG-recommended criteria (prevalence, carrier rate, severity), including highly penetrant severe childhood conditions. Couples were defined at-risk when both partners carried an autosomal recessive pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant (PLP) on the same gene or when the woman was a carrier of an X-linked PLP variant. ARC detection rate defined the clinical validity of the ECS approach. Clinical utility was evaluated by monitoring ARCs reproductive decision making. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: A total of 402 individuals (10.4%) showed PLP for at least one of the genes tested. Among the 766 couples tested, 173 showed one carrier partner (22.6%), whereas 20 couples (2.6%) were found to be at increased risk. Interestingly, one ARC was identified as a result of cascade testing in the extended family of an individual carrying a pathogenic variant on the Survival Of Motor Neuron 1SMN1 gene. Of the identified ARCs, 5 (0.7%) were at risk for cystic fibrosis, 5 (0.7%) for fragile X syndrome, 4 (0.5%) for spinal muscular atrophy, 4 (0.5%) for Beta-Thalassemia/Sickle Cell Anemia, 1 (0.1%) for Smith-Lemli-Opitz Syndrome and 1 (0.1%) for Duchenne/Becker Dystrophy. Fifteen ARCs were successfully followed up from both the IVF and the natural conception groups. All of these (15/15) modified their reproductive planning by undergoing ART with Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Monogenic disease and Aneuploidies (PGT-M and PGT-A). To date, 6/15 (40%) couples completed their PGT cycle with euploid/unaffected embryos achieving a pregnancy after embryo transfer and three of them have already had an unaffected baby. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The use of a limited panel of core gene-disease pairs represents a limitation on the research perspective as it can underestimate the rate of detectable carriers and ARCs in this cohort of prospective parents. Expanding the scope of ECS to a larger panel of conditions is becoming increasingly feasible, thanks to a persistent technological evolution and progressive cataloging of gene-disease associations. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: These results highlight the potential clinical validity and utility of ECS in reducing the risk of a pregnancy affected by a detectable inheritable genetic condition. The steady reduction in the costs of genetic analyses enables the expansion of monogenic testing/screening applications at the preimplantation stage, thus, providing valid decisional support and reproductive autonomy to patients, particularly in the context of IVF. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No external funding was used for this study. A.C., M.F., S.C., M.P., L.G., and C.P. are employees of Igenomix Italy. C.S. is the head of the scientific board of Igenomix. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.


Asunto(s)
Transferencia de Embrión , Diagnóstico Preimplantación , Niño , Femenino , Fertilización In Vitro , Tamización de Portadores Genéticos , Pruebas Genéticas , Humanos , Italia , Embarazo , Estudios Prospectivos
10.
J Assist Reprod Genet ; 36(5): 875-887, 2019 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30710230

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To investigate the association of cumulus cell (CC)-related expression of a selected cluster of key genes (PTGS2, CAMK1D, HAS2, STC1, and EFNB2) with embryo development to blastocyst. METHODS: Exploratory study at a private clinic. Eighteen advanced maternal age patients were enrolled (37.3 ± 4.0 years). Seventy-five cumuli were collected, whose oocytes resulted in either developmental arrest (N = 33) or blastocyst formation (N = 42). The noninvasive CC gene expression was combined with time-lapse morphokinetic parameters and, for blastocysts, with qPCR-based aneuploidy testing on trophectoderm biopsies. RESULTS: The detection rate was 100% for all transcripts, but STC1 (96%) and CAMK1D (89%). Among amplified assays, CC mean expression levels of CAMK1D, PTGS2, and HAS2 were higher from oocytes that developed to blastocyst. No difference in CC key gene expression was reported between euploid (N = 21) and aneuploid (N = 21) blastocysts. Some timings of early embryo development were faster in embryos developing to blastocyst (time of pronuclei appearance and fading, division to two- and four-cells, first and second cell cycles). However, the generalized linear models outlined increasing CAMK1D expression levels as the strongest parameter associated with oocytes' developmental potential from both a general (AUC = 0.78 among amplified samples) and an intrapatient perspectives (AUC = 0.9 among patients obtaining ≥ 2 zygotes from the cohort with different developmental outcomes). CONCLUSIONS: CAMK1D level of expression in CCs associated with blastocyst development. If confirmed from larger studies in wider populations of patients, the investigation of CC key gene expression might suit IVF clinics not adopting blastocyst culture. Future investigations should clarify the role of CAMK1D in ovarian physiology and could provide novel insights on how oocytes gain competence during folliculogenesis.


Asunto(s)
Aneuploidia , Biomarcadores/análisis , Blastocisto/fisiología , Células del Cúmulo/citología , Células del Cúmulo/metabolismo , Oocitos/citología , Oocitos/metabolismo , Adulto , Proteína Quinasa Tipo 1 Dependiente de Calcio Calmodulina/genética , Proteína Quinasa Tipo 1 Dependiente de Calcio Calmodulina/metabolismo , Ciclooxigenasa 2/genética , Ciclooxigenasa 2/metabolismo , Desarrollo Embrionario , Efrina-B2/genética , Efrina-B2/metabolismo , Femenino , Glicoproteínas/genética , Glicoproteínas/metabolismo , Humanos , Hialuronano Sintasas/genética , Hialuronano Sintasas/metabolismo , Oogénesis , Embarazo , Cigoto
11.
J Ovarian Res ; 17(1): 63, 2024 Mar 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38491534

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Artificial Intelligence entails the application of computer algorithms to the huge and heterogeneous amount of morphodynamic data produced by Time-Lapse Technology. In this context, Machine Learning (ML) methods were developed in order to assist embryologists with automatized and objective predictive models able to standardize human embryo assessment. In this study, we aimed at developing a novel ML-based strategy to identify relevant patterns associated with the prediction of blastocyst development stage on day 5. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed the morphokinetics of 575 embryos obtained from 80 women who underwent IVF at our Unit. Embryo morphokinetics was registered using the Geri plus® time-lapse system. Overall, 30 clinical, morphological and morphokinetic variables related to women and embryos were recorded and combined. Some embryos reached the expanded blastocyst stage on day 5 (BL Group, n = 210), some others did not (nBL Group, n = 365). RESULTS: The novel EmbryoMLSelection framework was developed following four-steps: Feature Selection, Rules Extraction, Rules Selection and Rules Evaluation. Six rules composed by a combination of 8 variables were finally selected, and provided a predictive power described by an AUC of 0.84 and an accuracy of 81%. CONCLUSIONS: We provided herein a new feature-signature able to identify with an high performance embryos with the best developmental competence to reach the expanded blastocyst stage on day 5. Clear and clinically relevant cut-offs were identified for each considered variable, providing an objective tool for early embryo developmental assessment.


Asunto(s)
Inteligencia Artificial , Desarrollo Embrionario , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Blastocisto , Aprendizaje Automático , Técnicas de Cultivo de Embriones/métodos , Imagen de Lapso de Tiempo/métodos
12.
Hum Reprod Open ; 2023(3): hoad023, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37332387

RESUMEN

STUDY QUESTION: How should recurrent implantation failure (RIF) in patients undergoing ART be defined and managed? SUMMARY ANSWER: This is the first ESHRE good practice recommendations paper providing a definition for RIF together with recommendations on how to investigate causes and contributing factors, and how to improve the chances of a pregnancy. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: RIF is a challenge in the ART clinic, with a multitude of investigations and interventions offered and applied in clinical practice, often without biological rationale or with unequivocal evidence of benefit. STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION: This document was developed according to a predefined methodology for ESHRE good practice recommendations. Recommendations are supported by data from the literature, if available, and the results of a previously published survey on clinical practice in RIF and the expertise of the working group. A literature search was performed in PubMed and Cochrane focussing on 'recurrent reproductive failure', 'recurrent implantation failure', and 'repeated implantation failure'. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING METHODS: The ESHRE Working Group on Recurrent Implantation Failure included eight members representing the ESHRE Special Interest Groups for Implantation and Early Pregnancy, Reproductive Endocrinology, and Embryology, with an independent chair and an expert in statistics. The recommendations for clinical practice were formulated based on the expert opinion of the working group, while taking into consideration the published data and results of the survey on uptake in clinical practice. The draft document was then open to ESHRE members for online peer review and was revised in light of the comments received. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The working group recommends considering RIF as a secondary phenomenon of ART, as it can only be observed in patients undergoing IVF, and that the following description of RIF be adopted: 'RIF describes the scenario in which the transfer of embryos considered to be viable has failed to result in a positive pregnancy test sufficiently often in a specific patient to warrant consideration of further investigations and/or interventions'. It was agreed that the recommended threshold for the cumulative predicted chance of implantation to identify RIF for the purposes of initiating further investigation is 60%. When a couple have not had a successful implantation by a certain number of embryo transfers and the cumulative predicted chance of implantation associated with that number is greater than 60%, then they should be counselled on further investigation and/or treatment options. This term defines clinical RIF for which further actions should be considered. Nineteen recommendations were formulated on investigations when RIF is suspected, and 13 on interventions. Recommendations were colour-coded based on whether the investigations/interventions were recommended (green), to be considered (orange), or not recommended, i.e. not to be offered routinely (red). LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION: While awaiting the results of further studies and trials, the ESHRE Working Group on Recurrent Implantation Failure recommends identifying RIF based on the chance of successful implantation for the individual patient or couple and to restrict investigations and treatments to those supported by a clear rationale and data indicating their likely benefit. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: This article provides not only good practice advice but also highlights the investigations and interventions that need further research. This research, when well-conducted, will be key to making progress in the clinical management of RIF. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: The meetings and technical support for this project were funded by ESHRE. N.M. declared consulting fees from ArtPRED (The Netherlands) and Freya Biosciences (Denmark); Honoraria for lectures from Gedeon Richter, Merck, Abbott, and IBSA; being co-founder of Verso Biosense. He is Co-Chief Editor of Reproductive Biomedicine Online (RBMO). D.C. declared being an Associate Editor of Human Reproduction Update, and declared honoraria for lectures from Merck, Organon, IBSA, and Fairtility; support for attending meetings from Cooper Surgical, Fujifilm Irvine Scientific. G.G. declared that he or his institution received financial or non-financial support for research, lectures, workshops, advisory roles, or travelling from Ferring, Merck, Gedeon-Richter, PregLem, Abbott, Vifor, Organon, MSD, Coopersurgical, ObsEVA, and ReprodWissen. He is an Editor of the journals Archives of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biomedicine Online, and Editor in Chief of Journal Gynäkologische Endokrinologie. He is involved in guideline developments and quality control on national and international level. G.L. declared he or his institution received honoraria for lectures from Merck, Ferring, Vianex/Organon, and MSD. He is an Associate Editor of Human Reproduction Update, immediate past Coordinator of Special Interest Group for Reproductive Endocrinology of ESHRE and has been involved in Guideline Development Groups of ESHRE and national fertility authorities. D.J.M. declared being an Associate Editor for Human Reproduction Open and statistical Advisor for Reproductive Biomedicine Online. B.T. declared being shareholder of Reprognostics and she or her institution received financial or non-financial support for research, clinical trials, lectures, workshops, advisory roles or travelling from support for attending meetings from Ferring, MSD, Exeltis, Merck Serono, Bayer, Teva, Theramex and Novartis, Astropharm, Ferring. The other authors had nothing to disclose. DISCLAIMER: This Good Practice Recommendations (GPR) document represents the views of ESHRE, which are the result of consensus between the relevant ESHRE stakeholders and are based on the scientific evidence available at the time of preparation. ESHRE GPRs should be used for information and educational purposes. They should not be interpreted as setting a standard of care or be deemed inclusive of all proper methods of care, or be exclusive of other methods of care reasonably directed to obtaining the same results. They do not replace the need for application of clinical judgement to each individual presentation, or variations based on locality and facility type. Furthermore, ESHRE GPRs do not constitute or imply the endorsement, or favouring, of any of the included technologies by ESHRE.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA