Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Clin Oncol ; 33(33): 3921-9, 2015 Nov 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26056177

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The US community-based, phase IIIB UPFRONT trial was designed to compare three frontline bortezomib-based regimens in transplantation-ineligible patients with myeloma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (N = 502) were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to 24 weeks (eight 21-day cycles) of induction with bortezomib-dexamethasone (VD; n = 168; intravenous bortezomib 1.3 mg/m(2), days 1, 4, 8, and 11 plus oral dexamethasone 20 mg, days 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, and 12 [cycles 1 to 4], or 1, 2, 4, and 5 [cycles 5 to 8]), bortezomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone (VTD; n = 167; bortezomib and dexamethasone as before plus oral thalidomide 100 mg, days 1 to 21), or bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone (VMP; n = 167; bortezomib as before plus oral melphalan 9 mg/m(2) and oral prednisone 60 mg/m(2), days 1 to 4, every other cycle), followed by 25 weeks (five 35-day cycles) of bortezomib maintenance (1.6 mg/m(2), days 1, 8, 15, and 22). The primary end point was progression-free survival. RESULTS: After 42.7 months' median follow-up, median progression-free survival with VD, VTD, and VMP was 14.7, 15.4, and 17.3 months, respectively; median overall survival was 49.8, 51.5, and 53.1 months, with no significant differences among treatments for either end point (global P = .46 and P = .79, respectively, Wald test). Overall response rates were 73% (VD), 80% (VTD), and 70% (VMP). Adverse events were more common with VTD than VD or VMP. Bortezomib maintenance was feasible without producing cumulative toxicity. CONCLUSION: Although all bortezomib-containing regimens produced good outcomes, VTD and VMP did not appear to offer an advantage over VD in transplantation-ineligible patients with myeloma treated in US community practice.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Bortezomib/administración & dosificación , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Mieloma Múltiple/mortalidad , Corticoesteroides/administración & dosificación , Corticoesteroides/efectos adversos , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Bortezomib/efectos adversos , Servicios de Salud Comunitaria , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mieloma Múltiple/patología , Análisis Multivariante , Pronóstico , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Prospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Análisis de Supervivencia , Talidomida/administración & dosificación , Talidomida/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Oncologist ; 11(4): 409-17, 2006 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16614237

RESUMEN

Patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy often have chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA) and reduced quality of life. Darbepoetin alfa can effectively treat CIA when administered at an extended dosing interval of once every 3 weeks (Q3W). Darbepoetin alfa administered Q3W may allow synchronization of darbepoetin alfa therapy with chemotherapy administered Q3W. This multicenter, open-label, 16-week study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of darbepoetin alfa administered as a fixed dose (300 mug) Q3W in patients with CIA. Eligible patients (> or =18 years) were anemic (hemoglobin <11g/dl), had a nonmyeloid malignancy, and were receiving multicycle chemotherapy. This analysis includes 1,493 patients who received at least one dose of darbepoetin alfa. The effect of baseline hemoglobin (<10 or > or =10 g/dl) on clinical outcomes was evaluated. Patients in the > or =10-g/dl stratum achieved the hemoglobin target range (11-13 g/dl)in less time than patients in the <10-g/dlstratum (3 weeks vs. 9 weeks). More patients in the > or =10-g/dl stratum achieved the hemoglobin target range (87% vs. 66%); however, similar proportions of patients in both strata maintained hemoglobin within the target range (73% vs. 71%). Fewer patients in the > or =10-g/dl stratum received RBC transfusions from week 5 to the end of the study (12% vs. 28%). Over 50% of patients in both strata reported clinically significant improvements (> or =3-point increase) in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Fatigue score. Twenty-eight percent of patients reported serious adverse events; 3% of all patients had a venous or arterial thrombotic event. This study demonstrates that darbepoetin alfa Q3W is well tolerated and effective for treating CIA.


Asunto(s)
Anemia/inducido químicamente , Anemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Eritropoyetina/análogos & derivados , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anemia/sangre , Darbepoetina alfa , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Esquema de Medicación , Quimioterapia Combinada , Determinación de Punto Final , Eritropoyetina/administración & dosificación , Eritropoyetina/efectos adversos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Hemoglobinas/efectos de los fármacos , Hemoglobinas/metabolismo , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Calidad de Vida , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA