Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Anesth Analg ; 132(2): 485-492, 2021 02 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32149759

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: QT interval prolongation is associated with torsade de pointes but remains a poor predictor of drug torsadogenicity. Increased transmural dispersion of myocardial repolarization (TDR), measured as the time interval between the peak and end of the T wave (Tp-e), is a more reliable predictor. Carbetocin is recommended as an uterotonic in patients undergoing cesarean delivery (CD), but its effect on Tp-e is unknown. We evaluated the effect of carbetocin dose on Tp-e and Bazett-corrected QT intervals (QTc) during elective CD under spinal anesthesia. METHODS: On patient consent, 50 healthy parturients undergoing elective CD with a standardized spinal anesthetic and phenylephrine infusion were randomized to receive an intravenous (IV) bolus of carbetocin 50 µg (C50) or 100 µg (C100) via an infusion pump over 1 minute. A 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) was obtained at baseline, 5 minutes after spinal anesthesia, then 5 and 10 minutes after carbetocin administration. A cardiologist blinded to group and timing of ECGs measured QTc and Tp-e using Emori's criteria. Primary outcome was the change in Tp-e at 5 minutes after carbetocin administration between the C50 and C100 groups and within each group compared to baseline values. Secondary outcomes included occurrence of arrhythmias, changes in QTc at 5 and 10 minutes after carbetocin, changes in both QTc and Tp-e after spinal anesthesia compared to baseline between and within groups. RESULTS: Data from 41 parturients with a mean (standard deviation [SD]) age of 39.0 (0.7) years and weight of 75.0 (12.0) kg were analyzed. Between groups, at 5 minutes after carbetocin administration, Tp-e in C100 was 4.1 milliseconds longer compared to C50 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.8-7.5; P = .01). Within groups, at 5 minutes after carbetocin administration, C50 did not significantly increase Tp-e compared to baseline (mean difference [MD] 1.9 milliseconds; 95% CI, -0.95 to 4.81 milliseconds; P = .42) but C100 did (MD 5.1 milliseconds; 95% CI, 2.1-8.1; P = .003). QTc increased significantly within C50 and C100 groups at 5 and 10 minutes after carbetocin administration (all P < .001), with no between-group differences. There were no arrhythmias. CONCLUSIONS: Tp-e was unaffected by C50 IV given after CD in healthy parturients under spinal anesthesia, but minimally prolonged by C100. The increase in QTc after carbetocin administration was statistically significant, but with no apparent dose-dependent effect. The minimal Tp-e prolongation at the higher dose is unlikely to have any clinically significant impact on TDR and therefore the risk of inducing torsade de pointes is low.


Asunto(s)
Anestesia Raquidea , Cesárea , Sistema de Conducción Cardíaco/efectos de los fármacos , Oxitócicos/administración & dosificación , Oxitocina/análogos & derivados , Parto , Potenciales de Acción/efectos de los fármacos , Administración Intravenosa , Adulto , Anestesia Raquidea/efectos adversos , Colombia Británica , Cesárea/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos , Femenino , Sistema de Conducción Cardíaco/fisiopatología , Frecuencia Cardíaca/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Oxitócicos/efectos adversos , Oxitocina/administración & dosificación , Oxitocina/efectos adversos , Embarazo , Estudios Prospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Torsades de Pointes/inducido químicamente , Torsades de Pointes/fisiopatología , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol ; 31(3): 302-307, 2018 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29432293

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Concerns regarding the potential neurotoxic effects of general anaesthesia have seen resurgence in awake spinal anaesthesia in neonates and infants. This review includes recently published data from a large prospective randomized controlled trial with view to determining if spinal anaesthesia is safer and better than general anaesthesia in this population. RECENT FINDINGS: Compared with general anaesthesia, spinal anaesthesia results in less haemodynamic instability and fewer early (<30 min) apnoeic episodes in neonates and infants undergoing inguinal herniorraphy; the overall incidence of apnoeas in the first 12 h postoperatively was similar. Neurodevelopmental outcome 2 years postoperatively was similar. An appreciable failure rate for spinal anaesthesia was confirmed. SUMMARY: Spinal anaesthesia represents a suitable alternative to general anaesthesia in neonates and infants undergoing minor surgery avoiding the need for endotracheal intubation and ventilation. Spinal anaesthesia has some advantages but a significant failure rat and has not been demonstrated to improve neurodevelopmental outcome.


Asunto(s)
Anestesia General/efectos adversos , Anestesia Raquidea/efectos adversos , Animales , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Seguridad del Paciente , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Ratas
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA