Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
BMC Genomics ; 19(1): 30, 2018 01 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29310587

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Sample index cross-talk can result in false positive calls when massively parallel sequencing (MPS) is used for sensitive applications such as low-frequency somatic variant discovery, ancient DNA investigations, microbial detection in human samples, or circulating cell-free tumor DNA (ctDNA) variant detection. Therefore, the limit-of-detection of an MPS assay is directly related to the degree of index cross-talk. RESULTS: Cross-talk rates up to 0.29% were observed when using standard, combinatorial adapters, resulting in 110,180 (0.1% cross-talk rate) or 1,121,074 (0.29% cross-talk rate) misassigned reads per lane in non-patterned and patterned Illumina flow cells, respectively. Here, we demonstrate that using unique, dual-matched indexed adapters dramatically reduces index cross-talk to ≤1 misassigned reads per flow cell lane. While the current study was performed using dual-matched indices, using unique, dual-unrelated indices would also be an effective alternative. CONCLUSIONS: For sensitive downstream analyses, the use of combinatorial indices for multiplexed hybrid capture and sequencing is inappropriate, as it results in an unacceptable number of misassigned reads. Cross-talk can be virtually eliminated using dual-matched indexed adapters. These results suggest that use of such adapters is critical to reduce false positive rates in assays that aim to identify low allele frequency events, and strongly indicate that dual-matched adapters be implemented for all sensitive MPS applications.


Asunto(s)
Biología Computacional/métodos , Secuenciación de Nucleótidos de Alto Rendimiento , Análisis de Secuencia de ADN , Secuenciación de Nucleótidos de Alto Rendimiento/métodos , Secuenciación de Nucleótidos de Alto Rendimiento/normas , Humanos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Análisis de Secuencia de ADN/métodos , Análisis de Secuencia de ADN/normas
2.
J Neurosci ; 34(9): 3142-60, 2014 Feb 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24573274

RESUMEN

Animals modulate their arousal state to ensure that their sensory responsiveness and locomotor activity match environmental demands. Neuropeptides can regulate arousal, but studies of their roles in vertebrates have been constrained by the vast array of neuropeptides and their pleiotropic effects. To overcome these limitations, we systematically dissected the neuropeptidergic modulation of arousal in larval zebrafish. We quantified spontaneous locomotor activity and responsiveness to sensory stimuli after genetically induced expression of seven evolutionarily conserved neuropeptides, including adenylate cyclase activating polypeptide 1b (adcyap1b), cocaine-related and amphetamine-related transcript (cart), cholecystokinin (cck), calcitonin gene-related peptide (cgrp), galanin, hypocretin, and nociceptin. Our study reveals that arousal behaviors are dissociable: neuropeptide expression uncoupled spontaneous activity from sensory responsiveness, and uncovered modality-specific effects upon sensory responsiveness. Principal components analysis and phenotypic clustering revealed both shared and divergent features of neuropeptidergic functions: hypocretin and cgrp stimulated spontaneous locomotor activity, whereas galanin and nociceptin attenuated these behaviors. In contrast, cart and adcyap1b enhanced sensory responsiveness yet had minimal impacts on spontaneous activity, and cck expression induced the opposite effects. Furthermore, hypocretin and nociceptin induced modality-specific differences in responsiveness to changes in illumination. Our study provides the first systematic and high-throughput analysis of neuropeptidergic modulation of arousal, demonstrates that arousal can be partitioned into independent behavioral components, and reveals novel and conserved functions of neuropeptides in regulating arousal.


Asunto(s)
Nivel de Alerta/fisiología , Regulación de la Expresión Génica/fisiología , Actividad Motora/fisiología , Neuropéptidos/metabolismo , Animales , Animales Modificados Genéticamente , Nivel de Alerta/genética , Péptido Relacionado con Gen de Calcitonina/metabolismo , Colecistoquinina/metabolismo , Adaptación a la Oscuridad/efectos de los fármacos , Adaptación a la Oscuridad/genética , Adaptación a la Oscuridad/fisiología , Femenino , Regulación de la Expresión Génica/genética , Regulación de la Expresión Génica/efectos de la radiación , Calor , Larva , Luz , Masculino , Actividad Motora/genética , Proteínas del Tejido Nervioso/química , Proteínas del Tejido Nervioso/metabolismo , Neuropéptidos/genética , Péptidos Opioides/metabolismo , Polipéptido Hipofisario Activador de la Adenilato-Ciclasa , Análisis de Componente Principal , Pez Cebra , Proteínas de Pez Cebra/genética , Proteínas de Pez Cebra/metabolismo , Nociceptina
3.
Cancer Discov ; 8(1): 37-48, 2018 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28978556

RESUMEN

Gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA) is a lethal disease where targeted therapies, even when guided by genomic biomarkers, have had limited efficacy. A potential reason for the failure of such therapies is that genomic profiling results could commonly differ between the primary and metastatic tumors. To evaluate genomic heterogeneity, we sequenced paired primary GEA and synchronous metastatic lesions across multiple cohorts, finding extensive differences in genomic alterations, including discrepancies in potentially clinically relevant alterations. Multiregion sequencing showed significant discrepancy within the primary tumor (PT) and between the PT and disseminated disease, with oncogene amplification profiles commonly discordant. In addition, a pilot analysis of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) sequencing demonstrated the feasibility of detecting genomic amplifications not detected in PT sampling. Lastly, we profiled paired primary tumors, metastatic tumors, and cfDNA from patients enrolled in the personalized antibodies for GEA (PANGEA) trial of targeted therapies in GEA and found that genomic biomarkers were recurrently discrepant between the PT and untreated metastases. Divergent primary and metastatic tissue profiling led to treatment reassignment in 32% (9/28) of patients. In discordant primary and metastatic lesions, we found 87.5% concordance for targetable alterations in metastatic tissue and cfDNA, suggesting the potential for cfDNA profiling to enhance selection of therapy.Significance: We demonstrate frequent baseline heterogeneity in targetable genomic alterations in GEA, indicating that current tissue sampling practices for biomarker testing do not effectively guide precision medicine in this disease and that routine profiling of metastatic lesions and/or cfDNA should be systematically evaluated. Cancer Discov; 8(1); 37-48. ©2017 AACR.See related commentary by Sundar and Tan, p. 14See related article by Janjigian et al., p. 49This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Esofágicas/genética , Secuenciación del Exoma/métodos , Genómica/métodos , Medicina de Precisión , Neoplasias Gástricas/genética , Adenocarcinoma , Estudios de Cohortes , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Humanos , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA