Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 33
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 59(8)2023 Aug 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37629770

RESUMEN

Background: Tofacitinib (TOFA) was the first Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi) to be approved for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, data on the retention rate of TOFA therapy are still far from definitive. Objective: The goal of this study is to add new real-world data on the TOFA retention rate in a cohort of RA patients followed for a long period of time. Methods: A multicenter retrospective study of RA subjects treated with TOFA as monotherapy or in combination with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) was conducted in 23 Italian tertiary rheumatology centers. The study considered a treatment period of up to 48 months for all included patients. The TOFA retention rate was assessed with the Kaplan-Meier method. Hazard ratios (HRs) for TOFA discontinuation were obtained using Cox regression analysis. Results: We enrolled a total of 213 patients. Data analysis revealed that the TOFA retention rate was 86.5% (95% CI: 81.8-91.5%) at month 12, 78.8% (95% CI: 78.8-85.2%) at month 24, 63.8% (95% CI: 55.1-73.8%) at month 36, and 59.9% (95% CI: 55.1-73.8%) at month 48 after starting treatment. None of the factors analyzed, including the number of previous treatments received, disease activity or duration, presence of rheumatoid factor and/or anti-citrullinated protein antibody, and presence of comorbidities, were predictive of the TOFA retention rate. Safety data were comparable to those reported in the registration studies. Conclusions: TOFA demonstrated a long retention rate in RA in a real-world setting. This result, together with the safety data obtained, underscores that TOFA is a viable alternative for patients who have failed treatment with csDMARD and/or biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs). Further large, long-term observational studies are urgently needed to confirm these results.


Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos , Artritis Reumatoide , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Piperidinas/efectos adversos , Antirreumáticos/efectos adversos
2.
Age Ageing ; 51(10)2022 10 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36201328
3.
Clin Drug Investig ; 44(3): 141-148, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38294672

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Long-term treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis with tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors leads to initial changes in disease activity that can predict a late treatment response. This observational and retrospective study aimed to determine when it is possible to foresee the response to therapy in the case of long-standing rheumatoid arthritis comparing also the efficacy of the original biologics with their biosimilars. METHODS: A total of 1598 patients were recruited and treated with the original biologics, adalimumab and etanercept, or with biosimilars. Patients were monitored over a period of 48 months and disease activity scores (28-Joint Disease Activity Score, Simplified Disease Activity Index, and Clinical Disease Activity Index) were measured every 6 months. RESULTS: No differences in disease activity levels were observed in etanercept versus biosimilars (GP2015/SB4) and adalimumab versus biosimilar (GP2017) patient groups. All scores significantly decreased in all treatments during the first 18 months of therapy, and after 24 months reached a minimum that lasted up to 48 months. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that biosimilars of adalimumab and etanercept have equivalent effectiveness over a long period of time compared to their originator drugs, and also that the levels of disease activity after 6 months of tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors (originator drugs and biosimilars) might predict the response to therapy at 4 years in patients with long-standing rheumatoid arthritis.


Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos , Artritis Reumatoide , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos , Humanos , Etanercept/uso terapéutico , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa , Adalimumab/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores del Factor de Necrosis Tumoral/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Artritis Reumatoide/diagnóstico , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Infliximab
4.
Minerva Med ; 115(4): 430-438, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39376099

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Upadacitinib (UPA) is a selective, reversible Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi) approved for the treatment of RA. However, there is still no solid evidence on the long-term efficacy of UPA in treated patients. The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of UPA to obtain remission or low disease activity (LDA) in a series of UPA patients in patients with RA after 6 and 12 months of treatment in a real-world setting. METHODS: A series of 111 consecutive patients treated with UPA in 23 rheumatology centers were enrolled. Personal history, treatment history and disease activity at baseline, after 6 and 12 months were recorded. Intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses assessed achievement of remission or LDA or defined as DAS28 <2.6 and ≤3.2, respectively. Logistic regression analysis examined the role of several independent factors on the reduction of disease activity after 6 months of treatment. RESULTS: Of the initial group of 111 subjects at baseline, 86 and 29 participants completed clinical assessments at 6 and 12 months. According to ITT analysis, the rates of remission and LDA were 18% and 18% at 6 months and 31.5% and 12.5% at 12 months, respectively. PP analysis showed higher rates of remission and LDA at 6 (23.3% and 19.8%) and 12 months (55.2% and 20.7%). Results of multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that a low DAS28 score (P=0.045) was the only predictor of achieving remission at 6 months. None of the baseline factors predicted remission/LDA at 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: RA patients treated with UPA achieved a significant rate of disease remission or LDA in a real-world setting. The 6-month response was found to depend only on the baseline value of DAS28, while it was not influenced by other factors such as disease duration, line of treatment or concomitant therapy with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) or corticosteroids.


Asunto(s)
Artritis Reumatoide , Humanos , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Compuestos Heterocíclicos con 3 Anillos/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Inducción de Remisión , Inhibidores de las Cinasas Janus/uso terapéutico , Janus Quinasa 1/antagonistas & inhibidores , Adulto , Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico
5.
J Clin Med ; 13(13)2024 Jul 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38999494

RESUMEN

Background/Objectives: The Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) tofacitinib (TOFA), baricitinib (BARI), upadacitinib (UPA), and filgotinib (FILGO) are effective drugs for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. However, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) raised concerns about the safety of TOFA after its approval. This prompted the European Medicines Agency (EMA) to issue two safety warnings for limiting TOFA use, then extended a third warning to all JAKi in patients at high risk of developing serious adverse effects (SAE). These include thrombosis, major adverse cardiac events (MACE), and cancer. The purpose of this work was to analyze how the first two safety warnings from the EMA affected the prescribing of JAKi by rheumatologists in Italy. Methods: All patients with rheumatoid arthritis who had been prescribed JAKi for the first time in a 36-month period from 1 July 2019, to 30 June 2022 were considered. Data were obtained from the medical records of 29 Italian tertiary referral rheumatology centers. Patients were divided into three groups of 4 months each, depending on whether the JAKi prescription had occurred before the EMA's first safety alert (1 July-31 October 2019, Group 1), between the first and second alerts (1 November 2019-29 February 2020, Group 2), or between the second and third alerts (1 March 2021-30 June 2021, Group 3). The percentages and absolute changes in the patients prescribed the individual JAKi were analyzed. Differences among the three groups of patients regarding demographic and clinical characteristics were also assessed. Results: A total of 864 patients were prescribed a JAKi during the entire period considered. Of these, 343 were identified in Group 1, 233 in Group 2, and 288 in Group 3. An absolute reduction of 32% was observed in the number of patients prescribed a JAKi between Group 1 and Group 2 and 16% between Group 1 and Group 3. In contrast, there was a 19% increase in the prescription of a JAKi in patients between Group 2 and Group 3. In the first group, BARI was the most prescribed drug (227 prescriptions, 66.2% of the total), followed by TOFA (115, 33.5%) and UPA (1, 0.3%). In the second group, the most prescribed JAKi was BARI (147, 63.1%), followed by TOFA (65, 27.9%) and UPA (33, 11.5%). In the third group, BARI was still the most prescribed JAKi (104 prescriptions, 36.1%), followed by UPA (89, 30.9%), FILGO (89, 21.5%), and TOFA (33, 11.5%). The number of patients prescribed TOFA decreased significantly between Group 1 and Group 2 and between Group 2 and Group 3 (p ˂ 0.01). The number of patients who were prescribed BARI decreased significantly between Group 1 and Group 2 and between Group 2 and Group 3 (p ˂ 0.01). In contrast, the number of patients prescribed UPA increased between Group 2 and Group 3 (p ˂ 0.01). Conclusions: These data suggest that the warnings issued for TOFA were followed by a reduction in total JAKi prescriptions. However, the more selective JAKi (UPA and FILGO) were perceived by prescribers as favorable in terms of the risk/benefit ratio, and their use gradually increased at the expense of the other molecules.

6.
Acta Biomed ; 94(4): e2023148, 2023 08 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37539603

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Iloprost is recommend worldwide for the treatment of RP and the healing of DUs. The aim of this study is to report the regimens of Iloprost administered in different rheumatological centers within the same regional Health System Methods: A questionnaire exploring different items related to the use of Iloprost was developed and reviewed by three expert rheumatologists. The questionnaire was distributed as an online survey to all local SSc referral centers in Emilia-Romagna (Italy). Data are reported as percentage or median with interquartile range (IQR), as appropriate. An updated review of world literature on this topic was also carried out. RESULTS: All the invited centers completed the survey. There were both local (8) and university hospitals (4). The majority (58%) had a rheumatologist as head physician. All centers used Iloprost: a single monthly administration was the most common treatment (75%). The cycle lasted 1 [IQR 1-2] days with a 0.5-2.0 ng/Kg/min dose according to the drug tolerance of the patients. There were overall 68 spots (beds, reclining armchair, or simple armchair); 2.0 [1.5-4.0] patients were able to receive Iloprost at the same time. University Hospitals had more physicians at their disposal than local hospitals but less paramedic personnel (respectively: 1.8 vs 1.2 physicians, 1.5 vs 2.1 nurses). CONCLUSIONS: These observations were in line with the majority of previous studies reporting different regimens, comparing similar (but not identical) dose and schedule administration, however, despite differences being at times substantial, no standard infusion method is yet available.


Asunto(s)
Iloprost , Esclerodermia Sistémica , Humanos , Iloprost/uso terapéutico , Iloprost/efectos adversos , Epoprostenol/uso terapéutico , Prostaglandinas I , Cicatrización de Heridas , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Esclerodermia Sistémica/tratamiento farmacológico , Esclerodermia Sistémica/inducido químicamente
7.
Biomedicines ; 11(2)2023 Feb 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36830969

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To date, only a few real-world-setting studies evaluated apremilast effectiveness in psoriatic arthritis (PsA). The aims of this retrospective observational study are to report long-term Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) response of apremilast in PsA patients and to analyze the predictors of clinical response. METHODS: All PsA consecutive patients treated with apremilast in fifteen Italian rheumatological referral centers were enrolled. Anamnestic data, treatment history, and PsA disease activity (DAPSA) at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months were recorded. The Mann-Whitney test and chi-squared tests assessed the differences between independent groups, whereas the Wilcoxon matched pairs signed-rank test assessed the differences between dependent samples. Logistic regressions verified if there were factors associated with achievement of DAPSA low disease activity or remission at 6 and 12 months. RESULTS: DAPSA low disease activity or remission rates at 6 and 12 months were observed, respectively, in 42.7% (n = 125) and 54.9% (n = 161) patients. Baseline DAPSA was inversely associated with the odds of achieving low disease activity or remission at 6 months (odds ratio (OR) 0.841, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.804-0.879; p < 0.01) and at 12 months (OR 0.911, 95% CI 0.883-0.939; p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Almost half of the PsA patients receiving apremilast achieved DAPSA low disease activity or remission at 6 and 12 months. The only factor associated with achievement of low disease activity or remission at both 6 and 12 months was baseline DAPSA.

8.
J Clin Med ; 12(12)2023 Jun 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37373587

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Enthesitis and dactylitis are difficult-to-treat features of psoriatic arthritis (PsA), leading to disability and affecting quality of life. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate enthesitis (using the Leed enthesitis index (LEI)) and dactylitis at 6 and 12 months in patients treated with apremilast. METHODS: Patients affected by PsA from fifteen Italian rheumatological referral centers were screened. The inclusion criteria were: (a) enthesitis or dactylitisphenotype; (b) treatment with apremilast 30 mg bid. Clinical and treatment history, including PsA disease activity, were recorded. Mann-Whitney and chi-squared tests were used to assess the differences between independent groups, and Wilcoxon matched pairs signed-rank test assessed the differences between dependent samples. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The Eph cohort consisted of 118 patients (median LEI 3); the Dph cohort included 96 patients with a median dactylitis of 1 (IQR 1-2). According to an intention to treat analysis, 25% and 34% of patients with enthesitis achieved remission (i.e., LEI = 0) in T1 and T2. The remission of dactylitis was 47% in T1 and 44% in T2. The per protocol analysis (patients observed for at least 12 months) showed that both dactylitis and LEI significantly improved in T1 (median LEI 1 (IQR 1-3)) and T2 (median LEI 0 (IQR 1-2)). CONCLUSION: Eph and Dph PsA patients treated with apremilast experienced a significant improvement in enthesitis and dactylitis activity. After 1 year, enthesitis and dactylitis remission was achieved in more than one-third of patients.

9.
Clin Rheumatol ; 41(10): 3219-3225, 2022 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35796847

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: There are few real-world setting studies focused on apremilast effectiveness (i.e., retention rate) in psoriatic arthritis (PsA). The main aim of this retrospective observational study is the assessment of apremilast 3-year retention rate in real-world PsA patients. Moreover, the secondary objective is to report the reasons of apremilast discontinuation and the factors related to treatment persistence. METHODS: In fifteen Italian rheumatological referral centers, all PsA consecutive patients who received apremilast were enrolled. Anamnestic data, treatment history, and PsA disease activity (DAPSA) at baseline were recorded. The Kaplan-Meier curve and the Cox analysis computed the apremilast retention rate and treatment persistence-related risk factors. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The 356 enrolled patients (median age 60 [interquartile range IQR 52-67] yrs; male prevalence 42.7%) median observation period was 17 [IQR 7-34] months (7218 patients-months). The apremilast retention rate at 12, 24, and 36 months was, respectively, 85.6%, 73.6%, and 61.8%. The main discontinuation reasons were secondary inefficacy (34% of interruptions), gastro-intestinal intolerance (24%), and primary inefficacy (19%). Age and oligo-articular phenotype were related to treatment persistence (respectively hazard ratio 0.98 IQR 0.96-0.99; p = 0.048 and 0.54 IQR 0.31-0.95; p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Almost three-fifths of PsA patients receiving apremilast were still in treatment after 3 years. This study confirmed its effectiveness and safety profile. Apremilast appears as a good treatment choice in all oligo-articular PsA patients and in those ones burdened by relevant comorbidities. Key Points • Apremilast retention rates in this real-life cohort and trials are comparable. • The oligo-articular phenotype is associated with long-lasting treatment (i.e., 3 years). • No different or more prevalent adverse events were observed.


Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos , Artritis Psoriásica , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Artritis Psoriásica/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Talidomida/efectos adversos , Talidomida/análogos & derivados , Resultado del Tratamiento
10.
Rheumatology (Oxford) ; 49(3): 501-4, 2010 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20015973

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: We report the use of nicotine-patch therapy on active mucocutaneous lesions of Behçet's disease (BD). METHODS: Five BD ex-smoker patients with refractory active mucocutaneous manifestations were treated with nicotine patches for 6 months. RESULTS: Four out of five patients quickly responded to nicotine-patch therapy and experienced a complete regression of mucocutaneous lesions. Other manifestations of BD did not respond and new manifestations appeared during this treatment. One patient had no benefit from therapy but on restarting smoking it was promptly effective. CONCLUSIONS: Mucocutaneous lesions associated with BD may be modulated by smoking. Both smoking and nicotine-replacement therapy may be efficacious not only on oral aphthae, but also on other mucocutaneous manifestations, whereas the efficacy in the treatment and prevention of other systemic manifestations of BD is not proven. At least in ex-smokers, nicotine in its pure form is well tolerated and its use could be justified in selected cases of BD with predominant and recurrent refractory mucocutaneous manifestations.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Behçet/tratamiento farmacológico , Nicotina/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nicotina/uso terapéutico , Recurrencia , Enfermedades Cutáneas Vasculares/tratamiento farmacológico , Fumar , Cese del Hábito de Fumar , Parche Transdérmico , Resultado del Tratamiento
11.
Rheumatol Int ; 30(7): 855-62, 2010 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20020138

RESUMEN

Adult-onset Still's disease (AOSD) is a rare systemic inflammatory disorder characterised by high spiking fever, an evanescent salmon pink rash and arthritis, frequently accompanied by sore throat, myalgias, lymphadenopathies, splenomegaly and neutrophilic leukocytosis. Aetiology is still unknown, however, it seems that an important role is played by various infectious agents, which would act as triggers in genetically predisposed hosts. Diagnosis is a clinical one and may be lengthy because it requires exclusion of infectious neoplasms, including malignant lymphomas and leukaemias, and other autoimmune diseases. Different diagnostic or classification criteria have been proposed, but not definitely accepted. There are no specific laboratory tests for AOSD, but they reflect the systemic inflammation: the ESR is consistently high, while the rheumatoid factors and antinuclear antibodies are negative. High serum ferritin levels associated with a low fraction of its glycosylated component are assessed as useful diagnostic and disease activity markers. The clinical course can be divided into three main patterns with different prognoses: self-limited or monophasic, intermittent or polycyclic systemic and chronic articular pattern. Therapy includes non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, corticosteroids and disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs: biological agents have recently been introduced and they seem to be very promising not only for the treatment but also for understanding the pathogenic mechanisms underlying the disease.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Still del Adulto/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de Still del Adulto/fisiopatología , Antiinflamatorios/farmacología , Antiinflamatorios/uso terapéutico , Antirreumáticos/farmacología , Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Artritis/clasificación , Artritis/inmunología , Artritis/fisiopatología , Biomarcadores/análisis , Biomarcadores/sangre , Sedimentación Sanguínea , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Ferritinas/análisis , Ferritinas/sangre , Humanos , Sistema Inmunológico/fisiopatología , Enfermedad de Still del Adulto/tratamiento farmacológico
12.
Rheumatol Int ; 29(11): 1355-7, 2009 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19048255

RESUMEN

Adult-onset Still disease (AOSD) is a rare condition disease of unknown etiology, characterized by quotidian or double quotidian spiking fever, with an evanescent pink-salmon rash, arthritis and multi-organ involvement. Diagnosis is usually clinical and made after other diseases in the differential diagnosis are excluded. We herein report the case of a patient with a remarkable familial autoimmune background in whom adult Still disease started off with a diffuse intravascular coagulation, probably triggered by a macrophage activation syndrome, followed by an acute interstitial myocarditis, leading to a fatal complete atrioventricular block. This case highlights that AOSD represents a troubling condition and that it may suddenly get worse with life-threatening events.


Asunto(s)
Coagulación Intravascular Diseminada/complicaciones , Miocarditis/etiología , Enfermedad de Still del Adulto/complicaciones , Adulto , Resultado Fatal , Humanos , Masculino , Miocarditis/diagnóstico
16.
Rheumatol Int ; 28(1): 1-6, 2007 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17653719

RESUMEN

Elderly-onset gout (EOG), defined as a disease with onset at age 65 years or over, shows relevant epidemiological, clinical and therapeutic differences from the typical middle-age form. The main differences are the more frequent subacute/chronic polyarticular onset with hand involvement, the unusual localization of tophi on ostheoarthritis (OA) nodes, the increased female/male ratio and the frequent association with drugs that decrease renal urate excretion (diuretics and low-dose aspirin) and/or with primitive renal impairment. EOG has recently been confirmed as the most common inflammatory arthropathy in older people, with important demographic implications and substantial impact on daily clinical practice. Despite the high prevalence, gout, in the elderly, often remains misdiagnosed or diagnosed late in its clinical course. Even when correctly recognized, its treatment is often difficult or unsatisfactory.


Asunto(s)
Diuréticos/uso terapéutico , Gota/diagnóstico , Gota/tratamiento farmacológico , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Ácido Úrico , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Gota/diagnóstico por imagen , Gota/epidemiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Prevalencia , Radiografía , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales
17.
Recenti Prog Med ; 98(9): 457-70, 2007 Sep.
Artículo en Italiano | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17902572

RESUMEN

The notion of autoinflammatory diseases delineates a heterogenous group of genetic pathologies characterized by spontaneous periodic systemic inflammation in the absence of infectious or autoimmune causes. The general hypothesis is that the innate immune response in these patients is wrongly tuned, being either too sensitive to minor stimuli or turned off too late. Clinical pictures of these disorders are characterized by high spiking fever associated with involvement of musculo-skeletal system, tegumentary apparatus and serosas. Although inflammatory syndromes are considered rare, they may represent a model in order to unravel some aspects of the innate immune system and of the inflammatory cascade.


Asunto(s)
Inmunidad Innata , Inflamación/inmunología , Adulto , Enfermedades Autoinmunes/epidemiología , Enfermedades Autoinmunes/genética , Enfermedades Autoinmunes/inmunología , Niño , Citocinas/metabolismo , Fiebre/etiología , Humanos , Inmunidad Innata/genética , Inflamación/clasificación , Inflamación/epidemiología , Inflamación/genética , Modelos Inmunológicos , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/etiología , Síndrome
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA