Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 18 de 18
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil ; 18(3): 415-23, 2011 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21450640

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Better knowledge of prevalence and early-stage determinants of subclinical left ventricular dysfunction (LVD) in type 2 diabetes would be useful to design prevention strategies. The objective of the LVD in Diabetes (DYDA) study was to assess these points in patients without established cardiac disease. METHOD: Baseline clinical, ECG, laboratory and echocardiographic data from 751 patients (61 ± 7 years, 59% hypertensive) recruited by 37 Italian diabetes clinics were analysed. Clinical history, life habits, laboratory data (NT-proBNP, HsCRP, HbA1c, serum glucose, lipids and creatinine, liver enzymes, microalbuminuria, glomerular filtrate) and data on microvascular complications and drug therapy were collected. RESULTS: LVD was present in 59.9% of patients. Age (OR 1.05, 95% CI [1.02-1.07]), HbA1c (OR 1.27, 95% CI [1.09-1.49]), triglycerides (OR 1.003, 95% CI [1.001-1.006]), treatment with metformin (OR 1.62, 95% CI [1.09-2.40]) and doxazosine (OR 2.48, 95% CI [1.10-5.55]) were independent predictors of LVD. Glitazones were associated with reduced risk of diastolic dysfunction (OR 0.44, 95% CI [0.22-0.87]) whereas waist circumference and metformin were adversely associated with systolic dysfunction (OR 1.02, 95% CI [1.01-1.04] and 1.57, 95% CI [1.01-2.43], respectively). CONCLUSION: In asymptomatic and fairly controlled diabetic patients, age, worse HbA1c, traits of insulin resistance, such as visceral adiposity and triglycerides or treatment with metformin, and use of doxazosin indicate greater risk of LVD. Glitazones, at this stage, seem to be associated with better diastolic performance.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Ventrículos Cardíacos/fisiopatología , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/etiología , Función Ventricular Izquierda/fisiología , Anciano , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/sangre , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/fisiopatología , Ecocardiografía , Electrocardiografía , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Hemoglobina Glucada/metabolismo , Ventrículos Cardíacos/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Incidencia , Resistencia a la Insulina , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/epidemiología , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/fisiopatología
2.
Diabetes Ther ; 11(1): 359-367, 2020 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31758519

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Three Italian scientific associations of different specialties (AMD, Associazione Medici Diabetologi-for diabetologists; ANMCO,Associazione Nazionale Medici Cardiologi Ospedalieri-for cardiologists; SIMG, Società Italiana di Medicina Generale-for General Practitioners) designed this study to assess whether an integrated care organization comprising three different specialists can improve adherence and can achieve the guidelines targets in a population of individuals with type 2 diabetes, without established cardiovascular disease but at high risk (≥ 20% at 10 years according to the CUORE.ISS risk cards) compared with the current standards of care provided by the Italian National Health Service. METHODS: Thirty primary care centers (general practitioners, GPs), 30 cardiology centers and 30 diabetes centers have been selected by the scientific associations, disseminated in the national territory, on the basis of proven previous cooperation in other studies. Each primary care center will enroll 100 type 2 diabetic subjects, > 45 years old, with no established cardiovascular disease, but with a high risk due to the presence of at least one other risk factor besides diabetes over the cutoff [hypertension > 135/80 mmHg, LDL cholesterol > 70 mg/dl, tobacco smoke, first-degree familiarity for CHD (coronary heart disease), central obesity according the WHO criteria]. Fifteen of 30 selected primary care centers, chosen randomly, will continue the treatment of the 100 identified patients according to their "usual care," driven by Good Clinical Practice and by current guidelines (control group or "UC"-usual care), collecting all available clinical and instrumental data and transferring them to the electronic CRF. The remaining 15, after informed consent, will submit their 100 patients each in a specific integrated pathway, which entails the mandatory operational integration and exchange of information with the diabetes specialists and cardiologists pertaining to the same previously identified area. The integrated care path for the patients in the proband group (IC, integrated care) is based on application of the recommendations of the Italian Guidelines aimed at achieving the proposed targets for the main risk factors [LDL < 70 mg/dl; SBP < 130 mmHg; HbA1c (glycated hemoglobin) ≤ 7% (52 mmol/mol]. All the clinical data will be recorded on a shared electronic CRF. The trial will last 3 years: 6 months for the enrollment and randomization of the centers, 6 months for the enrollment of the probands and control subjects, and 2 years of follow-up. The study will be conducted according the Helsinki Declaration on human experimentation ethics. PLANNED OUTCOMES: The primary planned outcome is represented by the increase in the percentage of people that achieve the target values of at least two out of three of the considered risk factors [HbA1c, SBP (systolic blood pressure), LDL cholesterol] compared with the percentage actually achieved in the control group. The secondary outcomes are: (1) a MACE (major adverse cardiac event) composite: non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, mortality from any cause and hospitalization for cardiovascular disease; (2) the number of early diagnoses of new onset complications; (3) evaluation of adverse events and safety of the probands and control patients; (4) comparative cost analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis.

3.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 7(8): ofaa233, 2020 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32766378

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Candida species are among the most frequent causative agents of health care-associated bloodstream infections, with mortality >40% in critically ill patients. Specific populations of critically ill patients may present peculiar risk factors related to their reason for intensive care unit admission. The primary objective of the present study was to assess the predictors of candidemia after open heart surgery. METHODS: This retrospective, matched case-control study was conducted in 8 Italian hospitals from 2009 to 2016. The primary study objective was to assess factors associated with the development of candidemia after open heart surgery. RESULTS: Overall, 222 patients (74 cases and 148 controls) were included in the study. Candidemia developed at a median time (interquartile range) of 23 (14-36) days after surgery. In multivariable analysis, independent predictors of candidemia were New York Heart Association class III or IV (odds ratio [OR], 23.81; 95% CI, 5.73-98.95; P < .001), previous therapy with carbapenems (OR, 8.87; 95% CI, 2.57-30.67; P = .001), and previous therapy with fluoroquinolones (OR, 5.73; 95% CI, 1.61-20.41; P = .007). Crude 30-day mortality of candidemia was 53% (39/74). Septic shock was independently associated with mortality in the multivariable model (OR, 5.64; 95% CI, 1.91-16.63; P = .002). No association between prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass time and candidemia was observed in this study. CONCLUSIONS: Previous broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy and high NYHA class were independent predictors of candidemia in cardiac surgery patients with prolonged postoperative intensive care unit stay.

4.
J Med Virol ; 81(10): 1807-13, 2009 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19697412

RESUMEN

The performances of surveillance systems for measles in Europe are poorly investigated, despite the fundamental role they should play in the early detection of outbreaks and in the assessment of the progress towards elimination. A new chief complaint syndrome surveillance system has been developed in Genoa, Italy, using data from the Emergency Department records of the regional reference university hospital and its ability to early detect an outbreak of measles that began during the winter months of 2007/2008 was evaluated. For the 23-month period from January 2007 to November 2008, the Emergency Department registration and triage software was used to obtain the time series of daily counts, that were related with cases notified by the statutory notification system and detection and characterization data from the measles regional reference laboratory. One hundred fifty five cases of measles-like illness were identified by the syndrome surveillance system. Two epidemic threshold breakthroughs were able to anticipate the first notified case by 54 and 11 days. Globally, the new syndrome surveillance system allows the activation of the alert state with a specificity of 94.3% and a sensitivity of 91%. Molecular investigation showed the spread of the virus from United Kingdom to Piemonte and then to Liguria and allowed us to exclude the re- circulation of strains circulating in Northern Italy during the previous seasons. Syndrome surveillance integrated with a rapid detection and characterization of the agent responsible for the disease could be an effective, specific and sensitive tool for measles surveillance.


Asunto(s)
Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles/métodos , Brotes de Enfermedades , Sarampión/epidemiología , Sarampión/virología , Morbillivirus/clasificación , Morbillivirus/genética , Vigilancia de Guardia , Análisis por Conglomerados , Recolección de Datos/métodos , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Sarampión/patología , Sarampión/fisiopatología , Epidemiología Molecular , Morbillivirus/aislamiento & purificación , Filogenia , ARN Viral , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Análisis de Secuencia de ADN , Programas Informáticos
5.
Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil ; 16(6): 722-8, 2009 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19770664

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Physicians' adherence to cardiovascular (CV) guidelines has been found to be poor. In this regard, accuracy in keeping medical records could play an important role. This study was devised to describe which data are present in medical records from a large sample of physicians and to investigate the association and the link between completeness in recording and clinical appropriateness. METHODS: The data extracted from medical records of 1078 doctors (general practitioners, cardiologists, and diabetologists) were analyzed, with a focus on CV prevention. The percentage of recorded data of several CV clinical variables was calculated. A multivariate analysis was performed to investigate the association between doctors' and patients' characteristics and different patterns in recording. Finally, the completeness in recording was calculated with a score and plotted against three indicators of appropriateness. RESULTS: The only risk factor that achieved a good standard of registration was blood pressure (89%). Low-density lipoprotein and waist circumference were largely under-recorded, whereas lifestyle data collection was almost negligible. Age, specialization, and use of electronic records increase the accuracy in recording. When one CV risk factor was predominant, the probability of having other risk factors recorded was reduced. A significant increase in the proportion of patients treated according to guidelines was found in doctors who were more accurate in recording. CONCLUSION: A link exists between accuracy in recording with both quality of care and adherence to guidelines. Specific training of all doctors in this field should be considered.


Asunto(s)
Cardiología/normas , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control , Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria/normas , Registros Médicos/normas , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/normas , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/normas , Adulto , Anciano , Biomarcadores/sangre , Presión Sanguínea , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/sangre , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/etiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/fisiopatología , Femenino , Adhesión a Directriz , Humanos , Italia , Estilo de Vida , Lípidos/sangre , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Circunferencia de la Cintura
6.
Nephrol Dial Transplant ; 23(4): 1278-84, 2008 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18039647

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We evaluated to what extent the presence of risk factors and their interactions increased the likelihood of microalbuminuria (MAU) among individuals with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: Fifty-five Italian diabetes outpatient clinics enrolled a sample of patients with type 2 diabetes, without urinary infections and overt diabetic nephropathy. A morning spot urine sample was collected to centrally determine the urinary albumin/creatinine ratio (ACR). A tree-based regression technique (RECPAM) and multivariate analyses were performed to investigate interaction between correlates of MAU. RESULTS: Of the 1841 patients recruited, 228 (12.4%) were excluded due to the presence of urinary infections and 56 (3.5%) for the presence of macroalbuminuria. Overall, the prevalence of MAU (ACR = 30-299 mg/g) was of 19.1%. The RECPAM algorithm led to the identification of seven classes showing a marked difference in the likelihood of MAU. Non-smoker patients with HbA1c <7% and waist circumference 98 cm and HbA1c >8% showed the highest likelihood of MAU (odds ratio = 13.7; 95% confidence intervals 6.8-27.6). In the other classes identified, the risk of MAU ranged between 3 and 5. Age, systolic blood pressure, HDL cholesterol levels and diabetes treatment represented additional, global correlates of MAU. CONCLUSIONS: The likelihood of MAU is strongly related to the interaction between diabetes severity, smoking habits and several components of the metabolic syndrome. In particular, abdominal obesity, elevated blood pressure levels and low HDL cholesterol levels substantially increase the risk of MAU. It is of primary importance to monitor MAU in high-risk individuals and aggressively intervene on modifiable risk factors.


Asunto(s)
Albuminuria/epidemiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/métodos , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Albuminuria/complicaciones , Albuminuria/diagnóstico , Concienciación , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/etiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/metabolismo , HDL-Colesterol/sangre , Creatinina/orina , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/diagnóstico , Femenino , Hemoglobina Glucada/metabolismo , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Prevalencia , Análisis de Regresión , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
7.
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis ; 17(1): 32-40, 2007 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17174224

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The greatest decrease in mortality from cardiovascular disease (CAD) that can be achieved with 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins) is seen in patients with the highest risk for CAD, such as diabetics. Yet, there is evidence for inadequate use of drug therapies to achieve lipid goals. Our aims were to: (1) assess the prevalence of statin use in patients attending diabetic clinics and (2) correlate the use of statins with their risk and clinical status. METHODS AND RESULTS: Of 9921 patients included, only 20.4% of them were receiving statin therapy. Statins were more progressively prescribed in those with risk factors additional to that of diabetes. Patients under statin treatment were older, mostly type 2 diabetics, more hypertensive and hyperlipidemic, had a higher prevalence of both macro- and microvascular disease. Among those with a total cholesterol concentration above 252 mg/dl, statin treatment was given only to 60% of diabetic patients with prior myocardial infarction, 56% of those with angina, 66% of those having had prior revascularization procedure, 54% of those with cerebrovascular disease and 51% of those with peripheral artery disease. CONCLUSIONS: At least in Italy, statins are not prescribed to the majority of diabetic patients, and a substantial proportion of patients not treated with statins present significant macro- and microvascular complications.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Angiopatías Diabéticas/prevención & control , Utilización de Medicamentos , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/etiología , LDL-Colesterol/sangre , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
8.
Monaldi Arch Chest Dis ; 60(4): 263-82, 2003 Dec.
Artículo en Italiano | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15061601

RESUMEN

Cardiac rehabilitation is accepted as an important component in the management of heart disease. Diabetes Mellitus is a chronic disease frequently associated to ischemic heart disease and both disease require continuing medical care, aggressive treatment of other risk factors, educational programs for self management of disease to prevent acute complication. The scientific community should offer standard of care for management of diabetic patients with coronary artery disease, and should design new strategies to promote prevention in this high risk patients. The need to define characteristics and peculiar problems of diabetics patients with ischemic heart disease encouraged the Board of the Italian Group of Cardiac Rehabilitation and Prevention (GICR) to set up a working group composed of cardiologists and diabetologists chosen on the basis of their proven specific experience. The document is subdivided in six parts. In the first section is described the cardiovascular risks in patients with diabetes and the importance of post-prandial hyperglycemia and glycemic variability. We analyse also the difference in prevalence of ischemic heart disease in Italian diabetic patients compared with other countries. In the second section we described clinical presentation of ischemic heart disease in diabetic patients such as acute myocardial infarction and unstable angina, and the revascularization procedures (balloon angioplasty and coronary bypass surgery). We analysed the differences between the procedures and the evidence-based results. In patients with myocardial infarction we analysed the evidence-based therapy and specific advantages of aspirin, beta-blockers and ace-inhibitor in diabetic patients. In this section we also posed particular attention to the clinical course of patients who underwent bypass grafting and to the impact of diabetes on short and long-term results and on main intervention-related complications including deep infections, mediastinitis, neurological problems, renal failure. In the third section we evaluated the factors responsible of atherosclerosis progression and their treatment, and we underlined that cardiac rehabilitation is less effective for patients with diabetes mellitus. Suggestions proposed in this paper about risk factors are in line with the recommendations of standards guidelines of American Diabetics Association. In patients with concomitant diabetes and ischemic heart disease we suggest blood pressure <130/80, LDL-cholesterol <100 mg/dl, triglycerides <150 mg/dl and daily physical activity. In the fourth section we analysed therapeutic regimens and management of diabetes. We posed particular attention on insulin therapy in acute phase of myocardial infarction and in recent coronary bypass grafting, and chronic use of oral antidiabetic drugs or insulin. In the fifth section we provided some recommendations on the organization of educational programs and physical activity in these patients. In the last section we provided some information on diagnosis of coronary artery disease in diabetes, aim of screening and in which patients is need to perform diagnostic tests. We described the available diagnostic tests with the differences in each method.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/terapia , Diabetes Mellitus/terapia , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapéutico , Angina Inestable/diagnóstico , Angina Inestable/etiología , Angioplastia de Balón , Aspirina/uso terapéutico , Glucemia/metabolismo , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/complicaciones , Puente de Arteria Coronaria , Complicaciones de la Diabetes , Humanos , Hiperglucemia/diagnóstico , Hiperglucemia/terapia , Insulina/uso terapéutico , Italia , Infarto del Miocardio/complicaciones , Infarto del Miocardio/terapia , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Factores de Riesgo
9.
Ital Heart J Suppl ; 5(8): 605-15, 2004 Aug.
Artículo en Italiano | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15554015

RESUMEN

Diabetes is a well known risk factor for the development of congestive heart failure. Epidemiological evidence in the community underscores the prevalence of left ventricular systolic dysfunction in diabetic patients as 2-fold with respect to non-diabetic ones, with half of them completely asymptomatic. Diastolic dysfunction in diabetic hearts, in comparison with non-diabetic, is even more frequent. The high prevalence has been explained by the frequent coexistence of an underlying diabetic cardiomyopathy, hypertension and ischemic heart disease. In these patients, the diabetic metabolic derangement, together with the early activation of sympathetic nervous system, induce a decrease of myocardial function. The activation of renin-angiotensin system results in an unfavorable cardiac remodeling. The progression from myocardial damage to overt dysfunction and heart failure is often asymptomatic for a long time and frequently undiagnosed and untreated. Currently, the widespread availability of echocardiography and possibly the use of cardiac natriuretic peptides, may allow for an earlier recognition of most of such patients. In heart failure, diabetic patients have a worse prognosis than non-diabetics. The available pharmacological treatments, such as ACE-inhibitors, beta-blockers and possibly angiotensin receptor blockers, togheter with a tight glycemic control, may be effective to reverse the remodeling process and prevent cardiovascular events. In order to identify most of the diabetic patients at risk of development of left ventricular dysfunction and to prevent its progression to overt heart failure, it seems important to elaborate a screening strategy in order to diagnose and treat most of diabetic patients with myocardial damage.


Asunto(s)
Complicaciones de la Diabetes , Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda , Complicaciones de la Diabetes/diagnóstico , Complicaciones de la Diabetes/epidemiología , Complicaciones de la Diabetes/etiología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/epidemiología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/etiología , Humanos , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/diagnóstico , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/epidemiología , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/etiología
10.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract ; 101(2): 236-42, 2013 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23806478

RESUMEN

AIMS: Left ventricular dysfunction (LVD) in type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) (DYDA) study is a prospective investigation enrolling 960 with DM without overt cardiac disease. At baseline, a high prevalence of LVD was detected by analysing midwall shortening. We report here the incidence of clinical events in DYDA patients after 2-year follow-up and the frequency of LVD detected at baseline and 2-year evaluation. METHODS: Systolic LVD was defined as midwall shortening ≤15%, diastolic LVD as any condition different from "normal diastolic function" identified as E/A ratio on Doppler mitral flow between 0.75 and 1.5 and deceleration time of E wave >140 ms. Major outcome was a composite of major events, including all-causes death and hospital admissions. RESULTS: During the study period, any systolic/diastolic LVD was found in 616 of 699 patients (88.1%) in whom LVD function could be measured at baseline or at 2 years. Older age and high HbA1c predicted the occurrence of LVD. During the follow-up 15 patients died (1.6%), 3 for cardiovascular causes, 139 were hospitalized (14.5%, 43 of them for cardiovascular causes, 20 for a new cancer). CONCLUSIONS: During a 2-year follow-up any LVD is detectable in a large majority of patients with DM without overt cardiac disease. Older age and higher HbA1c predict LVD. All-cause death or hospitalization occurred in 15% of patients, cardiovascular cause was uncommon. Independent predictors of events were older age, pathologic lipid profile, high HbA1c, claudicatio and repaglinide therapy. Echo-assessed LVD at baseline was not prognosticator of events.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/fisiopatología , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/fisiopatología , Anciano , Diástole/fisiología , Femenino , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos
12.
Eur J Prev Cardiol ; 19(5): 935-43, 2012 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21798988

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Individuals with diabetes mellitus (DM) have a higher risk to develop heart failure. Clinical guidelines emphasize the importance of early diagnosis of left ventricular dysfunction (LVD) and preventive interventions in these patients. In this study we assessed the prevalence of LVD, systolic or diastolic, in DM patients without known cardiac disease recruited in the 'left ventricular DYsfunction in DiAbetes (DYDA)' study. DESIGN AND METHODS: We performed clinical, ECG, laboratory, and echocardiographic exams in 960 patients (61 ± 8 years, 59% hypertensive) recruited in the DYDA study from 37 Italian diabetes referral centres. ECG and echo exams were read in central facilities. Systolic LVD was defined as ejection fraction ≤ 50% or midwall shortening (MFS) ≤ 15%. Diastolic LVD was identified when transmitral E/A was out of the range of 0.75-1.5 or deceleration time of mitral E wave ≤ 140 msec. RESULTS: Echocardiographic data were obtained in 751 patients (78.2%). Isolated systolic LVD was detected in 22.0% of patients, isolated diastolic LVD in 21.5%, and combined systolic and diastolic LVD in 12.7%. All patients with systolic LVD had MFS ≤ 15%, while only 9% had an ejection fraction ≤ 50%. Higher LV mass, relative wall thickness, prevalence of concentric geometry, and LV hypertrophy characterized the patients with LVD. CONCLUSIONS: LVD is present in more than half of DM patients without clinically detectable cardiac disease and is associated with LV hypertrophy and concentric LV geometry. One-third of patients exhibits systolic LVD detectable at the midwall level.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Ecocardiografía Doppler/métodos , Ventrículos Cardíacos/fisiopatología , Contracción Miocárdica/fisiología , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/fisiopatología , Diástole , Electrocardiografía , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Ventrículos Cardíacos/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Sístole , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/etiología , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/fisiopatología
13.
Diabetes Care ; 34(2): 347-52, 2011 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21270192

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The QUASAR (Quality Assessment Score and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Italian Diabetes Patients) study aimed to assess whether a quality-of-care summary score predicted the development of cardiovascular (CV) events in patients with type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In 67 diabetes clinics, data on randomly selected patients were extracted from electronic medical records. The score was calculated using process and outcome indicators based on monitoring, targets, and treatment of A1C, blood pressure, LDL cholesterol, and microalbuminuria. The score ranged from 0 to 40. RESULTS: Overall, 5,181 patients were analyzed; 477 (9.2%) patients developed a CV event after a median follow-up of 28 months. The incidence rate (per 1,000 person-years) of CV events was 62.4 in patients with a score of <15, 41.0 in those with a score between 20 and 25 and 36.7 in those with a score of >25. Multilevel analysis, adjusted for clustering and case-mix, showed that the risk to develop a new CV event was 84% higher in patients with a score of <15 (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 1.84; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.29-2.62) and 17% higher in those with a score between 15 and 25 (IRR = 1.17; 95% CI 0.93-1.49) compared with those with a score of >25. Mean quality score varied across centers from 16.5 ± 7.5 to 29.1 ± 6.3. When the score was tested as the dependent variable, it emerged that 18% of the variance in the score could be attributed to setting characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Our study documented a close relationship between quality of diabetes care and long-term outcomes. A simple score can be used to monitor quality of care and compare the performance of different centers/physicians.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/terapia , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Registros Electrónicos de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Italia/epidemiología , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Programas Nacionales de Salud/normas , Programas Nacionales de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas
14.
High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev ; 18(1): 19-30, 2011 Mar 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21612309

RESUMEN

Cardiovascular diseases represent the leading cause of morbidity and mortality, worldwide. Early detection and appropriate management of cardiovascular risk factors and disease markers in daily clinical practice may improve preventive strategies and reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease. The EFFECTUS (Evaluation of Final Feasible Effect of Control Training and Ultra Sensitisation) programme was an educational programme aimed at evaluating prevalence of major cardiovascular risk factors among outpatients, and preferences and attitudes for cardiovascular disease management among Italian physicians in their routine clinical practice. This article provides an overview of the main findings of different analyses from the EFFECTUS database, which have demonstrated a high prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors, irrespective of the clinical settings and outpatient clinics in which patients were followed. Also, findings from this database suggest that more intensive clinical data recording was paralleled by better adherence to guidelines, and that use of electronic rather than conventional support for clinical data collection and registration improved accuracy in data recording, which translated into better management of patients at risk in daily clinical practice.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control , Medicina General , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo
15.
Clin Cardiol ; 34(9): 560-6, 2011 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21905043

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The Evaluation of Final Feasible Effect of Ultra Control Training and Sensitization (EFFECTUS) study is aimed at implementing global cardiovascular (CV) risk management in Italy. HYPOTHESIS: To evaluate the impact of diabetes mellitus (DM) on attitudes and preferences for clinical management of global CV risk among physicians treating diabetic or nondiabetic patients. METHODS: Involved physicians were asked to submit data into a study-designed case-report form, covering the first 10 adult outpatients consecutively seen in May 2006. All available clinical data were centrally analyzed for global CV risk assessment and CV risk profile characterization. Patients were stratified according to the presence or absence of DM. RESULTS: Overall, 1078 physicians (27% female, ages 50 ± 7 y) collected data of 9904 outpatients (46.5% female, ages 67 ± 9 y), among whom 3681 (37%) had a diagnosis of DM at baseline. Diabetic patients were older and had higher prevalence of obesity, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and associated CV diseases than nondiabetic individuals (P<0.001). They had higher systolic blood pressure, total cholesterol, triglycerides, and creatinine levels, but lower high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels than nondiabetic patients (P<0.001). Higher numbers of blood pressure and lipid-lowering drugs and antiplatelet agents were used in diabetic than in nondiabetic patients (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The EFFECTUS study confirmed higher CV risk and more CV drug prescriptions in diabetic than in nondiabetic patients. Presence of DM at baseline significantly improved clinical data collection. Such an approach, however, was not paralleled by a better control of global CV risk profile, which was significantly worse in the former than in the latter group.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control , Competencia Clínica/estadística & datos numéricos , Diabetes Mellitus/patología , Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/etiología , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Escolaridad , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Hipertensión , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
16.
J Hypertens ; 29(10): 1994-2003, 2011 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21881524

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: An inappropriately high left ventricular mass (iLVM) may be detected in patients with diabetes mellitus. Several hemodynamic and nonhemodynamic factors stimulating LVM growth may actively operate in these patients. In this study, we assessed prevalence and factors associated with iLVM in patients with diabetes mellitus. METHODS: We analyzed baseline data from 708 patients (61 ±â€Š7 years, 57% treated for hypertension) with type 2 diabetes mellitus without evidence of cardiac disease enrolled in the left ventricular dysfunction in diabetes study. iLVM was diagnosed by Doppler echocardiography as LVM more than 28% of the expected LVM predicted from height, sex and stroke work. RESULTS: iLVM was detected in 166 patients (23%), irrespective of concomitant hypertension. Patients with iLVM were more frequently women, had higher BMI and prevalence of metabolic syndrome, higher serum triglyceride levels and were treated more frequently with metformin and diuretics. In a multivariate model, female sex [odds ratio (OR) 1.502 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.010-2.231), P = 0.04], higher serum triglyceride levels [OR 1.007 (95% CI 1.003-1.012), P < 0.001] and BMI [OR 1.220 (95% CI 1.116-1.335), P < 0.001] emerged independently related to iLVM. CONCLUSION: iLVM is detectable in about a quarter of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus without evidence of cardiac disease and is unrelated to blood pressure levels. The association between LVM and some components of metabolic syndrome in these patients may have important practical implications.


Asunto(s)
Cardiomiopatías Diabéticas/patología , Hipertrofia Ventricular Izquierda/patología , Anciano , Presión Sanguínea , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/diagnóstico por imagen , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/fisiopatología , Cardiomiopatías Diabéticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Cardiomiopatías Diabéticas/fisiopatología , Ecocardiografía Doppler , Femenino , Humanos , Hipertensión/complicaciones , Hipertensión/diagnóstico por imagen , Hipertensión/patología , Hipertensión/fisiopatología , Hipertrofia Ventricular Izquierda/complicaciones , Hipertrofia Ventricular Izquierda/diagnóstico por imagen , Hipertrofia Ventricular Izquierda/fisiopatología , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo
18.
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis ; 15(3): 204-11, 2005 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15955469

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIM: To perform an observational, cross-sectional study aiming to assess multiple cardiovascular risk factors and metabolic control in a very large and representative sample of type 2 diabetic subjects attending diabetes outpatient clinics (DOCs) in Italy. METHODS AND RESULTS: Two hundred and sixty-one clinics were involved, representing about one-third of the whole number of DOCs in the Country. Each clinic recruited on a random basis from 50 to 100 type 2 diabetic patients aged 35-70 years, diagnosed more than six months before the start of the study. Demographic and clinical data were collected and blood pressure, lipids, HbA(1c), fasting blood glucose (FBG), and microalbuminuria were measured. Overall, 12,222 type 2 diabetic patients were recruited in 253 DOCs. Female subjects showed higher FBG, HbA 1c, blood pressure, lipid levels, and a longer duration of disease. The proportion of patients with BMI > or = 30 was 33.3% among males and 45.9% among females; 40.9% of male patients had a waist circumference greater than 102 cm, while 79% of female patients had a waist circumference over 88 cm. More than two-third of the patients (74.4%) had systolic blood pressure values of > or = 130 mmHg, and one-third (33.2%) had diastolic values > or = 85 mmHg. The mean value of HbA(1c) was 7.6+/-1.6, and 23.7% of the observed population had an HbA 1c level > 8.5%. More than half of the study population had total cholesterol levels > or = 5.2 mmol/l, 47% had LDL cholesterol values of 3.3 mmol/l or greater and 9.6% had HDL cholesterol level lower than 0.90 mmol/l. The presence of multiple lipid alterations was associated with markedly higher HbA 1c levels, in both subjects treated with lipid lowering drugs and untreated subjects. Finally, even moderate increases in HbA 1c levels (i.e. HbA 1c > 7.5%) were associated with a statistically significant greater risk of systolic blood pressure levels > or = 160 mmHg in women (OR = 1.40; 95% CI 1.09-1.80) but not in men (OR = 1.21; 95% CI 0.96-1.54). CONCLUSIONS: The SFIDA study provides a clear indication of the need to orient diabetes care towards the control of global cardiovascular risk. Only a stricter adherence to the existing guidelines and a much stronger attention to the attainment of the desired therapeutic goals will allow a decrease in morbidity and mortality as well as in the costs related to diabetes.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Hipertensión/complicaciones , Obesidad/complicaciones , Adulto , Anciano , Glucemia/metabolismo , Índice de Masa Corporal , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/etiología , Estudios Transversales , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/metabolismo , Femenino , Hemoglobina Glucada/análisis , Humanos , Hipertensión/epidemiología , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obesidad/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA