Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
BMC Infect Dis ; 22(1): 752, 2022 Sep 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36167578

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The advent of the effective COVID-19 vaccine was the most eagerly expected worldwide. However, this hope quickly became hesitation and denial in many countries, including Guinea. Understanding the reasons for low vaccine coverage is essential to achieving herd immunity leading to disease control. This study aimed to comprehend the facilitators and barriers to the acceptance COVID-19 vaccine in Guinea. METHODS: The survey focused on healthcare workers (HCWs) and the general population (GP) in 4 natural regions in Guinea from 23 March 2021 to 25 August 2021. We used the Fishbein integration model to study the behaviours of HWCs and GP regarding vaccination. A mixed cross-sectional study collected knowledge, attitudes, norms, and perceptions. Regression and thematic content analysis identified the main facilitators and barriers to vaccination. RESULTS: We surveyed 3547 HCWs and 3663 GP. The proportion of people vaccinated was 65% among HCWs and 31% among the GP. For HCWs: the main factors associated with vaccination against COVID-19 were as follows: absence of pregnancy AOR = 4.65 [3.23-6.78], being supportive of vaccination AOR = 1.94 [1.66-2.27] and being an adult AOR = 1.64 [1.26-2.16]. Regarding the GP, the following factors increased the odds of vaccination: absence of pregnancy AOR = 1.93 [CI 1.01-3.91], being favourable for vaccination AOR = 3.48 [CI 2.91-4.17], being an adult AOR = 1.72 [CI 1.38-2.14] and being able to get the vaccine AOR = 4.67 [CI 3.76-5.84]. Semi-interviews revealed fear, lack of trust, and hesitant perception of the government as potential barriers to vaccination. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that beliefs and negative perceptions are potential barriers to vaccination against COVID-19 among HCWs and the GP. Policies should emphasise practical strategies to mitigate these barriers among young people and pregnant women. Lastly, there is a need to improve access to vaccines in the GP.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Adolescente , Adulto , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Guinea/epidemiología , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Personal de Salud , Humanos , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Embarazo , Vacunación
2.
Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol ; 2021: 9914424, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34305392

RESUMEN

Background: Malaria control interventions have been scaled up, particularly those in pregnant women in Guinea. Despite that, coverage of key malaria preventive measure (MPM) indicators remains low. Therefore, it is vital to understand the reasons behind that, especially for the low coverage of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) and long-lasting insecticide-treated bed nets (LLIN). Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey in nine district hospitals in Guinea. Pregnant women received for delivery were interviewed to collect sociodemographic and obstetrical parameters. Associated factors with MPMs were investigated through univariate analysis and classification and regression tree (CART). Results: A total of 2248 parturients participated in this study. Among pregnant women using mosquito nets (63.5% (61.4%, 65.5%)), only 41.2% (39.1%, 43.3%) had used it regularly during the last two weeks preceding delivery. Similarly, most pregnant women (57.9% (55.8%, 59.9%)) had received less than three doses of SP, and only a few pregnant women (23.9% (22.1%, 25.7%)) have benefited from full MPMs. Parturient's age, marital status, time spent in residence, place of residence, level of education, distance from home to the health centre, health conditions, occupation, head of the household's occupation, the presence of garbage and stagnant water in the neighbourhood, source of running water, and the number of pregnancies were significantly statistically associated with MPMs in pregnant women. However, the number of antenatal care visits (ANC), means of transportation used by the pregnant woman to accomplish ANCs, and stagnant water in the neighbourhood were the three preponderant factors. Conclusion: The low coverage of SP and LLINs among pregnant women requires revitalising some strategies, especially improving ANC coverage and more efforts to reduce inequalities in access to those services due to sociodemographic status. Education on the benefits of these MPMs should also be emphasised.


Asunto(s)
Antimaláricos , Mosquiteros Tratados con Insecticida , Malaria , Complicaciones Parasitarias del Embarazo , Antimaláricos/uso terapéutico , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Guinea/epidemiología , Humanos , Malaria/epidemiología , Malaria/prevención & control , Embarazo , Complicaciones Parasitarias del Embarazo/epidemiología , Complicaciones Parasitarias del Embarazo/prevención & control , Mujeres Embarazadas
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA