SDHB variant type impacts phenotype and malignancy in pheochromocytoma-paraganglioma.

BACKGROUND: Traditional genotype-phenotype correlations for the succinate dehydrogenase-complex II (SDH) genes link SDHB variants to thoracic-abdominal pheochromocytoma-paraganglioma (PPGL) and SDHD variants to head and neck paraganglioma (HNPGL). However, in a recent study we found strong and specific genotype-phenotype associations for SDHD variants. In the present study we zoom in on the genotype-phenotype associations of SDHB gene variants, considering the impact of individual gene variants on disease risk and risk of malignancy. METHODS: We analysed two large independent data sets, including a total of 448 patients with PPGL and HNPGL, and studied the association of missense or truncating SDHB variants with tumour incidence, age of onset and malignancy risk using binomial testing and Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: Compared with missense variants, truncating SDHB variants were significantly and consistently more common in patients with PPGL, by a 20 percentage point margin. Malignancy was also significantly more common in truncating versus missense variant carriers. No overall differences in age of PPGL onset were noted between carriers of the two variant types, although some individual variants may differ in certain cases. Missense variants were marginally over-represented among patients with HNPGL, but the difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: SDHB truncating variants convey an elevated risk for development of both PPGL and malignancy compared with missense variants. These results further support earlier robust associations between truncating variants and PPGL, and also suggest that the two variant types differ in their impact on complex II function, with PPGL/HNPGL tissues displaying differing sensitivities to changes in complex II function.

Clinical progression and metachronous paragangliomas in a large cohort of SDHD germline variant carriers.

Although it is well established that paternally transmitted germline variants in SDHD are associated with multifocal paragangliomas and lifelong follow-up is generally advised, the risk of metachronous lesions is presently unknown. In a large Dutch cohort of SDHD variant carriers, we studied the development of new paragangliomas, and the evolution of symptoms and cranial nerve impairment. Recurrent event analysis and the Kaplan-Meier product limit estimator were used to study the risk of new lesions. The relation between several predictors and development of new symptoms was assessed using logistic regression. Of the 222 SDHD variant carriers included, 65% presented with symptoms and 11% with cranial nerve dysfunction. Over a median period of 8 years, 42% reported new symptoms, and new cranial nerve impairment was observed in 11% of subjects. The estimated fraction of subjects that developed new HNPGL increased to 73% (95% CI: 52-85%) after 22 years of follow-up. Males were more likely to develop new HNPGL compared to females (HR: 1.63, 95% CI: 1.10-2.40), as were subjects that presented with symptoms, compared to subjects that were asymptomatic at baseline (HR: 1.61, 95% CI: 1.01-2.55). In addition, the risk of new lesions decreased with number of HNPGL present at first diagnosis (HR: 0.68 and 95% CI: 0.56-0.82). Carriers of a paternally inherited SDHD variant face a considerable risk for new HNPGL. In addition, nearly 50% of subjects reported new symptoms. However, new cranial nerve deficits were observed in only 11%, which is less than reported in surgical series. These risks should be taken into account when considering treatment strategies and counseling.

The Dutch founder mutation SDHD.D92Y shows a reduced penetrance for the development of paragangliomas in a large multigenerational family.

Germline mutations in SDHD predispose to the development of head and neck paragangliomas, and phaeochromocytomas. The risk of developing a tumor depends on the sex of the parent who transmits the mutation: paragangliomas only arise upon paternal transmission. In this study, both the risk of paraganglioma and phaeochromocytoma formation, and the risk of developing associated symptoms were investigated in 243 family members with the SDHD.D92Y founder mutation. By using the Kaplan-Meier method, age-specific penetrance was calculated separately for paraganglioma formation as defined by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and for paraganglioma-related signs and symptoms. Evaluating clinical signs and symptoms alone, the penetrance reached a maximum of 57% by the age of 47 years. When MRI detection of occult paragangliomas was included, penetrance was estimated to be 54% by the age of 40 years, 68% by the age of 60 years and 87% by the age of 70 years. Multiple tumors were found in 65% and phaeochromocytomas were diagnosed in 8% of paraganglioma patients. Malignant paraganglioma was diagnosed in one patient (3%). Although the majority of carriers of a paternally inherited SDHD mutation will eventually develop head and neck paragangliomas, we find a lower penetrance than previous estimates from studies based on predominantly index cases. The family-based study described here emphasizes the importance of the identification and inclusion of clinically unaffected mutation carriers in all estimates of penetrance. This finding will allow a more accurate genetic counseling and warrants a 'wait and scan' policy for asymptomatic paragangliomas, combined with biochemical screening for catecholamine excess in SDHD-linked patients.