RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To compare functional outcomes, complication rates, and survival in patients with intertrochanteric fracture treated with percutaneous compression plate (PCCP) or gamma nail (GN). METHODS: A retrospective study of prospectively collected data of patients treated with PCCP or GN for AO/OTA 31.A1 or AO/OTA 31.A2 fractures was conducted. Sixty-eight consecutive patients treated with PCCP between 2018 and 2020 were enrolled and matched with 68 patients with comparable characteristics treated with GN. The activities of daily living (ADL) index and specific scales for walking ability and need for walking aids at 4 months and 1 year after fracture fixation were chosen as primary outcomes. Postoperative complications and one-year survival were recorded and compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Walking ability and ADLs index decreased and the need for walking aids increased in both groups compared to the prefracture state at both follow-up intervals (p < 0.001), regardless of the treatment received. There was no difference between the two implants in the rate of implant-related complications. One-year survival rate was 78.9% (95% CI 67.0-86.9) and 82.4% (95% CI 71.0-89.5) in patients undergoing PCCP or GN, respectively, with no significant difference between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Walking ability, ADLs, complication rate, and 1-year survival are not significantly different when patients undergoing PCCP or GN are compared. The choice of implant may not be decisive for the outcome of treatment of intertrochanteric fractures, provided that stable fixation is ensured.
Asunto(s)
Actividades Cotidianas , Fracturas de Cadera , Humanos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fracturas de Cadera/cirugía , Placas Óseas , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Clavos OrtopédicosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Culturing of the sonication fluid of removed implants has proven to be more sensitive than conventional periprosthetic tissue culture for the microbiological diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection. Since bacteria surviving on antibiotic-loaded cement spacers used in a two-stage exchange protocol for infected arthroplasties may cause the persistence of infection, in this study we asked whether the sonication also could be used to identify bacteria on antibiotic-loaded cement spacers removed at the second surgical stage during a two-stage exchange procedure to confirm whether or not the prosthetic joint infection had been eradicated. METHODS: We cultured the sonication fluid of cement spacers that had been originally implanted in a two-stage exchange protocol in 21 patients (mean age, 66 years) affected by prosthetic joint infection (16 total knee prostheses and 5 hip prostheses). The cement spacers were vortexed for 30 seconds and then subjected to sonication (frequency 35-40 KHz). The resulting sonicate fluid was cultured for aerobic and anaerobic bacteria. RESULTS: The sonication fluid culture of the removed spacer was positive in six patients (29%), with isolation of methicillin-sensible Staphylococcus Aureus (MSSA) in three cases, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) in one case and Pseudomonas Aeruginosa in two cases. In three of these positive cases, the traditional culture of periprosthetic tissue was negative. Two patients with positive sonication culture of the spacer were successfully treated by early debridement of the revision prosthesis and systemic antibiotic therapy. In three patients a knee arthrodesis was planned and performed as the second surgical stage. In two of them the infection was caused by highly resistant Pseudomonas Aeruginosa. The other patient with a MSSA infection had been poorly compliant with the systemic antibiotic therapy due to her mental impairment. The patient originally affected by MRSA infection of his primary hip arthroplasty developed recurrent infection of his revision prosthesis and eventually underwent Girdlestone arthroplasty. CONCLUSIONS: The sonication culture can be used to discover any bacteria on the antibiotic-loaded cement spacer during a two-stage exchange protocol, thus permitting the adoption of timely treatment options, such as the early prosthetic debridment.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Prótesis de Cadera/microbiología , Prótesis de la Rodilla/microbiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/diagnóstico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/prevención & control , Sonicación/métodos , Anciano , Femenino , Prótesis de Cadera/efectos adversos , Humanos , Prótesis de la Rodilla/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There is a lack of data on the long-term outcome of total hip arthroplasty procedures, as assessed by validated tools. METHODS: We conducted a follow-up study to evaluate the quality of life and functionality of 250 patients an average of 16 years (range: 11-23 years) after total hip arthroplasty using a validated assessment set including the SF-36 questionnaire, Harris Hip Score, WOMAC score, Functional Comorbidity Index, and a study specific questionnaire. Models of multiple stepwise linear and logistic regression analysis were constructed to evaluate the relationships between several explanatory variables and these functional outcomes. RESULTS: The SF-36 physical indexes of these patients compared negatively with the normative values but positively with the results obtained in untreated subjects with severe hip osteoarthritis. Similar results were detected for the Harris Hip Score and WOMAC score. There was a 96% rate of post-surgical satisfaction. Hip functionality and comorbidities were the most important determinants of physical measures on the SF-36. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who had undergone total hip arthroplasty have impaired long-term self-reported physical quality of life and hip functionality but they still perform physically better than untreated patients with advanced hip osteoarthritis. However, the level of post-surgical satisfaction is high.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/rehabilitación , Osteoartritis de la Cadera/cirugía , Calidad de Vida , Actividades Cotidianas , Anciano , Comorbilidad , Empleo , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Estado de Salud , Articulación de la Cadera/fisiopatología , Articulación de la Cadera/cirugía , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Osteoartritis de la Cadera/epidemiología , Osteoartritis de la Cadera/fisiopatología , Satisfacción del Paciente , Recuperación de la Función , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the results obtained using unilateral external fixation as a definitive treatment for humeral shaft fractures and to identify possible predictors of radiographic and functional outcomes. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: One large metropolitan hospital. PATIENTS: A consecutive cohort of 107 patients who underwent external fixation for 109 humeral shaft fractures. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Union rate, time to fracture healing, and functional assessment with disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire, Constant score, Mayo Elbow Performance Index, and return to prefracture sports activity at a minimum of 2 years after surgery. Comorbidities were evaluated using the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to determine whether any explanatory variables were significantly associated with the outcomes. RESULTS: The union rate in 109 humeral shaft fractures was 97.2% (106/109) at a mean of 99.2 days. Two patients (1.8%) had delayed union, and 1 patient (0.9%) did not achieve union. At the latest follow-up, the mean Constant score, Mayo Elbow Performance Index, and disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire score was 85.6, 97.4, and 7.4 points, respectively. All patients engaged in sports activities before fracture resumed a sport activity. At the multiple linear regression analysis, obesity was directly related to a delayed healing of fracture (P = 0.010) and comorbidity was the most important determinant of the functional outcomes at follow-up (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These data support the use of unilateral external fixation as an effective therapeutic option in patients with humeral shaft fracture. Comorbidity as assessed by Cumulative Illness Rating Scale score is the most important determinant of functional outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Asunto(s)
Lesiones de Codo , Fijación de Fractura/métodos , Curación de Fractura , Fracturas del Húmero/cirugía , Radiografía/métodos , Rango del Movimiento Articular/fisiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Articulación del Codo/diagnóstico por imagen , Articulación del Codo/fisiopatología , Femenino , Humanos , Fracturas del Húmero/diagnóstico , Fracturas del Húmero/fisiopatología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To assess the change in ambulatory ability, need for walking aids, and activities of daily living (ADL) after femoral neck, intertrochanteric, or subtrochanteric fractures and to examine the determinants of these functional outcomes. DESIGN: A prospective observational cohort study. SETTING: A multicenter study involving 1 university hospital and 2 community hospitals. PATIENTS: A consecutive cohort of 552 patients (mean age, 78.3 years; range, 50-105) who underwent surgery for a hip fracture. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Ambulatory ability, need for walking aids, and ADL index, 4 and 12 months after surgery. RESULTS: At both 4 months and 1-year follow-up time points, there was a significant decrease in ambulatory ability and the ADL index score and also an increase in the need for walking aids in comparison with the prefracture status. Ambulatory ability, but not ADL, significantly recovered between the 4-month and 1-year follow-up. One year after fracture, the prefracture functional status was regained by 57% of the patients, but approximately 13% of the formerly ambulating patients were unable to walk. The prefracture status was the most important determinant of ambulatory ability, need for walking aids, and ADL. Comorbidities, a poor cognitive status, and non-weight-bearing status after surgery were also negative predictors. Neither the fracture pattern nor its specific surgical treatment was predictive of any functional outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of the type of fracture or surgical treatment used, 57% of the patients do not regain their prefracture ambulatory ability. Recovery of ambulatory ability can occur until 1 year postoperatively. The prefracture status and cognitive level are the most important determinant of all functional outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.