Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo de estudio
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Brain Spine ; 4: 102796, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38698806

RESUMEN

Introduction: Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring (IOM) is widely used in neurosurgery but specific guidelines are lacking. Therefore, we can assume differences in IOM application between Neurosurgical centers. Research question: The section of Functional Neurosurgery of the Italian Society of Neurosurgery realized a survey aiming to obtain general data on the current practice of IOM in Italy. Materials and methods: A 22-item questionnaire was designed focusing on: volume procedures, indications, awake surgery, experience, organization and equipe. The questionnaire has been sent to Italian Neurosurgery centers. Results: A total of 54 centers completed the survey. The annual volume of surgeries range from 300 to 2000, and IOM is used in 10-20% of the procedures. In 46% of the cases is a neurologist or a neurophysiologist who performs IOM. For supra-tentorial pathology, almost all perform MEPs (94%) SSEPs (89%), direct cortical stimulation (85%). All centers perform IOM in spinal surgery and 95% in posterior fossa surgery. Among the 50% that perform peripheral nerve surgery, all use IOM. Awake surgery is performed by 70% of centers. The neurosurgeon is the only responsible for IOM in 35% of centers. In 83% of cases IOM implementation is adequate to the request. Discussion and conclusions: The Italian Neurosurgical centers perform IOM with high level of specialization, but differences exist in organization, techniques, and expertise. Our survey provides a snapshot of the state of the art in Italy and it could be a starting point to implement a consensus on the practice of IOM.

2.
World Neurosurg ; 84(2): 592.e15-21, 2015 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25790874

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Giant serpentine aneurysms are a rare entity, which can be managed using either endovascular or surgical techniques. Although the perioperative morbidity and mortality have decreased since the development of bypass revascularization procedures, their surgical treatment is still challenging. Intraoperative functional and perfusion monitoring techniques can be precious to make better decisions and improve outcomes. CASE DESCRIPTION: We report on the case of a giant, unruptured, partially thrombosed, serpentine middle cerebral artery aneurysm that was treated with partial endovascular coiling of intra-aneurysmal vascular channels, surgical resection of the aneurysm, and end-to-end M1-temporal M2 anastomosis. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative continuous motor evoked potentials monitoring, flowmetry, and indocyanine-green angiography provide precise and reproducible information about cerebral function and perfusion, respectively, allowing for more rational decision making during surgery for these challenging malformations.


Asunto(s)
Anastomosis Quirúrgica , Encéfalo/irrigación sanguínea , Angiografía Cerebral , Revascularización Cerebral , Embolización Terapéutica , Potenciales Evocados Motores/fisiología , Aneurisma Intracraneal/terapia , Arteria Cerebral Media/cirugía , Monitoreo Intraoperatorio , Reología , Arterias Temporales/cirugía , Anciano , Angiografía de Substracción Digital , Terapia Combinada , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Femenino , Humanos , Verde de Indocianina , Aneurisma Intracraneal/fisiopatología , Angiografía por Resonancia Magnética , Arteria Cerebral Media/fisiopatología , Flujo Sanguíneo Regional/fisiología , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA