Intranasal Dexmedetomidine increases the successful sedation of children with autism for out-patient auditory brainstem response hearing tests.

INTRODUCTION: The auditory brainstem response (ABR) hearing test can be challenging in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) due to the inherent behavioral challenges associated with this condition. To attempt to increase our success in sedating ASD patients, we added the use of intranasal Dexmedetomidine (Dexmed) to be used alone or with oral Chloral Hydrate (CH) in an ambulatory care setting, with monitoring by a specialist nurse. OBJECTIVES: To determine the success and safety of a protocol for ABR testing performed under sedation with intranasal Dexmed and oral chloral hydrate in ASD patients. To compare the success rate, the occurrence of adverse events and time needed to initiate ABR between Dexmed-CH protocol and previous CH-alone protocol in ASD patients. METHODS: Retrospective review. ASD patients in Dexmed-CH sedation protocol were age- and sex-matched to ASD patients who underwent CH-alone sedation protocol, for comparison. RESULTS: 74 ABR records in ASD children were included, 37 patients using Dex-CH protocol and 37 patients using CH-alone protocol. In the Dexmed-CH protocol group, Dexmed was used in 2 different ways: alone as a first choice in patients who refused to swallow CH (9/37), or combined with CH as a rescue (28/37). Under this sedation protocol, 89% of the attempted ABRs were completed successfully with no major adverse effects. In comparison, in ASD patients sedated using the protocol of CH-alone, the success rate significantly lower (69% vs. 89%). The time needed to initiate the test was not significantly different. CONCLUSION: The use of intranasal Dexmed by itself or in combination with CH was a safe and reliable method of performing sedated ABR in ASD patients. Modifying our previous oral CH protocol to include intranasal Dexmed, substantially improved our success rate of sedation in ASD patients in an ambulatory setting. This study may be of significant value to centers worldwide exploring alternatives to general anesthesia for ABR testing in ASD patients.

Microtia: A Data Linkage Study of Epidemiology and Implications for Service Delivery.

Introduction: Previous studies of microtia epidemiology globally have demonstrated significant geographical and ethnic variation, cited broadly as affecting 3-5 in 10,000 live births. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of microtia in a largely homogeneous ethnic population in the United Kingdom (Wales) and to identify factors, such as distance and socioeconomic status, which may influence the access to surgical intervention. Materials and Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data linkage to identify patients born between 2000 and 2018 with a diagnosis of microtia. Microtia incidence was calculated using annual and geographic birth rates. Surgical operation codes were used to classify patients into those that had no surgery, autologous reconstruction or prosthetic reconstruction. Sociodemographic attributes were compared using descriptive statistics to determine differences in access to each type of surgical intervention. Results: A total of 101 patients were identified, 64.4% were male and the median age was 12 (8-16). The mean annual incidence was 2.13 microtia cases per 10,000 births over the 19-year study period. Both temporal and geographic variation was noted. The majority of patients undergoing surgery opted for autologous reconstruction (72.9%) at a median age of 9 (7-10) compared to 7 (5-8) for prosthetic reconstruction. Autologous reconstruction had a higher median number of surgeries (2, 1-3) than prosthetic (1.5, 1-2) and a higher median socioeconomic status of 3 (2-4) compared to 2 (1-4) for the prosthetic cohort. There were no statistically significant differences in the distance traveled for surgery. Discussion: This study highlights a role for data linkage in epidemiological analyses and provides a revised incidence of microtia in Wales. Although the majority of patients opted for autologous reconstruction, demographic disparities in socioeconomic status warrant further investigation, emphasizing the importance of striving for equity in accessibility to surgical intervention.