Phase I trial of volasertib, a Polo-like kinase inhibitor, plus platinum agents in solid tumors: safety, pharmacokinetics and activity.

BACKGROUND: This trial evaluated the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety, pharmacokinetics, and activity of volasertib, a selective Polo-like kinase 1 inhibitor that induces mitotic arrest and apoptosis, combined with cisplatin or carboplatin in patients with advanced/metastatic solid tumors (NCT00969761; 1230.6). METHODS: Sequential patient cohorts (3 + 3 dose-escalation design) received a single infusion of volasertib (100-350 mg) with cisplatin (60-100 mg/m(2)) or carboplatin (area under the concentration versus time curve [AUC]4-AUC6) on day 1 every 3 weeks for up to six cycles. Sixty-one patients received volasertib/cisplatin (n = 30) or volasertib/carboplatin (n = 31) for a median of 3.5 (range, 1-6) and 2.0 (range, 1-6) treatment cycles, respectively. RESULTS: The most common cycle 1 dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were thrombocytopenia, neutropenia and fatigue. MTDs (based on cycle 1 DLTs) were determined to be volasertib 300 mg plus cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) and volasertib 300 mg plus carboplatin AUC6. Co-administration did not affect the pharmacokinetics of each drug. Partial responses were observed in two patients in each arm. Stable disease was achieved in 11 and six patients treated with volasertib/cisplatin and volasertib/carboplatin, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Volasertib plus cisplatin or carboplatin at full single-agent doses was generally manageable and demonstrated activity in heavily pretreated patients with advanced solid tumors.

Phase I safety and pharmacokinetic dose-escalation study of pilaralisib polymorph E, a phosphoinositide 3-kinase inhibitor in tablet formulation, in patients with solid tumors or lymphoma.

PURPOSE: Pilaralisib (SAR245408), a pan-class I PI3K inhibitor, has been investigated in Phase I/II trials in several solid tumors and lymphomas in capsule and tablet formulations of polymorph A (capsule-A and tablet-A). This Phase I study was conducted to determine the recommended Phase II dose (RP2D) of a more thermodynamically stable form of pilaralisib (polymorph E), in tablet formulation (tablet-E), in patients with advanced solid tumors or relapsed/refractory lymphoma. METHODS: A modified '3 + 3' dose-escalation design was employed. Patients received pilaralisib once daily (QD; starting dose 400 mg) for two 28-day cycles. Primary endpoints were safety and pharmacokinetics (PK). Exploratory endpoints were pharmacodynamics and efficacy. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were enrolled: Six patients received pilaralisib 400 mg QD and 12 patients received pilaralisib 600 mg QD. Two patients in the 600 mg QD cohort had dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) (one patient with Grade 3 maculopapular rash and one patient with Grade 3 generalized rash and Grade 4 lipase increased). The most frequently occurring treatment-related, treatment-emergent adverse events were decreased appetite (22 %), dry skin (22 %), nausea (22 %) and vomiting (22 %). In PK analyses, individual exposures observed with 600 mg tablet-E were within the range of data at steady state from previous studies of 400 mg tablet-A and 600 mg capsule-A. Five patients (28 %) had stable disease as best response. CONCLUSIONS: With pilaralisib tablet-E, the RP2D was 600 mg QD, drug exposure was similar to the 400 mg tablet-A and 600 mg capsule-A formulations, and safety was consistent with the known safety profile of pilaralisib.

A phase I study of two dosing schedules of oral BI 847325 in patients with advanced solid tumors.

PURPOSE: This study determined the safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics, and preliminary efficacy of BI 847325, an oral dual MEK and Aurora kinase inhibitor, in patients with refractory solid tumors. METHODS: This trial recruited patients with an advanced non-resectable and/or metastatic solid tumor following failure of conventional treatment (NCT01324830; 1287.1). BI 847325 was administered orally, once daily (starting at 6 mg in the first cohort) using two dosing schedules: Schedule A (2 weeks on, 1 week off) and Schedule B (three periods of 5 days on, 2 days off). The primary objective was to identify the MTD of BI 847325 for both dosing schedules. RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients (Schedule A, n = 47; Schedule B, n = 22) were treated. The MTD was 120 mg per day for Schedule A (cumulative dose of 1680 mg per 3-week cycle) and 150 mg per day for Schedule B (cumulative dose of 2250 mg per 3-week cycle). Reversible hematologic and gastrointestinal toxicities were the most common dose-limiting toxicities. One patient with esophageal cancer (receiving 160 mg BI 847325, Schedule A) experienced a partial response for 67 days, and 21 patients (n = 11 [23.4%], Schedule A; n = 10 [45.5%], Schedule B) had stable disease. Pharmacokinetic analyses showed at least bi-exponential disposition, with high inter-subject variability. There was no obvious relationship between markers of MEK or Aurora kinase inhibition and exposure to BI 847325 (exploratory analysis). CONCLUSIONS: This first-in-human trial suggests that BI 847325 has an acceptable safety profile. However, due to insufficient drug exposure at the MTD to achieve relevant MEK inhibition, a decision was taken to halt the development of BI 847325.