RESUMEN
DNA assays for viral load (VL) monitoring are key tools in the management of immunocompromised patients with cytomegalovirus (CMV) or Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection. In this study, the analytical and clinical performances of the NeuMoDx™ CMV and EBV Quant Assays were compared with artus CMV and EBV QS-RGQ Kits in a primary hospital testing laboratory. Patient plasma samples previously tested using artus kits were randomly selected for testing by NeuMoDx assays. The NeuMoDx CMV Quant Assay and artus CMV QS-RGQ Kit limits of detection (LoDs) are 20.0 IU/mL and 69.7 IU/mL, respectively; 33/75 (44.0%) samples had CMV DNA levels above the LoD of both assays. The Pearson correlation coefficient was 0.9503; 20 samples (60.6%) had lower NeuMoDx CMV quantification values versus the artus kit. The LoD of the NeuMoDx EBV Quant Assay and artus EBV QS-RGQ Kit are 200 IU/mL and 22.29 IU/mL, respectively; 16/75 (21.3%) samples had EBV DNA levels above the LoD of both assays. The Pearson correlation coefficient was 0.8990. EBV quantification values with the NeuMoDx assay were higher versus the artus kit in 15 samples (93.8%). In conclusion, NeuMoDx CMV and EBV Quant Assays are sensitive and accurate tools for CMV and EBV DNA VL quantification.
Asunto(s)
Citomegalovirus , Herpesvirus Humano 4 , Carga Viral , Virología , Herpesvirus Humano 4/fisiología , Citomegalovirus/fisiología , Carga Viral/instrumentación , Carga Viral/métodos , Virología/instrumentación , Virología/métodos , Límite de Detección , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/sangre , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/virología , Infecciones por Virus de Epstein-Barr/sangre , Infecciones por Virus de Epstein-Barr/virología , Técnicas de Laboratorio Clínico/instrumentación , Técnicas de Laboratorio Clínico/métodos , Técnicas de Laboratorio Clínico/normas , HumanosRESUMEN
The emergence of variants of SARS-CoV-2 has created challenges for the testing infrastructure. Although large-scale genome sequencing of SARS-CoV-2 has facilitated hospital and public health responses, access to sequencing facilities globally is variable and turnaround times can be significant, so there is a requirement for rapid and cost-effective alternatives. Applying a polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) approach enables rapid (<4 h) identification of SARS-CoV-2 lineages from nucleic acid extracts, through the presence or absence of a panel of defined of genomic polymorphisms. For example, the B.1.1.7 lineage ("UK", "Alpha", or "Kent" variant) is characterised by 23 mutations compared to the reference strain, and the most biologically significant of these are found in the S gene. We have developed a SARS-CoV-2 typing assay focused on five positions in the S gene (HV69/70, N501, K417, E484 and P681). This configuration can identify a range of variants, including all the "Variants of Concern" currently designated by national and international public health bodies. The panel has been evaluated using a range of clinical isolates and standardised control materials at four UK hospitals and shows excellent concordance with the known lineage information derived from full sequence analysis. The assay has a turnaround time of about three hours for a set of up to 24 samples and has been utilised to identify emerging variants in a clinical setting.
Asunto(s)
Prueba de Ácido Nucleico para COVID-19/métodos , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa Multiplex/métodos , SARS-CoV-2/genética , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificación , Genoma Viral/genética , Humanos , Técnicas de Amplificación de Ácido Nucleico/métodos , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple/genética , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Glicoproteína de la Espiga del Coronavirus/genética , Secuenciación Completa del Genoma/métodosRESUMEN
The COVID-19 pandemic has spread rapidly throughout the world. In the UK, the initial peak was in April 2020; in the county of Norfolk (UK) and surrounding areas, which has a stable, low-density population, over 3200 cases were reported between March and August 2020. As part of the activities of the national COVID-19 Genomics Consortium (COG-UK) we undertook whole genome sequencing of the SARS-CoV-2 genomes present in positive clinical samples from the Norfolk region. These samples were collected by four major hospitals, multiple minor hospitals, care facilities and community organizations within Norfolk and surrounding areas. We combined clinical metadata with the sequencing data from regional SARS-CoV-2 genomes to understand the origins, genetic variation, transmission and expansion (spread) of the virus within the region and provide context nationally. Data were fed back into the national effort for pandemic management, whilst simultaneously being used to assist local outbreak analyses. Overall, 1565 positive samples (172 per 100â000 population) from 1376 cases were evaluated; for 140 cases between two and six samples were available providing longitudinal data. This represented 42.6â% of all positive samples identified by hospital testing in the region and encompassed those with clinical need, and health and care workers and their families. In total, 1035 cases had genome sequences of sufficient quality to provide phylogenetic lineages. These genomes belonged to 26 distinct global lineages, indicating that there were multiple separate introductions into the region. Furthermore, 100 genetically distinct UK lineages were detected demonstrating local evolution, at a rate of ~2 SNPs per month, and multiple co-occurring lineages as the pandemic progressed. Our analysis: identified a discrete sublineage associated with six care facilities; found no evidence of reinfection in longitudinal samples; ruled out a nosocomial outbreak; identified 16 lineages in key workers which were not in patients, indicating infection control measures were effective; and found the D614G spike protein mutation which is linked to increased transmissibility dominates the samples and rapidly confirmed relatedness of cases in an outbreak at a food processing facility. The large-scale genome sequencing of SARS-CoV-2-positive samples has provided valuable additional data for public health epidemiology in the Norfolk region, and will continue to help identify and untangle hidden transmission chains as the pandemic evolves.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/patología , Genoma Viral , SARS-CoV-2/genética , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/virología , Análisis por Conglomerados , Brotes de Enfermedades , Ligamiento Genético , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Pandemias , Filogenia , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple , SARS-CoV-2/clasificación , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificación , Glicoproteína de la Espiga del Coronavirus/genética , Reino Unido/epidemiología , Secuenciación Completa del GenomaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The introduction of an HPV immunisation programme in England should result in a significant reduction in the prevalence of vaccine type infections in young women. Here we describe type-specific HPV prevalence in three samples of the young female population in England, prior to the beginning of mass immunisation in 2008. METHODS: Residual vulva-vaginal swab samples from females aged under 25 years undergoing chlamydia testing as part of the National Chlamydia Screening Programme (NCSP) or Prevention of Pelvic Infection (POPI) trial were collected from sites across England, together with available demographic and sexual behaviour data. Residual samples were screened for HPV infection using the Hybrid Capture 2 (hc2) HPV DNA Test, including the high-risk (HR) and low-risk (LR) probes. Hc2 positive samples were genotyped using the Roche Linear Array (LA) HPV Genotyping Test. RESULTS: A total of 3829 samples were included: 2369 from 16 to 24 year old NCSP participants, 275 from 13 to 15 year old NCSP participants and 1185 from 16 to 24 year old POPI participants. Variations in HPV prevalence between and within the different samples followed a pattern largely consistent with differences in sexual behaviour. The prevalence of total HR HPV infection, of HPV 16 and/or 18 (16/18) infection and of five HR HPV types closely related to HPV 16/18 (HPV 31, 33, 45, 52 or 58) amongst 16-24 year old NCSP participants was 35% (95% CI 33-37%), 18% (95% CI 16-19%), and 16% (95% CI 14-18%), respectively. Risk of HR HPV infection increased with age during the teen years and was higher in women who reported two or more sexual partners in the last year and in women with chlamydia infection. Approximately half of women with HPV 16/18 infection also had another non-vaccine HR HPV type present. CONCLUSIONS: Prior to HPV immunisation, there was a high prevalence of HPV infections in the lower genital tract of young, sexually active females in England. The overall, type-specific, and multiple infection prevalence closely reflected age and sexual activity. These data provide a baseline against which the early impact of HPV immunisation on the prevalence of HPV 16/18 and closely related types in young women can be measured, in order to inform immunisation and cervical screening policies.