Targeted use of postoperative discharge phone calls to reduce early readmission rates.

OBJECTIVES: Postoperative readmissions are common and costly. Office-initiated phone calls to patients shortly after discharge may identify concerns and allow for early intervention to prevent readmission. We sought to evaluate our 30-day readmission rate after the implementation of a standardized postoperative discharge phone call (PODPC) intervention, compared with a historical aggregated cohort. METHODS: From July 2020 to 21, postoperative patients were prospectively identified at 48 hour after discharge. Medical assistants performed PODPCs, administering a survey designed to identify medical/surgical issues that could signify a complication and warrant escalation to a nurse practitioner (NP) for further management. Demographics, comorbidities, and procedure type were obtained retrospectively. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate PODPC responses, frequency of escalation, readmission, and reasons. The electronic medical record identified a historical aggregated cohort (July 2018 to 2019) and the 30-day readmission rate. A χ2 analysis was used to compare readmission rates between the preintervention historical and PODPC intervention groups. Predictors of 30-day readmission were modeled with multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 411 PODPCs conducted, 106 patients (26%) reported not feeling well; having concerns. Eighty-four PODPCs (20%) triggered escalation to a NP; of these, 60 patients (71%) were counseled over the phone by an NP, 16 (19%) were brought into clinic, 6 (7%) were sent to the emergency department, and 2 (2%) did not answer the NP call. Of 411 patients, 17% (n = 68) were readmitted within 30 days. Comparatively, the historical aggregated cohort readmission rate was significantly higher at 28% (n = 346; P < .001). On multivariable analysis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (odds ratio [OR], 1.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-3.65; P = .046), and feeling run down; having difficulty with movement; needing assistance for most activities (OR, 3.94; 95% CI, 2.09-7.43; P < .0001) were predictive of 30-day readmission when controlling for procedure type. CONCLUSIONS: Although readmissions remained common (>15%), being in the intervention cohort was associated with a significantly lower readmission rate compared with the historical aggregated cohort. One-fifth of PODPCs identified a concern; however, >90% of these could be managed by an NP by phone or in clinic. This PODPC intervention holds promise as a viable mechanism for decreasing readmissions.

Symptomatic peripheral artery disease increases risk of perioperative mortality following open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

OBJECTIVE: Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is associated with worse survival following abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. However, little is known about the impact of PAD and sex on outcomes following open infrarenal AAA repair (OAR). METHODS: All elective open infrarenal AAA cases were queried from the Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative from 2003 to 2022. PAD was defined as history of non-cardiac arterial bypass, non-coronary percutaneous vascular intervention (PVI), or non-traumatic major amputation. Cohorts were stratified by sex and history of PAD. Multivariable logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models were constructed to assess the primary endpoints: 30-day and 5-year mortality, respectively. RESULTS: Of 4910 patients who underwent elective OAR, 3421 (69.7%) were men without PAD, 298 (6.1%) were men with PAD, 1098 (22.4%) were women without PAD, and 93 (1.9%) were women with PAD. Men with PAD had prior bypass (45%), PVI (62%), and amputation (6.7%). Women with PAD had prior bypass (32%), PVI (76%), and amputation (5.4%). Thirty-day mortality was significantly higher in men with PAD compared with men without PAD (4.4% vs 1.7%; P = .001) and in women with PAD compared with women without PAD (7.5% vs 2.4%; P = .01). After risk adjustment, when compared with men without PAD, women with PAD had nearly four times the odds of 30-day mortality (odds ratio, 3.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.55-9.64; P = .004) and men with PAD had almost three times the odds of 30-day mortality (odds ratio, 2.77; 95% CI, 1.42-5.40; P = .003). Five-year survival was 87.8% in men without PAD, 77.8% in men with PAD, 85% in women without PAD, and 76.2% in women with PAD (P < .001). After risk adjustment, only men with PAD had an increased hazard of death at 5 years (hazard ratio, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.07-2.17; P = .019) compared with men without PAD. CONCLUSIONS: PAD is a potent risk factor for increased perioperative mortality in both men and women following OAR. In women, this equates to nearly four times the odds of perioperative mortality compared with men without PAD. Future study evaluating risk/benefit is needed to determine if women with PAD reflect a high-risk cohort that may benefit from a more conservative OAR threshold for treatment.

Impact of COVID-19 on clinical outcomes of robotic retromuscular ventral hernia repair.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted the healthcare sector and forced hospitals to limit the number of elective procedures with the goal of reducing overcrowding of wards and thus viral transmission. Recent trends for ventral hernia repair have shifted towards retromuscular techniques, which normally require a longer length of stay. Therefore, the aim of this study is to investigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on clinical outcomes of robotic retromuscular ventral hernia repair (rRVHR). METHODS: Patients who underwent rRVHR up to 600 days before and after March 10, 2020, were included in this retrospective study and assigned to the pre- or post-COVID group depending on the date of their procedure. Pre-, intra-, and postoperative variables including patients' demographics, hernia characteristics, complications, and hernia recurrence were compared between both groups. RESULTS: 153 (46% female) and 141 (51% female) patients were assigned to the pre- and post-COVID groups respectively. Median age was statistically different between both groups [pre-COVID: 57 (48-68) vs. post-COVID 55 (42-64) years, p = 0.045]. Median hospital length of stay (LOS) was 0 day (0-1) in both groups, and same day discharge were 61% pre-pandemic and 70% post-pandemic (p = 0.09). Mean postoperative follow-up was 39.2 (4.1-93.6) months. In total, 26 pre-COVID patients had postoperative complications, out of which 7 were pulmonary complications, whereas 23 complications were recorded in the post-COVID group, with only 3 pulmonary complications (p = 0.88). Rate of surgical-site events was comparable between both groups, and no recurrences were recorded. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to describe the impact of the COVID-19 on rRVHR. Hospital LOS was comparable between both groups. Rates of medical and hernia specific complications were not altered by the pandemic.

Ligamentum teres cardiopexy for post vertical sleeve gastrectomy gastroesophageal reflux.

PURPOSE: Vertical sleeve gastrectomy (VSG) evolved in the early 2000s into the standalone weight loss procedure we see today. While numerous studies highlight VSG's durability for weight loss, and improvements co-morbidities such as type 2 diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease, patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) have been counseled against VSG due to the concern for worsening reflux symptoms. When considering anti-reflux procedures, VSG patients are unable to undergo traditional fundoplication due to lack of gastric cardia redundancy. Magnetic sphincter augmentation lacks long-term safety data and endoscopic approaches have undetermined longitudinal benefits. Until recently, the only option for patients with a history of VSG with medically refractory GERD has been conversion to roux en Y gastric bypass (RNYGB), however, this poses other risks including marginal ulcers, internal hernias, hypoglycemia, dumping syndrome, and nutritional deficiencies. Given the risks associated with conversion to RNYGB, we have adopted the ligamentum teres cardiopexy as an option for patients with intractable GERD following VSG. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted of patients who had prior laparoscopic or robotic VSG and subsequently GERD symptoms refectory to pharmacological management who underwent ligamentum teres cardiopexy between 2017 and 2022. Pre-operative GERD disease burden, intraoperative cardiopexy characteristics, post-operative GERD symptomatology and changes in H2 blocker or PPI requirements were reviewed. RESULTS: Of the study's 60 patients the median age was 50 years old, and 86% were female. All patients had a diagnosis of GERD through pre-operative assessments and were taking antisecretory medication. Of the 36 patients who have completed their one year follow up, 81% of patients had either a decrease in dosage or cessation of the antisecretory medication at one year following ligamentum teres cardiopexy. CONCLUSION: Ligamentum teres cardiopexy is a viable alternative to RNYGB in patients with a prior vertical sleeve gastrectomy with medical refractory GERD.

Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair: Lessons Learned From a 7-year Experience.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the outcomes of RVHR with varying prosthetic reinforcement techniques. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: As a recent addition to minimally invasive hernia repair, more data is needed to establish the long-term benefits of RVHR and to identify potential predictors of adverse outcomes. METHODS: Patients who underwent RVHR over a 7-year period were evaluated. Robotic intraperitoneal onlay mesh (rIPOM), transabdominal preperitoneal (rTAPP), Rives-Stoppa (rRS), and transversus abdominis release (rTAR) techniques were compared. The main outcomes were 90-day FFC, and 5-year FFR, depicted through Kaplan-Meier curves stratified by repair type and date. RESULTS: A total of 644 RVHRs were analyzed; 197 rIPOM, 156 rTAPP, 153 rRS, and 138 rTAR. There was a gradual transition from intraperitoneal to extraperitoneal mesh placement across the study period. Although rTAPP had the highest 90-day FFC (89.5%) it also had the lowest 5-year FFR (93.3%). Conversely, although rTAR demonstrated the lowest FFC (71%), it had the highest FFR (100%). Coronary artery disease, lysis of adhesions, incisional hernia, and skin-to-skin time (10 minutes. increment) were significant predictors of 90-day complications. Incisional hernia was the sole predictor of 5-year recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides an in-depth perspective of the largest series of RVHR. Based on this experience, rTAPP is no longer recommended due to its limited applicability and high recurrence rate. Both rIPOM and rRS offer encouraging short- and long-term outcomes, while rTAR is associated with the highest perioperative morbidity. Longer follow-up is needed to assess rTAR durability, despite a promising recurrence profile.

Hemoglobin A1c monitoring practices before lower extremity bypass in patients with diabetes vary broadly and do not predict outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) is used as a marker of glycemic control, but the role of HbA1c before lower extremity bypass (LEB) in patients with diabetes remains unclear. We sought to characterize patients with diabetes undergoing LEB with and without HbA1c monitoring and to determine if HbA1c monitoring practices correlate with better outcomes. METHODS: The Vascular Quality Initiative was queried for all LEB in patients with diabetes (2010-2020). Patients with diabetes were characterized based on therapy: diet-controlled, noninsulin medication use, or insulin use. Glycemic control was characterized by preoperative HbA1c within 6 months of surgery: unknown control (no HbA1c), well-controlled (HbA1c <7%), poorly-controlled (HbA1c 7%-10%), and uncontrolled (HbA1c >10%). Centers with >5 LEB/y were stratified into terciles according to rate of HbA1c monitoring. The unadjusted associations between glycemic control and in-hospital major adverse limb events, major adverse cardiac events, and mortality were assessed with univariate methods. The independent association of center-level HbA1c monitoring with 5-year survival and 3-year amputation-free survival (AFS) was determined with Kaplan-Meier analyses and Cox regression modeling, adjusted for differences in patient characteristics and center volume. RESULTS: Of 16,092 patients with diabetes undergoing LEB, 4055 (25%) did not have a documented HbA1c. Insulin use was less common in no A1c (48%) and well-controlled diabetes (39%) compared with poorly controlled (67%) and uncontrolled diabetes (78%) (P < .01). In univariate analyses, glycemic control was not associated with differences for in-hospital major adverse limb events, major adverse cardiac events, or mortality. Of 162 centers, HbA1c monitoring practices varied widely (range: 12.5%-100% of LEB). The 3-year AFS and 5-year survival were worse in the highest monitoring tercile vs the lowest (73.6% vs 77.3%, P < .01, 72.1% vs 77.5%, P < .01, respectively). On multivariable analyses, centers in the highest tercile of monitoring had the greatest hazard of AFS (hazard ratio: 1.21, 95% confidence interval: 1.1-1.3, P < .001) and overall mortality (hazard ratio: 1.19, 95% confidence interval: 1.1-1.3, P < 0.001), compared with the centers in the lowest tercile of monitoring. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with diabetes and no preoperative HbA1c monitoring do not have worse LEB outcomes compared with those with HbA1c monitoring. Preoperative HbA1c monitoring varies widely, suggesting broad differences in practice and documentation. Centers with the highest rates of monitoring demonstrated inferior outcomes, likely due to other confounding unmeasured variables. These findings indicate that HbA1c monitoring before LEB, unto itself, should not be used as a measure of surgical quality.

Learning curve of robotic transversus abdominis release in ventral hernia repair: a cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis.

BACKGROUND: Despite heightened interest in robotic transversus abdominis release (rTAR), concerns over its steep learning curve (LC) and associated challenges may limit its adoption. This study defines the operative time and morbidity-based LC of a single surgeon's experience with rTAR. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing rTAR over an 8-year period was conducted. Consecutive ventral and incisional hernia repairs were stratified into four sub-categories based on bilaterality and complexity, with complex hernias being defined as those > 10 cm. Cumulative sum analyses (CUSUM) were used to evaluate skin-to-skin time and morbidity LCs. RESULTS: This study included a total of 156 rTARs with a mean skin-to-skin time of 222.8 min. Mean skin-to-skin times (min) for sub-categories were as follows: unilateral non-complex (137.6), bilateral non-complex (206.8), unilateral complex (241.9), and bilateral complex (298.6). The CUSUM-LC was obtained by summing the differences between each procedure's operative time and its sub-category mean, revealing a quadratic best-fit line maximum at case 49 and a transition point between early and late phases at case 75. Although skin-to-skin times between early and late phases did not differ significantly (235.3 vs 211.2, respectively; p = 0.12), a significant difference was found in console times. Overall postoperative complications also decreased significantly from early to late phases (41.3% vs 25.9%; p = 0.041). Postoperative complications were predicted by a history of wound infection (c = 0.61). CONCLUSIONS: This study reveals that the rTAR LC was overcome between 49 and 75 cases, after which, console time and postoperative complications decreased significantly.

Learning curve of robot-assisted transabdominal preperitoneal (rTAPP) inguinal hernia repair: a cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis.

BACKGROUND: Robot-assisted transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (rTAPP-IHR) is a safe and feasible approach for hernias of varying etiology. We aim to present a single surgeon's learning curve (LC) of this technique based on operative times, while accounting for bilaterality and complexity. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort analysis of patients who underwent rTAPP-IHR over a period of 5 years. Patients who underwent primary, recurrent, and complex (previous posterior repair, previous prostatectomy, scrotal, incarcerated) repairs were included. Cumulative and risk-adjusted cumulative sum analyses (CUSUM and RA-CUSUM) were used to depict the evolution of skin-to-skin times and complications/surgical site events (SSEs) with time, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 371 patients were included in the study. Mean skin-to-skin times were stratified according to four subgroups: unilateral non-complex (46.8 min), unilateral complex (63.2 min), bilateral non-complex (70.9 min), and bilateral complex (102 min). A CUSUM-LC was then plotted using each procedures difference in operative time from its subgroup mean. The peak of the plot occurred at case number 138, which was used as a transition between 'early' and 'late' phases. The average operative time for the late phase was 15.9 min shorter than the early phase (p < 0.001). The RA-CUSUM, plotted using the weight of case complexity and unilateral/bilateral status, also showed decreasing SSE rates after the completion of 138 cases (early phase: 8.8% vs. late phase: 2.2%, p = 0.008). Overall complication rates did not differ significantly between the two phases. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that regardless of bilateral or complex status, rTAPP operative times and SSE rates gradually decreased after completing 138 procedures. Previous laparoscopic experience, robotic team efficiency, and surgical knowledge are important considerations for a surgeon's LC.

Computed tomography angiography-derived area stenosis calculations overestimate degree of carotid stenosis compared with North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial-derived diameter stenosis calculations.

OBJECTIVE: The degree of carotid artery stenosis, calculated using catheter-based angiography and the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) method, has been shown to predict the stroke risk in several, large, randomized controlled trials. In the present era, patients have been increasingly evaluated using computed tomography (CT) angiography (CTA) before carotid artery revascularization, especially as the use of transcarotid artery revascularization has increased. Interpretation of CTA findings regarding the degree of carotid stenosis has not been standardized, with both NASCET methods and the area stenosis used. We performed a single-institution, blinded, retrospective analysis of CTA studies using both the NASCET method and the CT-derived area stenosis to assess the concordance and discordance between the two methods when evaluating ≥70% and ≥80% stenosis. METHODS: The UMass Memorial Medical Center vascular laboratory database was queried for all carotid duplex ultrasound scans performed from 2008 to 2017. The included patients were limited to those with duplex-defined ≥70% stenosis (defined as a peak systolic velocity of ≥125 cm/s and an internal carotid artery/common carotid artery ratio of ≥4), and a correlative CTA study performed within 1 year of the duplex ultrasound examination. A blinded review of all correlative CTA studies using centerline measurements on a three-dimensional workstation (Aquarius iNtuition Viewer; Terarecon, Durham, NC) was performed to characterize the degree of carotid stenosis using the NASCET method and the area stenosis method. Patients were excluded if revascularization had been performed between the two imaging studies. RESULTS: Of the 37,204 carotid duplex ultrasound scans reviewed (performed from 2008 to 2017), 3480 arteries met the criteria for duplex ultrasound-defined ≥70% stenosis. A correlative CTA study within 1 year of the duplex ultrasound examination was identified in 460 arteries, of which 320 were adequate quality for blinded review. The median interval between the duplex ultrasound and CTA examinations was 9.5 days. Concordance between the area stenosis and NASCET methods was poor for both ≥70% (κ = 0.32) and ≥80% (κ = 0.25) stenosis. Of the 247 arteries considered to have ≥70% area stenosis, 127 (51.4%) were considered to have ≥70% stenosis using the NASCET method. Of the 169 arteries considered to have ≥80% area stenosis, 44 (26.0%) were considered to have ≥80% stenosis using the NASCET method. CONCLUSIONS: The area stenosis CTA calculations of carotid artery stenosis dramatically overestimated the degree of carotid stenosis compared with that calculated using the NASCET method. Given that stroke risk estimates have been determined from trials that used the NASCET method, the area stenosis method likely overestimates the risk of stroke. Therefore, area stenosis calculations could lead to unnecessary carotid revascularization procedures. This model highlights the need for standardized usage of the NASCET method when using CTA as the imaging modality to determine the threshold for carotid revascularization.

Preoperative functional status predicts 2-year mortality in patients undergoing fenestrated/branched endovascular aneurysm repair.

BACKGROUND: Fenestrated/branched endovascular aneurysm repair (F/BEVAR) is a minimally invasive alternative for patients at high risk of open repair of complex aortic aneurysms. Nearly all investigative study protocols evaluating F/BEVAR have required a predicted life expectancy of >2 years for study inclusion. However, accurate risk models for predicting 2-year survival in this patient population are lacking. We sought to identify the preoperative predictors of 2-year survival for patients undergoing F/BEVAR. METHODS: The prospectively collected data for all consecutive F/BEVAR procedures, performed in an institutional review board-approved registry and/or a physician-sponsored investigational device exemption (IDE) trial (IDE no. G130210), were reviewed (November 2010 to February 2019). We assessed 44 preoperative patient characteristics, including comorbidities, preoperative functional status, aneurysm morphologies, and repair techniques. Preoperative functional status was defined as totally dependent (any impairment in activities of daily living or residing in a skilled nursing facility), partially dependent (any impairment in instrumental activities of daily living), or independent (no impairment in activities of daily living or instrumental activities of daily living). Using the results of univariate analysis (P < .2), a Cox proportional hazards model was constructed to identify the independent predictors of 2-year all-cause mortality. RESULTS: For the 256 consecutive patients who had undergone F/BEVAR (6 common iliac [2.3%], 94 juxtarenal [41%], 35 pararenal [14%], 119 thoracoabdominal [47%], and 2 arch [0.8%] aneurysms), the 2-year mortality was 18%. On Cox modeling, the only independent preoperative predictor contributing to 2-year mortality was functional status (totally dependent: hazard ratio [HR], 5.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.8-16; P = .0024; partially dependent: HR, 4.5; 95% CI, 2.4-8.7; P < .0000019). A history of an implanted anti-arrhythmic device was protective (HR, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2-0.99; P = .0495). Factors such as age, congestive heart failure, chronic kidney disease, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, aneurysm extent, and previous aortic surgery, were not significant. The 2-year mortality for the independent (n = 176; 69%), partially dependent (n = 69; 27%), and totally dependent (n = 10; 3.9%) groups was 11%, 33%, and 40%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: For patients undergoing F/BEVAR, decreased preoperative functional status was the strongest predictor of 2-year mortality, with totally dependent patients experiencing poor survival. The traditional risk factors were not independently significant, perhaps reflecting the high prevalence of severe chronic illness in these high-risk patients participating in an IDE trial. For the independent patients, the 2-year F/BEVAR survival rate was 89%, equivalent to patient survival after infrarenal EVAR. Therefore, for independent patients, it would be reasonable to expand the indication for F/BEVAR to low-risk patients.

Evolution of fenestrated/branched endovascular aortic aneurysm repair complexity and outcomes at an organized center for the treatment of complex aortic disease.

BACKGROUND: Fenestrated/branched endovascular aneurysm repair (F/BEVAR) volume has increased rapidly, with favorable outcomes at centers of excellence. We evaluated changes over time in F/BEVAR complexity and associated outcomes at a single-center complex aortic disease program. METHODS: Prospectively collected data of all F/BEVAR (definition: requiring ≥1 fenestration/branch), procedures performed in an institutional review board-approved registry and/or physician-sponsored investigational device exemption trial (IDE# G130210), were reviewed (11/2010-2/2019). Patients were stratified by surgery date into thirds: early experience, mid experience, and recent experience. Patient and operative characteristics, aneurysm morphology, device types, perioperative and midterm outcomes (survival, freedom from type I or III endoleak, target artery patency, freedom from reintervention), were compared across groups. RESULTS: For 252 consecutive F/BEVARs (early experience, n = 84, mid experience, n = 84, recent experience, n = 84), 194 (77%) company-manufactured custom-made devices, 11 (4.4%) company-manufactured off-the-shelf devices, and 47 (19%) physician-modified devices, were used to treat 5 (2.0%) common iliac, 97 (39%) juxtarenal, 31 (12%) pararenal, 116 (46%) thoracoabdominal, and 2 (0.8%) arch aneurysms. All patients had follow-up for 30-day events. The mean follow-up time for the entire cohort was 589 days (interquartile range, 149-813 days). On 1-year Kaplan-Meier analysis, survival was 88%, freedom from type I or III endoleak was 91%, and target vessel patency was 92%. When stratified by time period, significant differences included aneurysm extent (thoracoabdominal, 33% early experience, 40% mid experience, and 64% recent experience; P < .001) and target vessels per case (four-vessel case, 31% early experience, 39% mid experience, and 67% recent experience; P < .0001). There was no difference, but a trend toward improvement, in composite 30-day events (early experience, 39%; mid experience, 23%; recent experience, 27%; P = .05). On Kaplan-Meier analysis, there was no difference in survival (P = .19) or target artery patency (P = .6). There were differences in freedom from reintervention (P < .01) and from type I or III endoleak (P = .02), with more reinterventions in the early experience, and more endoleaks in the recent period. CONCLUSIONS: Despite increasing repair complexity, there has been no significant change in perioperative complications, overall survival, or target artery patency, with favorable outcomes overall. Type I or III endoleaks remain a significant limitation, with increased incidence as the number of branch arteries incorporated into the repairs has increased.

Effect of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm extent on outcomes in patients undergoing fenestrated/branched endovascular aneurysm repair.

OBJECTIVE: The outcomes after open repair of thoracoabdominal aneurysms (TAAAs) have been definitively demonstrated to worsen as the TAAA extent increases. However, the effect of TAAA extent on fenestrated/branched endovascular aneurysm repair (F/BEVAR) outcomes is unclear. We investigated the differences in outcomes of F/BEVAR according to the TAAA extent. METHODS: We reviewed a single-institution, prospectively maintained database of all F/BEVAR procedures performed in an institutional review board-approved registry and/or physician-sponsored Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption trial (trial no. G130210). The patients were stratified into two groups: group 1, extensive (extent 1-3) TAAAs; and group 2, nonextensive (juxtarenal, pararenal, and extent 4-5) TAAAs. The perioperative outcomes were compared using the χ2 test. Kaplan-Meier analysis of 3-year survival, target artery patency, reintervention, type I or III endoleak, and branch instability (type Ic or III endoleak, loss of branch patency, target vessel stenosis >50%) was performed. Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to assess the independent effect of extensive TAAA on 1-year mortality. RESULTS: During the study period, 299 F/BEVAR procedures were performed for 87 extensive TAAAs (29%) and 212 nonextensive TAAAs (71%). Most repairs had used company-manufactured, custom-made devices (n = 241; 81%). Between the two groups, no perioperative differences were observed in myocardial infarction, stroke, acute kidney injury, dialysis, target artery occlusion, access site complication, or type I or III endoleak (P > .05 for all). The incidence of perioperative paraparesis was greater in the extensive TAAA group (8.1% vs 0.5%; P = .001). However, the incidence of long-term paralysis was equivalent (2.3% vs 0.5%; P = .20), with nearly all patients with paraparesis regaining ambulatory function. On Kaplan-Meier analysis, no differences in survival, target artery patency, or freedom from reintervention were observed at 3 years (P > .05 for all). Freedom from type I or III endoleak (P < .01) and freedom from branch instability (P < .01) were significantly worse in the extensive TAAA group. Cox proportional hazards modeling demonstrated that F/BEVAR for extensive TAAA was not associated with 1-year mortality (hazard ratio, 1.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.91-3.52; P = .13). CONCLUSIONS: Unlike open TAAA repair, the F/BEVAR outcomes were similar for extensive and nonextensive TAAAs. The differences in perioperative paraparesis, branch instability, and type I or III endoleak likely resulted from the increasing length of aortic coverage and number of target arteries involved. These findings suggest that high-volume centers performing F/BEVAR should expect comparable outcomes for extensive and nonextensive TAAA repair.

Lumbar drain complications in patients undergoing fenestrated or branched endovascular aortic aneurysm repair: Development of an institutional protocol for lumbar drain management.

OBJECTIVE: Lumbar drain placement with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage is an effective adjunct for reducing the risk of spinal cord ischemia in patients undergoing complex aortic aneurysm repair. However, lumbar drain placement is a challenging procedure with potential for significant complications. We sought to characterize complications of lumbar drain placement in a large, single-center experience of patients who underwent fenestrated or branched endovascular aneurysm repair (F/BEVAR). METHODS: All patients who underwent F/BEVAR and attempted lumbar drain placement from 2010 to 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. All lumbar drains were placed by four cardiovascular anesthesiologists who compose the complex aortic anesthesia team. Lumbar drain placement was guided by a set protocol and used whenever the aortic stent graft coverage was planned to extend more proximal than 40 mm above the celiac artery. Details relating to lumbar drain placement, management, and frequency and type of associated complications were characterized. RESULTS: During the study period, 256 patients underwent F/BEVAR, of whom 100 (39%) were planned for lumbar drain placement. Successful placement occurred in 98 (98%) of the cases. All lumbar drains were placed before induction of general anesthesia, using fluoroscopy guidance in 28 cases (28%). The most common level of placement was L4-5 (n = 42 [42%]). The majority (n = 82 [82%]) were left in place ≤48 hours; 21% were removed during the first 24 hours, and 61% were removed between 24 and 48 hours. Nonfunctionality was the most common complication, occurring in 16 (16%) patients. Catheter dislodgment or fracture, CSF leak, and postdural puncture headache were observed in 4 (4%), 7 (7%), and 4 (4%) patients, respectively. The most common bleeding complication was the presence of asymptomatic blood in the CSF (n = 11 [11%]), whereas subarachnoid hemorrhage combined with intraventricular hemorrhage occurred in three patients (3%); none of these patients required surgical drainage or intervention. No infectious complications were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Lumbar drain placement for CSF drainage is a commonly employed adjunct to prevent spinal cord ischemia in F/BEVAR. Our experience demonstrates that lumbar drain placement can be performed successfully but is associated with a significant rate of nonfunctionality and a diverse range of complications that, fortunately, do not commonly have significant long-term sequelae.

Impact of acute kidney injury on long-term outcomes after fenestrated and branched endovascular aortic aneurysm repair.

OBJECTIVE: Acute kidney injury (AKI) has been identified as a common complication after fenestrated and branched endovascular aneurysm repair (F/BEVAR), occurring in 5% to 29% of patients. Predictors of AKI and its impact on long-term outcomes remain unknown. We sought to identify independent predictors of AKI and its effect on long-term survival after F/BEVAR. METHODS: A single-institution retrospective review of all consecutive F/BEVAR procedures was performed (November 2010-September 2018). Data were collected prospectively through an Institutional Review Board-approved registry and a physician-sponsored investigational device exemption clinical trial (G130210). AKI was defined as a decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate by >30% from baseline, within 30 days postoperatively. The cohort was stratified according to whether a patient experienced AKI. Demographics, operative details, perioperative complications, and length of stay between groups were compared. The primary outcome, long-term survival, was assessed with Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards modeling. Independent predictors of AKI were identified using logistic regression. RESULTS: Among 219 consecutive F/BEVAR patients, AKI occurred in 41 patients (19%) and was the most common 30-day complication observed. Whereas preoperative creatinine concentration, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and target renal artery stenosis >50% did not predict AKI, the occurrence of intraoperative complications did correlate with AKI (37% vs 7.3%; P < .01). By 30 days, AKI resolved in 7 (17%) patients, persisted without need for dialysis in 26 (64%), and progressed to dialysis in 5 (12%); the remaining 3 (7%) patients died. Survival at 30 days was significantly lower in the AKI group (92.7% vs 98.9%; P = .047), and this difference persisted at 1 year (68% vs 87%; log-rank, P <.01) and 3 years (44% vs 60%; log-rank, P = .04). On multivariable modeling, AKI increased the hazard of death nearly twofold (hazard ratio, 1.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11-3.23; P = .019). Independent predictors of AKI on multivariable logistic regression were intraoperative complications (odds ratio, 4.10; 95% CI, 1.61-10.42; P < .01) and increased operating room time (odds ratio, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.22-2.00; P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: In our 8-year experience of F/BEVAR, AKI was the most common postoperative complication observed in nearly 20% of patients. AKI after F/BEVAR is associated with decreased short- and long-term survival. Whether AKI is causative or just associated with decreased survival remains to be elucidated. Further study is needed to determine whether the independent predictors of AKI, including intraoperative complications and operating room time, are generalizable across all centers performing F/BEVAR and to investigate how we might further mitigate this common and serious complication.

Creation and Institutional Validation of a Readmission Risk Calculator for Elective Colorectal Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Readmissions reflect adverse patient outcomes, and clinicians currently lack accurate models to predict readmission risk. OBJECTIVE: We sought to create a readmission risk calculator for use in the postoperative setting after elective colon and rectal surgery. DESIGN: Patients were identified from 2012-2014 American College of Surgery-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data. A model was created with 60% of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program sample using multivariable logistic regression to stratify patients into low/medium- and high-risk categories. The model was validated with the remaining 40% of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program sample and 2016-2018 institutional data. SETTINGS: The study included both national and institutional data. PATIENTS: Patients who underwent elective abdominal colon or rectal resection were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was readmission within 30 days of surgery. Secondary outcomes included reasons for and time interval to readmission. RESULTS: The model discrimination (c-statistic) was 0.76 ((95% CI, 0.75-0.76); p < 0.0001) in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program model creation cohort (n = 50,508), 0.70 ((95% CI, 0.69-0.70); p < 0.0001) in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program validation cohort (n = 33,714), and 0.62 ((95% CI, 0.54-0.70); p = 0.04) in the institutional cohort (n = 400). High risk was designated as ≥8.7% readmission risk. Readmission rates in National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and institutional data were 10.7% and 8.8% overall; of patients predicted to be high risk, observed readmission rate was 22.1% in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and 12.4% in the institutional cohorts. Overall median interval from surgery to readmission was 14 days in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and 11 days institutionally. The most common reasons for readmission were organ space infection, bowel obstruction/paralytic ileus, and dehydration in both the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and institutional data. LIMITATIONS: This was a retrospective observational review. CONCLUSIONS: For patients who undergo elective colon and rectal surgery, use of a readmission risk calculator developed for postoperative use can identify high-risk patients for potential amelioration of modifiable risk factors, more intensive outpatient follow-up, or planned readmission. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B284. CREACIÓN Y VALIDACIÓN INSTITUCIONAL DE UNA CALCULADORA DE RIESGO DE REINGRESO PARA CIRUGÍA COLORRECTAL ELECTIVE: Los reingresos reflejan resultados adversos de los pacientes y los médicos actualmente carecen de modelos precisos para predecir el riesgo de reingreso.Intentamos crear una calculadora de riesgo de readmisión para su uso en el entorno postoperatorio después de una cirugía electiva de colon y recto.Los pacientes que se sometieron a una resección electiva del colon abdominal o rectal se identificaron a partir de los datos del Programa Nacional de Mejora de la Calidad Quirúrgica (ACS-NSQIP) del Colegio Americano de Cirugia Nacional 2012-2014. Se creó un modelo con el 60% de la muestra NSQIP utilizando regresión logística multivariable para estratificar a los pacientes en categorías de riesgo bajo / medio y alto. El modelo fue validado con el 40% restante de la muestra NSQIP y datos institucionales 2016-2018.El estudio incluyó datos tanto nacionales como institucionales.El resultado primario fue el reingreso dentro de los 30 días de la cirugía. Los resultados secundarios incluyeron razones e intervalo de tiempo para el reingreso.La discriminación del modelo (estadística c) fue de 0,76 (IC del 95%: 0,75-0,76, p < 0,0001) en la cohorte de creación del modelo NSQIP (n = 50,508), 0,70 (IC del 95%: 0,69-0,70, p < 0,0001) en la cohorte de validación NSQIP (n = 33,714), y 0,62 (IC del 95%: 0,54-0,70, p = 0,04) en la cohorte institucional (n = 400). Alto riesgo se designó como > 8,7% de riesgo de readmisión. Las tasas de readmisión en NSQIP y los datos institucionales fueron del 10,7% y del 8,8% en general; de pacientes con riesgo alto, la tasa de reingreso observada fue del 22.1% en el NSQIP y del 12.4% en las cohortes institucionales. El intervalo medio general desde la cirugía hasta el reingreso fue de 14 días en NSQIP y 11 días institucionalmente. Las razones más comunes para el reingreso fueron infección del espacio orgánico, obstrucción intestinal / íleo paralítico y deshidratación tanto en NSQIP como en datos institucionales.Esta fue una revisión observacional retrospectiva.Para los pacientes que se someten a cirugía electiva de colon y recto, el uso de una calculadora de riesgo de reingreso desarrollada para el uso postoperatorio puede identificar a los pacientes de alto riesgo para una posible mejora de los factores de riesgo modificables, un seguimiento ambulatorio más intensivo o un reingreso planificado. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B284. (Traducción-Dr Yesenia Rojas-Khalil).

A comparison of clinical outcomes and costs between robotic and open ventral hernia repair.

BACKGROUND: As robotic ventral hernia repair(VHR) adoption increases, real-world evidence is needed to ensure appropriate utilization. METHODS: Data for open and robotic VHR(OVHR, RVHR) was retrospectively analyzed. Outcomes and costs were compared via inverse probability treatment weighting using propensity scores to estimate the average treatment effect on the treated for RVHR. RESULTS: 675 open and 609 robotic ventral hernia repairs were included. Demographics and hernia characteristics were comparable. Complications rates were lower in RVHR(p < 0.001). Clavien-Dindo grade-III complications were lower in RVHR(13.2% vs. 4.9%, p < 0.001). RVHR resulted in fewer surgical site events(21.5% vs. 12.2%, p < 0.001). Recurrence rates were greater in OVHR(8.9% vs. 2.8%, p < 0.001). The higher RVHR hospital costs (Δ = $2456, p = 0.005) were balanced by the lower post-discharge costs, compared to OVHR(Δ = $799, p = 0.023). Total costs did not differ(Δ = $1656 p = 0.081). CONCLUSION: Although hospital costs were higher, post-discharge expenses favored RVHR due to the lower postoperative complications, which lead to comparable total costs to OVHR.

Learning Curve of Multiport Robotic Cholecystectomy: A Cumulative Sum Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To establish the learning curve of multiport robotic cholecystectomy (MRC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing MRC was performed. A cumulative sum analysis helped define the learning curve through the evaluation of skin-to-skin (STS) time and postoperative complications rate. Direct comparison of variables was conducted between the phases. RESULTS: Two hundred forty-five MRC cases were included. Average STS and console times were 50.6 and 29.9 minutes, respectively. Cumulative sum analysis established 3 phases with inflection points at cases 84th and 134th. A significant decrease in STS time was observed between the phases. Middle and late phases encompassed patients with higher comorbidities. Two conversions to open were recorded in the early phase. Postoperative complication rates were comparable among the early (2.5%), middle (6.8%), and late (5.6%) phases ( P = 0.482). CONCLUSION: A steady decrease in STS time was observed across the 3 different phases established at the 84th and 134th patients.

Learning Curve of Single-site Robotic Cholecystectomy: A Cumulative Sum Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive surgery has significantly improved cosmesis and clinical outcomes after either laparoscopic or robotic cholecystectomy. In an effort to minimize the number of incisions in multiport procedures, single-site approaches have been developed. However, single-site robotic cholecystectomy (SSRC) can be technically challenging for novice surgeons. The goal of this study is to establish the learning curve (LC) of SSRC through an assessment of operative times and clinical outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing SSRC over a period of 5 years was performed. Consecutive cholecystectomy cases were assessed based on the procedure setting (elective vs. emergent). Cumulative sum analysis were used to establish the LC through an evaluation of the skin-to-skin (STS) time and postoperative complications rate. Afterward, a direct comparison was performed between the established phases. RESULTS: This study included a total of 259 SSRCs with an overall mean STS time of 41.1 minutes. Elective cases took on average of 38.8 minutes, whereas emergent cases spanned over 60.5 minutes ( P= 0.005). The cumulative sum-LC was obtained by summing the differences between each procedure's STS time, revealing a quadratic best-fit line maximum and an inflection point between the early and late phases at case 91. A significant difference between STS time was seen between the early and late phases (53.8 vs. 30.0 min, P< 0.0001). There were no significant differences in terms of postoperative complications between the 2 phases. Incisional hernia rates were comparable between the 2 phases (early: 4.4% vs. late: 2.5%, P< 0.461). CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest study to assess the LC of SSRC through operative time and clinical outcomes. A steady decrease in STS time was observed during the completion of the first 91 consecutive cases.

Trends in General Surgery Operative Experience Obtained by Integrated Vascular Surgery Residents.

OBJECTIVE: When the integrated vascular surgery training pathway was introduced, training was comprised of nearly equal amounts of core general surgery and vascular surgery experience. However, specific requirements for case numbers or types were not defined. Over time, the time spent on core general surgery requirements has been reduced, most recently in 2018, from 24 to 18 months. We sought to determine trends in general surgery case volume and type over the past 10 years for vascular surgery residents. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education case log data for integrated vascular surgery graduates from 2012-2018. We evaluated trends in mean numbers of cases, categorized as general surgery open (GS-open), general surgery laparoscopic (GS-laparoscopic), vascular surgery open (VS-open), and vascular surgery endovascular (VS-endo). Cases were also categorized by anatomic region as head/neck, thoracic, or abdominal. RESULTS: The mean number of total head/neck, thoracic, or abdominal cases logged by graduating integrated vascular surgery trainees was 263.5. This total, as well as the proportion of general surgery cases (35%-38%, p = 0.99) has remained constant over time. The type of general surgery cases has changed significantly, with an upward trend in the mean number of GS-open cases and downward trend in mean GS-laparoscopic cases (GS-open p = 0.006, GS-laparoscopic p = 0.048). Among head/neck and thoracic subgroups, no significant changes were observed, while in the abdominal subgroup, there has been a significant increase in GS-open over time (p = 0.005). Additionally, the number of open vascular abdominal aortic cases has remained stable, with an average of 36.82 per graduating trainee per year. CONCLUSIONS: In the 10 years since the introduction of integrated vascular surgery programs, total case volume and proportion of general surgery cases have remained remarkably stable. The type of general surgery cases has shifted though, with a decrease in GS-laparoscopic cases, replaced primarily by open abdominal cases. These changes likely reflect integrated vascular residents actively seeking out these opportunities during their core rotations and a willingness by general surgery partners to provide these opportunities. At the program level, these data may help guide program directors' choices about the specific core rotations they incorporate into their curriculum. At the national level, this information may contribute to future discussions regarding the optimal number of core general surgery rotation requirements.

Learning Curve of Robotic Rives-Stoppa Ventral Hernia Repair: A Cumulative Sum Analysis.

Background: Robotic Rives-Stoppa ventral hernia repair (rRS-VHR) is a minimally invasive technique that incorporates extraperitoneal mesh placement, using either transabdominal or totally extraperitoneal access. An understanding of its learning curve and technical challenges may guide and encourage its adoption. We aim at evaluating the rRS-VHR learning curve based on operative times while accounting for adverse outcomes. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients undergoing rRS repair for centrally located ventral and incisional hernias. A single surgeon operative time-based cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis learning curve was created, and a composite outcome was used for risk-adjusted CUSUM (RA-CUSUM). Results: Eighty-one patients undergoing rRS-VHR were included. A learning curve was created by using skin-to-skin times. Accordingly, patients were grouped into three phases. The mean skin-to-skin time was 72.2 minutes, and there was a significant decrease in skin-to-skin times throughout the learning curve (Phase-I: 86.4 minutes versus Phase-III: 63.8 minutes; P = .001), with a gradual decrease after 29 cases. Eleven patients experienced adverse composite outcomes, which were used to create a RA-CUSUM graph. Results showed the highest adverse outcome rates in Phase-II, with a gradual decrease in risk-adjusted operative times after 51 cases. Conclusions: Consistently decreasing operative times and adverse outcome rates in rRS-VHR was observed after the completion of 29 and 51 cases, respectively. Future studies that provide group learning curves for this procedure can deliver more generalizable results in terms of its performance rates.