Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 11 de 11
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Cardiol Young ; 29(9): 1137-1142, 2019 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31337447

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Recurrent aortic arch obstruction following the Norwood procedure is recognised as an important complication. Balloon arch angioplasty is associated with a high recoarctation rate. METHODS: We sought to evaluate the prevalence and outcome of stent implantation for recoarctation in children following Norwood or Damus-Kaye-Stansel procedure over the past decade at a single national cardiology centre. RESULTS: Of 114 children who underwent Norwood procedure or Damus-Kaye-Stansel procedure between January 2003 and June 2013, 80 patients survived. Of these 15 children underwent stent implantation for recoarctation. Six of these patients had previous balloon angioplasty. The median age at stent implantation was 4.4 months (range 2-82 months). The median peak aortic arch gradient at catheterisation decreased from 26mmHg (range 10-70mmHg) to 2mmHg (range 0-20mmHg). The median luminal diameter increased from 4.7 mm (range 3.2-7.9 mm) to 8.6 mm (range 6.2-10.9 mm). The median coarctation index increased by 0.49 (range = 0.24-0.64). A Valeo stent was employed in 11 children, a Palmaz Genesis stent in 2 patients, a MultiLink stent in 1 child, and a Jomed covered stent in 1 child. Two factors were associated with the need for stent placement: previous arch angioplasty (p valve < 0.001, χ-square 11.5) and borderline left ventricle (p = 0.04, χ-square = 4.1). Stent migration occurred in one child. There were two deaths related to poor right ventricular systolic function and severe tricuspid regurgitation. Six patients underwent redilation of the stent with no complications. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of recurrent aortic arch obstruction following Norwood/Damus-Kaye-Stansel procedure was 18%. Stent implantation is safe and reliably eliminates the aortic obstruction. Redilation can be successfully achieved to accommodate somatic growth or development of stent recoarctation.


Asunto(s)
Angioplastia de Balón/métodos , Aorta Torácica/cirugía , Coartación Aórtica/cirugía , Predicción , Procedimientos de Norwood/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Stents , Angiografía , Coartación Aórtica/diagnóstico , Coartación Aórtica/etiología , Cateterismo Cardíaco , Preescolar , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Recurrencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Prevención Secundaria/métodos
2.
Ann Emerg Med ; 67(5): 593-601.e3, 2016 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26460983

RESUMEN

STUDY OBJECTIVE: In acute exacerbations of asthma in children, corticosteroids reduce relapses, subsequent hospital admission, and the need for ß2-agonist bronchodilators. Prednisolone is the most commonly used corticosteroid, but prolonged treatment course, vomiting, and a bitter taste may reduce patient compliance. Dexamethasone has a longer half-life and has been used safely in other acute pediatric conditions. We examine whether a single dose of oral dexamethasone is noninferior to prednisolone in the emergency department (ED) treatment of asthma exacerbations in children, as measured by the Pediatric Respiratory Assessment Measure (PRAM) at day 4. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, open-label, noninferiority trial comparing oral dexamethasone (single dose of 0.3 mg/kg) with prednisolone (1 mg/kg per day for 3 days) in patients aged 2 to 16 years and with a known diagnosis of asthma or at least 1 previous episode of ß2-agonist-responsive wheeze who presented to a tertiary pediatric ED. The primary outcome measure was the mean PRAM score (range of 0 to 12 points) performed on day 4. Secondary outcome measures included requirement for further steroids, vomiting of study medication, hospital admission, and unscheduled return visits to a health care practitioner within 14 days. RESULTS: There were 245 enrollments involving 226 patients. There was no difference in mean PRAM scores at day 4 between the dexamethasone and prednisolone groups (0.91 versus 0.91; absolute difference 0.005; 95% CI -0.35 to 0.34). Fourteen patients vomited at least 1 dose of prednisolone compared with no patients in the dexamethasone group. Sixteen children (13.1%) in the dexamethasone group received further systemic steroids within 14 days after trial enrollment compared with 5 (4.2%) in the prednisolone group (absolute difference 8.9%; 95% CI 1.9% to 16.0%). There was no significant difference between the groups in hospital admission rates or the number of unscheduled return visits to a health care practitioner. CONCLUSION: In children with acute exacerbations of asthma, a single dose of oral dexamethasone (0.3 mg/kg) is noninferior to a 3-day course of oral prednisolone (1 mg/kg per day) as measured by the mean PRAM score on day 4.


Asunto(s)
Antiasmáticos/administración & dosificación , Antiinflamatorios/administración & dosificación , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Vías Clínicas , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Prednisolona/administración & dosificación , Enfermedad Aguda , Administración Oral , Adolescente , Asma/fisiopatología , Niño , Niño Hospitalizado , Preescolar , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Esquema de Medicación , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Prehosp Emerg Care ; 20(1): 52-8, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26024309

RESUMEN

Pain is the most common symptom in the emergency setting and remains one of the most challenging problems for emergency care providers, particularly in the pediatric population. The primary objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of acute pain in children attending emergency departments (EDs) in Ireland by ambulance. In addition, this study sought to describe the prehospital and initial ED management of pain in this population, with specific reference to etiology of pain, frequency of pain assessment, pain severity, and pharmacological analgesic interventions. A prospective cross-sectional study was undertaken over a 12-month period of all pediatric patients transported by emergency ambulance to four tertiary referral hospitals in Ireland. All children (<16 years) who had pain as a symptom (regardless of cause) at any stage during the prehospital phase of care were included in this study. Over the study period, 6,371 children attended the four EDs by emergency ambulance, of which 2,635 (41.4%, 95% confidence interval 40.2-42.3%) had pain as a documented symptom on the ambulance patient care report (PCR) form. Overall 32% (n = 856) of children who complained of pain were subject to a formal pain assessment during the prehospital phase of care. Younger age, short transfer time to the ED, and emergency calls between midnight and 6 am were independently associated with decreased likelihood of having a documented assessment of pain intensity during the prehospital phase of care. Of the 2,635 children who had documented pain on the ambulance PCR, 26% (n = 689) received some form of analgesic agent prior to ED arrival. Upon ED arrival 54% (n = 1,422) of children had a documented pain assessment and some form of analgesic agent was administered to 50% (n = 1,324). Approximately 41% of children who attend EDs in Ireland by ambulance have pain documented as their primary symptom. This study suggests that the management of acute pain in children transferred by ambulance to the ED in Ireland is currently poor, with documentary evidence of only 26% receiving prehospital analgesic agents.


Asunto(s)
Analgesia/métodos , Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Dimensión del Dolor , Dolor/epidemiología , Adolescente , Ambulancias , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Irlanda/epidemiología , Masculino , Prevalencia , Estudios Prospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
4.
Neuromodulation ; 19(8): 832-837, 2016 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27310062

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Tinnitus is the perception of sound in the absence of an external auditory stimulus. It is widely believed that tinnitus, in patients with associated hearing loss, is a neurological phenomenon primarily affecting the central auditory structures. However, there is growing evidence for the involvement of the somatosensory system in this form of tinnitus. For this reason it has been suggested that the condition may be amenable to bi-modal stimulation of the auditory and somatosensory systems. We conducted a pilot study to investigate the feasibility and safety of a device that delivers simultaneous auditory and somatosensory stimulation to treat the symptoms of chronic tinnitus. METHODS: A cohort of 54 patients used the stimulation device for 10 weeks. Auditory stimulation was delivered via headphones and somatosensory stimulation was delivered via electrical stimulation of the tongue. Patient usage, logged by the device, was used to classify patients as compliant or noncompliant. Safety was assessed by reported adverse events and changes in tinnitus outcome measures. Response to treatment was assessed using tinnitus outcome measures: Minimum Masking Level (MML), Tinnitus Loudness Matching (TLM), and Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI). RESULTS: The device was well tolerated by patients and no adverse events or serious difficulties using the device were reported. Overall, 68% of patients met the defined compliance threshold. Compliant patients (N = 30) demonstrated statistically significant improvements in mean outcome measures after 10 weeks of treatment: THI (-11.7 pts, p < 0.001), TLM (-7.5dB, p < 0.001), and MML (-9.7dB, p < 0.001). The noncompliant group (N = 14) demonstrated no statistical improvements. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the feasibility and safety of a new bi-modal stimulation device and supports the potential efficacy of this new treatment for tinnitus.


Asunto(s)
Estimulación Acústica/métodos , Estimulación Física/métodos , Acúfeno/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proyectos Piloto , Acúfeno/fisiopatología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
5.
Stroke ; 43(8): 2042-7, 2012 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22693134

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The World Health Organization has emphasized the importance of international population-based data for unbiased surveillance of stroke incidence and outcome. To date, few such studies have been conducted using recommended gold-standard ascertainment methods. We conducted a large, population-based stroke study in Dublin, Ireland. METHODS: Using gold-standard ascertainment methods, individuals with stroke and transient ischemic attack occurring over a 12-month period (December 1, 2005-November 30, 2006) in North Dublin were identified. Disability was assessed using the modified Rankin score and stroke severity (<72 hours) by the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. Stroke-related deaths were confirmed by review of medical files, death certificates, pathology, and coroner's records. Crude and standardized (to European and World Health Organization standard populations) rates of incidence, risk factors, severity, and early outcome (mortality, case-fatality, disability) were calculated, assuming a Poisson distribution for the number of events. RESULTS: Seven hundred one patients with new stroke or transient ischemic attack were ascertained (485 first-ever stroke patients, 83 recurrent stroke patients, 133 first-ever transient ischemic attack patients). Crude frequency rates (all rates per 1000 person-years) were: 1.65 (95% CI, 1.5-1.79; first-ever stroke), 0.28 (95% CI, 0.22-0.35; recurrent stroke), and 0.45 (95% CI, 0.37-0.53; first-ever transient ischemic attack). Age-adjusted stroke rates were higher than those in 9 other recent population-based samples from high-income countries. High rates of subtype-specific risk factors were observed (atrial fibrillation, 31.3% and smoking, 29.1% in ischemic stroke; warfarin use, 21.2% in primary intracerebral hemorrhage; smoking, 53.9% in subarachnoid hemorrhage; P<0.01 for all compared with other subtypes). Compared with recent studies, 28-day case-fatality rates for primary intracerebral hemorrhage (41%; 95% CI, 29.2%-54.1%) and subarachnoid hemorrhage (46%; 95% CI, 28.8%-64.5%) were greater in Dublin. CONCLUSIONS: Using gold-standard methods for case ascertainment, we found high incidence rates of stroke in Dublin compared with those in similar high-income countries; this is likely explained in part by high rates of subtype-specific risk factors.


Asunto(s)
Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/terapia , Anciano , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Fibrilación Atrial/epidemiología , Isquemia Encefálica/complicaciones , Isquemia Encefálica/epidemiología , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Femenino , Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Hipertensión/complicaciones , Hipertensión/epidemiología , Renta , Irlanda/epidemiología , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/epidemiología , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/terapia , Masculino , Proyectos Piloto , Distribución de Poisson , Población , Factores de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
6.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30820336

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: District-level hospitals (DLHs) can play an important role in the delivery of essential surgical services for rural populations in sub-Saharan Africa if adequately prepared and supported. This article describes the protocol for the evaluation of the Scaling up Safe Surgery for District and Rural Populations in Africa (SURG-Africa) project which aims to strengthen the capacity in district-level hospitals (DLHs) in Malawi, Tanzania and Zambia to deliver safe, quality surgery. The intervention comprises a programme of quarterly supervisory visits to surgically active district-level hospitals by specialists from referral hospitals and the establishment of a mobile phone-based consultation network. The overall objective is to test and refine the model with a view to scaling up to national level. METHODS: This mixed-methods controlled pilot trial will test the feasibility of the proposed supervision model in making quality-assured surgery available at DLHs. Firstly, the study will conduct a quantitative assessment of surgical service delivery at district facilities, looking at hospital preparedness, capacity and productivity, and how these are affected by the intervention. Secondly, the study will monitor changes in referral patterns from DLHs to a higher level of care as a result of the intervention. Data on utilisation of the mobile based-support network will also be collected. The analysis will compare changes over time and between intervention and control hospitals. The third element of the study will involve a qualitative assessment to obtain a better understanding of the functionality of DLH surgical systems and how these have been influenced by the intervention. It will also provide further information on feasibility, impact and sustainability of the supervision model. DISCUSSION: We seek to test a model of district-level capacity building through regular supervision by specialists and mobile phone technology-supported consultations to make safe surgical services more accessible, equitable and sustainable for rural populations in the target countries. The results of this study will provide robust evidence to inform and guide local actors in the national scale-up of the supervision model. Lessons learned will be transferred to the wider region.

7.
Eur J Emerg Med ; 24(6): 450-454, 2017 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26982205

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Acute pain is the most common symptom in the emergency setting and its optimal management continues to challenge prehospital emergency care practitioners, particularly in the paediatric population. Difficulty in establishing vascular access and fear of opiate administration to small children are recognized reasons for oligoanalgesia. Intranasal fentanyl (INF) has been shown to be as safe and effective as intravenous morphine in the treatment of severe pain in children in the Emergency Department setting. AIM: This study aimed to describe the clinical efficacy and safety of INF when administered by advanced paramedics in the prehospital treatment of acute severe pain in children. METHODS: A 1-year prospective cross-sectional study was carried out of children (>1 year, <16 years) who received INF as part of the prehospital treatment of acute pain by the statutory national emergency medical services in Ireland. RESULTS: Ninety-four children were included in the final analysis [median age 11 years (interquartile range 7-13)]; 53% were males and trauma was implicated in 86% of cases. A clinically effective reduction in the pain score was found in 78 children [83% (95% confidence interval: 74-89%)]. The median initial pain rating score was 10. Pain assessment at 10 min after INF administration indicated a median pain rating of 5 (interquartile range 2-7). No patient developed an adverse event as a result of INF. DISCUSSION: INF at a dose of 1.5 µg/kg appears to be a safe and effective analgesic in the prehospital management of acute severe pain in children and may be an attractive alternative to both oral and intravenous opiates.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Agudo/tratamiento farmacológico , Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificación , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Fentanilo/administración & dosificación , Dimensión del Dolor , Administración Intranasal , Factores de Edad , Niño , Preescolar , Intervalos de Confianza , Estudios Transversales , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Lactante , Irlanda , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Resultado del Tratamiento
8.
Pediatr Infect Dis J ; 35(1): 19-24, 2016 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26379160

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In several countries, respiratory syncytial virus prophylaxis is offered to late preterm infants who are at escalated risk of respiratory syncytial virus hospitalization (RSVH). However, targeted prophylaxis should be informed by country-specific data. This study, which uniquely includes 36 weeks of gestational age (GA) infants, aims to establish the risk factors for RSVH in 32-36 weeks of GA infants in Ireland. METHODS: A prospective observational study at 13 hospitals of laboratory-confirmed RSVH in nonprophylaxed 32-36 weeks of GA infants was conducted from July 2011 to February 2014. Baseline and first-year clinical data were analyzed by using SPSS software Version 22 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY). Significant (P < 0.05) variables were entered into multiple logistic regression to determine the independent risk factors for RSVH. RESULTS: Sixty-three percent of eligible infants (1825 of 2877) were recruited. The RSVH rate was 3.6% (65 of 1807 analyzed infant records). There was no RSV-attributable mortality. Twelve infants required intensive care. Of the 15 variables correlating to RSVH, 5 independent risk factors were identified: older siblings [odds ratio (OR): 3.8; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.97-7.41], being Caucasian (OR: 2.3; 95% CI: 1.04-5.29), neonatal respiratory morbidity (OR: 2.2; 95% CI: 1.28-3.94); birth July 15 to December 15 (OR: 2.1; 95% CI: 1.09-3.92) and family history of asthma (OR: 1.9; 95% CI: 1.01-3.39). Birth from 36 weeks to 36 + 6 days mitigated RSVH risk (relative risk: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.34-0.99); however, risk factors were similar to the 32-35 weeks of GA cohort. CONCLUSION: Neonatal respiratory morbidity or being Caucasian were the population-specific independent risk factors for RSVH in 32-36 weeks of GA in Ireland, whereas the other identified independent risk factors mirrored those established in previous studies.


Asunto(s)
Hospitalización , Recien Nacido Prematuro , Infecciones por Virus Sincitial Respiratorio/epidemiología , Infecciones por Virus Sincitial Respiratorio/virología , Virus Sincitial Respiratorio Humano , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Irlanda/epidemiología , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo
9.
BMJ Open ; 6(1): e009350, 2016 Jan 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26729384

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: In clinical practice, it is difficult to distinguish between patients with refractory asthma from those with poorly controlled asthma, where symptoms persist due to poor adherence, inadequate inhaler technique or comorbid diseases. We designed an audio recording device which, when attached to an inhaler, objectively identifies the time and technique of inhaler use, thereby assessing both aspects of adherence. This study will test the hypothesis that feedback on these two aspects of adherence when passed on to patients improves adherence and helps clinicians distinguish refractory from difficult-to-control asthma. METHODS: This is a single, blind, prospective, randomised, clinical trial performed at 5 research centres. Patients with partially controlled or uncontrolled severe asthma who have also had at least one severe asthma exacerbation in the prior year are eligible to participate. The effect of two types of nurse-delivered education interventions to promote adherence and inhaler technique will be assessed. The active group will receive feedback on their inhaler technique and adherence from the new device over a 3-month period. The control group will also receive training in inhaler technique and strategies to promote adherence, but no feedback from the device. The primary outcome is the difference in actual adherence, a measure that incorporates time and technique of inhaler use between groups at the end of the third month. Secondary outcomes include the number of patients who remain refractory despite good adherence, and differences in the components of adherence after the intervention. Data will be analysed on an intention-to-treat and a per-protocol basis. The sample size is 220 subjects (110 in each group), and loss to follow-up is estimated at 10% which will allow results to show a 10% difference (0.8 power) in adherence between group means with a type I error probability of 0.05. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01529697; Pre-results.


Asunto(s)
Antiasmáticos/administración & dosificación , Retroalimentación , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Nebulizadores y Vaporizadores , Administración por Inhalación , Antiasmáticos/uso terapéutico , Asma , Equipos y Suministros Eléctricos , Electrónica , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Proyectos de Investigación , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Método Simple Ciego
10.
J Burn Care Res ; 36(1): 159-66, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25185932

RESUMEN

Skin grafts are used to treat many types of skin defects in children, including burns, traumatic wounds, and revision of scars. The objective of this prospective randomized controlled trial was to compare the effectiveness of three dressing types for pediatric donor sites: foam, hydrofiber, and calcium alginate. Children attending a pediatric Burns & Plastics Service from October 2010 to March 2013, who required a split-skin graft, were recruited to the trial. Patients were randomly assigned to the two experimental groups, foam or hydrofiber, and to the control group, calcium alginate. Data were gathered on the management of exudate, assessment of pain, time to healing, and infection. Fifty-seven children aged 1 to 16 years (mean = 4.9 years) were recruited to the trial. Fifty-six patients had evaluable data and one participant from the control group was lost to follow-up. Most children required skin grafting for a burn injury (78%). The median size of the donor site was 63.50 cm (8-600 cm). There was a statistically significant difference in time to healing across the three dressing groups (x [2, n = 56] = 6.59, P = .037). The calcium alginate group recorded a lower median value of days to healing (median = 7.5 days) compared to the other two groups, which recorded median values of 8 days (hydrofiber) and 9.5 days (foam). The greatest leakage of exudate, regardless of dressing type, occurred on day 2 after grafting. No statistically significant difference was found in leakage of exudate, pain scores, or infection rates across the three groups. Calcium alginate emerged as the optimum dressing for pediatric donor site healing in this trial.


Asunto(s)
Alginatos/uso terapéutico , Carboximetilcelulosa de Sodio/uso terapéutico , Poliuretanos/uso terapéutico , Trasplante de Piel , Sitio Donante de Trasplante , Heridas y Lesiones/terapia , Adolescente , Vendajes , Materiales Biocompatibles , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Ácido Glucurónico/uso terapéutico , Hemostáticos/uso terapéutico , Ácidos Hexurónicos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Cicatrización de Heridas , Heridas y Lesiones/etiología , Heridas y Lesiones/patología
11.
J Heart Lung Transplant ; 34(6): 806-14, 2015 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25701372

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: No data are available for the outcome of children undergoing cardiac transplantation with shared care programs in different countries. We sought to investigate the outcome of a shared care transplant program between 2 countries given the complex immunologic, cardiac, and psychologic needs of these young people. METHODS: We investigated the results of a shared care program for children who underwent cardiac transplantation between our center in the Republic of Ireland and 2 centers in the United Kingdom over 2 decades. RESULTS: Between 1990 and 2013, 22 patients underwent 23 cardiac transplants. The median age at transplant was 3.2 years (range, 0.3-13.3 years), median age at listing was 30 months (range, 0.1-13.3 years), and the median waiting list time was 2.8 months (range, 0.3-14 months). The median time to return to the referral center from the time of transplant was 3 weeks (range, 2-8 weeks). The referral center treated 4 of 5 late rejection episodes. Angiography was undertaken in the transplant center at annual or biannual review. Outcomes for rejection, coronary vasculopathy, and survival were comparable between the referral and transplant centers. CONCLUSIONS: This report of shared care for pediatric transplant patients between 2 sovereign nations demonstrates good results, with comparable outcomes to the specialist transplant center. These data may encourage liberalization of follow-up in other centers.


Asunto(s)
Atención a la Salud/organización & administración , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/mortalidad , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/cirugía , Trasplante de Corazón , Servicios Hospitalarios Compartidos/organización & administración , Cooperación Internacional , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Rechazo de Injerto/epidemiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Irlanda , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Reino Unido
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA