Gut microbiota signatures and clinical manifestations in celiac disease children at onset: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Recent researches have shown an altered gut microbiota in celiac disease (CD) patients compared with healthy controls (HCs). This study aims to evaluate the composition of the microbiota of CD children at onset and the relationship between bacterial abundances and symptoms. METHODS: Celiac disease patients were consecutively enrolled at a pediatric unit referring for suspected CD. HCs were also included in the study. Stool and duodenal samples were collected and evaluated by a high taxonomic fingerprint microbiota array. RESULTS: Thirty-seven subjects enrolled: 21 CD patients and 16 HCs. Fourteen subjects were male (38%). The mean age was 75 months (standard deviation 31.5) for CD patients and 71 months (standard deviation 34.9) for HCs. Duodenal microbiota of CD patients showed a dominance of Enterobacteriaceae and subdominance of Bacteroidetes/Streptococcus. Stool microbiota showed a lower abundance of Bacteroides-Prevotella (P = 0.013), Akkermansia (P = 0.002), and Staphylococcaceae (P = 0.001) in CD patients compared with HC. At symptoms level, an increased mean relative abundance of Bacillaceae and Enterobaeriaceae in patients with abdominal pain (P = 0.007 and P = 0.010) was found. CD patients with diarrhea had reduced mean relative abundance of Clostridium cluster XIVa (P = 0.044) and Akkermansia (P = 0.033) and an increase in Bacillaceae (P = 0.048) and Fusobacterium (P = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS: Gut microbiota of CD children at disease onset is different from that of HC. Pro-inflammatory microbiota imbalances were associated with CD symptoms. Further studies are needed to assess whether dysbiosis is associated with CD early onset and symptoms.

Antibiotic Use in Very Low Birth Weight Neonates After an Antimicrobial Stewardship Program.

There is insufficient data regarding antimicrobial stewardship (AS) and outcomes of very low birth weight (VLBW) neonates after AS programs. This observational, retrospective study addressed AS and outcomes of VLBW neonates admitted to an Italian level-three center. Two periods were compared: (i) baseline, before AS (January 2011-December 2012) and (ii) intervention, after AS (January 2016-December 2017). Between these two periods, procedures were put in place to inform medical and nursing staff regarding AS. There were 111 and 119 VLBW neonates in the baseline (6744 live births) and in the intervention period (5902 live births), respectively. The number of infants exposed to antibiotics (70%) during the hospital stay did not change, but the total days of therapy (DOT, median 12 vs. 5) and DOT/1000 patient days (302 vs. 215) decreased in the intervention period (p < 0.01), as well as the median duration of first antibiotic treatment (144 vs. 48 h, p < 0.01). A re-analysis of single cases of culture-proven or culture-negative sepsis failed to demonstrate any association between deaths and a delay or insufficient antibiotic use in the intervention period. In conclusion, AS is feasible in preterm VLBW neonates and antibiotic use can be safely reduced.