Does the Application of Topical Vancomycin Reduce Surgical Site Infections in Spine Surgery? A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections (SSIs) represent a major challenge in spine surgery, leading to severe morbidity, mortality, and increased costs. The local application of antibiotics, particularly vancomycin, has emerged as a potential strategy. Individual randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have disagreed about the efficacy of topical vancomycin in preventing SSIs after spine surgery, and so a meta-analysis that pools data from those RCTs might be helpful to inform clinicians' decisions on the topic. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: This meta-analysis of RCTs asked: Does intrawound topical vancomycin reduce the risk of (1) SSIs, (2) deep SSIs, and (3) superficial SSIs in patients undergoing spine surgery? METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar (pages 1-20) were searched up through March 13, 2024 (search performed on March 13, 2024). Inclusion criteria consisted of English or non-English-language RCTs comparing the implementation of topical vancomycin in spine surgery to its nonuse and assessing its efficacy in preventing SSI, while exclusion criteria consisted of nonrandomized comparative studies, single-arm noncomparative studies, comparative studies based on national databases or from the same center as other included studies, studies posted to preprint servers, studies reporting incomplete/nonrelevant outcomes, and studies adding another SSI preventive measure. The studies were assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Heterogeneity was evaluated by Q tests and I2 statistics. We used a random-effects model when considerable heterogeneity was observed (all SSIs, deep SSIs); otherwise, a fixed-effects model was used (all SSIs subanalysis, superficial SSIs). Furthermore, the fragility index was calculated for each of the assessed outcomes when there was no difference between the two groups to assess how many patients were needed to experience the outcomes for a difference to become present. The studied outcomes were the risks of SSIs, deep SSIs, and superficial SSIs. Deep SSIs were defined by the included trials as SSIs underneath the fascia, otherwise they were considered superficial. Six RCTs representing a total of 2140 patients were included, with 1053 patients in the vancomycin group and 1087 in the control group. Using an alpha of 0.05, our meta-analysis had 80% power to detect a risk difference of 1.5% for the primary outcome between patients who did and did not receive vancomycin. The age of the patients in the vancomycin group ranged from 37 to 52 years, while the age in the control group ranged from 34 to 52 years. The surgical procedures consisted of both instrumented and noninstrumented spinal procedures. Overall, the risk of bias in the included studies was either low or unclear, with none of the studies having a high risk of bias in any of the assessed categories (selection bias, performance bias, detection bias, attrition bias, and reporting bias). RESULTS: We found no difference in the risk of SSI between the vancomycin and control groups (3.0% [32 of 1053] versus 3.9% [42 of 1087], relative risk 0.74 [95% CI 0.35 to 1.57]; p = 0.43). Ten additional patients (4.8% infection risk) in the control group would need to experience an SSI for a difference to be observed between the two groups. We found no difference in the risk of deep SSI between the vancomycin and control groups (1.8% [15 of 812] versus 2.7% [23 of 860], relative risk 0.69 [95% CI 0.24 to 2.00]; p = 0.50). Seven additional patients (3.5% infection risk) in the control group would need to experience a deep SSI for a difference to be observed between the two groups. We found no difference in the risk of superficial SSI between the vancomycin and control groups (1.0% [6 of 620] versus 1.4% [9 of 662], relative risk 0.68 [95% CI 0.25 to 1.89]; p = 0.46). Seven additional patients (2.4% infection risk) in the control group would need to experience a superficial SSI for a difference to be observed between the two groups. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis of randomized trials examining use of topical vancomycin in spine surgery failed to show efficacy in reducing infection, and thus we do not recommend routine use of topical vancomycin for this indication. Future large-scale trials would be needed if surgeons believe that between-group differences smaller than those for which we were powered here (this meta-analysis had 80% power to detect a between-group difference of 1.5% in infection risk) are clinically important, and large database surveys may be informative in terms of assessing for postoperative adverse events associated with the use of vancomycin powder. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, therapeutic study.

What Is the Epidemiology of Cervical and Thoracic Spine Fractures?

BACKGROUND: Vertebral fractures are associated with enduring back pain, diminished quality of life, as well as increased morbidity and mortality. Existing epidemiological data for cervical and thoracic vertebral fractures are limited by insufficiently powered studies and a failure to evaluate the mechanism of injury. QUESTION/PURPOSE: What are the temporal trends in incidence, patient characteristics, and injury mechanisms of cervical and thoracic vertebral fractures in the United States from 2003 to 2021? METHODS: The United States National Electronic Injury Surveillance System-All Injury Program (NEISS-AIP) database collects data on all nonfatal injuries treated in US hospital emergency departments and is well suited to capture epidemiological trends in vertebral fractures. As such, the NEISS-AIP was queried from 2003 to 2021 for cervical and thoracic fractures. The initial search by upper trunk fractures yielded 156,669 injuries; 6% (9900) of injuries, with a weighted frequency of 638,999 patients, met the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 62 ± 25 years and 52% (334,746 of 638,999) of patients were females. Descriptive statistics were obtained. Segmented regression analysis, accounting for the year before or after 2019 when the NEISS sampling methodology was changed, was performed to assess yearly injury trends. Multivariable logistic regression models with age and sex as covariates were performed to predict injury location, mechanism, and disposition. RESULTS: The incidence of cervical and thoracic fractures increased from 2.0 (95% CI 1.4 to 2.7) and 3.6 (95% CI 2.4 to 4.7) per 10,000 person-years in 2003 to 14.5 (95% CI 10.9 to 18.2) and 19.9 (95% CI 14.5 to 25.3) in 2021, respectively. Incidence rates of cervical and thoracic fractures increased for all age groups from 2003 to 2021, with peak incidence and the highest rate of change in individuals 80 years or older. Most injuries occurred at home (median 69%), which were more likely to impact older individuals (median [range] age 75 [2 to 106] years) and females (median 61% of home injuries); injuries at recreation/sports facilities impacted younger individuals (median 32 [3 to 96] years) and male patients (median 76% of sports facility injuries). Falls were the most common injury mechanism across all years, with females more likely to be impacted than males. The proportion of admissions increased from 33% in 2003 to 50% in 2021, while the proportion of treated and released patients decreased from 53% to 35% in the same period. CONCLUSION: This epidemiological study identified a disproportionate increase in cervical and thoracic fracture incidence rates in patients older than 50 years from 2003 to 2021. Furthermore, high hospital admission rates were also noted resulting from these fractures. These findings indicate that current osteoporosis screening guidelines may be insufficient to capture the true population at risk of osteoporotic fractures, and they highlight the need to initiate screening at an earlier age. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, prognostic study.

Open Versus Percutaneous Fixation of Trigger Finger: Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes.

PURPOSE: With variable and conflicting results to date, it remains unclear whether the percutaneous or open surgical A1 pulley release technique is superior regarding safety and efficacy. The goal of this meta-analysis was to compare the two techniques. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar (pages 1-20) were searched through August 2023. Eight randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria and were included in this meta-analysis. RESULTS: Of the eight included studies and 548 total patients, there were 278 subjects in the percutaneous release group and 270 subjects in the open release group. There was no significant difference between the two surgical techniques in postoperative rates of revision, complications, or pain. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis found no significant difference between open and percutaneous techniques regarding the need for revision procedures, complications, or postoperative pain. Therefore, both open and percutaneous releases are appropriate. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic I.

Enhanced Risk of 90-Day Medical and 2-Year Implant Related Complications in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Patients with Osteoporosis.

BACKGROUND: As the average age of patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty (SA) increases, the frequency of SA patients with osteoporosis is expected to rise. While the effects of osteoporosis have been described in the broader orthopedic literature, it is presently unclear how osteoporosis affects SA postoperative medical and implant-related outcomes. METHODS: A multicenter database TriNetX was queried for patients between 2011-2021 who underwent SA with and without osteoporosis. Patients with less than 2-years of follow-up and those with a prior shoulder hemiarthroplasty were excluded. Primary outcomes included 2-year periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), prosthesis dislocation, periprosthetic fracture, and revision surgery. Secondary outcomes included 90-day medical complications and readmissions. Osteoporotic and control patient cohorts were propensity matched in a 1:1 ratio. RESULTS: 7,842 patients were included after matching in each cohort. Baseline demographic variables were similar between groups, except osteoporotic patients had a lower BMI (28.6 vs 31.0 kg/m2; p < 0.001). Osteoporotic patients undergoing SA were more likely to experience wound disruptions, stroke, pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, myocardial infarction, anemia, pneumonia, renal failure, transfusion, and readmission within 90 days after surgery. At 2 years postoperative, osteoporotic SA patients experienced an elevated risk of mechanical loosening, PJI, dislocation, periprosthetic fracture, and required revision surgery at a higher rate than control patients. CONCLUSIONS: Osteoporotic patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty are at greater risk for medical complications within the 90-day peri-operative period as well as implant-related complications within 2 years of surgery. Patients and surgeons should be aware of the potential higher risk of complications in osteoporotic patients following SA, and further investigation into benefits of preoperative management and treatment of osteoporosis is necessary.

Reverse Versus Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis with Intact Cuff: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty (TSA, RSA) have surged in popularity in recent years. While RSA is Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved for cases of rotator cuff tear arthropathy, indications have expanded to include, among others, primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis (GHOA). METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar (pages 1-20) were queried through November 2023. Inclusion criteria consisted of studies that compared the utility of TSA to that of RSA for the treatment of GHOA with intact rotator cuff with respect to adverse events, patient-reported outcomes, and range of motion. The ROBINS-I tool was used to assess the risk of bias in the included non-randomized studies, and Review Manager 5.4 was used for statistical analysis. P-values <0.05 were deemed significant. RESULTS: Fourteen studies met the above inclusion criteria. Twelve studies reported adverse outcomes, with the RSA group having a lower rate of complications (odds-ratio=0.54, p=0.004) and reoperations (odds-ratio=0.31, p<.001) relative to TSA at an average follow-up of 3.4 years. Four studies reported SPADI and UCLA scores, while five reported SST scores. These studies showed superior SPADI (p=0.040), UCLA(p=0.006), and SST(p=0.040) scores among the RSA group. No significant differences were seen with regards to other patient reported outcomes. Ten studies reported on range of motion, and the RSA group had a significantly lower external rotation relative to the TSA group (p<.001) while other range of motion parameters did not show statistically significant differences. CONCLUSION: The present study provides support for RSA as a reasonable surgical option for patients with GHOA and an intact rotator cuff, with lower rates of adverse events and better outcomes relative to TSA, although at the expense of decreased external rotation. Patient education and counseling is key in order to decide optimal treatment as part of a shared decision-making process, as well as setting appropriate expectations.

Chronic Anticoagulation in Patients Who Have Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Outpatient Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Matched Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Patients who have atrial fibrillation frequently require long-term anticoagulation with warfarin or a direct-acting oral anticoagulant (DOAC), such as apixaban or rivaroxaban, to avoid vascular complications. However, the impact of anticoagulant use on postoperative complications following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in an outpatient setting has not been thoroughly elucidated. The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of anticoagulant use on early postoperative complications among atrial fibrillation patients undergoing outpatient TKA. METHODS: An insurance claims database was queried to identify all patients who underwent outpatient TKA between January 2010 and April 2022. There were two cohorts of patients, with associated 1:1 matched controls, who had atrial fibrillation and filled a prescription of either warfarin (N = 4,396) or DOAC (N = 5,383) for at least 30 days. The mean age was 70 years (range, 51 to 84 years) and 47.9% were women in the warfarin cohort, while the mean age was 70 years and 49.2% were women in the DOAC cohort. Postoperative 30-day medical and 90-day surgical complications were subsequently compared. RESULTS: Patients on warfarin had a higher incidence of pulmonary embolism (1.1 versus 0.2%, P < 0.001) and a lower incidence of TKA revision (0.1 versus 0.4%, P = 0.003) than matched controls. Similarly, patients on DOACs exhibited a higher incidence of pneumonia (1.4 versus 0.6%, P < 0.001) and myocardial infarction (3.2 versus 1.5%, P < 0.001) and a lower incidence of wound dehiscence (0.1 versus 0.5%, P < 0.001), joint infection (0.4 versus 0.9%, P = 0.002), and TKA revision (0.1 versus 0.4%, P = 0.002) than matched controls. CONCLUSIONS: Atrial fibrillation patients on long-term anticoagulants undergoing outpatient TKA experience higher rates of medical complications and lower rates of surgical complications than matched controls. Thus, patients on long-term anticoagulants may be considered for outpatient TKA, but should be counseled appropriately on associated medical risks.

Should my recommendation letter be written by artificial intelligence?

SummaryLetters of recommendation are increasingly important for the residency match. We assessed whether an artificial intelligence (AI) tool could help in writing letters of recommendation by analyzing recommendation letters written by 3 academic staff and AI duplicate versions for 13 applicants. The preferred letters were selected by 3 blinded orthopedic program directors based on a pre-determined set of criteria. The first orthopedic program director selected the AI letter for 31% of applicants, and the 2 remaining program directors selected the AI letter for 38% of applicants, with the staff-written versions selected more often by all of the program directors (p < 0.05). The first program director recognized only 15% of the AI-written letters, the second was able to identify 92%, and the third director identified 77% of AI-written letters (p < 0.05).

Platelet rich plasma therapy versus other modalities for treatment of plantar fasciitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Plantar fasciitis (PF) is the most common cause of heel pain in adults. There are numerous non-operative treatments available including platelet rich plasma (PRP) injections. PPR has demonstrated effectiveness for a range of musculoskeletal conditions including plantar fasciitis. PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of PRP to other conservative treatment options for the management of PF. METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed and Google Scholar was performed for randomized control trials (RCT) comparing PRP to other treatment modalities. Studies met inclusion criteria if mean and standard deviations for visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, plantar fascia thickness (PFT), Foot Function Index (FFI), or American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Score were reported. Mean differences (MD) were used to compare VAS pain, PFT, FFI, and AOFAS between PRP and other treatments. RESULTS: Twenty-one RCTs which altogether included 1356 patients were included in the meta-analysis. PRP demonstrated significantly greater improvements in VAS pain scores compared to extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) (SMD: 0.86; CI: [0.30, 1.41]; p = 0.002), corticosteroid injections (CSI) (SMD: 1.08; CI: [0.05, 2.11]; p = 0.04), and placebo (SMD: 3.42; CI: [2.53, 4.31]; p < 0.00001). In terms of FFI, no significant differences existed among PRP, ESWT, CSI, dextrose prolotherapy (DPT), and meridian trigger points (MTP) in enhancing foot functionality. However, PRP demonstrated a marked advantage over phonophoresis, showing a substantial improvement in FFI scores (SMD: 3.07, 95% CI: 2.34-3.81). PRP did not demonstrate superiority over ESWT, CSI, or MTP for improving PFT, but it was notably more effective than phonophoresis (SMD: 3.18, 95% CI: 2.43-3.94). PRP demonstrated significantly greater improvements in AOFAS scores over CSI (SMD: 3.31, CI: [1.35, 5.27], p = 0.0009) and placebo (SMD: 3.75; CI: [2.81, 4.70]; p < 0.00001). CONCLUSION: PRP is more effective than CSI, ESWT, and placebo in reducing VAS and more effective than CSI and placebo in improving AOFAS. PRP did not demonstrate a consistent advantage across all outcome measures, such as PFT and FFI. These findings underscore the complexity of PF treatment and call for a more standardized approach to PRP preparation and outcome measurement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I Meta-Analysis.

Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using banana-shaped and straight cages: meta-analysis of clinical and radiological outcomes.

PURPOSE: Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) surgery rate increased over the last decade. There is no consensus about the better shape of cage to use in TLIF. This meta-analysis was conducted to compare the shape focusing on bony union, lordosis restoration as well as perioperative complications. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar (page 1-20) were searched till September 2022. The clinical outcomes consisted of the bony union, segmental and lumbar lordosis restoration, quality of life, and operation-related outcomes. RESULTS: Only 5 studies were included in this meta-analysis. Straight-shaped cages tended to have a lower subsidence rate compared to banana-shaped cages (p = 0.10), had a better restoration of segmental lordosis (p < 0.0001), better disc height restoration (p = 0.01), as well as a higher Oswestry Disability Index decrease (p = 0.0002). CONCLUSION: Straight-shaped cages had a better restoration of lumbar lordosis, disc height, and a lower subsidence rate when compared to banana-shaped cages. This may be explained by the absence of the optimal placement of the curved cages, which is at the most anterior part of the disc space. Better conducted randomized controlled trial could strengthen these findings.

Analysis of systemic risk factors between diabetic/vascular patients having primary lower limb amputations and re-amputations.

Background: Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) are known to be predisposed to many complications in the lower extremities such as neuropathy, peripheral artery disease (PAD) and infection. Diabetic foot ulcers are complications of diabetes that can lead to lower extremity amputations, re-amputations and high mortality rates.Purpose: The aim of this study is to evaluate the risk factors associated with higher re-amputation rates in diabetic foot disease.Research Design: This is a mono-centric retrospective comparative study.Study Sample: the study included 136 patients, with a total of 193 procedures (111 primary amputations and 82 re-amputations) between 2011 and 2021.Data Analysis: The t-student test and Spearman correlation were used to look for mean differences and any relevant association, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was computed to look for independent variables.Results: Twenty-two (27%) and 60 (50%) of those who had major and minor amputations, respectively, had a re-amputation (p = 0.006). Besides diabetes (89%), the commonest risk factor associated with amputation was hypertension (86.7%), be it for primary amputation or re-amputation, followed by peripheral (PAD) and coronary artery diseases. Only three risk factors showed independent correlation with re-amputation; chronic kidney disease (r = 15%, p = 0.03), smoking (r = 15%, p = 0.03), and simultaneous presence of DM + PAD (r = 13.7%, p = 0.05).Conclusions: Factors that were significantly correlated with increased re-amputation rates have a clear pathologic pathway that affects vascularity and wound healing. Further studies should be aimed at developing a clear scoring system that can be used to stratify patient for re-amputation risk, and to better predict the results according to the severity of diabetes.

Patient genetic heterogeneities acting as indicators of post-operative pain and opioid requirement in orthopedic surgery: A systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Orthopedic surgical procedures are expected to increase annually, making it imperative to understand the correlations between patient genetic makeup and post-operative pain levels. METHODS: We performed a systematic literature review using PubMed and Cochrane databases in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A total of 299 articles were initially selected, 20 articles remained after title and abstract review, and nine articles were selected for inclusion upon full text review. RESULTS: Genetic risk factors identified included the A allele of the 5HT2A gene single nucleotide polymorphism, the AA genotype of the ADRB2 gene, the CG genotype of the IL6 gene, the genotypes CT and TT of the NTRK1 gene, genotypes AA and GA of the OPRM gene, and the AA and GA genotypes of the COMT gene. Additional studies in the review discuss statistical significance of other variants of the COMT gene. CONCLUSION: There have been genetic association studies performed on the patient heterogeneity and its relationship on patient pain levels, but more data need to be collected to understand the clinical utility of stratifying patients based on genomic sequence.

Osteoporosis in the setting of knee arthroplasty: a narrative review.

Patients undergoing knee replacement, which is mainly indicated in severe osteoarthritis, are frequently co-affected by osteoporosis and osteopenia. With a prevalence standing at around 20% in patients receiving knee arthroplasty, osteoporosis could lead to poor outcomes postoperatively. Some of these complications include periprosthetic fractures and an increased revision rate. Antiresorptive medications have been shown to be beneficial postoperatively. However, no studies have been conducted on whether they had any benefits if given preoperatively. Surgical management may also be beneficial, but this area remains full of controversy.

Approaches in Anterior Column Support in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis was conducted to compare anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) in terms of postoperative complications, improvement in radiographic parameters, and patient-reported outcomes. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar (pages 1-20) databases were searched up to June 2023. The studied outcomes were the rate of rod failures, rod failures requiring revision surgery, all complications, all revision surgeries, the change in pelvic tilt, sacral slope, Cobb angle, lumbar lordosis (LL), sagittal vertical axis, the postoperative pelvic incidence-LL, and LL, and the improvement in back pain and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). RESULTS: Six studies were included in this meta-analysis. ALIF showed higher postoperative lordosis (P = 0.003) and better improvement in ODI (P = 0.0001). No difference was seen in the remaining outcomes between ALIF and TLIF. CONCLUSIONS: Although ALIF had better improvement in ODI, the mean difference was 6.5 points, which is below the minimal clinically important difference, stripping this result of any clinical value. Furthermore, even though ALIF had better postoperative lordosis, the change in LL postoperatively was not different between ALIF and TLIF. With no difference in complications, sagittal and coronal alignment, and patient-reported outcomes, TLIF was shown in this study to be favored instead of ALIF in adult spinal deformity surgery to avoid all the double approach-related comorbidity.

Hybrid vs all pedicle screws constructs in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a metaanalysis of clinical and radiological outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) affects around 1 to 3% of young individuals, leading to spinal deformities typically exceeding a Cobb angle of 10 degrees without congenital or neuromuscular causes. Advances in treatment now include various surgical techniques such as posterior fusion utilizing all-pedicle screw constructs or hybrid constructs. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar (pages 1-20) were searched up until February 2024. Comparative studies in which the cohort was separated into two groups (HC and PSC) were included. Data consisting of, surgery-related outcomes, sagittal radiographic outcomes, coronal radiographic outcomes, and patient-reported outcomes, was extracted and compared. RESULTS: Twenty-eight studies including 3435 patients were included. Higher rates of complications (Odds-Ratio = 1.99, p < 0.00001) and reoperations (Odds-Ratio = 2.82, p < 0.00001) were seen in the hybrid group. Better radiographic coronal correction was seen in the PSC group in both the major curve (Mean Difference = 5.97, p < 0.00001) and the secondary curve (Mean Difference = - 10.73, p < 0.0001). However, restoration of sagittal alignment was better in the HC group when assessing thoracic kyphosis (Mean Difference = 2.97, p = 0.02) and lumbar lordosis (Mean Difference = 3.17, p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: While all-pedicle screw constructs demonstrated greater stability in AIS compared to hybrid constructs, resulting in reduced rates of reoperations and complications, as well as improved correction of major and secondary curves, they were unable to fully restore optimal sagittal alignment.

Hip Labral Repair versus Reconstruction: Meta-analysis.

The purpose of this meta-analysis is to compare the postoperative outcomes and complications of labral repair with those of labral reconstruction. An electronic search strategy was conducted from 1986 until August 2023 using the following databases: PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar (pages 1-20). The primary objectives included the postoperative clinical outcomes determined by the number of patients who reached minimal clinical important difference (MCID) on the visual analog scale (VAS), modified Harris hip score (mHHS), Hip Outcome Score-Sports Subscale (HOS-SS), Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Life (HOS-ADL), and International Hip Outcome Tool-12 (iHOT-12). In addition, analysis of the rate of revision arthroscopy, the rate of conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA), the postoperative VAS, mHHS, HOS-SS, HOS-ADL, iHOT-12, nonarthritic hip score (NAHS), patient satisfaction, lower extremity function scale (LEFS), and the SF-12 (12-item shortform) was also performed. Any differences arising between the investigators were resolved by discussion. Seventeen studies were relevant to the inclusion criteria and were included in this meta-analysis. A higher rate of patients who reached MCID in the mHHS (P=0.02) as well as a higher rate of revision arthroscopy was observed for labral repair (P=0.03). The remaining studied outcomes were comparable. Despite the greater predictability of success in the reconstruction group, conduct of additional studies will be required for evaluation of the benefits of such findings. In addition, labral reconstruction is more technically demanding than a labral repair.

Platelet-Rich Plasma vs Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy in the Treatment of Plantar Fasciitis at 3-6 Months: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

BACKGROUND: Plantar fasciitis (PF) is a common foot disorder with variability in treatment strategy. Two effective management techniques include platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections and extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT). The purpose of this meta-analysis is to compare the effectiveness of PRP vs ESWT in the management of PF. METHODS: A systematic search was performed of PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar for randomized controlled trials comparing PRP to ESWT. Studies met inclusion criteria if mean and SDs for visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores and plantar fascia thickness (PFT) were reported. Mean differences were used to compare VAS pain score and PFT between PRP and ESWT. RESULTS: Six randomized controlled trials, comparing a total of 214 subjects in the PRP group and 218 subjects in the ESWT group, were analyzed. A significantly greater statistical improvement was seen in the PRP group in VAS pain (mean difference = -0.67 [95% CI -1.16, -0.18], P = .007) and plantar fascia thickness (PFT) (mean difference = -0.56 [95% CI -0.77, -0.35], P < .001). CONCLUSION: PRP had a statistically higher pain reduction than ESWT, but the difference does not reach clinical significance in this meta-analysis.

Gabapentinoid prescriptions for neuropathic and musculoskeletal pain in Lebanon.

Aim: The purpose of this study is to analyze the different characteristics of gabapentinoids prescription by Lebanese orthopedics surgeons. Methods: This is an observational, cross-sectional study using a survey which was carried out in collaboration with the Lebanese Orthopedic Society over a 3-month period. Results: Forty-two orthopedic surgeons responded, most of them prescribing gabapentinoids in their daily practice with only half of the patients feeling relief after taking them. Furthermore, most of the surgeons prescribed these drugs for patients above 18 years old and for both acute and chronic pain. Conclusion: Even though almost half of the patients do not experience relief after taking gabapentinoids, these drugs are becoming more and more prescribed.

With pain being a major concern in orthopedic surgery, a lot of surgeons prescribe drugs before surgical procedures for their patients. One of these drugs categories include Gabapentinoids. This class of medications was shown to be prescribed more and more by orthopedic surgeons despite it not granting successful pain relief for half of the patients and not being US FDA approved.

The Efficacy of Bone Wax in Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Objectives: This meta-analysis was conducted to study the hemostatic efficacy of bone wax in total joint arthroplasty (TJA) defined in this manuscript as total knee arthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar (page 1-20), and Scopus were searched updated to November 2023. Only comparative studies were included. The clinical outcomes evaluated were the transfusion rate, total blood loss, and the loss of hemoglobin on day 1, 3, and 5 post-operatively. Results: Only 3 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in this meta-analysis. Bone wax was associated with a reduced transfusion rate (p=0.01), reduced total blood loss (p=0.001), and a decrease in hemoglobin loss on day 1 (p<0.00001), day 3 (p<0.0001), and day 5 (p<0.00001) after the surgery. Conclusion: Bone wax reduced the rate of transfusion, total blood loss, and hemoglobin loss after the surgery. This may induce a reduction the cost of correcting post-operative anemia as well as decrease hospital stay and improving functional outcomes in patients undergoing TJA. Better-conducted randomized controlled studies and cost-effectivity studies could strengthen these findings.

Hip Strengthening After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review.

Objectives: As the population is growing older, incidence of knee osteoarthritis is largely increasing and the rate total knee arthroplasty surgery is following that same trend. However, patients post-operatively are retaining weakness in the quadriceps and hip abductors for a period reaching up to 3 years following surgery. The current literature results on the effectiveness of rehabilitation programs that also includes hip strengthening exercises are still highly contradicting. This meta-analysis studies and assesses the efficacy of hip strengthening exercises following total knee arthroplasty surgery. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane and Google Scholar (page 1-20) were searched till January 2024. The clinical outcomes consisted of the post-operative tests (6MWT, TUG, SLS), pain, and range of motion (flexion and extension). Results: Three randomized clinical studies were included in the meta-analysis. When compared to the standard rehabilitation, hip strengthening exercises proved a better improvement of single leg stance with no difference observed in the remaining outcomes. Conclusion: Hip strengthening exercise protocols ensured a better improvement of single leg stance scores. However, no difference was observed in the remaining analyzed outcomes. This contradictions between studies can be explained by the different physical therapy protocols used. Nevertheless, more randomized controlled studies are needed to confirm such results.

Bilateral reverse shoulder arthroplasty versus bilateral anatomic shoulder arthroplasty: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

BACKGROUND: As the population is aging and indications are expanding, shoulder arthroplasty is becoming more frequent, especially bilateral staged replacement. However, surgeons are hesitant to use bilateral reverse prostheses due to potential limitations on activities of daily living. METHODS: This meta-analysis was conducted to compare bilateral anatomic to bilateral reverse shoulder implants. PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar (pages 1-20) were searched until April 2023. The clinical outcomes consisted of postoperative functional scores (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons [ASES], Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation [SANE], Physical Component Score [PCS], Mental Component Score, and Simple Shoulder Test), pain, and range of motion (external rotation and forward elevation). Three studies were included in this meta-analysis. RESULTS: Bilateral anatomic implants had better postoperative functional outcomes and range of motion, but no significant difference was seen in postoperative pain when compared to the reverse prosthesis. Better ASES score, SANE score, and PCS as well as better external rotation and forward elevation were seen in the bilateral anatomic shoulder replacement group, but no significant difference in pain levels was seen between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The results may be explained by the lower baseline seen in the reverse prosthesis group, which may be due to an older population and different indications. Nevertheless, more randomized controlled studies are needed to confirm these findings. Level of evidence: III.