Management and return of incidental genomic findings in clinical trials.

Whole-genome/exome sequencing used in clinical trials (CTs) to identify 'druggable' mutations and targets uncovers incidental findings unrelated to the trial objectives but of value for participants, although ethically challenging. To be disclosed to trial participants, the analytical validity, clinical validity, clinical utility, clinical relevance and actionability of incidental genomic findings (IGFs) must be established. Special considerations should be taken with minors to disclose only those findings related to early-onset conditions or diseases and in cases where early implementation of measures is necessary to prevent the occurrence of diseases. A plan for disclosing incidental findings that classifies the types that can be found, and who, when and how these findings will be disclosed to participants, should be included in the trial protocol to be approved by the relevant institutional review board. IGFs in CTs raise new ethical challenges that must be discussed by CT stakeholders, professional associations and patient advocates.

Association of common genetic variants with risperidone adverse events in a Spanish schizophrenic population.

Risperidone non-compliance is often high due to undesirable side effects, whose development is in part genetically determined. Studies with genetic variants involved in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of risperidone have yielded inconsistent results. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the putative association of genetic markers with the occurrence of four frequently observed adverse events secondary to risperidone treatment: sleepiness, weight gain, extrapyramidal symptoms and sexual adverse events. A series of 111 schizophrenia inpatients were genotyped for genetic variants previously associated with or potentially involved in risperidone response. Presence of adverse events was the main variable and potential confounding factors were considered. Allele 16Gly of ADRB2 was significantly associated with a higher risk of sexual adverse events. There were other non-significant trends for DRD3 9Gly and SLC6A4 S alleles. Our results, although preliminary, provide new candidate variants of potential use in risperidone safety prediction.

Ethical problems arising from the use of placebo in clinical trials with drugs for migraine. Their analysis by the moral deliberation method.

INTRODUCTION: Migraine is characterised as episodes of headache plus a variety of accompanying symptoms. Its pharmacological control remains unsatisfactory for some patients. The use of placebo in drug clinical trials on migraine commonly leads to numerous ethical uncertainties. METHODS: The purpose of this paper is to illustrate how the deliberation method helps in analysing the issues and finding solutions to selected ethical problems. Ethical decisions that try to solve conflicts arising from placebo use in clinical trials may be adopted using the moral deliberation method. Thus, the conflict is systematically assessed by identifying the following: Relevant facts; Values in conflict; Duties, or in other words, possible courses of action. Moral duty is following the optimal course of action. To identify this, it is recommended to state extreme courses of action, then intermediate courses of action, and then to proceed to the optimal course(s) of action. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: In this paper, the application of this method is shown in several conflicting situations arising in two placebo-controlled clinical trials with drugs under development for the prophylaxis and acute treatment of migraine.

Drug development: assessment of pharmacogenetic studies by Spanish research ethics committees.

The decision taken by research ethics committees (RECs) while assessing pharmacogenetic (PGx) substudies as part of international clinical trials is almost unknown. A total of 255 applications of 36 PGx substudies embedded in clinical trials (12 phase 2, 24 phase 3) were submitted to 72 RECs in 2006-2007 by GlaxoSmithKline in Spain. These were trials of 17 different compounds, aimed to be conducted in the five continents. Of the 255 applications, 226 (89%) were directly approved by RECs without raising any queries to the sponsor; 1% (3/255) were plainly rejected by two RECs. The rest (10%) were followed by 64 queries asked by 16 RECs on 25 PGx substudies. Following responses from the sponsor, all but two applications were approved. Thus, the RECs involved finally approved 98% (250/255) of the submitted applications. The requirements specifically raised by two RECs (PGx samples to be transferred to a public biobank or alternatively destroyed immediately, or storage permitted only 5 years after the trial is concluded) could not be met by the sponsor. It can be inferred from the results obtained that ethical and scientific standards implemented by the sponsor in the design, conduct and sample management of PGx substudies satisfied the vast majority (70/72; 97%) of RECs involved in this study.

Prevalence of HLA-B*5701 in HIV-infected patients in Spain (results of the EPI Study).

BACKGROUND: A hypersensitivity reaction (HSR) is associated with abacavir (ABC), a nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor. Genetic association of ABC HSR with the presence of HLA-B*5701 has been demonstrated in PREDICT-1 study, showing a prevalence of 5.6% in HIV-infected population. However the prevalence of this allele in HIV-infected patients in Spain has not been established yet. METHOD: This is a cross-sectional epidemiological study that included 1,198 patients in 74 centers that serve the HIV-infected population of Spain. HLA-B*5701 was checked both in the hospital lab and one central lab, showing an overall prevalence of this allele of 6%. RESULTS: HLA-B*5701 was most prevalent in Caucasian population (6.5%). Concordance between the local and central lab was very high for positive and negative results (95.7% and 99.3%, respectively). CONCLUSION: These aspects define this test as a useful tool for the management of HIV-infected patients.

Potential predatory journals are colonizing the ICMJE recommendations list of followers.

BACKGROUND: The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) has expressed its concerns about predatory journals using the list of ICMJE Recommendations (ICMJE-R) followers to "gain the appearance of legitimacy." We assessed the presence of potential predatory journals on the ICMJE-R list and their adherence to ICMJE recommendations. METHODS: A random sample of 350 journals from the estimated 3,100-3,200 biomedical journals listed as ICMJE-R followers was chosen. Data collected from the ICMJE and journal webpages in English were: adherence to six ICMJE-R policies/requirements, year of journal's listing as ICMJE-R follower, discipline covered, publisher and its country of origin and existence of article processing charge. Potential predatory journal was considered as one open access journal not being a member of a recognized listing in COPE, DOAJ, OASPA, AJOL and/or INASP. RESULTS: Thirty-one percent of journals were considered to be potentially predatory; 94% of them were included in the ICMJE-R list in 2014-2018. Half were published in the United States and 62% were devoted to medicine. Adherence to five of the six policies/requirements was infrequent, ranging from 51% (plagiarism) to 7% (trial registration). Seventy-two percent of journals mentioned a policy on authors' conflicts of interest. Information on article processing charge was available for 76% journals and could not be found for 22%. Authorship policy/ instructions were significantly more present in journals with publishers from India than from the USA (53% vs 30%; p = 0.047), with no differences in the other five policies. CONCLUSION: Predatory journals should be deleted from the ICMJE-R list of followers to prevent misleading authors. ICMJE-R following journals need to be reevaluated with pre-defined published criteria.

Factors impacting on length of stay and mortality of community-acquired pneumonia.

A 1-year retrospective multicentre study was performed to identify factors influencing hospital length of stay (LOS) and mortality of patients (n = 3233) admitted to hospital because of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Pneumonia severity index (PSI) high-risk classes (IV and V), positive blood culture, admission to an intensive care unit (ICU), multi-lobar involvement and alcohol consumption were associated independently with prolonged LOS. Tobacco smoking was associated with a reduced LOS. The LOS varied markedly among centres. Only PSI high-risk class, admission to ICU and multi-lobar involvement were associated with early, late and global mortality. Positive blood cultures, antimicrobial therapy according to treatment guidelines and the establishment of an aetiological diagnosis were linked to reduced late and global mortality. These data suggest that early mortality associated with CAP is highly dependent on the clinical status of the patient at presentation. Conversely, late mortality seems to be associated more closely with clinical management factors; hence, an aetiological diagnosis and compliance with appropriate therapeutic guidelines have a significant influence on outcome.

Validation of the Spanish version of the Asthma Control Test (ACT).

OBJECTIVE: Validation of the Spanish version of the Asthma Control Test (ACT). METHODS: A total of 607 asthmatic patients were assessed. The psychometric properties of ACT were evaluated. The ACT capacity to predict the physician's assessment of asthma control was assessed using the area under the receiving operating characteristics (ROC) curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and positive-negative predictive values. RESULTS: ACT's Cronbach alpha was 0.84. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.85. The AUC was 0.86, with a sensitivity of 71% and a specificity of 85% for a score of < or =19. CONCLUSIONS: The Spanish version of ACT is shown to be a reliable and valid tool for evaluating and discriminating asthma control.

Antimicrobial susceptibility of clinical Escherichia coli isolates from uncomplicated cystitis in women over a 1-year period in Spain.

High usage of antibiotics in Spain has led to an increase in resistance in urinary Escherichia coli isolates in different geographic regions. The problem of resistance in urinary E. coli in Spain was investigated by gathering a large number of isolates from 20 different sites nationwide over a 1-year period from November 2003 to October 2004 in a large population of women. The objectives of this study were to assess the resistance to the antibiotics most commonly prescribed for community-acquired urinary tract infections (UTIs), according to age and different geographical areas of Spain, and to evaluate the potential association between geographical differences in quinolone consumption and resistance to E. coli. A total of 2,292 valid E. coli strains from female outpatients were isolated and sent to a single central reference laboratory for confirmation and susceptibility testing. Of these, 2,230 isolates were available for the age analysis. A two-sided chi2 test was used to identify differences in resistance between age groups. Antibiotic units per province were purchased from IMS and consumption was expressed in units per 1,000 people per year. Univariate correlation (Pearson coefficient) between resistance to ciprofloxacin and quinolone consumption was calculated using a two-sided p-value. Resistance shown by E. coli was more common to ampicillin (52.1%) and cotrimoxazole (26%), followed by quinolones (18%), whereas resistance to amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, cefuroxime-axetil and fosfomycin was less than 3%. In the subgroup of women aged >65 years, resistance to ciprofloxacin was 29% compared to 13% for the subgroup of women <65 years (p<0.001). For these same subgroups, resistance rates were 32% vs. 23% for cotrimoxazole (p<0.001) and 56% vs. 50% for ampicillin (p=0.02), respectively. Statistically significant correlations were found between consumption of quinolones and E. coli resistance to ciprofloxacin (r=0.5; p=0.025). Resistance of E. coli isolates to quinolones varied significantly according to geographical areas, ranging from a high of 16.5% and 16.6% in the southern and eastern regions of Spain, respectively, to a low of 8% in the north in women aged <65 years. Additionally, the susceptibility to quinolones of E. coli isolates recovered from women aged >65 years was significantly lower across all regions of Spain than that of isolates recovered from younger women. Fosfomycin, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and cefuroxime-axetil are the most suitable antibiotics for empirical treatment in Spain given the high 18% and 26% resistance rates to quinolones and cotrimoxazole, respectively. Higher resistance rates to ciprofloxacin were associated with being aged 65 years and over. These data need to be considered when recommending empirical therapy for acute cystitis.

Quinolone resistance in female outpatient urinary tract isolates of Escherichia coli: age-related differences.

During a 1-year period, from November 2003 to October 2004, urinary Escherichia coli isolates were collected from 20 clinical microbiology laboratories across Spain. The main objective was to assess the resistance of E. coli to the antimicrobials most commonly prescribed for community-acquired urinary tract infections depending on the patient's age. A total of 2,230 valid E. coli strains from female outpatients were isolated and sent to a single central reference laboratory for confirmation and susceptibility testing using an agar dilution method. A two-sided chi-squared test was used to assess the differences in resistance between age groups (< or =65 and >65 years). E. coli resistance was found to be more common to ampicillin (52.1%), cotrimoxazole (26%) and quinolones (18%), whereas resistance to amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, cefuroxime axetil and fosfomycin were below 3%. In women older than 65 years, resistance to ciprofloxacin reached up to 29% compared with 13% of those in the under 65 age group (p <0.001). For cotrimozaxole, rates were 32% vs. 23% (p <0.001) and for ampicillin 56% vs. 50% (p=0.02), respectively. It was concluded that fosfomycin, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid and cefuroxime axetil are the most suitable antimicrobials for empirical treatment in Spain given the high 18% and 26% resistance rates to quinolones and cotrimoxazole, respectively. Being older than 65 years of age was associated with higher resistance rates to ciprofloxacin (29%). These results should be considered when recommending empirical therapy for acute cystitis in women.

[The European Medicines Agency rejects the authorization of aducanumab for Alzheimer's disease]. / La Agencia Europea de Medicamentos rechaza la autorización del aducanumab para la enfermedad de Alzheimer.

TITLE: La Agencia Europea de Medicamentos rechaza la autorización del aducanumab para la enfermedad de Alzheimer.

[Patients organizations and new drug approval in the US. Eteplirsen and Duchenne muscular dystrophy case]. / Asociaciones de pacientes y autorizacion de nuevos farmacos en Estados Unidos. El caso del eteplirseno para la distrofia muscular de Duchenne.

INTRODUCTION: In 2016 the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted the marketing authorization for eteplirsen for Duchenne muscular dystrophy. This has been a very controversial decision since it happened after a negative assessment from both the Advisory Committee and the technical FDA evaluation team. The FDA's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) director was who ultimately approved the product, while the FDA Commissioner did not overrule that decision. AIM: To report about the most relevant events regarding the approval of eteplirsen by the US FDA. DEVELOPMENT: All relevant facts that occurred during the clinical development and evaluation phase following 'accelerated approval' procedure of eteplirsen are discussed in detail. The technical FDA evaluation team reasons supporting that the drug has not proven clinical benefit, the attitude of patient advocacy groups and the post-approval FDA requirements to the marketing authorization holder are discussed. Finally, we reflect on what is the situation Spanish patients face once eteplirsen is on the US market. CONCLUSIONS: This is a unique case in the history of drug authorizations in western countries, that shows the difficulties that current regulations on accelerated approval of new medicines could have when interpreting scarce and low quality clinical development data, when dealing with rare diseases with no available therapies.

TITLE: Asociaciones de pacientes y autorizacion de nuevos farmacos en Estados Unidos. El caso del eteplirseno para la distrofia muscular de Duchenne.Introduccion. En 2016, la Agencia de Medicamentos y Alimentos (FDA) estadounidense autorizo la comercializacion del eteplirseno para el tratamiento de la distrofia muscular de Duchenne. Este hecho ha sido muy controvertido, por cuanto la autorizacion se produjo tras una evaluacion negativa por parte del comite asesor de la FDA y de sus propios tecnicos. Fue la directora del Centro de Investigacion y Evaluacion de Farmacos quien autorizo el medicamento, decision que no revoco el director de la FDA. Objetivo. Informar sobre los acontecimientos mas relevantes que han conducido a la autorizacion del eteplirseno por la FDA. Desarrollo. En el articulo se exponen pormenorizadamente los hechos relevantes que acontecieron durante el desarrollo clinico y la evaluacion reguladora del eteplirseno siguiendo la via de la 'autorizacion acelerada'. Se comentan las razones por las que los tecnicos de la FDA entienden que este medicamento no ha mostrado producir beneficio clinico, la actitud de las asociaciones de pacientes y las exigencias postautorizacion que la FDA ha impuesto a la compañia propietaria del medicamento. Por ultimo, se reflexiona sobre la situacion en que quedan los pacientes espanoles una vez que el eteplirseno esta comercializado en Estados Unidos. Conclusiones. Este caso, unico en la historia de autorizacion de medicamentos en el mundo occidental, pone de manifiesto las dificultades que las regulaciones actuales de autorizacion acelerada de nuevos medicamentos pueden tener en la interpretacion de datos del desarrollo clinico, cuando estos son escasos y de poca calidad, y cuando se trata de enfermedades raras sin terapias disponibles.

[Aducanumab approval for Alzheimer's disease in the USA: the surrender of science]. / Aprobación del aducanumab para la enfermedad de Alzheimer en Estados Unidos: la claudicación de la ciencia.

TITLE: Aprobación del aducanumab para la enfermedad de Alzheimer en Estados Unidos: la claudicación de la ciencia.

The cohabitation of academia and industry: What position do the medical journals take regarding opinion articles? / La cohabitación de la academia y la industria: ¿qué postura toman las revistas médicas en relación con los artículos de opinión?

Should medical journals publish editorials and educational articles written by authors who have financial conflicts of interest with pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries on whose products (or their competitors) they discuss? In the last 18 months, a controversy was sparked between The New England Journal of Medicine and BMJ, who took 2 opposite positions: the former stated that the negative bias against authors with conflicts of interest with industry is excessive and therefore accept articles from any expert, ensuring that they have the minimum possible bias. BMJ, in contrast, prohibits the publication of these types of article by authors who have financial conflicts of interest with industry. This article discusses the approaches of the 2 journals (and those of others) and reflects on this type of conflict in the medical profession.

If the results of an article are noteworthy, read the entire article; do not rely on the abstract alone. / Si le llaman la atención los resultados de un artículo, léalo completo, no se fíe solo del resumen.

Clinicians typically update their knowledge by reading articles on the Internet. Easy access to the articles' abstracts and a lack of time to access other information sources creates a risk that therapeutic or diagnostic decisions will be made after reading just the abstracts. Occasionally, however, the abstracts of articles from clinical trials that have not obtained statistically significant differences in the primary study endpoint have reported other positive results, for example, of a secondary endpoint or a subgroup analysis. The article, however, correctly reports all results, including those of the primary endpoint. In the abstract, the safety information of the experimental treatment is usually deficient. The whole article should be read if a clinical decision is to be made.

Effect of eprosartan and losartan on uric acid metabolism in patients with essential hypertension.

OBJECTIVE: The influence of angiotensin II AT-1 receptor antagonists on uric acid metabolism, and the potential differences among them with regard to this effect, remains to be precisely established. This study was designed to compare the effects of losartan and eprosartan on uric acid metabolism in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study in hypertensive patients. SETTING: Outpatient clinic. PATIENTS: Following a 2- to 3-week single-blind placebo run-in period, 60 patients with sitting diastolic blood pressure > or = 95 and < or = 114 mmHg were randomized. Fifty-eight patients completed the study. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to receive losartan 50 mg or eprosartan 600 mg once daily for 4 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary endpoint was the change in the ratio of urinary uric acid/creatinine in the period 0-4 h of a 24 h urine collection after 4 weeks of treatment. Secondary endpoints included 24 h urinary uric acid excretion, as well as serum urate and anti-hypertensive efficacy. RESULTS: Mean urinary uric acid/creatinine changes from baseline were 0.14 (day 1) and 0.11 (week 4) for losartan and -0.04 for eprosartan (at both day 1 and week 4; P < 0.01 between groups at both time-points). The mean increase in 24 h urinary uric acid excretion with losartan was 0.7 mmol/24 h (25% increase from baseline) at both day 1 and week 4. No significant difference was observed in the change of serum urate levels versus baseline between both treatment groups after 4 weeks (- 23.4 and - 19.5 micromol/l for losartan and eprosartan, respectively). Patients with hyperuricaemia in both treatment groups showed similar modifications of uric acid metabolism compared with non-hyperuricaemic subjects. Blood pressure control (sitting diastolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg or < 100 mmHg with a decrease of at least 10 mmHg from baseline) was achieved in 22 patients (73%) with eprosartan and in 16 (53%) with losartan. CONCLUSIONS: Losartan increased uric acid excretion in hypertensive patients, whilst eprosartan did not Neither AT-1 receptor antagonist substantially modified serum urate concentrations.

Does tetanus immune globulin interfere with the immune response to simultaneous administration of tetanus-diphtheria vaccine? A comparative clinical trial in adults.

In the management of wounds, sometimes it is recommended to give an adult-type tetanus-diphtheria (Td) vaccine dose plus tetanus immune globulin (TIG). Sixty and 59 healthy young adults previously immunized against tetanus (T) and diphtheria (D) were randomized to receive intramuscularly either Td vaccine alone (group 1) or Td vaccine plus 500 IU of TIG (group 2) simultaneously. Antitoxin response was assessed after 4 weeks and 4 months. Circulating antibodies were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The cutoff of these tests was 0.1 IU/mL. Titers of 0.1 IU/mL or greater were considered protective. For geometric mean titers (GMT), antibody titers below the cutoff of the assay were given, arbitrarily, 0.05 IU/mL. At 4 weeks, 98% or more of the subjects in group 1 had circulating T and D antitoxin levels of 0.1 IU/mL or higher; in group 2, 95% and 90% of the subjects had titers above this limit for T and D, respectively. At 4 months, these percentages were 98% and 95% for T antitoxin levels in groups 1 and 2, respectively; whereas 96% and 88% of the subjects in groups 1 and 2 had D antitoxin levels of 0.1 IU/mL or higher, respectively. Significantly (P < .05) higher GMTs were seen at the 4-week assessment (but not at 4 months) in group 1, as compared with group 2, in both T and D antitoxin levels (9.91 IU/mL versus 5.60 IU/mL for T antitoxin, and 2.86 IU/mL versus 1.45 IU/mL for D antitoxin). This finding resulted from those participants with low (< 0.1 IU/mL) prevaccination antibody titers.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)