Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo de estudio
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Orthod Craniofac Res ; 24(1): 78-86, 2021 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32608152

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Lateral cephalograms (LC) should be usable to evaluate the vertical bone height of the anterior maxilla for planning the placement of orthodontic mini-implants (OMI). The purpose of this study is to determine the usability of LC for examining the real vertical dimension of the anterior palate. SETTING AND SAMPLE POPULATION: Lateral cephalograms and corresponding cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were employed for examining 30 fresh cadaver heads. MATERIALS & METHODS: The minimum (distance A) and maximum (distance B) vertical palatal bone heights on LCs at the level of first premolars were measured, whereas the corresponding measurements were taken via CBCTs on the median, and 2-, 4- and 6-mm paramedian planes. Additionally, the overall minimum vertical palatal height on CBCT was recorded. RESULTS: Distance A and B on LC were about 8.3 ± 2.5 mm and 9.9 ± 2.5 mm, respectively. The median palatal height on CBCT was significantly higher than both measurements on LC (P < .01). Furthermore, the bone supply on the paramedian planes was similar or higher on CBCT compared to Distance A and similar or less compared to Distance B. The strongest correlation at the level of the premolars was found in the comparison of the maximum vertical palatal height via LC with the vertical palatal height on the median plane via CBCT (r = .84, 95% CI: 0.69-0.92, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: In order to make the best possible use of the vertical bone supply of the anterior palate and to avoid injuries to the nasal floor, Distance A should be taken into account for planning paramedian OMI placements and distance B for median OMI insertion.


Asunto(s)
Implantes Dentales , Métodos de Anclaje en Ortodoncia , Tomografía Computarizada de Haz Cónico , Maxilar/diagnóstico por imagen , Hueso Paladar/diagnóstico por imagen
2.
Clin Oral Investig ; 25(3): 1299-1306, 2021 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32613434

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of fully guided orthodontic mini-implant (OMI) placements supported by tooth- (TBGs) or gingiva-borne silicone guides (GBGs) based on virtually superimposed lateral cephalograms on virtual plaster models. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Lateral cephalograms and corresponding plaster models were virtually superimposed for the planning of OMI positions; fully guided TBGs and GBGs were fabricated (each, n = 10). A total of 40 OMIs were inserted in a paramedian position into the palate of 20 human cadavers. Postoperative cone-beam computer tomographies (CBCTs) were carried out, and an accuracy evaluation was performed by comparing preoperative planning models and postoperative CBCTs. Deviations of the axis, tip, centre of the shoulder and vertical position of each of the implants were evaluated. Furthermore, the transfer accuracy measured by postoperative CBCT scans were compared with the accuracy determined using an intraoral scanner. RESULTS: A significant deviation between TBGs (2.81° SD 2.69) and GBGs (6.22° SD 4.26) regarding implant angulation was evaluated (p = 0.005). Implant tip and implant shoulder deviations revealed no statistical differences between the guides. Accuracy values of oral scans regarding vertical deviations were significantly more inaccurate when compared with CBCTs (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy of an OMI position can be significantly increased by using a guide extension over the teeth. Vertical implant positions presented the lowest deviations. Postoperative oral scans and CBCTs represent diverging accuracy measurements when compared with virtual planning. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Users must keep in mind that despite virtual planning deviations, inaccuracies of a few millimetres may occur.


Asunto(s)
Implantes Dentales , Métodos de Anclaje en Ortodoncia , Cirugía Asistida por Computador , Cadáver , Diseño Asistido por Computadora , Tomografía Computarizada de Haz Cónico , Implantación Dental Endoósea , Humanos , Imagenología Tridimensional , Planificación de Atención al Paciente
3.
Sci Rep ; 12(1): 5013, 2022 03 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35322115

RESUMEN

The aim of this study was to compare the soft tissue predicative abilities of two established programs depending on the surgical technique and amount of displacement. On the basis of 50 computed tomography images, 11 orthognathic operations with differences in displacement distances and technique (maxillary advancement, MxA; maxillary impaction, MxI; mandibular setback, MnS; mandibular advancement, MnA bimaxillary displacement, MxA/MnS) as well as corresponding soft tissue predictions were simulated using the programs Dolphin (D) and ProPlan (PP). For all the soft tissue predictions by the two programs, eight linear and two angular measurements were performed and compared. The simulation of maxillary impaction showed a similar soft tissue behaviour between the two programs. However, differences or divergent behaviours were observed for other procedures. In the middle third of the face these significant differences concerned in particular the nasolabial angle (Ns-Sn-Ls)(5 mm-MA, D: 119.9 ± 8.6° vs. PP: 129.5 ± 8.4°; 7 mm-MnS: D: 128.5 ± 8.2° vs. PP: 129.6 ± 8.1°; 10 mm-MnA D: 126.0 ± 8.0° vs. PP: 124.9 ± 8.4°; 5 mm-MxA/4 mm-MnS, D: 120.2 ± 8.7° vs. PP: 129.9 ± 8.3°; all p < 0.001) and in the lower third the mentolabial angle (Pog´-B´-Li) (5 mm-MA, D: 133.2 ± 11.4° vs. PP: 126.8 ± 11.6°; 7 mm-MnS: D: 133.1 ± 11.3° vs. PP: 124.6 ± 11.9°; 10 mm-MnA D: 133.3 ± 11.5° vs. PP: 146.3 ± 11.1°; bignathic 5 mm-MxA/4 mm-MnS, D: 133.1 ± 11.4° vs. PP: 122.7 ± 11.9°; all p < 0.001) and the distance of the inferior lip to the aesthetic Line (E-Line-Li) (5 mm-MA, D: 3.7 ± 2.3 mm vs. PP: 2.8 ± 2.5 mm; 7 mm-MnS: D: 5.1 ± 3.0 mm vs. PP: 3.3 ± 2.3 mm; 10 mm-MnA D: 2.5 ± 1.6 mm vs. PP: 3.9 ± 2.8 mm; bignathic 5 mm-MxA/4 mm-MnS, D: 4.8 ± 3.0 mm vs. PP: 2.9 ± 2.0 mm; all p < 0.001). The soft tissue predictions by the tested programs differed in simulation outcome, which led to the different, even divergent, results. However, the significant differences are often below a clinically relevant level. Consequently, soft tissue prediction must be viewed critically, and its actual benefit must be clarified.


Asunto(s)
Cirugía Ortognática , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ortognáticos , Cefalometría/métodos , Mandíbula/cirugía , Maxilar/diagnóstico por imagen , Maxilar/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ortognáticos/métodos , Programas Informáticos
4.
J Orofac Orthop ; 81(5): 340-349, 2020 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32632653

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was twofold: first, to evaluate the precision of guided orthodontic mini-implant (OMI) placement planned on virtual superimposition of plaster models and lateral cephalograms with regard to the bone support and, second, to investigate the effects of silicone guide extension. METHODS: A total of 40 OMIs were placed in the paramedian area of the anterior palates of 20 cadaver heads. Digitalized models and the corresponding lateral cephalograms were superimposed for planning the OMI positions, and tooth-supported (TS) and soft-tissue-supported (STS) templates were manufactured. Thereafter, postoperative cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was performed, and the straight (A) and right-angle distance (B) from the implant tip to the nasal floor, the distance from the implant shoulder to the hard palate (C) and the angle (α) between the implant and palate plane with the preoperative (T0) and postoperative (T1) positions were measured. RESULTS: The postoperative distances A, B, and C were less than the planned implant positions. However, significant difference between T0 and T1 was only noted in terms of distance A using the TS templates (T0: 4.7 ± 2.3 mm, T1: 3.0 ± 2.3 mm; p = 0.008) and distance B using the STS template (T0: 3.1 ± 3.5 mm, T1: 2.3 ± 3.2 mm; p = 0.041). There were no significant differences in all average deviations (∆ Ceph/CBCT) between the two templates. CONCLUSIONS: Guided OMI placement planned by virtual superimposition of digitized models and the corresponding lateral cephalogram is fundamentally feasible. However, the position closer to the nasal floor needs critical assessment for correct implantation. The silicone template expansion seems to have only a minor effect on transfer accuracy.


Asunto(s)
Implantes Dentales , Métodos de Anclaje en Ortodoncia , Cirugía Asistida por Computador , Tomografía Computarizada de Haz Cónico , Implantación Dental Endoósea , Imagenología Tridimensional
5.
Head Face Med ; 16(1): 17, 2020 Aug 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32741369

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study aimed at comparing bracket placement and excess bonding adhesive depending on different indirect bonding (IDB) techniques and bracket geometries. METHODS: Four hundred eighty brackets without hook (WOH) and 360 with hook (WH) were placed on 60 plaster models. Three IDB techniques were tested: polyvinyl-siloxane vacuum-form (PVS-VF), polyvinyl-siloxane putty (PVS-putty), and translucence double-polyvinyl-siloxane (double-PVS). PVS-VF and PVS-putty were combined with chemically, and double-PVS was combined with light cured bonding adhesive. Virtual images of models before and after bracket transfer were generated, and computerized images were compared. Linear, angular deviations, and excess bonding adhesive were measured. RESULTS: Linear differences between the three groups were obtained for PVS-VF (WH: 1.08, SD 0.50 mm; WOH: 0.86, SD 0.25 mm), PVS-putty (WH: 0.73, SD 0.51 mm; WOH: 0.58, SD 0.28 mm), and double-PVS (WH: 0.65, SD 0.45 mm; WOH: 0.59, SD 0.33 mm) (P < 0.001). Hooks affected bracket placement accuracy in PVS-VF (P < 0.001) and PVS-putty (P = 0.029). Angular differences were observed for brackets WOH between the PVS-VF (0.64, SD 0.48°) and double-PVS group (0.92, SD 0.76°) (P < 0.001) and within double-PVS group (WH: 0.66, SD 0.51° vs. WOH: 0.92, SD 0.76°, P < 0.001). Highest amount of excess adhesive was obtained for PVS-putty group (WH: 6.54, SD 5.31 mm 2). CONCLUSIONS: The double-PVS group revealed promising results with respect to transfer accuracy, whereas the PVS-VF group provided least excess bonding adhesive. Basically, hooks lead to lower precision and higher excess bonding adhesive. PVS trays for IDB generate high bracket placement accuracy. PVS-putty is the easiest to handle with and also the cheapest, but leads to large excess bonding adhesive, especially in combination with hooked brackets or tubes.


Asunto(s)
Recubrimiento Dental Adhesivo , Soportes Ortodóncicos , Cementos Dentales
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA