Radiomics on radiography predicts giant cell tumor histologic response to denosumab.

OBJECTIVE: Denosumab is an established targeted systemic therapy for treatment of giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB). We sought to determine whether treatment response could be quantified from radiomics analysis of radiographs taken longitudinally during treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pre- and post-treatment radiographs of 10 GCTB tumors from 10 patients demonstrating histologic response after treatment with denosumab were analyzed. Intensity- and texture-based radiomics features for each manually segmented tumor were calculated. Radiomics features were compared pre- and post-treatment in tumors. RESULTS: Mean intensity (p = 0.033) significantly increased while skewness (p = 0.028) significantly decreased after treatment. Post-treatment increases in fractal dimensions (p = 0.057) and abundance (p = 0.065) approached significance. A potential linear correlation in mean (p = 0.005; ΔMean = 0.022 * duration - 0.026) with treatment duration was observed. CONCLUSION: Radiomics analysis of plain radiographs quantifies time-dependent matrix mineralization and trabecular reconstitution that mark positive response of giant cell tumors of bone to denosumab.

Rectal MRI radiomics inter- and intra-reader reliability: should we worry about that?

PURPOSE: The aim of this review paper is to summarize the current literature regarding inter- and intra-reader reliability of radiomics on rectal MRI. METHODS: Original studies examining treatment response prediction in patients with rectal cancer following neoadjuvant therapy using rectal MRI-based radiomics between January 2010 and December 2021 were identified via a PubMed/Medline search. Studies in which intra- and/or inter-reader reliability had been reported were included in this review. RESULTS: Thirteen studies were selected, with an average number of patients of 145 (range, 20-649). All included studies evaluated T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) and/or diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequences, while 3/13 (23%) also evaluated the contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging (T1WI) sequence. Most of the selected studies involved two readers (10/13, 77%), 6/13 (46%) studies used baseline MRI only, 1/13 (8%) study used restaging MRI only, and 6/13 (46%) used both. Segmentation was performed manually in 10/13 (77%) studies, and in a slight majority of studies (7/13, 54%), the entire tumor volume (3D VOI) was segmented, while 4/13 (31%) studies segmented the 2D ROI and 2/13 (15%) segmented both. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) on intra-reader agreement varied from 0.73 to 0.93. ICC to assess inter-reader varied from 0.60 to 0.99. Overall, features obtained from baseline rectal MRI, using 3D VOI and first-order features, had higher agreement. CONCLUSION: Based on our qualitative assessment of a small number of non-dedicated studies, there seems to be good reliability, particularly among low-order features extracted from the entire tumor volume using baseline MRI; however, direct evidence remains scarce. More targeted research in this area is required to quantitatively verify reliability, and before these novel radiomic techniques can be clinically adopted.