Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Rev Sanid Hig Publica (Madr) ; 68(3): 393-8, 1994.
Artículo en Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7716429

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The early diagnosis of Human Hydatidosis through immunologic methods has been one of the most important activities displayed by the Programme of Struggle (fight) in endemic areas of Argentina, to improve the prediction of the Hydatid patient. It is of great interest to define exactly the advantages and limitations of the DD5 and Elisa techniques in the diagnosis of hydatidosis in inhabited areas with no clinic symptoms of the disease. METHODS: For this, the sensibility, the specification and predictive value of both methods has been evaluated, studying serologically 499 inhabitants from a rural community in the Province of Río Negro. The inhabitants with reactive serology to EIE and/or DD5 are studied by means of images using US, RX and TC. A controlled group is selected according to its un-reactive serology. The cases compatible with Hydatidosis are directed to surgery. RESULTS: The DD5 technique is shown as 100% specific but with a sensibility of only 31%; on the other hand, EIE at a cutting level of 8 DE presents a specification of 97% with a sensibility of 63%. CONCLUSIONS: It is important to underline the value of the US as the first image prognosis, while the TC, in the present experience, did not show a great number of positive images, allowing only to confirm the US findings.


Asunto(s)
Equinococosis/diagnóstico , Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática , Inmunodifusión , Estudios de Evaluación como Asunto , Humanos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
2.
J Clin Ultrasound ; 16(4): 233-7, 1988 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3152510

RESUMEN

This study presents new evidence as to the usefulness of ultrasound scanning in field conditions, to screen out hydatidosis in endemic areas, and to compare its detection capability with serological methods. It also intends to demonstrate that for an efficient rural ultrasound screening, neither an experienced ultra sonographer nor expensive and sophisticated equipment is necessary, it can be done by suitably trained personnel (eg, nurse, public health worker), using basic equipment, without public health installations or electricity, thus making it a feasible, simple, fast, and cheap screening method for hydatidosis.


Asunto(s)
Países en Desarrollo , Equinococosis Hepática/diagnóstico , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Salud Rural , Ultrasonografía/métodos , Argentina , Errores Diagnósticos , Equinococosis Hepática/prevención & control , Humanos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA