Challenge to Predict Mobilized Peripheral Blood Stem Cells on the Fourth Day of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Treatment in Healthy Donors: Predictive Value of Basal CD34+ Cell and Platelet Counts.

A longitudinal, prospective, observational, single-center cohort study on healthy donors was designed to identify predictors of CD34+ cell mobilization on day 4 after granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) administration. As potential predictors of mobilization, age, sex, body weight, height, blood volume, WBC count, peripheral blood (PB) mononuclear cell count, platelet (Plt) count, and hematocrit and hemoglobin levels were considered. Two different evaluations of CD34+ cell counts were determined for each donor: baseline (before G-CSF administration) and in PB on day 4 after G-CSF administration. One hundred twenty-two consecutive healthy donors with a median age of 47.5 years were enrolled. The median value of CD34+ on day 4 was 43 cells/µL (interquartile range, 23 to 68), and 81.1% of donors had ≥20 cells/µL. Basal WBC count, Plt count, and CD34+ were significantly higher for the subjects with CD34+ levels over median values on day 4. A multivariate quartile regression analysis, adjusted by sex, age, basal CD34+, and basal Plt count, showed a progressively stronger relationship between baseline CD34+ and Plt levels and the CD34+ levels on day 4. The basal CD34+ cut-off level to predict the levels of CD34+ on day 4 was either ≤2 cells/µL or ≥3 cells/µL and that of basal Plt count was ≤229 × 109/L or ≥230 × 109/L, respectively, to determine whether mobilization therapy should or should not be attempted. PB stem cell mobilization with G-CSF was highly effective on day 4, and herein we describe a model for predicting the probability of performing PB stem cell collection after a short course of G-CSF.

Basal CD34+ Cell Count Predicts Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Mobilization in Healthy Donors after Administration of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor: A Longitudinal, Prospective, Observational, Single-Center, Cohort Study.

A longitudinal, prospective, observational, single-center, cohort study on healthy donors (HDs) was designed to identify predictors of CD34+ cells on day 5 with emphasis on the predictive value of the basal CD34+ cell count. As potential predictors of mobilization, age, sex, body weight, height, blood volume as well as white blood cell count, peripheral blood (PB) mononuclear cells, platelet count, hematocrit, and hemoglobin levels were considered. Two different evaluations of CD34+ cell counts were determined for each donor: baseline (before granulocyte colony-stimulating factor [G-CSF] administration) and in PB after G-CSF administration on the morning of the fifth day (day 5). A total of 128 consecutive HDs (66 males) with a median age of 43 years were enrolled. CD34+ levels on day 5 displayed a non-normal distribution, with a median value of 75.5 cells/µL. To account for the non-normal distribution of the dependent variable, a quantile regression analysis to predict CD34+ on day 5 using the baseline value of CD34+ as the key predictor was performed. On crude analysis, a baseline value of CD34+ ranging from .5 cells/µL to 1 cells/µL predicts a median value of 50 cells/µL on day 5; a value of 2 cells/µL predicts a median value of 70.7 cells/µL; a value of 3 cells/µL to 4 cells/µL predicts a median value of 91.3 cells/µL, and a value ≥ 5 predicts a median value of 112 cells/µL. In conclusion, the baseline PB CD34+ cell count correlates with the effectiveness of allogeneic PB stem cell mobilization and could be useful to plan the collection.

Mobilization of hematopoietic progenitor stem cells in allogeneic setting with lenograstim by subcutaneous injection, in daily or twice-daily dosing: a single-center prospective study with historical control.

BACKGROUND: Although the mobilization of hematopoietic progenitor stem cells from healthy donors (HDs) using granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor is widely used, the ideal method for the administration of the cytokine has not yet been determined. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Seventy-five consecutive HDs received lenograstim (LENO) as mobilization agent. LENO was given subcutaneously at a dose of 10 µg/kg in a once-daily dose (ODD) every 24 hours. Results were compared with a historical control group of 181 HDs treated with 5 µg/kg LENO twice-daily dose (TDD) with a time interval of 12 hours. RESULTS: CD34+ cell concentrations evaluated on Day 4 and on Day 5 were 45 × 10(6) (range, 6 × 10(6) -217 × 10(6) )/L and 75 × 10(6) (range, 7 × 10(6) -279 × 10(6) )/L with ODD versus 36 × 10(6) (range, 3 × 10(6) -200 × 10(6) )/L and 55 × 10(6) (range, 3 × 10(6) -738 × 10(6) )/L with TDD (p = 0.067 and p = 0.001). The collected CD34+ cell counts in first apheresis procedure were 5.6 × 10(6) ± 2.9 × 10(6) and 5.7 × 10(6) ± 3 × 10(6) /kg donor and recipient body weight in the ODD versus 5.4 × 10(6) ± 3.8 × 10(6) and 5.3 × 10(6) ± 3.5 × 10(6) /kg in the TDD cohort, respectively (p = 0.08 and p = 0.02). Five HDs (6.7%) mobilized CD34+ cells of fewer than 2 × 10(6) /kg recipient body weight in the ODD group compared with seven HDs (3.9%) in the TDD group (p = 0.3). CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily administration of LENO is at least as effective as twice-daily administration for the mobilization of CD34+ cells in HDs.

Tolerability and efficacy of busulfan and fludarabine as allogeneic pretransplant conditioning therapy in acute myeloid leukemia: comparison with busulfan and cyclophosphamide regimen.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare safety and efficacy of the association of busulfan with cyclophosphamide (BuCy2) versus busulfan and fludarabine (BuFlu) as a conditioning regimen in allogeneic hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation (allo-HPCT) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 65 consecutive patients who received an allo-HPCT from Human Leucocyte Antigen-matched sibling donors were analyzed. The conditioning was BuCy2 in 48 patients and BuFlu in 17 patients. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the 2 cohorts in hematological engraftment, incidence of extrahematological toxicities, and acute graft versus host disease (GVHD). The incidence of chronic GVHD was 34% in the BuCy2 group versus 57% in the BuFlu group (P = .03). Transplant-related mortality was 17% (8 patients) in the BuCy2 group versus 0 in the BuFlu arm. Disease-related mortality was similar in the whole study population; in high-risk AML patients it was 11% in the BuCy2 group and 19% in the BuFlu group (P = .015). The probability of disease-free and event-free survival at 2 years was, respectively, 70% and 60% in the BuCy2 group and 59% and 58% in the BuFlu group (P = .06 and P = not significant [ns]). The probability of overall survival at 2 years was 71% in the BuCy2 group and 63% in the BuFlu group (P = ns), and in the high-risk group it was 83% and 67% in the BuCy2 and BuFlu group, respectively (P = ns). CONCLUSION: BuFlu is well tolerated and is less toxic than BuCy2 and our results did not suggest that in high-risk AML, BuCy2 should be the favorite regimen in terms of efficacy.