Asunto(s)
Atención Ambulatoria/normas , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Embolia Pulmonar/tratamiento farmacológico , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Dabigatrán/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Alta del Paciente , Selección de Paciente , Embarazo , Complicaciones Cardiovasculares del Embarazo/tratamiento farmacológico , Embolia Pulmonar/sangre , Embolia Pulmonar/complicaciones , Embolia Pulmonar/diagnóstico por imagen , Pirazoles/uso terapéutico , Piridinas/uso terapéutico , Piridonas/uso terapéutico , Medición de Riesgo , Rivaroxabán/uso terapéutico , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Abuso de Sustancias por Vía Intravenosa/complicaciones , Tiazoles/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
CONTEXT: Malignant pleural effusion causes disabling dyspnea in patients with a short life expectancy. Palliation is achieved by fluid drainage, but the most effective first-line method has not been determined. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether indwelling pleural catheters (IPCs) are more effective than chest tube and talc slurry pleurodesis (talc) at relieving dyspnea. DESIGN: Unblinded randomized controlled trial (Second Therapeutic Intervention in Malignant Effusion Trial [TIME2]) comparing IPC and talc (1:1) for which 106 patients with malignant pleural effusion who had not previously undergone pleurodesis were recruited from 143 patients who were treated at 7 UK hospitals. Patients were screened from April 2007-February 2011 and were followed up for a year. INTERVENTION: Indwelling pleural catheters were inserted on an outpatient basis, followed by initial large volume drainage, education, and subsequent home drainage. The talc group were admitted for chest tube insertion and talc for slurry pleurodesis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Patients completed daily 100-mm line visual analog scale (VAS) of dyspnea over 42 days after undergoing the intervention (0 mm represents no dyspnea and 100 mm represents maximum dyspnea; 10 mm represents minimum clinically significant difference). Mean difference was analyzed using a mixed-effects linear regression model adjusted for minimization variables. RESULTS: Dyspnea improved in both groups, with no significant difference in the first 42 days with a mean VAS dyspnea score of 24.7 in the IPC group (95% CI, 19.3-30.1 mm) and 24.4 mm (95% CI, 19.4-29.4 mm) in the talc group, with a difference of 0.16 mm (95% CI, −6.82 to 7.15; P = .96). There was a statistically significant improvement in dyspnea in the IPC group at 6 months, with a mean difference in VAS score between the IPC group and the talc group of −14.0 mm (95% CI, −25.2 to −2.8 mm; P = .01). Length of initial hospitalization was significantly shorter in the IPC group with a median of 0 days (interquartile range [IQR], 0-1 day) and 4 days (IQR, 2-6 days) for the talc group, with a difference of −3.5 days (95% CI, −4.8 to −1.5 days; P < .001). There was no significant difference in quality of life. Twelve patients (22%) in the talc group required further pleural procedures compared with 3 (6%) in the IPC group (odds ratio [OR], 0.21; 95% CI, 0.04-0.86; P = .03). Twenty-one of the 52 patients in the catheter group experienced adverse events vs 7 of 54 in the talc group (OR, 4.70; 95% CI, 1.75-12.60; P = .002). CONCLUSION: Among patients with malignant pleural effusion and no previous pleurodesis, there was no significant difference between IPCs and talc pleurodesis at relieving patient-reported dyspnea. TRIAL REGISTRATION: isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN87514420.
Asunto(s)
Cateterismo , Disnea/etiología , Disnea/terapia , Derrame Pleural Maligno/complicaciones , Pleurodesia/métodos , Talco/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Catéteres de Permanencia , Drenaje/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Pleural infection is common, and has a >30% major morbidity and mortality-particularly when infection is caused by Gram-negative, Staphylococcus aureus or mixed aerobic pathogens. Standard pleural fluid culture is negative in â¼40% of cases. Culturing pleural fluid in blood culture bottles may increase microbial yield, and is cheap and easy to perform. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether inoculating pleural fluid into blood culture bottles increases the culture positivity of pleural infection over standard laboratory culture, and to assess the optimum volume of inoculum to introduce. METHODS: 62 patients with pleural infection were enrolled. Pairs of aerobic and anaerobic blood culture bottles were inoculated at the bedside with 2, 5 or 10 ml of pleural fluid, and two pleural fluid specimens were sent for standard culture. Pleural fluid from nine control patients was cultured to test for 'false-positive' results. RESULTS: The addition of blood culture bottle culture to standard culture increased the proportion of patients with identifiable pathogens by 20.8% (20/53 (37.7%) to 31/53 (58.5%) (difference 20.8%, 95% CI difference 8.9% to 20.8%, p<0.001)). The second standard culture did not similarly improve the culture positivity (19/49 (38.8%) to 22/49 (44.9%) (difference 6.1%, 95% CI difference -2.5% to 6.1%, p=0.08)). The culture inoculum volume did not influence bacterial isolation frequency. The control fluids were culture negative. CONCLUSIONS: Blood culture bottle culture of infected pleural fluid increases microbial yield when used in addition to standard culture. This technique should be part of routine care.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones Bacterianas/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Pleurales/diagnóstico , Derrame Pleural/microbiología , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/diagnóstico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Bacterias/aislamiento & purificación , Técnicas Bacteriológicas/instrumentación , Recolección de Muestras de Sangre/instrumentación , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Manejo de Especímenes/instrumentación , Manejo de Especímenes/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The role of the innate immune protein mannose-binding lectin (MBL) in host defence against severe respiratory infection remains controversial. Thoracic empyema is a suppurative lung infection that arises as a major complication of pneumonia and is associated with a significant mortality. Although the pathogenesis of thoracic empyema is poorly understood, genetic susceptibility loci for this condition have recently been identified. The possible role of MBL genotypic deficiency in susceptibility to thoracic empyema has not previously been reported. METHODS: To investigate this further we compared the frequencies of the six functional MBL polymorphisms in 170 European individuals with thoracic empyema and 225 healthy control individuals. RESULTS: No overall association was observed between MBL genotypic deficiency and susceptibility to thoracic empyema (2 x 2 Chi square = 0.02, P = 0.87). Furthermore, no association was seen between MBL deficiency and susceptibility to the Gram-positive or pneumococcal empyema subgroups. MBL genotypic deficiency did not associate with progression to death or requirement for surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that MBL genotypic deficiency does not associate with susceptibility to thoracic empyema in humans.
Asunto(s)
Empiema Pleural/genética , Lectina de Unión a Manosa/genética , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Empiema Pleural/sangre , Estudios de Asociación Genética , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Genotipo , Humanos , Lectina de Unión a Manosa/sangre , Lectina de Unión a Manosa/deficiencia , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido SimpleRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Intrapleural fibrinolytic agents are used in the drainage of infected pleural-fluid collections. This use is based on small trials that did not have the statistical power to evaluate accurately important clinical outcomes, including safety. We conducted a trial to clarify the therapeutic role of intrapleural streptokinase. METHODS: In this double-blind trial, 454 patients with pleural infection (defined by the presence of purulent pleural fluid or pleural fluid with a pH below 7.2 with signs of infection or by proven bacterial invasion of the pleural space) were randomly assigned to receive either intrapleural streptokinase (250,000 IU twice daily for three days) or placebo. Patients received antibiotics and underwent chest-tube drainage, surgery, and other treatment as part of routine care. The number of patients in the two groups who had died or needed surgical drainage at three months was compared (the primary end point); secondary end points were the rates of death and of surgery (analyzed separately), the radiographic outcome, and the length of the hospital stay. RESULTS: The groups were well matched at baseline. Among the 427 patients who received streptokinase or placebo, there was no significant difference between the groups in the proportion of patients who died or needed surgery (with streptokinase: 64 of 206 patients [31 percent]; with placebo: 60 of 221 [27 percent]; relative risk, 1.14 [95 percent confidence interval, 0.85 to 1.54; P=0.43), a result that excluded a clinically significant benefit of streptokinase. There was no benefit to streptokinase in terms of mortality, rate of surgery, radiographic outcomes, or length of the hospital stay. Serious adverse events (chest pain, fever, or allergy) were more common with streptokinase (7 percent, vs. 3 percent with placebo; relative risk, 2.49 [95 percent confidence interval, 0.98 to 6.36]; P=0.08). CONCLUSIONS: The intrapleural administration of streptokinase does not improve mortality, the rate of surgery, or the length of the hospital stay among patients with pleural infection.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones Bacterianas/tratamiento farmacológico , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades Pleurales/tratamiento farmacológico , Estreptoquinasa/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Bacterianas/diagnóstico por imagen , Infecciones Bacterianas/mortalidad , Infecciones Bacterianas/cirugía , Terapia Combinada , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infección Hospitalaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Método Doble Ciego , Drenaje , Empiema Pleural/tratamiento farmacológico , Empiema Pleural/mortalidad , Empiema Pleural/cirugía , Femenino , Fibrinolíticos/efectos adversos , Humanos , Instilación de Medicamentos , Tiempo de Internación , Pulmón/diagnóstico por imagen , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades Pleurales/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades Pleurales/mortalidad , Enfermedades Pleurales/cirugía , Neumonía/complicaciones , Radiografía , Estreptoquinasa/efectos adversos , Reino UnidoRESUMEN
Talc pleurodesis is commonly used in the palliative treatment of malignant pleural effusions but the shortest and most effective regime has not been determined. In particular, it is not clear when the intercostal drain should be removed following the insertion of sclerosant. We conducted a single-centre, randomised, open trial of drain removal at 24 h versus 72 h following talc slurry pleurodesis. The primary outcome measure was success of pleurodesis (no recurrence of effusion on chest radiograph at 1-month follow-up) and secondary outcome measures included length of hospital stay and mortality. We found no difference between recurrence of pleural effusion in those randomised to drain removal at 24 h and those randomised to drain removal at 72 h (p>0.5). However, length of stay was significantly reduced when the chest drain was removed at 24 h (4 days versus 8 days; p<0.01). Mortality did not differ between the two groups. We conclude that this shorter pleurodesis regime is safe and effective.
Asunto(s)
Derrame Pleural Maligno/terapia , Pleurodesia/métodos , Talco/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Tubos Torácicos , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Remoción de Dispositivos , Drenaje , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Cuidados Paliativos , Derrame Pleural Maligno/mortalidad , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Resultado del TratamientoAsunto(s)
Infecciones Bacterianas/terapia , Enfermedades Pleurales/terapia , Adulto , Algoritmos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Bacterianas/diagnóstico , Infecciones Bacterianas/transmisión , Broncoscopía , Tubos Torácicos , Enfermedad Crónica , Drenaje/métodos , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia/métodos , Humanos , Enfermedades Pleurales/diagnóstico , Derrame Pleural/microbiología , PronósticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The optimal choice of chest tube size for the treatment of pleural infection is unknown, with only small cohort studies reported describing the efficacy and adverse events of different tube sizes. METHODS: A total of 405 patients with pleural infection were prospectively enrolled into a multicenter study investigating the utility of fibrinolytic therapy. The combined frequency of death and surgery, and secondary outcomes (hospital stay, change in chest radiograph, and lung function at 3 months) were compared in patients receiving chest tubes of differing size (chi(2), t test, and logistic regression analyses as appropriate). Pain was studied in detail in 128 patients. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the frequency with which patients either died or required thoracic surgery in patients receiving chest tubes of varying sizes ( < 10F, number dying or needing surgery 21/58 [36%]; size 10-14F, 75/208 [36%]; size 15-20F, 28/70 [40%]; size > 20F, 30/69 [44%]; chi(2)trend, 1 degrees of freedom [df] = 1.21, P = .27), nor any difference in any secondary outcome. Pain scores were substantially higher in patients receiving (mainly blunt dissection inserted) larger tubes ( < 10F, median pain score 6 [range 4-7]; 10-14F, 5 [4-6]; 15-20F, 6 [5-7]; > 20F, 6 [6-8]; chi(2), 3 df = 10.80, P = .013, Kruskal-Wallis; chi(2)trend, 1 df = 6.3, P = .014). CONCLUSIONS: Smaller, guide-wire-inserted chest tubes cause substantially less pain than blunt-dissection-inserted larger tubes, without any impairment in clinical outcome in the treatment of pleural infection. These results suggest that smaller size tubes may be the initial treatment of choice for pleural infection, and randomized studies are now required. TRIAL REGISTRATION: MIST1 trial ISRCTN number: 39138989.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones Bacterianas/terapia , Tubos Torácicos , Fibrinolíticos/administración & dosificación , Pleuresia/terapia , Infecciones Bacterianas/diagnóstico , Infecciones Bacterianas/microbiología , Método Doble Ciego , Diseño de Equipo , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Pleuresia/diagnóstico , Pleuresia/microbiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Supuración , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
RATIONALE: Increasing evidence supports a key role for the transcription factor nuclear factor (NF)-kappaB in the host response to pneumococcal infection. Control of NF-kappaB activity is achieved through interactions with the IkappaB family of inhibitors, encoded by the genes NFKBIA, NFKBIB, and NFKBIE. Rare NFKBIA mutations cause immunodeficiency with severe bacterial infection, raising the possibility that common IkappaB gene polymorphisms confer susceptibility to common bacterial disease. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether polymorphisms in NFKBIA, NFKBIB, and NFKBIE associate with susceptibility to invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) and thoracic empyema. METHODS: We studied the frequencies of 62 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) across NFKBIA, NFKBIB, and NFKBIE in individuals with IPD and control subjects (n=1,060). Significantly associated SNPs were then studied in a group of individuals with thoracic empyema and a second control group (n=632). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Two SNPs in the NFKBIA promoter region were associated with protection from IPD in both the initial study group and the pneumococcal empyema subgroup. Significant protection from IPD was observed for carriage of mutant alleles at these two loci on combining the groups (SNP rs3138053: Mantel-Haenszel 2x2 chi2=13.030, p=0.0003; odds ratio [OR], 0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.45-0.79; rs2233406: Mantel-Haenszel 2x2 chi2=18.927, p=0.00001; OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.42-0.72). An NFKBIE SNP associated with susceptibility to IPD but not pneumococcal empyema. None of the NFKBIB SNPs associated with IPD susceptibility. CONCLUSIONS: NFKBIA polymorphisms associate with susceptibility to IPD. Genetic variation in an inhibitor of NF-kappaB therefore not only causes a very rare immunodeficiency state but may also influence the development of common infectious disease.
Asunto(s)
Empiema Pleural/genética , Proteínas I-kappa B/genética , Infecciones Neumocócicas/genética , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple/genética , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas/genética , Adulto , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Empiema Pleural/microbiología , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Humanos , Inhibidor NF-kappaB alfaRESUMEN
We sought formal consensus on the appropriateness of Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS) talc pleurodesis and bedside thoracostomy talc slurry by use of a well established method - the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method (RAM). We recruited an expert panel of respiratory physicians, oncologists, and surgeons under the leadership of experts in health services research. The panellists were provided with evidence from a systematic review and then were taken through two rounds of opinion gathering, the first individually, the second as a group. The purpose is not to force consensus, but to find scenarios where there is agreement on the appropriateness or inappropriateness of a treatment and scenarios where there is disagreement. In scenarios where the diagnosis was proven and expectation of life beyond six months, pleurodesis was deemed appropriate. If there was no tissue diagnosis surgical VATS was preferred. The response to a trial aspiration played a major part in the recommendation for or against pleurodesis. The attitude to breathlessness was incongruous; it is the target of palliation yet some interpreted it as performance status and thus a contraindication. Although the RAM is well developed and in widespread use, we found it worryingly unreliable and to be used with caution.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Antibiotic choices for pleural infection are uncertain as its bacteriology is poorly described. METHODS: Pleural fluid from 434 pleural infections underwent standard culture and a screen for bacteria by amplification and sequencing of bacterial 16S ribosomal RNA gene. RESULTS: Approximately 50% of community-acquired infections were streptococcal, and 20% included anaerobic bacteria. Approximately 60% of hospital-acquired infections included bacteria frequently resistant to antibiotics (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, 25%; Enterobacteriaceae, 18%; Pseudomonas spp., 5%, enterococci, 12%). Mortality was increased in hospital-acquired infection (hospital, 17/36 [47%]; community, 53/304 [17%]; relative risk, 4.24; 95% confidence interval, 2.07-8.69; p < 0.00001; chi(2), 1 df = 17.47) and in gram-negative (10/22 [45%]), S. aureus (15/34 [44%]), or mixed aerobic infections (13/28 [46%]), compared with streptococcal infection (23/137 [17%]) and infection including anaerobic bacteria (10/49 [20%]; p < 0.00001, chi(2), 4 df = 23.35). CONCLUSION: Pleural infection differs bacteriologically from pneumonia and requires different treatment. Antibiotics for community-acquired infection should treat aerobic and anaerobic bacteria. Hospital-acquired, gram-negative S. aureus and mixed aerobic infections have a high mortality rate.