Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 148
Filtrar
Más filtros

Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Epidemiol Infect ; 146(4): 409-422, 2018 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29415790

RESUMEN

In this retrospective study, we describe and analyse Salmonella data from four livestock species in Great Britain between 1983 and 2014, focusing on Salmonella Typhimurium. A total of 96 044 Salmonella isolates were obtained during the study period. S. Typhimurium was the predominant serovar isolated from cattle and pigs and represented 40.7% (18 455/45 336) and 58.3% (4495/7709) of isolates from these species respectively, while it only accounted for 6.7% (2114/31 492) of chicken isolates and 8.1% (926/11 507) of turkey isolates. Over the study period, DT104 was the most common phage type in all four species; however, DT104 peaked in occurrence between 1995 and 1999, but is currently rare. Monophasic strains of S. Typhimurium represented less than 3% of all Salmonella isolates in cattle and chickens in 2014, but accounted for 10.4% of all turkey isolates and 39.0% of all pig isolates in the same year. Salmonella isolates were tested for their in vitro susceptibility to 16 antimicrobials. Antimicrobial resistance of S. Typhimurium isolates is largely influenced by the dominance of specific phage types at a certain time, which are commonly associated with particular resistance patterns. Changes in resistance patterns over time were analysed and compared between species.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/farmacología , Ganado/microbiología , Salmonelosis Animal/tratamiento farmacológico , Salmonelosis Animal/epidemiología , Salmonelosis Animal/microbiología , Salmonella typhimurium/efectos de los fármacos , Salmonella typhimurium/aislamiento & purificación , Animales , Tipificación de Bacteriófagos , Bovinos/microbiología , Pollos/microbiología , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Estudios Retrospectivos , Serotipificación , Porcinos/microbiología , Pavos/microbiología , Reino Unido/epidemiología
2.
Epidemiol Infect ; 146(15): 1909-1915, 2018 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30099969

RESUMEN

Salmonella prevalence in UK pigs is amongst the highest in Europe, highlighting the need to investigate pig farms which have managed to maintain a low Salmonella seroprevalence. A total of 19 pig farms that had a consistently low (<10%) seroprevalence over 4 years (named Platinum farms) were compared against 38 randomly selected Control farms, chosen to match the same distribution of production types and geographical distribution of the Platinum farms. Each farm was visited and floor faeces and environmental samples were collected. It was shown that Control farms had a significantly higher median percentage of pooled faecal samples positive for Salmonella compared with the Platinum farms (12.1% and 0.4% for pooled faecal samples, respectively) and were more likely to have serovars of public health importance detected (S. Typhimurium/ monophasic variants or S. Enteritidis). Considering the comprehensive on-farm sampling, the identification of farms negative for Salmonella, along with the identification of those that had maintained low prevalence over a long period is important. The risk factor analyses identified pelleted feed, feed deliveries crossing farm perimeter and regular antibiotic use as associated with being a Control farm. Performance data indicated that Platinum farms were performing better for slaughter live weight than Controls. Limited assessments of available pig movement records suggested that the source of pigs was not key to Platinum status, but further study would be needed to confirm this finding. These results emphasise that maintaining very low prevalence on UK farms is achievable.


Asunto(s)
Granjas , Salmonelosis Animal/epidemiología , Salmonella/aislamiento & purificación , Enfermedades de los Porcinos/epidemiología , Animales , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Heces/microbiología , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo , Salmonella/clasificación , Serogrupo , Porcinos , Reino Unido/epidemiología
3.
Epidemiol Infect ; 145(10): 1983-1992, 2017 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28502264

RESUMEN

Anecdotal evidence has suggested that outdoor-kept pigs show an improvement to health and productivity after being moved to a new site. This study explores whether Salmonella occurrence reduced and was sustained after moving to a new site. Nine farms were followed for a year in which four sampling visits were completed. The highest detection of Salmonella was from pooled faecal dropping from pigs, run-off/ pooled water, rodents and wild birds. Descriptive summaries showed that the prevalence of both all Salmonella and serovars of public health importance were lower at all visits after the move. Some variability was shown in results from individual farms, but a year after the move, six farms still maintained a lower prevalence. A risk factor model showed that the prevalence at visits 2 and 3 after the move was significantly lower than baseline, after accounting for a number of significant factors that were included in the model. These were sample type and seasonality (included as a priori), presence of coughing in the sampled group and Glasser's disease on the farm, and the use of tent or kennel accommodation. This finding provides important evidence that more frequent site moves may help reduce Salmonella prevalence in outdoor herds.


Asunto(s)
Crianza de Animales Domésticos/métodos , Salmonelosis Animal/epidemiología , Salmonella/fisiología , Enfermedades de los Porcinos/epidemiología , Animales , Estudios Longitudinales , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo , Salmonelosis Animal/microbiología , Salmonelosis Animal/prevención & control , Estaciones del Año , Porcinos , Enfermedades de los Porcinos/microbiología , Enfermedades de los Porcinos/prevención & control , Transportes , Reino Unido/epidemiología
4.
Appl Environ Microbiol ; 82(8): 2347-2355, 2016 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26873321

RESUMEN

The genetic diversity of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coliisolates from commercial broiler farms was examined by multilocus sequence typing (MLST), with an assessment of the impact of the sample type and laboratory method on the genotypes of Campylobacter isolated. A total of 645C. jejuniand 106C. coli isolates were obtained from 32 flocks and 17 farms, with 47 sequence types (STs) identified. The Campylobacter jejuniisolates obtained by different sampling approaches and laboratory methods were very similar, with the same STs identified at similar frequencies, and had no major effect on the genetic profile of Campylobacter population in broiler flocks at the farm level. ForC. coli, the results were more equivocal. While some STs were widely distributed within and among farms and flocks, analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) revealed a high degree of genetic diversity among farms forC. jejuni, where farm effects accounted for 70.5% of variance, and among flocks from the same farm (9.9% of variance for C. jejuni and 64.1% forC. coli). These results show the complexity of the population structure of Campylobacterin broiler production and that commercial broiler farms provide an ecological niche for a wide diversity of genotypes. The genetic diversity of C. jejuni isolates among broiler farms should be taken into account when designing studies to understand Campylobacter populations in broiler production and the impact of interventions. We provide evidence that supports synthesis of studies on C. jejuni populations even when laboratory and sampling methods are not identical.


Asunto(s)
Técnicas Bacteriológicas/métodos , Infecciones por Campylobacter/veterinaria , Campylobacter coli/clasificación , Campylobacter jejuni/clasificación , Pollos/microbiología , Variación Genética , Manejo de Especímenes/métodos , Animales , Infecciones por Campylobacter/microbiología , Campylobacter coli/genética , Campylobacter coli/aislamiento & purificación , Campylobacter jejuni/genética , Campylobacter jejuni/aislamiento & purificación , Genotipo , Tipificación de Secuencias Multilocus
5.
Epidemiol Infect ; 144(7): 1538-49, 2016 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26586451

RESUMEN

An abattoir-based study was undertaken between January and May 2013 to estimate the prevalence of Salmonella spp. and Yersinia spp. carriage and seroprevalence of antibodies to Toxoplasma gondii and porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSv) in UK pigs at slaughter. In total, 626 pigs were sampled at 14 abattoirs that together process 80% of the annual UK pig slaughter throughput. Sampling was weighted by abattoir throughput and sampling dates and pig carcasses were randomly selected. Rectal swabs, blood samples, carcass swabs and the whole caecum, tonsils, heart and tongue were collected. Salmonella spp. was isolated from 30·5% [95% confidence interval (CI) 26·5-34·6] of caecal content samples but only 9·6% (95% CI 7·3-11·9) of carcass swabs, which was significantly lower than in a UK survey in 2006-2007. S. Typhimurium and S. 4,[5],12:i:- were the most commonly isolated serovars, followed by S. Derby and S. Bovismorbificans. The prevalence of Yersinia enterocolitica carriage in tonsils was 28·7% (95% CI 24·8-32·7) whereas carcass contamination was much lower at 1·8% (95% CI 0·7-2·8). The seroprevalence of antibodies to Toxoplasma gondii and PRRSv was 7·4% (95% CI 5·3-9·5) and 58·3% (95% CI 53·1-63·4), respectively. This study provides a comparison to previous abattoir-based prevalence surveys for Salmonella and Yersinia, and the first UK-wide seroprevalence estimates for antibodies to Toxoplasma and PRRSv in pigs at slaughter.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome Respiratorio y de la Reproducción Porcina/epidemiología , Salmonelosis Animal/epidemiología , Toxoplasmosis Animal/epidemiología , Yersiniosis/veterinaria , Mataderos , Animales , Anticuerpos Antiprotozoarios/sangre , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Masculino , Síndrome Respiratorio y de la Reproducción Porcina/virología , Virus del Síndrome Respiratorio y Reproductivo Porcino/aislamiento & purificación , Prevalencia , Salmonella/aislamiento & purificación , Salmonelosis Animal/microbiología , Estudios Seroepidemiológicos , Porcinos , Enfermedades de los Porcinos/epidemiología , Enfermedades de los Porcinos/microbiología , Enfermedades de los Porcinos/parasitología , Enfermedades de los Porcinos/virología , Toxoplasma/aislamiento & purificación , Toxoplasmosis Animal/parasitología , Reino Unido/epidemiología , Yersinia/aislamiento & purificación , Yersiniosis/epidemiología , Yersiniosis/microbiología
6.
Avian Pathol ; 45(2): 261-6, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27100154

RESUMEN

Salmonella infection causes a significant number of cases of gastroenteritis and more serious illnesses in people in the UK and EU. The serovars Salmonella Enteritidis and Salmonella Typhimurium are most frequently associated with foodborne illness in Europe. Whilst control programmes exist to monitor these serovars in the chicken and turkey sectors, no regulatory programme is currently in place for the duck sector. A voluntary industry scheme (Duck Assurance Scheme) was launched in the UK in 2010. Hatcheries act as focal points of Salmonella contamination, in particular if Salmonella-contaminated eggs from positive breeding farms enter the hatchery. Five duck hatcheries were visited in this study and four were positive for Salmonella. S. Typhimurium DT8 and S. Indiana were isolated from hatchery 1 and S. Typhimurium DT41 and S. Senftenberg were isolated from hatchery 3. S. Kottbus, S. Bovismorbificans and S. Senftenberg were isolated from hatchery 2 and S. Kedougou was isolated from hatchery 4. Advice on the control/elimination of Salmonella was provided at each visit and a longitudinal study was undertaken to monitor its effectiveness. Extensive sampling was carried out in the hatcheries visited and the tray wash area and waste/external areas had the highest probability of being contaminated. The hatcher area was also found to be a primary focus of contamination. Improvements of farm and hatchery biosecurity standards have resulted in a reduction of hatchery contamination in this study and in previous investigations. Hatcheries 1 and 5 were cleared of Salmonella, demonstrating that elimination of Salmonella contamination from duck hatcheries is achievable.


Asunto(s)
Patos/microbiología , Enfermedades de las Aves de Corral/epidemiología , Salmonelosis Animal/epidemiología , Salmonella enteritidis/aislamiento & purificación , Salmonella typhimurium/aislamiento & purificación , Crianza de Animales Domésticos , Animales , Femenino , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Óvulo/microbiología , Enfermedades de las Aves de Corral/prevención & control , Salmonelosis Animal/prevención & control , Reino Unido/epidemiología
7.
Avian Pathol ; 45(5): 559-68, 2016 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27171857

RESUMEN

Data on husbandry practices, performance, disease and drug use were collected during a cross-sectional survey of 89 poultry meat farms in England and Wales to provide information on possible risk factors for the occurrence of fluoroquinolone (FQ)-resistant bacteria. Faeces samples were used to classify farms as "affected" or "not affected" by FQ-resistant (FQr) Escherichia coli or Campylobacter spp. Risk factor analysis identified the use of FQ on the farms as having by far the strongest association, among the factors considered, with the occurrence of FQr bacteria. Resistant E. coli and/or Campylobacter spp. were found on 86% of the farms with a history of FQ use. However, a substantial proportion of farms with no history of FQ use also yielded FQr organisms, suggesting that resistant bacteria may transfer between farms. Further analysis suggested that for Campylobacter spp., on-farm hygiene, cleaning and disinfection between batches of birds and wildlife control were of most significance. By contrast, for E. coli biosecurity from external contamination was of particular importance, although the modelling indicated that other factors were likely to be involved. Detailed studies on a small number of sites showed that FQr E. coli can survive routine cleaning and disinfection. It appears difficult to avoid the occurrence of resistant bacteria when FQ are used on a farm, but the present findings provide evidence to support recommendations to reduce the substantial risk of the incidental acquisition of such resistance by farms where FQ are not used.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/farmacología , Campylobacter/efectos de los fármacos , Escherichia coli/efectos de los fármacos , Fluoroquinolonas/farmacología , Enfermedades de las Aves de Corral/microbiología , Aves de Corral/microbiología , Crianza de Animales Domésticos , Animales , Campylobacter/aislamiento & purificación , Estudios Transversales , Inglaterra/epidemiología , Escherichia coli/aislamiento & purificación , Granjas , Heces/microbiología , Enfermedades de las Aves de Corral/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo , Gales/epidemiología
8.
Avian Pathol ; 45(5): 576-81, 2016 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27207299

RESUMEN

In 2010, 81 confirmed cases of Salmonella Typhimurium DT8 were reported across England and Northern Ireland - an increase of 26% from 2009 and 41% since 2008. Five cases were hospitalized and one death reported, with a strong association found between cases and the consumption of duck eggs. Once present on farms, Salmonella may become persistent and can survive for long periods of time in residual organic matter, increasing risk of infection for follow-on flocks if cleaning and disinfection is not carried out effectively. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of a range of disinfectants used by the duck industry against Salmonella using laboratory models. Sixteen products were selected from seven chemical groups and the Minimum Inhibitory Concentration and Minimum Bactericidal Concentrations determined. Each product was also tested at the recommended general orders (GO) concentration using a faecal suspension model to mimic boot dips and a surface contamination model to simulate contaminated building fabric and equipment. In the faecal suspension model, all products were effective at 2 × GO concentration, and activity was more inconsistent at GO concentration. At 0.5 × GO concentration, iodine-based and quaternary-ammonium-compound-based products were significantly less effective than products within other chemical groups (P < 0.001). Glutaraldehyde-based products were significantly more effective than the other products in the surface contamination tests (P < 0.001). Chlorocresol-based products were found to be most effective for use in boot dips and aldehyde-based products for surface disinfection, although there was variability between products within a chemical group.


Asunto(s)
Desinfectantes/farmacología , Patos/microbiología , Enfermedades de las Aves de Corral/prevención & control , Salmonelosis Animal/prevención & control , Salmonella typhimurium/efectos de los fármacos , Crianza de Animales Domésticos , Animales , Desinfección , Inglaterra , Heces/microbiología , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana/veterinaria , Modelos Teóricos , Óvulo/microbiología , Enfermedades de las Aves de Corral/microbiología , Salmonelosis Animal/microbiología
9.
Epidemiol Infect ; 143(8): 1681-91, 2015 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25266772

RESUMEN

There has been a rapid rise in the prevalence of cases of monophasic Salmonella Typhimurium (mST) in both humans and farm animals, and it has been found in pigs, cattle and poultry. It is therefore vital to have a good understanding of how to efficiently detect infected farms. The objective of this project was to determine sample type sensitivity in the detection of Salmonella to detect infected groups of animals on both pig (breeder, grower and finisher sites) and cattle (beef and dairy) farms, using data collected from a study investigating farms that were positive for mST, and to explore any variation between different age groups and management practices. A Bayesian approach in the absence of a gold standard was adopted to analyse the individual and pooled faecal sample data collected from each epidemiological group on each of the farms. The sensitivity of pooled sampling depended on the prevalence of infection in the group being sampled, with a higher prevalence leading to higher sensitivity. Pooled sampling was found to be more efficient at detecting positive groups of animals than individual sampling, with the probability of a random sample from a group of animals with 5% prevalence testing positive being equal to 15·5% for immature pigs (3·6% for an individual faecal sample, taking into account the sensitivity and infection prevalence), 7·1% for adult pigs (1·2% for individual sampling), 30% for outdoor cattle (2% for individual sampling) and 34% for indoor cattle (1% for individual sampling). The mean prevalence of each epidemiological group was higher in outdoor farms than indoor for both pigs and cattle (mean within-farm prevalence of 29·4% and 38·7% for outdoor pigs and cattle, respectively, compared to 19·8% and 22·1% for indoor pigs and cattle).


Asunto(s)
Heces/microbiología , Salmonelosis Animal/diagnóstico , Salmonella typhimurium/aislamiento & purificación , Animales , Teorema de Bayes , Bovinos , Prevalencia , Salmonella/aislamiento & purificación , Salmonelosis Animal/epidemiología , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Porcinos
10.
Br Poult Sci ; 56(3): 315-9, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26035643

RESUMEN

1. The objective of this study was to identify any issues arising during the laboratory testing of samples collected under the National Control Programme for Salmonella. 2. A questionnaire-based survey was conducted among Defra (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs)-approved testing laboratories in order to identify any complicating factors that the laboratories may encounter during the processing of samples. 3. Samples were reported to arrive in good condition and within the specified time frame after collection. The only concern was that new clients may be unaware of the procedure or correct sampling consumables to use. 4. There was evidence of variability between laboratories regarding the sample testing procedure used, with deviation from the guidelines in some cases. 5. This finding suggests that further guidance for laboratories on methodology is likely to be beneficial as this could help improve the detection of low levels of Salmonella.


Asunto(s)
Pollos , Enfermedades de las Aves de Corral/diagnóstico , Salmonelosis Animal/diagnóstico , Salmonella/aislamiento & purificación , Manejo de Especímenes/métodos , Pavos , Animales , Enfermedades de las Aves de Corral/microbiología , Salmonelosis Animal/microbiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Reino Unido
11.
Br Poult Sci ; 56(1): 48-57, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25654335

RESUMEN

1. The onset and progression of Salmonella infections was investigated in commercial turkey flocks from placement at 1 d old until slaughter in "brood and move" systems using a longitudinal observational approach based on faeces and environmental sampling with subsequent culture of Salmonella. 2. Persistent Salmonella Newport contamination was found within rearing houses and on their external concrete aprons after cleaning and disinfection between crops of heavily shedding young birds. 3. Salmonella shedding was often detected by 5 d of age and the frequency of positive samples peaked at 14-35 d. Thereafter Salmonella isolations declined, especially in the later (fattening) stages. Samples were still Salmonella-positive at low prevalence in half of the intensively sampled houses at slaughter age. 4. A number of management interventions to combat Salmonella infection of flocks, including sourcing policy, competitive exclusion cultures and cleaning and disinfection, were inadequate to prevent flock infection, although improved disinfection on one unit was associated with a delay in the onset of flock infection.


Asunto(s)
Microbiología Ambiental , Enfermedades de las Aves de Corral/epidemiología , Enfermedades de las Aves de Corral/prevención & control , Salmonelosis Animal/epidemiología , Salmonelosis Animal/prevención & control , Salmonella/aislamiento & purificación , Pavos , Animales , Desinfección , Heces/microbiología , Estudios Longitudinales , Enfermedades de las Aves de Corral/microbiología , Prevalencia , Salmonelosis Animal/microbiología , Reino Unido/epidemiología
12.
Epidemiol Infect ; 142(5): 1061-9, 2014 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24020913

RESUMEN

A key element of national control programmes (NCPs) for Salmonella in commercial laying flocks, introduced across the European Union, is the identification of infected flocks and holdings through statutory sampling. It is therefore important to know the sensitivity of the sampling methods, in order to design effective and efficient surveillance for Salmonella. However, improved Salmonella control in response to the NCP may have influenced key factors that determine the sensitivity of the sampling methods used to detect Salmonella in NCPs. Therefore the aim of this study was to compare estimates of the sensitivity of the sampling methods using data collected before and after the introduction of the NCP, using Bayesian methods. There was a large reduction in the sensitivity of dust in non-cage flocks between the pre-NCP studies (81% of samples positive in positive flocks) and post-NCP studies (10% of samples positive in positive flocks), leading to the conclusion that sampling dust is not recommended for detection of Salmonella in non-cage flocks. However, cage dust (43% of samples positive in positive flocks) was found to be more sensitive than cage faeces (29% of samples positive in positive flocks). To have a high probability of detection, several NCP-style samples need to be used. For confirmation of Salmonella, five NCP faecal samples for cage flocks, and three NCP faecal boot swab samples for non-cage flocks would be required to have the equivalent sensitivity of the EU baseline survey method, which was estimated to have an 87% and 75% sensitivity to detect Salmonella at a 5% within-flock prevalence in cage and non-cage flocks, respectively.


Asunto(s)
Microbiología Ambiental , Modelos Biológicos , Enfermedades de las Aves de Corral/diagnóstico , Enfermedades de las Aves de Corral/microbiología , Salmonelosis Animal/diagnóstico , Salmonelosis Animal/microbiología , Salmonella/aislamiento & purificación , Animales , Teorema de Bayes , Huevos/microbiología , Monitoreo del Ambiente , Heces/microbiología , Aves de Corral/microbiología , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
13.
Br Poult Sci ; 55(5): 569-75, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25350727

RESUMEN

In line with European legislation and the UK National Control Programme for Salmonella, poultry farms are sampled to establish their Salmonella status. Regular samples are collected by the farmer (operator), with annual routine (official) samples being collected by the competent authority to verify achievement of the Salmonella programme reduction target. To confirm sampling was being carried out effectively, a questionnaire-based survey was conducted. The aim was to identify any complicating factors the samplers encountered and the decisions made in these circumstances. There was good compliance with the official sampling visits, with few delays reported. However, farm-specific clothing/separate boots for non-caged houses were rarely provided by the operator, whereas boot dips and hand washing facilities were usually available. The collection of dust was often a problem for official samplers, operator boot swabs were not always moistened before sampling and both sampler groups did not always follow the recommended method for the collection of faeces from belts and scrapers. Overall, there was a good application of the sampling protocol, although a few areas for improvement were identified.


Asunto(s)
Crianza de Animales Domésticos/métodos , Pollos , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Enfermedades de las Aves de Corral/prevención & control , Salmonelosis Animal/prevención & control , Salmonella/fisiología , Manejo de Especímenes/métodos , Animales , Femenino , Enfermedades de las Aves de Corral/microbiología , Salmonelosis Animal/microbiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Reino Unido
14.
Br Poult Sci ; 55(5): 559-68, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25350726

RESUMEN

High standards of biosecurity are known to reduce the risk of disease outbreaks; however, uptake of advice and implementation of biosecurity measures are dependent on many factors. This study assessed the uptake of targeted biosecurity advice by 60 laying hen farms provided during biosecurity audit visits. Advice was provided as bullet point cards focusing on specific areas identified as benefitting from improvement. These covered site entrance, site tidiness, vaccination, boot hygiene, hand hygiene, house tidiness, rodent control, fly control, red mite control and cleaning and disinfection between flocks. Background knowledge of Salmonella and biosecurity and farmers' willingness and intent to implement additional measures were assessed. About 50% of the principal decision-makers had basic background knowledge of Salmonella, with 22% considered well informed; almost all agreed that biosecurity could impact on Salmonella control and many appeared willing to implement additional biosecurity measures. Sixty-three per cent of study farms were categorised using the Defra Farmer Segmentation Model as Modern Family Businesses (MFBs), with 7-11% of farms being categorised as Custodian, Lifestyle Choice, Pragmatist or Challenged Enterprise; however, categorisation, did not determine uptake of advice. The most frequently used advice cards were boot hygiene, red mite control, hand hygiene, site entrance and cleaning and disinfection; uptake of advice ranged from 54 to 80% depending on the advice card. Uptake of advice by the farmers was encouraging, especially considering it was being provided by people other than their usual source of biosecurity information. Those who did not implement the recommended measures cited cost, difficulty of enforcement and practicality as the main reasons. However, the positive uptake of advice and implementation of recommended measures by many farmers demonstrates that targeted advice, discussed face to face with farmers, on a small number of key areas, is a potentially effective method of providing biosecurity information to complement more lengthy formal advisory reports.


Asunto(s)
Crianza de Animales Domésticos/métodos , Pollos , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Enfermedades de las Aves de Corral/prevención & control , Salmonelosis Animal/prevención & control , Salmonella/fisiología , Medidas de Seguridad , Animales , Inglaterra , Femenino , Humanos , Enfermedades de las Aves de Corral/microbiología , Salmonelosis Animal/microbiología , Factores Socioeconómicos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Gales
15.
Br Poult Sci ; 54(1): 96-105, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23444859

RESUMEN

1. A field study was performed to investigate the presence and characteristics of ciprofloxacin-resistant, extended spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL) and AmpC Escherichia coli from turkeys in Great Britain. E. coli were isolated from ~9000 boot swab samples from 27 different farms owned by four different companies. Between 1 and 14 visits were made to each farm (mean 3) at between 0 and 15 m intervals (mean ~5 m). 2. CHROMagar ECC with and without ciprofloxacin or cephalosporin antibiotics was used as selective isolation media. Representative isolates with different phenotypes were tested for mutations in gyrA and for: qnrA, B, S, qepA and aac(6')-Ib genes, for ESBL phenotype, the presence of bla genes and plasmid type, and for ampC genes Representative ciprofloxacin-resistant and CTX-M isolates were further tested for serotype and PFGE type. On ciprofloxacin selective media 55% of samples yielded ciprofloxacin resistant E. coli and of those further analysed, most had ciprofloxacin MICs >4 mg/l and mutations in gyrA. 3. For the different companies, the mean number of samples per farm with cefoxitin- or cefotaxime-resistant isolates ranged from 1·0% to 61·9% and 4·7% to 31·7% respectively. Cefotaxime-resistance was most commonly associated with an ESBL phenotype, a CTX-M-1 or CTX-M-14 sequence type and an I1-γ or K plasmid inc type. The mechanism of cefoxitin resistance was not determined for most isolates, but where determined it was bla . 4. PFGE and serotyping showed clonally-related isolates persisting over multiple visits suggesting both more prudent use of antibiotics and improved farm hygiene are needed to address the issue of antimicrobial resistance in isolates from turkeys.


Asunto(s)
Cefalosporinas/farmacología , Ciprofloxacina/farmacología , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple/genética , Escherichia coli/efectos de los fármacos , Pavos/microbiología , Animales , Escherichia coli/aislamiento & purificación , Proteínas de Escherichia coli/química , Proteínas de Escherichia coli/genética , Genotipo , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Fenotipo , Serotipificación , Reino Unido/epidemiología , beta-Lactamasas/química , beta-Lactamasas/genética
16.
Zoonoses Public Health ; 70(6): 523-541, 2023 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37337320

RESUMEN

Campylobacter is a major cause of food poisoning and is typically the most common cause of gastroenteritis in the UK. Data collected at broiler farm and abattoir level, for slaughter batches that were sampled for UK-wide monitoring, were used to generate two epidemiological risk factor models. A total of 483 batches slaughtered between January 2016 and March 2017 were used in the analysis, coming from 19 abattoirs representing more than 85% of UK broiler production. For each selected slaughter batch, one carcase was sampled after primary chilling and 10 randomly sampled birds had caecal samples collected at the evisceration point. Samples were used for Campylobacter identification and quantification. Two multivariable mixed-effects models were designed, one with the binary outcome for the detection of a highly contaminated (>1000 colony forming units (CFU)/g) Campylobacter-positive carcase, whereas the other used the Campylobacter colony count (CFU/g) carcase outcome. The results suggest that caecal colonization within the batch was a key factor for the occurrence of Campylobacter on carcases, and many factors that were identified in the model were also likely to be related to colonization or related to the risk of introduction of Campylobacter from partial depopulation (referred to as thinning) of ~30% of the flock approximately 1 week before full flock depopulation events. The amount of neck skin in the sample was another key factor identified and was included in both models as a risk factor. The models have also identified other factors which may be related to the general health and husbandry on-farm (use of prebiotics or vaccines, and identification of the product used for drinking line cleaning), whereas the other factors may identify control points related to transmission within a farm. The identification of these variables could help focus control efforts on-farm, especially for relatively easy improvements, such as improving the provision of house-specific bird-weighing buckets/cages in houses.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Campylobacter , Campylobacter , Animales , Microbiología de Alimentos , Pollos , Infecciones por Campylobacter/epidemiología , Infecciones por Campylobacter/veterinaria , Factores de Riesgo , Mataderos , Reino Unido/epidemiología
17.
Avian Pathol ; 41(1): 83-9, 2012.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22845325

RESUMEN

Fluoroquinolones are a widely used group of antimicrobials in both human and animal medicine, with ciprofloxacin being a critically important fluoroquinolone for serious human infections. The present study reports on a 1-year survey for the presence of ciprofloxacin-resistant Escherichia coli in turkeys from Great Britain. Boot swabs were taken from 442 turkey flocks comprised of 125 breeding flocks and 317 meat flocks from 337 different farms over a 1-year period (2006 to 2007). CHROMagar ECC containing 1 mg/l ciprofloxacin was used to obtain ciprofloxacin-resistant isolates. Isolates were tested for sensitivity to 16 different antimicrobials. Isolates with ciprofloxacin minimum inhibitory concentrations ≥8 mg/l were tested for mutations in gyrA by polymerase chain reaction and DNA sequencing. Selected isolates were tested by multiplex polymerase chain reaction for qnrA, qnrB and qnrS, qepA and aac(6')-Ib-cr genes. Conjugations were performed to assess the transferability of resistance to quinolones. Ciprofloxacin-resistant E. coli was found in 22.4% of turkey breeding flocks and 60.9% of meat flocks. Two main mutations in gyrA, as well as a range of silent mutations, were identified in resistant isolates. Flocks with transferable resistance genes qnrB, qnrS, and aac(6')-Ib-cr were found at a low flock prevalence of 4.2%, 1.6% and 1.0%, respectively; however, under laboratory conditions only transfer of qnrS genes could be demonstrated. This work has confirmed the occurrence of ciprofloxacin-resistant E. coli strains throughout turkey breeding and meat flocks, with almost one-third of E. coli isolates being resistant to ciprofloxacin. Of those, more than 87% were also resistant to three or more antimicrobial classes.


Asunto(s)
Ciprofloxacina , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana/genética , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/veterinaria , Escherichia coli/genética , Enfermedades de las Aves de Corral/epidemiología , Enfermedades de las Aves de Corral/microbiología , Pavos , Animales , Girasa de ADN/genética , Análisis Mutacional de ADN/veterinaria , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/epidemiología , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/microbiología , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana/veterinaria , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa Multiplex/veterinaria , Polimorfismo de Longitud del Fragmento de Restricción , Prevalencia , Reino Unido/epidemiología
18.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 66(1): 86-95, 2011 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21098542

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: to determine the prevalence of extended-spectrum ß-lactamases (ESBLs) in Escherichia coli from poultry in Great Britain (GB). METHODS: E. coli was isolated from 388 broiler chicken caecal samples from 22 abattoirs and from boot swabs from 442 turkey flocks over successive 1 year periods. CHROMagar ECC with and without cephalosporin antibiotics was used as isolation medium and the chicken study also used CHROMagar CTX. ESBL phenotype isolates were tested for the presence of bla(CTX-M,) bla(OXA), bla(SHV), bla(TEM) and ampC genes(.) CTX-M isolates were tested for O25 serogroup, replicon, CTX-M sequence, multilocus sequence type (MLST), PFGE type, plasmid transfer and qnrA, qnrB, qnrS, qepA and aac(6')-Ib genes. RESULTS: CTX-M-carrying E. coli were isolated from 54.5% of the broiler abattoirs and from 3.6% of individual broiler caecal samples and were CTX-M sequence types 1 (mainly), 3 and 15 with replicon types I1-γ, A/C and P/F, and I1-γ, respectively. CTX-M-carrying E. coli were isolated from 5.2% of turkey meat production farms and 6.9% of turkey breeder farms and were CTX-M sequence types 1, 14 (mainly), 15 and 55 with mainly replicon types F, FIA, K and I1-γ, respectively. None of the CTX-M isolates was serogroup O25. PFGE/MLST showed the CTX-M isolates to be clonally diverse, although MLST 156 with CTX-M-15 was isolated from both chickens and turkeys and has been previously reported in gulls. CTX-M-negative, ESBL- and bla(TEM)-positive strains were mainly TEM-52C. CONCLUSIONS: poultry-derived CTX-M E. coli in GB are different from major CTX-M sequence types causing disease in humans.


Asunto(s)
Ciego/microbiología , Pollos/microbiología , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/veterinaria , Escherichia coli/enzimología , Pavos/microbiología , beta-Lactamasas/biosíntesis , Animales , Técnicas de Tipificación Bacteriana , ADN Bacteriano/genética , Electroforesis en Gel de Campo Pulsado , Escherichia coli/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/epidemiología , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/microbiología , Genes Bacterianos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana/métodos , Epidemiología Molecular , Tipificación Molecular , Tipificación de Secuencias Multilocus , Plásmidos/análisis , Prevalencia , Reino Unido/epidemiología
19.
Avian Pathol ; 40(5): 429-36, 2011 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21879803

RESUMEN

Salmonella Typhimurium has been reported to contaminate egg production across the world, but where Salmonella Enteritidis is endemic it is this latter serovar that dominates egg-borne salmonellosis. However, Salmonella Typhimurium is a major food-borne pathogen so it is important to understand how it can impact the microbiological safety of eggs and what serovar-specific control strategies may be appropriate in the future as control over Salmonella Enteritidis continues to improve. To that end, the present review examines the published literature on Salmonella Typhimurium in laying hens and eggs, with particular reference to comparative studies examining different serovars. Experimentally Salmonella Enteritidis is more often isolated from egg contents and seems to adhere better to reproductive tract mucosa, whilst Salmonella Typhimurium appears to provoke a more intense tissue pathology and immune response, and flock infections are more transient. However, it is observed in many cases that the present body of evidence does not identify clear differences between specific behaviours of the serovars Typhimurium and Enteritidis, whether in laying hens, in their eggs, or in the laying environment. It is concluded that further long-term experimental and natural infection studies are needed in order to generate a clearer picture.


Asunto(s)
Huevos/microbiología , Enfermedades de las Aves de Corral/microbiología , Salmonelosis Animal/epidemiología , Salmonelosis Animal/microbiología , Salmonella enteritidis/patogenicidad , Salmonella typhimurium/patogenicidad , Animales , Pollos , Femenino , Ovario/microbiología , Oviductos/microbiología , Salmonella enteritidis/genética , Salmonella typhimurium/genética , Especificidad de la Especie
20.
J Appl Microbiol ; 111(4): 960-70, 2011 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21722278

RESUMEN

AIMS: This study investigated the diversity and persistence of Salmonella strains through the pork finishing cycle, from the farm into the abattoir. METHODS AND RESULTS: Isolates from four batches of finishers, from farm to abattoir, were used. Salmonella Typhimurium isolates were subjected to molecular typing using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and variable number of tandem repeat analysis. The results demonstrated that infection was transferred from the farm to the abattoir. Within the abattoir, infection from individual pigs contaminated the exterior of the carcass and pigs exposed to Salmonella in the lairage were infected. CONCLUSIONS: Salmonella can be introduced at various points in the pig production and slaughter process. Carcass contamination may arise from infection on farm and exposure in the lairage and abattoir environment. Pigs could be contaminated by previous batches of pigs while in lairage or during the dressing process. Salmonella infection on farms is dynamic with multiple serovars present from different sources. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: Molecular typing methods facilitated the tracing of Salm. Typhimurium through the production cycle and differentiated some farm-acquired from abattoir-acquired strains. The findings emphasize the importance of integrated control strategies along the pork food chain.


Asunto(s)
Repeticiones de Minisatélite , Salmonelosis Animal/microbiología , Salmonella typhimurium/genética , Enfermedades de los Porcinos/microbiología , Porcinos/microbiología , Mataderos , Animales , Técnicas de Tipificación Bacteriana , Electroforesis en Gel de Campo Pulsado , Contaminación de Alimentos/análisis , Microbiología de Alimentos , Carne/microbiología , Salmonelosis Animal/epidemiología , Salmonella typhimurium/aislamiento & purificación , Enfermedades de los Porcinos/epidemiología , Reino Unido/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA