Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
Aten Primaria ; 49(7): 389-398, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28314542

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of computerized clinical practice guidelines on the management, diagnosis, treatment, control, and follow-up of the main cardiovascular risk factors: hypertension, hypercholesterolaemia, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. DESIGN: Pre-post controlled study. SETTING: Catalonia, autonomous community located in north-eastern Spain. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals aged 35-74 years assigned to general practitioners of the Catalan Health Institute. INTERVENTION: The intervention group consisted of individuals whose general practitioners had accessed the computerized clinical practice guidelines at least twice a day, while the control group consisted of individuals whose general practitioner had never accessed the computerized clinical practice guidelines platform. MAIN OUTCOMES: The Chi-squared test was used to detect significant differences in the follow-up, control, and treatment variables for all three disorders (hypertension, hypercholesterolaemia, and type 2 diabetes mellitus) between individuals assigned to users and non-users of the computerized clinical practice guidelines, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 189,067 patients were included in this study, with a mean age of 56 years (standard deviation 12), and 55.5% of whom were women. Significant differences were observed in hypertension management, treatment and control; type 2 diabetes mellitus management, treatment and diagnoses, and the management and control of hypercholesterolaemia in both sexes. CONCLUSIONS: Computerized clinical practice guidelines are an effective tool for the control and follow-up of patients diagnosed with hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and hypercholesterolaemia. The usefulness of computerized clinical practice guidelines to diagnose and adequately treat individuals with these disorders remains unclear.

2.
Inform Prim Care ; 20(2): 129-39, 2012.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23710777

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The electronic medical records software of the Catalan Institute of Health has recently incorporated an electronic version of clinical practice guidelines (e-CPGs). This study aims to assess the impact of the implementation of e-CPGs on the diagnosis, treatment, control and management of hypercholesterolaemia, diabetes mellitus type 2 and hypertension. METHODS: Eligible study participants are those aged 35-74 years assigned to family practitioners (FPs) of the Catalan Institute of Health. Routinely collected data from electronic primary care registries covering 80% of the Catalan population will be analysed using two approaches: (1) a cross-sectional study to describe the characteristics of the sample before e-CPG implementation; (2) a controlled before-and-after study with 1-year follow-up to ascertain the effect of e-CPG implementation. Patients of FPs who regularly use the e-CPGs will constitute the intervention group; the control group will comprise patients assigned to FPs not regularly using the e-CPG. The outcomes are: (1) suspected and confirmed diagnoses, (2) control of clinical variables, (3) requests for tests and (4) proportions of patients with adequate drug prescriptions. RESULTS: This protocol should represent a reproducible process to assess the impact of the implementation of e-CPGs. We anticipate reporting results in late 2013. CONCLUSION: This project will assess the effectiveness of e-CPGs to improve clinical decisions and healthcare procedures in the three disorders analysed. The results will shed light on the use of evidence-based medicine to improve clinical practice of FPs.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control , Registros Electrónicos de Salud/normas , Implementación de Plan de Salud/organización & administración , Atención Primaria de Salud/normas , Adulto , Anciano , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/etiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/terapia , Registros Electrónicos de Salud/organización & administración , Práctica Clínica Basada en la Evidencia , Femenino , Implementación de Plan de Salud/métodos , Humanos , Hipercolesterolemia/complicaciones , Hipercolesterolemia/diagnóstico , Hipercolesterolemia/terapia , Hipertensión/complicaciones , Hipertensión/diagnóstico , Hipertensión/terapia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Atención Primaria de Salud/métodos , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud/métodos , España
3.
Med Clin (Barc) ; 143 Suppl 1: 55-61, 2014 Jul.
Artículo en Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25128361

RESUMEN

The aim of this paper is to discover the aggregated results of a general notification system for incidents related to patient safety implemented in Catalan hospitals from 2010 to 2013. Observational study describing the incidents notified from January 2010 to December 2013 from all hospitals in Catalonia forming part of the project to create operational patient safety management units. The Patient Safety Notification and Learning System (SiNASP) was used. This makes it possible to classify incidents depending on the area where they occur, the type of incident notified, the consequences, the seriousness according to the Severity Assessment Code (SAC) and the profession of the notifying party, as the principal variables. The system was accessed via the Internet (SiNASP portal). Access was voluntary and anonymous or with a name given and later removed. During the study period, notification of a total of 5,948 incidents came from 22-29 hospitals. 5,244 of the incidents were handled by the centres and these are the ones analysed in the study. 64% (3,380) affected patients, 18% (950) created a situation capable of causing an incident and 18% (914) did not affect patients. 26% of incidents that affected patients (864) caused some kind of harm. Most incidents occurred during hospitalisation (54%) and in casualty (15%), followed by the ICU (9%) and the surgical block (8%). The most frequent notifying parties were nurses (71%) followed by doctors (15%) and pharmacists (9%). In terms of severity, most incidents were classified as low-risk (37%) or incidents that did not affect the patient (36%). However, 40 cases (0.76%) of extreme risk should be highlighted. In terms of the types of incident notified, most were due to a medication error (26.8%), followed by falls (16.3%) and patient identification (10.6%). The majority of notifications were incidents that affected patients and, of these, 26% caused harm. In general, they occurred in hospitalisation units and notification was mostly given by nurses. The incident notification system is a tool that complements others for promoting a patient safety culture and defining the risk profile of a health organisation. The opportunity for learning from experience is the reason for the existence of the notification system.


Asunto(s)
Seguridad del Paciente , Gestión de Riesgos/organización & administración , Accidentes por Caídas/estadística & datos numéricos , Departamentos de Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Internet , Errores Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Sistemas de Identificación de Pacientes , Pacientes , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Gestión de Riesgos/estadística & datos numéricos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , España/epidemiología
4.
Med Clin (Barc) ; 143 Suppl 1: 74-80, 2014 Jul.
Artículo en Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25128364

RESUMEN

There are few experiences of accreditation models validated by primary care teams (EAP). The aim of this study was to detail the process of design, development, and subsequent validation of the consensus EAP accreditation model of Catalonia. An Operating Committee of the Health Department of Catalonia revised models proposed by the European Foundation for Quality Management, the Joint Commission International and the Institut Català de la Salut and proposed 628 essential standards to the technical group (25 experts in primary care and quality of care), to establish consensus standards. The consensus document was piloted in 30 EAP for the purpose of validating the contents, testing standards and identifying evidence. Finally, we did a survey to assess acceptance and validation of the document. The Technical Group agreed on a total of 414 essential standards. The pilot selected a total of 379. Mean compliance with the standards of the final document in the 30 EAP was 70.4%. The standards results were the worst fulfilment percentage. The survey target that 83% of the EAP found it useful and 78% found the content of the accreditation manual suitable as a tool to assess the quality of the EAP, and identify opportunities for improvement. On the downside they highlighted its complexity and laboriousness. We have a model that fits the reality of the EAP, and covers all relevant issues for the functioning of an excellent EAP. The model developed in Catalonia is a model for easy understanding.


Asunto(s)
Acreditación/normas , Instituciones de Salud/normas , Modelos Organizacionales , Atención Primaria de Salud/organización & administración , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Consenso , Objetivos , Agencias Gubernamentales , Adhesión a Directriz , Planificación en Salud , Recursos en Salud , Proyectos Piloto , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/normas , Asignación de Recursos , España , Gestión de la Calidad Total
5.
Med Clin (Barc) ; 143 Suppl 1: 48-54, 2014 Jul.
Artículo en Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25128360

RESUMEN

Since its inception in 2006, the Alliance for Patient Safety in Catalonia has played a major role in promoting and shaping a series of projects related to the strategy of the Ministry of Health, Social Services and Equality, for improving patient safety. One such project was the creation of functional units or committees of safety in hospitals in order to facilitate the management of patient safety. The strategy has been implemented in hospitals in Catalonia which were selected based on criteria of representativeness. The intervention was based on two lines of action, one to develop the model framework and the other for its development. Firstly the strategy for safety management based on EFQM (European Foundation for Quality Management) was defined with the development of standards, targets and indicators to implement security while the second part involved the introduction of tools, methodologies and knowledge to the management support of patient safety and risk prevention. The project was developed in four hospital areas considered higher risk, each assuming six goals for safety management. Some of these targets such as the security control panel or system of adverse event reporting were shared. 23 hospitals joined the project in Catalonia. Despite the different situations in each centre, high compliance was achieved in the development of the objectives. In each of the participating areas the security control panel was developed. Stable structures for safety management were established or strengthened. Training in patient safety played and important role, 1415 professionals participated. Through these kind of projects not only have been introduced programs of proven effectiveness in reducing risks, but they also provide to the facilities a work system that allows autonomy in diagnosis and analysis of the different risk situations or centre specific safety issues.


Asunto(s)
Seguridad del Paciente , Accidentes por Caídas/prevención & control , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/normas , Objetivos , Política de Salud , Hospitales Privados/organización & administración , Hospitales Públicos/organización & administración , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/normas , Errores de Medicación/prevención & control , Modelos Teóricos , Quirófanos/normas , Manejo del Dolor , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Gestión de Riesgos/organización & administración , España , Gestión de la Calidad Total
6.
Med Clin (Barc) ; 143 Suppl 1: 68-73, 2014 Jul.
Artículo en Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25128363

RESUMEN

The implementation of an accreditation model for healthcare centres in Catalonia which was launched for acute care hospitals, leaving open the possibility of implementing it in the rest of lines of service (mental health and addiction, social health, and primary healthcare centres) is described. The model is based on the experience acquired over more tan 31 years of hospital accreditation and quality assessment linked to management. In January 2006 a model with accreditation methodology adapted to the European Foundation for Quality Management (EFQM) model was launched. 83 hospitals are accredited, with an average of 82.6% compliance with the standards required for accreditation. The number of active assessment bodies is 5, and the accreditation period is 3 years. A higher degree of compliance of the so-called "agent" criteria with respect to "outcome" criteria is obtained. Qualitative aspects for implementation to be stressed are: a strong commitment both from managers and staff in the centres, as well as a direct and fluent communication between the accreditation body (Ministry of Health of the Government of Catalonia) and accredited centres. Professionalism of audit bodies and an optimal communication between audit bodies and accredited centres is also added.


Asunto(s)
Acreditación , Hospitales/normas , Fundaciones , Agencias Gubernamentales , Humanos , Relaciones Interinstitucionales , Auditoría Médica , Modelos Organizacionales , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , España , Gestión de la Calidad Total
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA