Postoperative pulmonary complications and mortality after major abdominal surgery. An observational multicenter prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) significantly contribute to postoperative morbidity and mortality. We conducted a study to determine the incidence of PPCs after major elective abdominal surgery and their association with early and 1-year mortality in patient without pre-existing respiratory disease. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter observational prospective clinical study in 40 Italian centers. 1542 patients undergoing elective major abdominal surgery were recruited in a time period of 14 days and clinically managed according to local protocol. The primary outcome was to determine the incidence of PPCs. Further, we aimed to identify independent predictors for PPCs and examine the association between PPCs and mortality. RESULTS: PPCs occurred in 12.6% (95% CI 11.1-14.4%) of patients with significant differences among general (18.3%, 95% CI 15.7-21.0%), gynecological (3.7%, 95% CI 2.1-6.0%) and urological surgery (9.0%, 95% CI 6.0-12.8%). PPCs development was associated with known pre- and intraoperative risk factors. Patients who developed PPCs had longer length of hospital stay, higher risk of 30-days hospital readmission, and increased in-hospital and one-year mortality (OR 3.078, 95% CI 1.825-5.191; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of PPCs in patients without pre-existing respiratory disease undergoing elective abdominal surgery is high and associated with worse clinical outcome at one year after surgery. General surgery is associated with higher incidence of PPCs and mortality compared to gynecological and urological surgery.

Sedation in digestive endoscopy: innovations for an old technique.

Patient complexity, along with duration, number and invasiveness of procedures, increase every year in digestive endoscopy; so deep sedation, analgesia or general anesthesia requests are rising. The need for a safe, flexible, low cost and high-profile service play a central role in drugs, devices and monitoring development. The patient's degree of comfort and anxiety are also critical. On the other hand, the role of the anesthesiologist is still debated, and many European countries are promoting non-anesthesiologist administration of propofol (NAAP). For high risk patients, anesthesiologists play an important role in choosing sedative drugs, kind of anesthesia/analgesia and devices for airway control. New drugs with safe profile, low costs, and favorable pharmacokinetics are now available for digestive endoscopy. Among these, fospropofol, a water-soluble prodrug of Propofol, is a very promising compound. Moreover, new devices and different modalities of ventilation can help anesthesiologists in management of high-risk patients, like obese patients and others patients at risk of hypopnea/apnea. The main challenges for anesthesiologists in this setting are endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, management of obese patients and recovery time after procedure, since digestive endoscopies are frequently performed as outpatient procedures. Nevertheless, these short and at low risk procedures can induce cognitive impairment. Currently, only anesthesiologists seem to have the competences to maintain high levels of safety by an appropriate evaluation and sedatives' choice, and a detailed protocol should be present in each gastrointestinal endoscopy department. In conclusion, the role of the anesthetist should be to supervise endoscopy activities at every level.

An unusual case of acute unilateral parotitis following abdominal surgery. Report of a case and review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative parotitis is a well known entity which can develop in patients who undergo major abdominal surgery. METHODS: We present a case of postoperative parotitis which occurred after a laparotomy for incisional hernia repair. RESULTS: After establishing diagnosis by ultrasonography assessment and blood chemical tests, patient was successfully treated by morphine discontinuing and antibiotics therapy. CONCLUSION: Beside sialolithiasis, sitting position or dehydratation we suggest that morphine could play a substantial role in the development of postoperative parotitis.

Recurrent postoperative delirium in spinocerebellar ataxia type 2: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative delirium is a relatively uncommon condition in middle aged patients, but very widespread in patients with psychiatric and neurological diseases undergoing general anesthesia. Few studies are currently available in the literature on the perioperative anesthesiological management of patients suffering from spinocerebellar ataxia. CASE PRESENTATION: A 58-year-old Caucasian woman affected by spinocerebellar ataxia type 2 underwent total hip arthroplasty for advanced osteoarthritis. One month later, debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention was performed for periprosthetic hip infection. Both times she underwent general anesthesia and developed an early postoperative delirium treated successfully with chlorpromazine. CONCLUSIONS: This case report highlights the need to correctly manage patients at high risk of developing postoperative delirium, especially if suffering from degenerative neurological diseases. On the other hand, further studies will be needed in order to evaluate if spinocerebellar ataxia is an independent risk factor for the development of this acute and transient pathological condition.

Effect of different doses of remifentanil on stress response during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

OBJECTIVES: An adequate perioperative analgesia reduces neuroendocrine stress response and postoperative complica-tions. Opioids are the most effective parenteral drugs to control pain and stress response. DESIGN: This is a prospective randomized double-blinded controlled study. SETTING: Institutional tertiary level. PATIENTS, PARTICIPANTS: Fifty patients underwent general anesthesia with desflurane for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: To compare two different doses of remifentanil (0.15 mcg/kg/min or 0.3 mcg/kg/min) in reducing markers of stress. Perioperative stress was assessed through the dosage of adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), cortisol, growth hormone (GH), and prolactin (PRL). Three venous blood samples were collected from patients: before transferring the patient to the operating room (Time 0), at the trocar insertion (Time 1), and 1 hour after the end of the surgery (Time 2). RESULTS: Hemodynamic parameters showed no differences between the two groups. The authors observed an increase of GH and PRL in both groups at trocar insertion (Time 1) (p = 0.473 and 0.754, respectively). ACTH and cortisol showed a decrease at Time 1 and an increase after surgery (p = 0.586). The modification of stress parameters levels showed no significant differences between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study showed that a lower dose of remifentanil is equally effective in controlling stress hormones during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Dreams recall and auditory evoked potentials during propofol anaesthesia.

It is unclear whether shorter wave latencies of middle-latency-auditory-evoked-potentials may be associated to cognitive function other than nondeclarative memory. We investigated the presence of declarative, nondeclarative and dreaming memory in propofol-anaesthetized patients and any relationship to intraoperatively registered middle-latency-auditory-evoked-potentials. An audiotape containing one of two stories was presented to patients during anaesthesia. Patients were interviewed on dream recall immediately upon emergence from anaesthesia. Declarative and nondeclarative memories for intraoperative listening were assessed 24 h after awakening without pointing out positive findings. Six patients who reported dream recall showed an intraoperative Pa latency less than that of patients who were unable to remember any dreams (P<0.001). A high responsiveness degree of primary cortex was associated to dream recall formation during anaesthesia.

Perioperative evaluation of myasthenia gravis.

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is the prototype of antibody mediated autoimmune disease and results from the production of autoantibodies against the acetylcholine receptor (AChR) of the neuromuscular synapse. Adequate preoperative evaluation of the myasthenic patient must be carried out carefully. Age, sex, onset and duration of the disease as well as the presence of thymoma may determine the response to thymectomy. Specific attention should be paid to voluntary and respiratory muscle strength. The preoperative preparation of MG patients is essential for the success of surgery. It depends on the severity of clinical status and changes if myasthenic patients receive anticholinesterase therapy. Myasthenic patients may have little respiratory reserve, and hence depressant drugs for preoperative premedication should be used with caution and avoided in patients with bulbar symptoms. The anaesthetic management of myasthenic patient must be individualized in according to the severity of the disease and the type of surgery required. The use of regional or local anaesthesia seems warranted whenever possible. General anaesthesia can be performed safely when patient is optimally prepared and neuromuscular transmission is adequately monitored during and after surgery. Adequate postoperative pain control, pulmonary toilet, and avoidance of drugs that interfere with neuromuscular transmission will facilitate tracheal extubation. Myasthenia gravis is a disease with many implications for the safe administration of anaesthesia. The potential for respiratory compromise in these patients requires the anaesthesiologist to be familiar with the underlying disease state, as well as the interaction of anaesthetic and non-anaesthetic drugs with MG.

Perioperative management of thymectomy.

Thymoma is the most frequent type of tumor in the anterior-superior mediastinum. The presentation of thymomas is variable; most are asymptomatic and others present themselves with local compression syndrome or parathymic syndrome; rarely thymomas appear as an acute emergency. Surgery is the treatment of choice for thymic tumors and complete resection is the most important prognostic factor. Surgery with adjuvant radiation is recommended for invasive thymoma. The anaesthetic management of patients with mediastinal thymoma undergoing thymectomy is associated with several risks related to potential airway obstruction, hypoxia and cardiovascular collapse. Patients at high risk of perioperative complications can be identified by the presence of cardiopulmonary signs and symptoms. However, asymptomatic thymomas have been occurred with acute cardiorespiratory complications under general anaesthesia. A careful preoperative evaluation of signs, symptoms, chest X-ray, CT scan, MRI, cardiac echogram and venous angiogram should be helpful to investigate neoplasm presence and the area of invasion; moreover, an adequate airway and cardiovascular management, such as performing an awake intubation in the sitting position, allowing spontaneous and non-controlled ventilation, a rigid bronchoscope available and a standby cardiopulmonary bypass, is suggested to prevent the main life-threatening cardiorespiratory complications.

Effect of remifentanil and fentanyl on postoperative cognitive function and cytokines level in elderly patients undergoing major abdominal surgery.

PURPOSE: Postoperative cognitive dysfunction is a frequent complication occurring in geriatric patients. Type of anesthesia and the patient's inflammatory response may contribute to postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD). In this prospective randomized double-blinded controlled study we hypothesized that intraoperative remifentanil may reduce immediate and early POCD compared to fentanyl and evaluated if there is a correlation between cognitive status and postoperative inflammatory cytokines level. METHODS: Six hundred twenty-two patients older than 60 years undergoing major abdominal surgery were randomly assigned to two groups and treated with different opioids during surgery: continuous infusion of remifentanil or fentanyl boluses. Twenty-five patients per group were randomly selected for the quantitative determination of serum interleukin (IL)-1ß, IL-6, and IL-10 to return to the ward and to the seventh postoperative day. RESULTS: Cognitive status and its correlation with cytokines levels were assessed. The groups were comparable regarding to POCD incidence; however, IL-6 levels were lower the seventh day after surgery for remifentanil group (P= .04). No correlation was found between POCD and cytokine levels. CONCLUSIONS: The use of remifentanil does not reduce POCD.

Sedation in PACU: the role of propofol.

In critically ill patients, adequate sedation increases comfort, minimizes stress response and facilitates diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Propofol (2-, 6-diisopropylphenol) is an intravenous sedative-hypnotic agent popular for sedation in the Intensive Care Unit. The favorable propofol pharmacokinetic, characterized by a three compartment linear model, allows rapid onset and short duration of action. The emergence time from sedation with propofol varies with the depth and the duration of sedation and the patient's bodyweight. Propofol causes hypotension, particularly in volume depleted patients, decreases cerebral oxygen consumption, reduces intracranial pressure and has potent anti-convulsant properties. It is a potent antioxidant, has anti-inflammatory properties and is a bronchodilator. As a consequence of these properties, propofol is being increasingly used in the management of traumatic head injury, status epilepticus, delirium tremens, status asthmaticus and in septic patients. Prolonged use (>48 h) of high doses of propofol (>66 mcg/Kg/min) has been associated with lactic acidosis, bradycardia, and lipidemia in pediatric patients. A rare complication firstly reported in pediatrics patients and also observed in adults is known as "propofol syndrome" characterized by myocardial failure, metabolic acidosis and rhabdomiolysis. Hyperkalemia and renal failure have also been associated with this syndrome. Hypertriglyceridemia and pancreatitis are uncommon complications. A large number of trials have compared the use of propofol with midazolam. Sedation with propofol is associated with adequate sedation in ICU patients, shorter weaning time and earlier tracheal extubation compared to midazolam, but not before ICU discharge.

Postoperative management of elective esophagectomy for cancer.

Postoperative management after elective esophagectomy for cancer has not been standardized. Thoracoabdominal incision with associated pain, extended operative time with consequent extracellular fluid shifts, single lung ventilation, potential for prolonged postoperative mechanical ventilation and comorbidities in patients with esophageal cancer, all contribute to high perioperative risk. Respiratory problems remain the major cause of both mortality and morbidity after esophagectomy for cancer. A specific pulmonary disorder, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) occurs in 10-20% of patients after esophagectomy. ARDS mortality exceeds 50%. Atrial fibrillation, that complicates recovery in 20 to 25% of patients after esophagectomy, contributes to make outcome worse. Anesthesiologists should adopt strategies known to be able to optimize patient outcome. Decreased postoperative mortality and morbidity have been associated with epidural analgesia, bronchoscopy to clear persistent bronchial secretions, intraoperative fluid restriction and early extubation. It has been shown that setting up early respiratory physiotherapy and mobilitation may improve functional recovery.

Preoperative anesthetic evaluation and preparation in patients requiring esophageal surgery for cancer.

Esophagectomy for carcinoma of the esophagus is associated with significant mortality and morbidity. Patients with esophageal cancer have frequently obstruction with dysphagia and they often develop malnutrition. In addition, patients can suffer from chronic aspiration leading to a poor preoperative respiratory status. Thorough preoperative evaluation is essential for assessing the operative risk in the individual patient. Respiratory and cardiac problems are the most common complications and assessment of surgical risk, preoperative performance status, particularly with regard to pulmonary and cardiac risk, is likely to be the most important factor. Clinical findings are more predictive of pulmonary complications than results of testing. Cardiac risk is evaluated according to the American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association guidelines. With the identification of risk factors, patients undergoing esophageal surgery could be stratified. Appropriate preoperative risk-reduction strategies can be used to decrease morbidity and mortality rates associated with esophagectomy for cancer.

A prospective randomized clinical trial on pain control after major abdominal surgery.

This study was conducted in order to investigate the advantages and limitations of four analgesic modalities: a) epidural morphine; b) intravenous morphine; c) patient controlled intravenous morphine (patient-controlled analgesia); and d) non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Eighty patients undergoing major abdominal surgical procedures were prospectively and randomly treated with one of the above-mentioned analgesic methods. Evaluation of pain perception was done using the visual analogue pain score and the simple descriptive scale 4 hours after the procedure, in the early morning on postoperative day 1 and in the afternoon on postoperative days 1, 2 and 3. The need for supplementary analgesia and the onset of complications, if any, were also evaluated for each patient. Patient-controlled intravenous morphine yielded the best analgesic effect over the entire period. Epidural morphine was more effective in the very early postoperative period compared to modalities (b) and (d). Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, on the other hand, were more effective on the later postoperative days. None of the patients in group C needed supplementary analgesia, as against 20% in group A, 55% in group B and 40% in group D. Patients with hypochondriasis scores > 70 or depression scores > 70 required supplementation of analgesia more often. Morphine proved to be the drug of choice. Drug titration may be modulated in relation to the psychological characteristics of the patient. The best drug titration modality, in fact, is patient-controlled analgesia.

Preoperative evaluation and risk factors in patients undergoing lung resection for cancer.

Surgical resection remains the mainstay of treatment in lung cancer patients. Stratification of preoperative risk should be based on the functional status of pulmonary and cardiac systems usually damaged by cigarette smoking. Preoperative pulmonary evaluation should be performed taking into consideration the specific characteristics of the single patient and the type of surgery planned. Spirometry only may be required or oxygen consumption determination is necessary. Cardiac assessment should be based on clinical and instrumental examinations while invasive tests should be limited to high-risk patients. The potential difficulties in endotracheal intubation and lung isolation, the risk for desaturation during one-lung ventilation, and postoperative pain control should be analyzed.

Extraparenchymal control of hepatic veins during mesohepatectomy.

BACKGROUND: Bleeding is the most relevant operative risk during mesohepatectomy because of the wideness of the resection surfaces and the exposure of main intrahepatic vascular structures. Preliminary extraparenchymal exposure of the main hepatic veins, with the possibility of clamping them in association with the Pringle maneuver, and the maintenance of a low central venous pressure during mesohepatectomy, can contribute to substantially reducing operative bleeding. STUDY DESIGN: We report the results obtained in 18 mesohepatectomies, performed for liver metastases (13 patients) and for hepatocellular carcinoma (5 patients). Liver resection was performed without preliminary exposure of the main hepatic veins in nine patients (group A) and with preliminary looping of the main hepatic veins in nine patients (group B), without complications related to the maneuver. RESULTS: Intermittent pedicle clamping was used in all patients; in six patients in group B (66.7%), clamping of the main hepatic veins was also performed (mean duration, 37 minutes; range 16 to 68 minutes). Intraoperative blood transfusions were needed in 5 patients (5 of 18, 27.8%): 4 belonged to group A (44.4%) and 1 to group B (11.1%). Mortality was nil and morbidity was 33.3%, involving four patients in group A and two in group B (none related to the exposure, looping, and clamping of the main hepatic veins). CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary control of the main hepatic veins is a safe maneuver. During mesohepatectomy, clamping of these veins, associated with pedicle clamping, is effective in reducing operative bleeding. In our patients, this resulted in a low blood transfusion rate, similar to that of classic major hepatectomies, despite the higher complexity of mesohepatectomy.