Access to Care and Depression among Emergency Department Patients.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of depression among patients in the emergency department (ED) is significantly higher than in the general population, making the ED a potentially important forum for the identification of depression and intervention. Concomitant to the identification of depression is the issue of patient access to appropriate care. OBJECTIVE: This study sought to establish prevalence estimates of potential barriers to care among ED patients and relate these barriers with symptoms of depression. METHODS: Two medical students conducted brief surveys on all ED patients ≥ 18 years on demographics, perceived access to care, and depression. RESULTS: A total of 636 participants were enrolled. The percentage of participants with mild or greater depression was 42%. The majority of patients reported experiencing some barriers to care, with the most prominent being difficulty finding transportation, work responsibilities, and the feeling that the doctor is not responsive to their concerns. Higher depression scores were bivariately associated with higher overall barriers to care mean scores (r = 0.44; p < 0.001), suggesting that greater symptoms of depression are associated with greater difficulties accessing care. Particularly strong associations were observed between symptoms of depression and difficulty finding transportation, the feeling that the doctor is not responsive to patients' concerns, embarrassment about a potential illness, and confusion trying to schedule an appointment. CONCLUSIONS: Across all barriers analyzed, there was a greater incidence of depression associated with a greater perception of barriers. These barriers may be used as potential targets for intervention to increase access to health care resources.

An Educational Video Demonstration of How to Prone a Critically Ill Intubated Patient.

Early in the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, it was reported that prone position was beneficial for mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). However, for staff in some small and large hospitals, experience with this intervention was low. Select hospitals were able to assemble proning teams; but, as facilities began to experience staffing shortages, they found proning teams unsustainable, and less specialized staff needed to learn how to safely prone patients. Proning is a high-risk procedure-a lack of a standard approach can result in staff confusion and poor patient outcomes, including unintentional endotracheal tube (ET) loss, vascular access dislodgement, and skin breakdown. Given the acuity and high patient volume, translating a complex procedure into written policy may not be entirely effective. Critical care nurses, respiratory therapists, physical therapists, wound nurses, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and medical doctors need to be prepared to safely perform this procedure for an acutely ill COVID-19 patient. Communication, teamwork, and multidisciplinary collaboration are critical for complication avoidance. Interventions to prevent tube and vascular access dislodgement, skin breakdown, and brachial plexus and soft tissue injury must be implemented during the procedure. Repositioning the patient in the prone position, as well as returning the patient to supine positioning, should be components of a comprehensive proning plan.

Depression symptomology groups among middle and older adult emergency department patients.

INTRODUCTION: Middle and late life adults may present depression symptomology differently than the expected symptoms of depression. Clusters of common symptoms may be overlooked when determining the most appropriate treatment options, leading to a less than effective treatment. Investigation of these clusters is needed to better understand patterns of depressive symptomology among middle and late life adults. METHODS: Consent, demographics, self-report items and PHQ-9 items were administered to subjects. Latent class analysis (LCA), was used to determine groupings of patients based on PHQ-9 items. Demographics were compared across classes for additional information. RESULTS: A total of 252 subjects aged 45-85 years old were enrolled. An LCA indicated that a 3 class solution explained the clusters endorsed: Low Concerns (35%), Many Concerns (34%), and Sleep and Fatigue Concerns (31%). Patients in the Low Concerns class were more likely to have private insurance compared to those in the Many Concerns class (57% vs 34%, p = 0.003). They also reported better general health (M = 2.39 vs M = 1.58, p < 0.001), and visited their PCP less frequently (M = 1.64 visits vs M = 3.31 visits, p = 0.004). LIMITATIONS: Recall bias may have been present due to self-report of symptoms which was a report based on a low threshold for endorsement of items. Future larger studies should utilize more response options. CONCLUSION: LCA suggests there are three unique groupings of symptoms as reported by the PHQ-9. These clusters may be valuable in determining treatment options and designing interventions.

Latent Class Analysis of Barriers to Care Among Emergency Department Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Emergency department (ED) patients experience a variety of barriers to care that can lead to unnecessary or repeated visits. By identifying the patterns of barriers experienced by subsets of the ED patient population, future researchers might effectively design interventions to circumvent these barriers and improve care. This study sought to identify classes of individuals with regard to perceived barriers to care. METHODS: Over a 10-week period, two medical students distributed surveys to eligible patients ≥18 years who presented to the ED. After consent, patients provided demographics data and rated their perceived access to care on nine specific items (scored 1-5). We used latent class analysis (LCA), a parametric clustering method, to determine patient groups. Demographic characteristics were then compared across classes. RESULTS: We enrolled a total of 637 patients. Results of the LCA indicated that a six-class solution fit best: 1) low barriers (60%); 2) "work responsibility" barriers (13%); 3) economic-related barriers (10%); 4) "appointment difficulty" barriers (8%); 5) "illness and care responsibilities" barriers (6%); and 6) diverse barriers (2%). Patients in the low-barriers class were the oldest across classes (p<.001). Individuals in the low-barriers class were also more likely to be White (p=.015) and have private insurance (p<.001) than those in the "appointment difficulty," "illness and care responsibilities," and diverse barriers classes. CONCLUSION: LCA suggests there are six distinct classes of patients with regard to perceived access to care. These classes may be used as a potential starting point in designing targeted interventions for ED patients to improve continuity of care.

Perceived access to care among adult patients who attempted suicide.

This study examined perceptions of barriers to care among patients presenting through the emergency department with a suicide attempt. Eighteen patients were surveyed on their perceived access to providers and how they felt 6 distinct barriers limited their access to treatment. Although most (73%) reported having a health care provider they could have contacted before their suicide attempt, the majority (78%) reported at least 1 moderate barrier to care, with the most common barrier being difficulty finding transportation. Of those reporting any experienced barriers, 80% reported more than 1. Knowledge of the most prevalent and serious barriers perceived can subsequently be used to craft tailored follow-up instructions to prevent repeated attempts. (PsycINFO Database Record

Implementation of an Emergency Medicine Research Associates Program: Sharing 20 Years of Experience.

INTRODUCTION: The use of research associates (RA) programs to facilitate study enrollment in the emergency department was initiated during the mid-1990s. The University of Rochester Medical Center (URMC) was an early adopting site for this model, which has experienced considerable growth and development over the past 20 years. METHODS: Our goal was to detail the Emergency Department Research Associates (EDRA) program processes developed at the URMC that has led to our program's sustainability and productivity. These processes, and the lessons learned during their development, can assist institutions seeking to establish an RA program or refine an existing program. RESULTS: Defined procedures for selecting, training, and monitoring EDRAs have been created and refined with the goal of maximizing study enrollment and minimizing protocol deviations. Our EDRA program functions as a paid service center for investigators, and our EDRAs engage in a variety of study-related activities including screening and enrolling patients, administering surveys, collecting bio-specimens, and making follow-up calls. Over the past two years, our program has averaged 222 enrollments/month (standard deviation = 79.93), gathering roughly 25 participants per study per month. CONCLUSION: Our EDRA model has consistently resulted in some of the highest number of enrollments across a variety of recently funded, multi-center studies. Maintaining a high-quality EDRA program requires continual investment on the part of the leadership team, though the benefits to investigators within and outside the department outweigh these costs.

Depression and Anxiety Among Emergency Department Patients: Utilization and Barriers to Care.

BACKGROUND: Anxiety and depression rates among emergency department (ED) patients are substantially higher than those in the general population. Additionally, those with mental health issues often have difficulty accessing care. Unfortunately, issues of anxiety and depression are frequently not addressed in the ED due to competing care priorities. This may lead to increased burden and overcrowding in EDs. OBJECTIVE: This study related anxiety and depression with ED utilization and perceived barriers to care. METHODS: To limit the impact of insurance coverage on ED utilization and access to care, a convenience sample of adults 45 to 85 years of age in the ED were surveyed. The Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7 and Patient Health Questionnaire 9 were used to measure anxiety and depression. RESULTS: A total of 251 subjects were enrolled. Severe anxiety was observed in 10% of patients, while moderately severe or severe depression was observed in 12%. Patients who were both severely anxious and depressed visited the ED nearly twice as often as nonanxious and nondepressed patients. The majority of patients cited at least one moderate barrier to care, and greater anxiety and depression scores were related to greater perceived barriers to care. Perceived barriers to care were more than three times higher among patients who were both anxious and depressed compared to those in patients who were neither depressed nor anxious and twice as high as in those who were either depressed or anxious (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Patients identified with internalizing mental health concerns utilize the ED at elevated rates while also reporting the greatest difficulties accessing care. These findings highlight the need for ED interventions aimed at identifying patient mental health concerns, as well as perceived barriers to care, to design interventions to effectively improve continuity of care.