Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Revista
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Lancet ; 403(10445): 2747-2750, 2024 Jun 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38795713

RESUMEN

The Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization Supreme Court decision, which revoked the constitutional right to abortion in the USA, has impacted the national medical workforce. Impacts vary across states, but providers in states with restrictive abortion laws now must contend with evolving legal and ethical challenges that have the potential to affect workforce safety, mental health, education, and training opportunities, in addition to having serious impacts on patient health and far-reaching societal consequences. Moreover, Dobbs has consequences on almost every facet of the medical workforce, including on physicians, nurses, pharmacists, and others who work within the health-care system. Comprehensive research is urgently needed to understand the wide-ranging implications of Dobbs on the medical workforce, including legal, ethical, clinical, and psychological dimensions, to inform evidence-based policies and standards of care in abortion-restrictive settings. Lessons from the USA might also have global relevance for countries facing similar restrictions on reproductive care.


Asunto(s)
Decisiones de la Corte Suprema , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Aborto Inducido/legislación & jurisprudencia , Aborto Inducido/ética , Aborto Legal/legislación & jurisprudencia , Personal de Salud , Fuerza Laboral en Salud , Estados Unidos , Salud de la Mujer
2.
Lancet ; 403(10445): 2751-2754, 2024 Jun 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38795714

RESUMEN

On June 24, 2022, the US Supreme Court's decision in Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization marked the removal of the constitutional right to abortion in the USA, introducing a complex ethical and legal landscape for patients and providers. This shift has had immediate health and equity repercussions, but it is also crucial to examine the broader impacts on states, health-care systems, and society as a whole. Restrictions on abortion access extend beyond immediate reproductive care concerns, necessitating a comprehensive understanding of the ruling's consequences across micro and macro levels. To mitigate potential harm, it is imperative to establish a research agenda that informs policy making and ensures effective long-term monitoring and reporting, addressing both immediate and future impacts.


Asunto(s)
Decisiones de la Corte Suprema , Salud de la Mujer , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Aborto Inducido/legislación & jurisprudencia , Aborto Inducido/ética , Aborto Legal/legislación & jurisprudencia , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Estados Unidos , Salud de la Mujer/legislación & jurisprudencia , Derechos de la Mujer/legislación & jurisprudencia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA