Mitogen-activated protein kinase activation in lung adenocarcinoma: a comparative study between ever smokers and never smokers.

PURPOSE: There are major differences affecting genes in adenocarcinomas in ever and never smokers. However, data on whether mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) activation state differs according to smoking status are limited. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Expression of activated extracellular signal-regulated kinases, c-Jun NH(2)-terminal kinases, and P38 enzymes (pP38) were evaluated by means of immunohistochemistry in 188 chemonaïve patients with surgically resected lung adenocarcinoma. Cell viability of the lung adenocarcinoma cell line HCC827 was studied after treatment with cisplatin or the P38 MAPK inhibitor SB 203580. RESULTS: Thirty-seven of 44 never smokers [84%; 95% confidence intervals (95% CI), 70-92%] expressed high pP38 levels compared with 45 of 104 ever smokers (43%; 95% CI, 34-53%; P < 0.0001). The proportion of never smokers expressing high c-Jun NH(2)-terminal kinase levels (72%; 95% CI, 57-83%) was greater than that of ever smokers (53%; 95% CI, 44-62%; P = 0.03). The proportion of ever smokers expressing high extracellular signal-regulated kinase levels (51%; 95% CI, 42-59%) was similar to that of never smokers (57%; 95% CI, 42-71%; P = 0.47). Never smokers were 10.5 times (95% CI, 3.5-31.5) more likely to express high pP38 levels after adjustment for variables linked to smoking status, including age, sex, and histologic subtype. None of the activated MAPKs predicted for overall survival. Cell viability of HCC827 was significantly reduced after exposure to SB203580 alone or when combined with cisplatin. CONCLUSIONS: Life-long nonsmoking is associated with high activated P38 levels in patients with lung adenocarcinoma. Activated P38 can contribute to the viability of adenocarcinoma cells in never smokers, but is not predictive for overall survival.

More Similarities Than Differences Testing Insulin Glargine 300 Units/mL Versus Insulin Degludec 100 Units/mL in Insulin-Naive Type 2 Diabetes: The Randomized Head-to-Head BRIGHT Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare insulin glargine 300 units/mL (Gla-300) versus insulin degludec 100 units/mL (IDeg-100) in this first head-to-head randomized controlled trial. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: BRIGHT (NCT02738151) was a multicenter, open-label, active-controlled, two-arm, parallel-group, 24-week, noninferiority study in insulin-naive patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes. Participants were randomized 1:1 to evening dosing with Gla-300 (N = 466) or IDeg-100 (N = 463), titrated to fasting self-monitored plasma glucose of 80-100 mg/dL. The primary end point was HbA1c change from baseline to week 24. Safety end points included incidence and event rates of hypoglycemia. RESULTS: At week 24, HbA1c improved similarly from baseline values of 8.7% (72 mmol/mol) in the Gla-300 group and 8.6% (70 mmol/mol) in the IDeg-100 group to 7.0% (53 mmol/mol)-least squares mean difference -0.05% (95% CI -0.15 to 0.05) (-0.6 mmol/mol [-1.7 to 0.6])-demonstrating noninferiority of Gla-300 versus IDeg-100 (P < 0.0001). Hypoglycemia incidence and event rates over 24 weeks were comparable with both insulins, whereas during the active titration period (0-12 weeks) the incidence and rate of anytime (24-h) confirmed hypoglycemia (≤70 and <54 mg/dL) were lower with Gla-300. Both insulins were properly titrated and exhibited no specific safety concerns. CONCLUSIONS: Gla-300 and IDeg-100 provided similar glycemic control improvements with relatively low hypoglycemia risk. Hypoglycemia incidence and rates were comparable with both insulins during the full study period but lower in favor of Gla-300 during the titration period. The choice between these longer-acting basal insulins may be determined by factors such as access and cost, alongside clinical considerations.