[Cardiovascular risk profile of uncontrolled hypertensive patients. The Control-Project study]. / Perfil de riesgo cardiovascular de los pacientes con hipertensión arterial no controlada. Estudio Control-Project.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To assess absolute cardiovascular risk and co-morbidities in uncontrolled hypertensive patients (blood pressure [BP]>or=140/90 mmHg or>or=130/80 mmHg in diabetics) attending Primary Care Physicians in Spain, and to determine the attitudes of these physicians towards this problem. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Cross-sectional, multicenter study involving 356 general practitioners around Spain. Absolute cardiovascular risk was assessed according to ESH-ESC 2003 Guidelines in a sample of 1,710 patients. RESULTS: Two hundred ninety seven patients were excluded by several reasons and a total of 1,413 hypertensive patients were valuable (mean age: 65.3+/-11.4 years; 56.7% women). Normal BP values (<140/90 mmHg) were exhibited by 0.2%, high-normal BP (120-139/80-89 mmHg) were exhibited by 2.8%, grade 1 hypertension (140-159/90-99 mmHg) by 49.9%, grade 2 hypertension (160-179/100-109 mmHg) by 39.3%, and grade 3 hypertension (>or=180/110 mmHg) by 7.9%. Associated cardiovascular risk factors were observed in 96.0% of patients (95% CI=94.7-97.2%), target organ damage in 34.5% (95% CI=31.6-36.5%), and cardiovascular clinical disease in 36.0% (95% CI=33.5-38.5%). According to ESH-ESC 2003 Guidelines 34.0% (CI=31.5-38.2%) were at very-high risk; 29.4% (95% CI=26.4-32.8%) at high risk; 30.4% (95% CI=27.2-33.7%) at moderate risk and 5.4% (95% CI=3.9-7.2%) at low risk of cardiovascular disease. Despite the high absolute risk, physicians did not do any therapeutic change in 30.4% (95% CI=28.2-33.5%) of uncontrolled hypertensive patients. Most of them (64.26%) considered that bad compliance to life style changes was the reason for inadequate BP control. The most frequent measure introduced was the association of additional drugs. CONCLUSIONS: Absolute cardiovascular risk in uncontrolled hypertensive patients attending Primary Care Physicians in Spain is very relevant. Sixty-five percent of these patients are at high or very high risk with a high prevalence of target organ damage or associated cardiovascular clinical disease. Therapeutic attitudes towards these patients are still very conservative although they are improving compared with previous studies.

24-h pulse pressure cutoff point definition by office pulse pressure in a population of Spanish older hypertensive patients.

OBJECTIVE: The European Guidelines on Hypertension define an office pulse pressure (PP) at least 60 mmHg in the elderly patient as asymptomatic organ damage. Our objective was to estimate the cutoff point of 24-h PP that best predicts office PP associated with higher cardiovascular risk (≥60 mmHg) in hypertensive older patients. METHODS: We studied all hypertensive patients at least 60 years with a first valid ambulatory blood pressure monitoring drawn from the Spanish ambulatory blood pressure monitoring registry. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to estimate the best 24-h PP cutoff predictor of office PP at least 60 mmHg that maximized the sum of sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS: We included 52 246 hypertensive patients [52.4%, female; mean age (SD) 69.0 (7.0) years]. From these, 34 530 (66.1%) patients had an office PP at least 60 mmHg. The value of 24-h PP that best predicts higher risk clinic PP is 54.9 mmHg [sensitivity: 69.2%; specificity: 70.3%; area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.761 (95% confidence interval 0.756-0.765)]. Mean clinic and 24-h PPs were progressively higher as the study participants were classified at higher cardiovascular risk group. Some 20.5% of patients presented isolated office high PP and 10% a masked high 24-h PP. CONCLUSION: In a large clinical sample of older hypertensive patients, the cutoff point of 24-h PP that best predicts office PP at least 60 mmHg is 55 mmHg. In 30.5% of cases, there is a discrepancy between office PP and ambulatory 24-h PP.

Role of dihydropyridinic calcium channel blockers in the management of hypertension.

Dihydropyridinic calcium channel blockers are a subclass of antihypertensive drugs with growing significance in the therapeutic armamentarium. Early studies in the 1990s had aroused certain fears with regard to the safety of the first drugs from this class, since they had a fast onset of action and a short half-life, and thus they were associated with reflex adrenergic activation. New molecules with long half-lives and high lipophilia have shown safety and efficacy in the control of blood pressure, as well as in the reduction of several end points related to hypertension. Moreover, these new molecules, which block special subtypes of calcium channel receptors, provide drugs not only with an action profile that goes beyond the antihypertensive effect, but also with a lower rate of side effects. Therefore, in the light of new studies that include calcium channel blockers alone or in combination, these agents will probably be used even more extensively for the management of hypertension in the following years.

Low-dose fixed combination of perindopril plus indapamide in the diabetic hypertensive population.

In order to determine the perception of general practitioners (GPs) and specialists regarding their clinical experience with the use of the low-dose fixed combination of perindopril 2 mg plus indapamide 0.625 mg in hypertensive patients with diabetes, a multicenter survey carried out across Spain was performed. A total of 894 physicians (597 GPs and 297 specialists) participated in the survey. A total of 5126 patients were included (3434 in the GPs' group and 1692 in the specialists' group). Associated risk factors and organ damage were more frequently documented in the specialists' group. At baseline, 1.7% of the GPs' patients and 1.3% of the specialists' patients had their blood pressure controlled and with the combined therapy the blood pressure control rate attained 30.7 and 29.8%, respectively (p < 0.001 vs baseline and not significant intergroups). Less than 85% of physicians considered the efficacy and tolerability of combined therapy as 'good' or 'very good' but 93% of the patients were 'satisfied' or 'very satisfied' with combined therapy.

[Different uses of home blood pressure measurement in the diagnosis and monitoring of hypertension]. / Diferentes utilidades de la automedición de la presión arterial domiciliaria en el diagnóstico y seguimiento de la hipertensión arterial.

OBJECTIVE: To find differences between measurements of clinical blood pressure and self-monitored home blood pressure measurement (HBPM). DESIGN: Descriptive study developed in a general population census. SETTING: Primary care. SUBJECTS: A total of 1411 subjects > or =18 years old were selected by stratified randomized sampling. METHODS: A skilled nurse made 3 clinical blood pressure (CBP) measurements, and trained patients or their relatives in HBPM, doing 12 in one day. CBP and HBPM employed an electronic device (OMRON 705CP). RESULTS: A total of 12 HBPM from 1184 subjects (52% women) were completed, with a mean age of 47.6 (SD, 17.2); 195 subjects were known to have hypertension. White-coat effect was diagnosed in 14.9% of subjects with normal pressure, 22.3% of hypertense patients treated and 57.6% of subjects with suspicion of isolated clinical hypertension. Possible isolated clinical hypertension was diagnosed in 10% of subjects without hypertension. White Coat normal pressure was found in 2.3% of untreated subjects and 4.7% of subjects with treated hypertension. 20.7% of subjects with hypertension poorly controlled in the clinic were considered pseudo-refractory (11.4% at the end of dosage interval). 77% of subjects conducted HBPM on their own and 89% thought it easy to do so. CONCLUSION: Incorporation of HBPM into daily medical practice could avoid 20%-30% of possible mistakes in diagnosis and monitoring of hypertense patients.