Spontaneous allograft tolerance in B7-deficient mice independent of preexisting endogenous CD4+CD25+ regulatory T-cells.

BACKGROUND: Acute cardiac allograft rejection requires host, but not donor, expression of B7-1/B7-2 costimulatory molecules. However, acute cardiac rejection requires direct antigen presentation by donor-derived antigen presenting cells to CD4 T-cells and does not require indirect antigen presentation to CD4 T-cells. Given this discrepancy in the literature and that the consequence of allograft exposure in B7-deficient mice is unknown; the goal of the study was to examine the antidonor status of allografted B7-1/B7-2-deficient hosts. METHODS: C57Bl/6 B7-1/B7-2-/- mice were grafted with heterotopic BALB/c hearts. Recipients bearing long-term surviving allografts were used to examine the status of antidonor reactivity in vitro and in vivo. Tolerance was examined in vivo through adoptive transfer of splenocytes from graft-bearing animals to secondary immune-deficient Rag-1-/- hosts bearing donor-type or third-party cardiac allografts and by regulatory T-cell depletion with anti-CD25 antibody. RESULTS: When transferred to B7-replete Rag-1-/- recipients, cells from naïve B7-1/B7-2-/- mice readily initiated cardiac allograft rejection. However, splenocytes transferred from long-term allograft acceptor B7-1/B7-2-/- hosts failed to reject donor-type hearts but acutely rejected third-party allografts. In addition, such cells did not reject (donorxthird-party) F1 allografts. Finally, in vivo depletion of regulatory T-cells did not prevent long-term acceptance. CONCLUSIONS: Results demonstrate that B7-deficient T-cells are capable of acute cardiac allograft rejection in a B7-replete environment. Importantly, results also show that B7-deficient hosts do not simply ignore cardiac allografts, but rather spontaneously develop transferable, donor-specific tolerance and linked suppression in vivo. Interestingly, this tolerant state does not require endogenous CD4+CD25+ regulatory T-cells.

CD4 T cells mediate cardiac xenograft rejection via host MHC Class II.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that acute CD4 T-cell-mediated cardiac allograft rejection requires donor major histocompatibility complex (MHC) Class II expression and can be independent of "indirect" antigen presentation. However, other studies suggested that indirect antigen presentation to CD4 T cells may play a primary role in cellular xenograft immunity. Thus, the relative roles of direct/indirect CD4 T cell reactivity against cardiac xenografts are unclear. In this study we set out to determine the role for indirect CD4 T cell reactivity in cardiac xenograft rejection. METHODS: Rat hearts were transplanted heterotopically into wild-type and immunodeficient mice. Recipients were untreated, treated with depleting antibodies, or reconstituted with wild-type cells. RESULTS: Antibody depletion confirmed that rat heart xenograft rejection in C57Bl/6 mice was CD4 T-cell-dependent. Also, heart xenografts survived long term in B6 MHC Class II (C2D)-deficient mice. Graft acceptance in C2D mice was not secondary to CD4 T cell deficiency alone, because transferred B6 CD4 T cells failed to trigger rejection in C2D hosts. Furthermore, purified CD4 T cells were sufficient for acute rejection of rat heart xenografts in immune-deficient B6rag1(-/-) recipients. Importantly, CD4 T cells did not reject rat hearts in C2Drag1(-/-) hosts, in contrast to results using cardiac allografts. "Direct" xenoreactive CD4 T cells were not sufficient to mediate rejection despite vigorous reactivity to rat stimulator cells in vitro. CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, our results show that CD4 T cells are both necessary and sufficient for acute cardiac xenograft rejection and that host MHC Class II is critical in this process.

Perturbation of leukocyte function-associated antigen-1/intercellular adhesion molecule-1 results in differential outcomes in cardiac vs islet allograft survival.

BACKGROUND: Various studies indicate the requirements for tolerance induction may vary between different transplanted tissues and organs. Consequently, we compared the efficacy of anti-leukocyte function-associated antigen-1 (LFA-1)/anti-intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) monoclonal antibody therapy for facilitating cardiac vs islet long-term allograft acceptance in mice. METHODS: BALB/c (H-2d) mouse cardiac or islet allografts were transplanted into recipient CBA/J (H-2k) mice. Monoclonal anti-body therapy with anti-LFA-1, anti-ICAM-1, the combination, or control rat immunoglobulin (Ig) was administered intraperitoneally on Days 0 to 5. Cardiac allograft function was assessed by palpation and islet graft function by blood glucose monitoring. Mixed lymphocyte assays were performed to assess proliferation of CD4 and CD8 T-cells under conditions of stimulator-cell ICAM-1 and/or LFA-1 deficiency. RESULTS: Anti-ICAM-1 therapy resulted in a modest prolongation of cardiac allografts but in pronounced survival of islet allografts. Anti-LFA-1 therapy promoted significant long-term survival of both cardiac and islet allografts. Surprisingly, combined anti-LFA-1/anti-ICAM-1 therapy abrogated long-term islet, but not cardiac, allograft acceptance relative to either monotherapy. Mixed lymphocyte reactions demonstrated complete blockade of CD4 and CD8 T-cell proliferation under conditions of ICAM-1 deficiency alone or in combination with anti-LFA-1 therapy. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that optimal therapies for some allografts (vascularized-heart) may not translate to other types of allografts (cellular-islet). Thus, the type of transplant represents an independent variable for optimizing strategies to promote indefinite allograft acceptance. Complete inhibition of CD4 and CD8 T-cell proliferation during ICAM-1/LFA-1 blockade suggests a threshold signal may be dependent upon ICAM-1/LFA-1 for regulatory tolerance to occur and that this signal may be lost under conditions of minimal graft cellular mass.