Levofloxacin versus Cefpodoxime for Antibacterial Prophylaxis in Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation.

National guidelines recommend antimicrobial prophylaxis for allogeneic stem cell transplant patients during the pre-engraftment period because of increased infection risk during neutropenia. Fluoroquinolones have demonstrated lower rates of bacteremias and incidence of neutropenic fever, but there is limited evidence in the use of alternative antibacterials such as cefpodoxime. The primary objective of this study is to compare the rates of antibiotic prophylaxis failure between levofloxacin and cefpodoxime in allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients. Secondary objectives include comparing and characterizing number and type of infections, mortality at day 100 post-transplant, and hospitalizations for infectious causes in the first 100 days of transplant. This is a single-center, retrospective chart review of adult patients who received an allogeneic stem cell transplant from matched related and matched unrelated donors and antibacterial prophylaxis with levofloxacin or cefpodoxime from January 1, 2011, to October 1, 2014. A total of 142 patients were evaluated (71 levofloxacin, 71 cefpodoxime). Both levofloxacin and cefpodoxime groups had similar rates of neutropenic fever and antibiotic prophylaxis failure (58% versus 58%, P = NS). There were similar incidences of Clostridioides difficile and Multi-drug resistant (MDR) infections among both levofloxacin and cefpodoxime groups. Rates of infections, hospitalizations, and mortality in the first 100 days were similar among both groups. Cefpodoxime can be used as an alternative to levofloxacin for antibiotic prophylaxis in allogeneic stem cell transplant patients.

Leflunomide therapy for refractory cytomegalovirus infections in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Currently, there are no prospective, randomized trials analyzing leflunomide for the treatment of cytomegalovirus infection or disease in allogeneic stem cell transplant patients. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this case series was to determine the clinical and virological responses of utilizing leflunomide as therapy for refractory cytomegalovirus infections, unresponsive to first-line therapy in allogeneic stem cell transplant patients. Additionally, patient and leflunomide specific characteristics were identified and determined in this descriptive case series. METHODS: This is a single-center, case series of adult allogeneic stem cell transplant patients with refractory cytomegalovirus infections receiving leflunomide between 1 January 2005 and 31 March 2015. RESULTS: A total of 14 patients with refractory cytomegalovirus infections received leflunomide. All patients received concurrent anti-cytomegalovirus therapy. Nine of 13 patients tested positive for phosphotransferase UL97 and/or viral DNA polymerase UL54 genotype mutations. Nine patients achieved a virological response with undetectable cytomegalovirus titers. Of the 13 patients with teriflunomide serum levels, eight patients maintained levels >40 micrograms/milliliter (mcg/mL). Common adverse effects were pancytopenia (n = 8) and elevated liver function tests (n = 4). CONCLUSIONS: Despite current strategies, refractory or recurrent cytomegalovirus infection and disease remain a clinical challenge to treat in the stem cell transplant patient population. Leflunomide used in combination with other concomitant therapies use for refractory cytomegalovirus infection in clinical practice may be a safe and effective option in the allogeneic stem cell transplant patient population.

Subtherapeutic posaconazole prophylaxis in a gastric bypass patient following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

PURPOSE: A case of invasive fungal infections (IFIs) with subtherapeutic posaconazole prophylaxis in a gastric bypass patient following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is reported. SUMMARY: A 52-year-old malnourished male with a medical history of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for obesity developed acute myelogenous leukemia and underwent allogeneic HSCT approximately 17 months later. He was admitted 1 month after HSCT for failure to thrive and initiated on parenteral nutrition due to worsening diarrhea and suspected gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease (GI GVHD). During admission, the patient was continued on daily oral posaconazole for antifungal prophylaxis and was found to have subtherapeutic posaconazole and deficient vitamin levels, likely secondary to his gastrojejunostomy and increased gastric transit time. The oral posaconazole was altered to twice-daily dosing in an effort to increase serum drug levels and prevent IFIs. CONCLUSION: Patients with a history of gastric bypass are at increased risk for malabsorption of oral posaconazole and nutrients, especially following HSCT with suspected GI GVHD.