Measuring Adherence to Antibiotic Use Guidelines in Managing Mandible Fractures.

PURPOSE: Due to variability in practice patterns when managing patients with facial fractures, the Surgical Infection Society's Therapeutics and Guidelines Committee (SIS) released guidelines in June 2020 concerning antibiotic use in the treatment of patients with facial fractures. The purpose of this study was to measure adherence to SIS guidelines among patients treated for isolated mandibular fractures and to identify factors associated with deviation from SIS guidelines. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors designed and implemented a retrospective cohort study and enrolled a sample derived from the population of patients treated for isolated mandibular fractures at Harborview Medical Center (Seattle, WA) and University of Washington Medical Center-Montlake (Seattle, WA) from June 2020 through October 2021. The primary outcome variable was adherence to SIS antibiotic guidelines (yes or no). Covariates were grouped into the following categories: demographic (age, gender), treatment (operative treatment, primary service, transfer status), and risk factor (Charlson Comorbidity Index, tobacco use, alcohol use, drug use other than marijuana, mandibular injury severity score). Descriptive and bivariate statistics were computed to measure the association between adherence and the study variables. The level of statistical significance was set at a P-value ≤.05. RESULTS: The study sample was composed of 114 patients with a mean age of 41.8 ± 19.0 years and 72% were males. The frequency of adherence to SIS antibiotic protocol was 91.2%. Variables associated with deviation from SIS antibiotic protocol were operative treatment (P-value = .03 - relative risk (RR) not calculable), current drug use other than marijuana (RR = 4.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-12.8; P-value = .01), and transfer from an outside facility (RR = 4.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-12.8; P-value = .01). CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study suggest that the SIS antibiotic guidelines in the management of isolated mandible fractures were translated well into practice at our institution as evidenced by the high level of compliance (>90%). To improve adherence, additional research is indicated to better understand how factors such as treatment choice, drug exposure, and transfer status adversely affect adherence to guidelines.

What Is the 5-year Incidence of Recurrent Disease of Odontogenic Keratocysts?

PURPOSE: There is no consensus on the ideal treatment of odontogenic keratocysts (OKCs). Certain risk factors may modify the disease recurrence rate. The purpose of this study was: 1) to estimate the incidence of OKC recurrence in a statistically rigorous manner; and 2) to identify risk factors associated with OKC recurrence. METHODS: The investigators designed and implemented a retrospective cohort study and enrolled a sample derived from the population of patients presenting to the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery outpatient clinics at the University of Washington School of Dentistry and Harborview Medical Center for evaluation and management of OKCs between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2020. Predictor variables included demographics (age, gender), radiographic characteristics (location of lesion, locularity, size, and cortical perforation), and type of operation performed (decompression + cystectomy, enucleation ± adjuvant therapy, or resection). The primary outcome variable was time to recurrent disease, defined as the time from treatment to radiographic or clinical evidence of a new lesion (recorded in months). Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate median time to recurrence, and Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify covariates statistically associated with recurrent disease (P ≤ .05). RESULTS: The sample was composed of 60 subjects with 63 previously untreated lesions. Eight subjects (13%) developed a recurrent lesion during the study interval with a median time to recurrence of 31 (interquartile range, 24 to 48) months. One of the 8 recurrences occurred within 12 months of treatment and 7 of the 8 recurrences occurred more than 21 months after treatment. Based on using Kaplan-Meier analysis, the 5-year incidence of disease recurrence was estimated to be 34%. Lesions with cortical perforation were 8.3 times more likely to recur (95% confidence interval [1.7, 41.3]; P-value = .01), and multilocular lesions were 10.6 times more likely to recur (95% confidence interval [1.3, 86.9]; P-value = .03). The sample size was the limiting factor to performing regression analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Virtually every publication on OKCs to date reports frequencies of disease recurrence rather than applying appropriate survival analyses commonly used to estimate outcomes in cancer research. Failure to use the appropriate statistical analyses underestimates the risk of disease recurrence. Our study is no exception. The estimated frequency of disease recurrence during the study interval was 13% (8/60). When survival analyses are applied that account for varying months of follow-up, the incidence of disease recurrence is 34 per 100 per 5 years. We recommend the application of time-to-event analyses in the study of disease entities with the potential for recurrence.

American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons' Position Paper on Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaws-2022 Update.

Strategies for management of patients with, or at risk for, medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws (MRONJ) - formerly referred to as bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaws (BRONJ)-were set forth in the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons (AAOMS) position papers in 2007, 2009 and 2014. The position papers were developed by a committee appointed by the AAOMS Board of Trustees and comprising clinicians with extensive experience in caring for these patients, as well as clinical and basic science researchers. The knowledge base and experience in addressing MRONJ continues to evolve and expand, necessitating modifications and refinements to the previous position papers. Three members of the AAOMS Committee on Oral, Head, and Neck Oncologic and Reconstructive Surgery (COHNORS) and three authors of the 2014 position paper were appointed to serve as a working group to analyze the current literature and revise the guidance as indicated to reflect current knowledge in this field. This update contains revisions to diagnosis and management strategies and highlights the current research status. AAOMS maintains that it is vitally important for this information to be disseminated to other relevant healthcare professionals and organizations.

Do Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons Prescribe More Opioids After Third Molar Removal for Patients with Substance Use History?

PURPOSE: Oral and maxillofacial surgeons (OMSs) must manage postoperative pain control for patients who take illicit substances. The purpose of this study was to measure and compare the amount of opioid prescribing between patients with and without self-reported substance use history (SUH) by OMSs after third molar (M3) removal. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The investigators implemented a retrospective cohort study and enrolled a sample of subjects who had M3 removal between January 1, 2019 through December 31, 2019. The primary predictor variable was SUH coded as yes (SUH+) or no (SUH-). The primary and secondary outcome variables were prescribed morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) and number of postoperative visits due to inadequate pain control (IPC), respectively. Other variables were age, gender, payor, provider, anesthesia, and procedure specific. Descriptive, bivariate, and multiple linear regression models were computed. RESULTS: The sample included 1,112 subjects with a mean age of 25 ± 9 years; 61.2% were female. Of the 1,112 subjects, 198 (17.8%) reported a SUH. Mean MMEs were 70.9 ± 27.9 and 63.4 ± 28.8 in the SUH+ and SUH- groups, respectively (P ≤ .001). An adjusted linear regression model showed a non-significant association between SUH and MMEs prescribed (P = .50). The study showed a non-significant increase (P = .15) in the proportion of patients with IPC in the SUH- group (4.1%) versus the SUH+ group (2.0%). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that 10% more opioids were prescribed for postoperative pain after M3 removal for patients with SUH, though after adjustment, the amount may not be clinically significant. Postoperative pain management after M3 removal in patients with SUH, on average, can be managed in a similar manner as for patients without SUH.

Is Distance Between Home and Treatment Site a Risk Factor for Complications After Treating Mandibular Fractures?

PURPOSE: Our level I trauma center provides care over a large geographic area including Alaska, Washington, Idaho, Montana, and Wyoming, with many patients traveling hundreds of miles to receive care. Distance to a treatment site is documented to be an independent risk factor for complications after multisystem trauma, but it is unclear if it is a risk factor for isolated mandibular fractures. The study purpose was to measure the association between distance to treatment site and risk for postoperative complications after treatment of isolated mandibular fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The investigators designed and implemented a retrospective cohort study and enrolled a sample derived from patients treated for isolated mandibular fractures at Harborview Medical Center by the oral and maxillofacial surgery service between June 2012 and December 2016. The primary predictor variable was distance (miles) between the patient's residence and site of treatment (Harborview Medical Center). The primary outcome variable was postoperative complication (yes or no), subcategorized as major and minor. Secondary outcome variables were time to treatment between injury and operative treatment (days) and length of hospital stay (LOS) (days). Descriptive, bivariate, and multiple logistic regression statistics were computed to measure the association between distance to treatment site and postoperative complications, time to treatment, and LOS. The level of statistical significance was set at P ≤ .05. RESULTS: The study sample was composed of 403 subjects with a mean age of 32.6 ± 14.3 years and 80% were men. The average distance from the patient's residence to treatment site was 44.8 ± 128.6 miles (range, 0 to 1,440 miles; median, 20.4 miles). Major complications occurred in 11.6% of patients. The average distance between patients with and without postoperative complications was not significantly different (42.3 ± 55.8 miles vs 45.5 ± 141.7 miles; P = .8). Increasing distance was significantly associated with longer LOS (r = 0.16; P < .001) but not time to treatment (r = .04; P = .4). CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to other studies regarding multisystem trauma, complications after treating isolated mandible fractures were not associated with increasing distance to treatment site. Increasing distance may be associated with longer LOS but not time to treatment.

Is It Necessary to Free the Inferior Alveolar Nerve From the Proximal Segment in the Sagittal Split Osteotomy?

PURPOSE: When the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) is contained within the proximal segment after a mandibular sagittal split osteotomy (SSO), conventional teaching is to release the nerve so that it freely enters the distal segment. However, manipulation of the IAN may cause further injury. The purpose of this study was to measure IAN neurosensory recovery in SSOs when the nerve was not freed from the proximal segment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective split-mouth study of patients undergoing bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO). The sample was composed of patients who underwent a BSSO in which the IAN was intact bilaterally but freely entering the distal segment on one side (IANDI) and contained within the proximal segment on the other (IANPR). The outcome of interest was time to functional sensory recovery (FSR) of the IAN, measured in days. Descriptive, bivariate, and Kaplan-Meier statistics were computed. P ≤ .05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Twenty patients undergoing 40 SSOs were included as study patients. The sample's mean age was 19.0 ± 2.4 years (range, 15 to 26 years); there were 13 female patients. Of these patients, 15 underwent BSSO whereas 5 underwent BSSO plus genioplasty. The planned mean composite 3-dimensional mandibular movements for IANDI and IANPR were 6.3 ± 2.8 mm (range, 2.5 to 12.3 mm) and 6.3 ± 2.3 mm (range, 2.7 to 10.8 mm), respectively (P = .96). All patients achieved FSR in the bilateral IAN distributions within 1 year of surgery (range, 34 to 284 days). The median times to FSR were 100 days for IANDI and 101 days for IANPR (P = .64). CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing SSOs, maintaining the IAN within the proximal segment of the mandible may not affect neurosensory recovery.

Why Is Mandibular Third Molar Coronectomy Successful Without Concurrent Root Canal Treatment?

PURPOSE: Coronectomy is performed to avoid injury to the inferior alveolar nerve when mandibular third molars (M3s) in close proximity to the inferior alveolar nerve are indicated for extraction. Concern has been raised regarding the fate of submerged roots with exposed pulp tissue and whether this will serve as a nidus for infection. The study purpose was to answer the following clinical question: Among patients undergoing coronectomy, do those treated with concurrent root canal treatment (RCT), when compared with those not treated with RCT, have a decreased frequency of postoperative infections? The specific aims of this study were to 1) perform a comprehensive review to compare postoperative infection rates in M3 coronectomies with and without concurrent RCT and 2) review relevant animal and human studies pertaining to pulpal physiology as it relates to coronectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was designed as a comprehensive review to identify controlled studies that compared outcomes of M3 coronectomies with and without concurrent RCT published through January 2020. Studies included in the sample needed to meet the following criteria: 1) studies published in English, 2) human studies, and 3) studies that reported the postoperative infection outcomes. The predictor variable was concurrent RCT at the time of coronectomy. The outcome variable was postoperative infection. RESULTS: The database search identified 107 publications for initial review. After application of the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the final sample included only 1 publication. The frequencies of postoperative infection with and without concurrent RCT were 87.5% and 12.5%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The one study identified for detailed review showed that RCT at the time of coronectomy does not decrease the frequency of postoperative infections. This result supports the recommendation that it is unnecessary to perform concurrent RCT on M3 roots that are retained. The finding that intentional submersion of roots does not require RCT also is supported by multiple animal and human studies.

The Low Medial Horizontal Osteotomy in Patients With Atypical Ramus Morphology Undergoing Sagittal Split Osteotomy.

PURPOSE: Sagittal split osteotomy (SSO) of rami with fused cortices or minimal marrow space above the lingula can increase the risk of an unfavorable osteotomy split of the proximal ramus. To reduce the risk of a proximal segment fracture, a recent modification of the SSO places the medial horizontal osteotomy below the lingula. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the outcomes of SSOs utilizing a low medial horizontal osteotomy in patients with atypical ramus morphologies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The present study was a prospective series composed of patients with atypical proximal ramus anatomy undergoing SSOs. All patients had undergone bilateral SSO for correction of mandibular deformities. The horizontal ramus osteotomy had been placed at or slightly above the mandibular occlusal plane because of atypical ramus morphology (thin ramus with no appreciable marrow space at or above the lingula and/or narrow retromolar ramus width). The outcome variables were an unfavorable split of the proximal or distal segments, nerve location after SSO (proximal or distal segment), and neurosensory recovery of the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN). RESULTS: The sample included 25 patients who had undergone 50 SSOs using a low medial horizontal osteotomy. Their mean age was 19.6 ± 3.2 years; 14 patients were female. Of the 25 patients, 22 had a primary diagnosis of craniofacial anomaly; 23 had undergone bimaxillary surgery and 6 had received concomitant genioplasty. No unfavorable fractures of the proximal segment occurred. No intraoperative IAN injuries occurred. The IAN was contained within the proximal segment in 52% of the cases. All the patients achieved functional sensory recovery of the IAN bilaterally by 1 year postoperatively. The mean interval to functional sensory recovery was 116 days. CONCLUSIONS: The low medial horizontal osteotomy is an effective technique for reliable execution of SSOs in morphologically atypical mandibles.

Do Academic Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons Comply With Best Practices for Reporting the Results of Randomized Clinical Trials?

PURPOSE: To address the shortcoming of reporting P values, several leading medical journals have revised their guidelines for reporting results, specifically mandating the use of confidence intervals (CIs). The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the frequency of reporting CIs in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) by academic oral and maxillofacial surgeons. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We implemented a retrospective cohort study and enrolled a sample composed of RCTs reported in 3 oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMS) journals in 2009, 2012, 2015, and 2018. We identified RCTs using a Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) search in Medline. Studies were included in the sample if they were randomized and reported a measure of association. Predictor variables included the year of publication, journal, OMS focus area (eg, dentoalveolar surgery, anesthesia/facial pain, craniomaxillofacial trauma), reported confounding factors, funding sources, conflict of interest, study region, number of institutions involved, number of authors, and academic rank of the authors. The primary outcome of interest was reporting of the CI. Descriptive and bivariate statistics were computed. A P value of ≤ .05 was considered significant. RESULTS: The sample included 102 reports. The P value was uniformly reported (100%) in all 102 publications. CIs were reported in 29 reports (28.4%; 95% CI, 19.9 to 38.2). The OMS focus area was associated with reporting CIs (P = .02). Anesthesia/facial pain studies were significantly less likely to report the CIs (12.0%) compared with studies of craniomaxillofacial deformities (100%; Bonferroni P = .02). No other significant associations were found between the predictors and CI reporting (P ≥ .08). CONCLUSIONS: CIs have been reported in a small proportion of RCTs within OMS. Given the shortcomings of reporting only the P values, a significant need exists for improving the statistical reporting standards among OMS journals.

Are Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons Prescribing Fewer Opioids and More Non-Narcotic Analgesics for Postoperative Pain After Third Molar Removal?

PURPOSE: In response to the national opioid epidemic crisis, the purpose of this study was to measure changes in opioid and non-narcotic analgesia (NNA) prescribing practices over time after third molar (M3) removal. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective double cohort study was utilized enrolling 2 samples of patients who had M3s removed during 2 different 3-month intervals. The primary predictor variable was prescribing practice, divided into cohorts: 1) previous prescribing practice (PPP) occurring early during the evolving opioid epidemic (2014); and 2) current prescribing practice (CPP) (2018). The outcome measures were morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs), NNA prescriptions, and refill MMEs for inadequate pain control (IPC). Other variables were age, gender, payor, provider, anesthesia, procedure, and number of M3s removed. Descriptive, bivariate, and multiple linear and logistic regression models were computed. RESULTS: The sample included 330 subjects with a mean age of 23.1 ± 8.1 years; 42.4% were male. Of the 330 subjects, 147 were in the PPP cohort (44.5%) and 183 in CPP cohort (55.5%). Mean MMEs were 130.1 ± 42.4 and 68.5 ± 32.0 in the PPP and CPP cohorts, respectively (P ≤ .001). An adjusted linear regression model showed differences in MMEs prescribed persisted (P ≤ .001). The frequency of postoperative NNA prescriptions written increased from 2.7 to 71.6% (P ≤ .001). An adjusted logistic regression model also revealed that NNA prescriptions had significantly increased (odds ratio, 242.00; P ≤ .001). No difference was found in the frequency of refills for IPC (P = .13) or mean refill MME prescriptions between the cohorts (P = .48). CONCLUSIONS: Within our academic practice, fewer opioids and more NNAs are being prescribed for postoperative pain after M3 removal without an increase in IPC. Increased awareness through prescribing regulations, non-narcotic research findings, and organizational guidelines could have contributed to these changes.

Communities With Bikeshare Programs Might Have a Lower Risk of Bicycle-Related Maxillofacial Injuries: Results From an Early Adopter of Bikeshare Programs.

PURPOSE: Although bikeshare programs can relieve traffic congestion, concerns for cyclist safety have been reported, secondary to the low frequency of helmet use observed among bikeshare users. The purpose of the present study was to measure and compare the risk of cycling-related maxillofacial injuries in communities with and without bikeshare programs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We designed a retrospective cohort study and enrolled a sample of patients who had presented to a level 1 trauma center for evaluation of bicycle-related injuries. The primary predictor variable was the community's status regarding bikeshare programs, coded as present or absent. The primary outcome variable was the presence of a facial injury, coded as present or absent. Other study variables included demographic and injury-related parameters. Uni-, bi-, and multivariate statistics were computed, and statistical significance was set at P ≤ .05. RESULTS: The study sample included 1346 subjects. Of the 1346 patients, 507 (37.7%) had been injured in communities with bikeshare systems, and facial injuries were present in 305 (22.7%). Facial injuries were less common in the patients injured in communities with bikeshare than in those injured in communities without bikeshare (18.1 vs 25.4%; relative risk, 0.7; P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to expectations, bicyclists injured in communities with bikeshare programs had a 30% decreased risk of maxillofacial injuries compared with bicyclists injured in communities without bikeshare programs. This finding might be partially explained by the low performance associated with the current bikeshare bicycles.

Can Patients With Isolated Mandibular Fractures Be Treated as Outpatients?

PURPOSE: Treating mandibular fractures urgently is controversial. The purpose of this study was to estimate and compare the rates of postoperative inflammatory complications (POICs) in patients with isolated mandibular fractures treated in a nonurgent manner by an outpatient protocol versus a traditional, urgent inpatient protocol. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We implemented a retrospective cohort study and enrolled a sample of patients with isolated mandibular fractures treated with open reduction-internal fixation (ORIF). The primary predictor variable was the treatment protocol: outpatient (elective) or inpatient (urgent). The outpatient group was treated with closed reduction and intermaxillary fixation, discharged, and scheduled for definitive treatment as outpatients. The inpatient group was admitted to the hospital, and the fracture was treated with ORIF as soon as possible. The primary outcome variable was POIC (present or absent). Descriptive, bivariate, and multiple logistic regression statistics were computed to measure the association between the treatment protocol and POICs, with statistical significance set at P < .05. RESULTS: The study sample was composed of 193 patients, with 82 in the outpatient group and 111 in the inpatient group. The frequency of POICs was 17.1% and 18.9% in the outpatient and inpatient groups, respectively (P = .13; relative risk, 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.62 to 1.0). The time to ORIF was not significantly associated with POICs (P = .71). After adjustment for treatment group, fracture location, and time to fracture stabilization, smoking (P = .04, odds ratio, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.0 to 5.1) and intraoral incision with a transbuccal trocar (P = .02, odds ratio, 3.4; 95% CI, 1.2 to 9.8) were associated with an increased risk of POICs. Length of stay was 0.6 ± 0.8 days in the outpatient group compared with 2.7 ± 2.0 days in the inpatient group (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: An outpatient model to treat isolated mandibular fractures was not associated with an increased risk of POICs. This outpatient care model reduced the hospital length of stay without increasing the risk of POICs.

Children Have an Increased Risk of Periorbital Dog Bite Injuries.

PURPOSE: Dog bites to the head, neck, and face (HNF) disproportionately affect children. It is unclear if specific facial regions are uniquely at risk in this population. Both the periorbital region and the central target area (CTA; nose, lips, and cheeks) have been proposed as being at increased risk. This study addressed the following question: Among individuals sustaining a dog bite injury to the HNF, are children, when compared with adults, at greater risk of injury to the periorbital region or CTA? PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using a retrospective cohort design, we enrolled a sample composed of patients presenting with HNF dog bite injuries. The predictor variable was age category: pediatric or adult (≥18 years). The primary outcome variable was injury location: isolated periorbital, isolated CTA, both periorbital and CTA, or other HNF location (neither periorbital nor CTA). Other variables included specific facial structures injured, demographic characteristics, injury circumstances, and clinical course. Descriptive and bivariate statistics were calculated. RESULTS: The sample consisted of 183 pediatric (58.5%) and 130 adult (41.5%) patients. Isolated periorbital injuries were more common in the pediatric group (relative risk [RR], 2.2 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.3 to 3.7]; P = .003), as was injury to both periorbital and CTA regions (RR, 2.0 [95% CI, 1.2 to 3.5]; P = .01). Isolated CTA injury was the most common injury pattern overall in both children and adults, but children were at significantly less risk than adults (RR, 0.7 [95% CI, 0.5 to 0.9]; P = .002). Children were also less likely to sustain an injury to other HNF regions (RR, 0.6 [95% CI, 0.3 to 0.97]; P = .038). CONCLUSIONS: Children were twice as likely as adults to incur a periorbital dog bite, but no such increased risk was observed for the CTA. This may reflect unique anatomic risks in children or targeting of their eyes by attacking dogs, contributing to higher rates of HNF injury in this population. Public health measures should recommend against children being at eye level with dogs, even if familiar or under adult supervision.

Is the Mandible Injury Severity Score a Valid Measure of Mandibular Injury Severity?

PURPOSE: Developing a valid method for assessing mandibular injury severity could permit standardized comparisons of treatment-specific outcomes between and among various mandibular fracture studies. The study purpose was to assess the validity of the Mandible Injury Severity Score (MISS) developed by Shetty et al (J Oral Maxillofac Surg 65:663, 2007) by measuring the association between the MISS and postoperative complications, operative time, and length of hospital stay (LOS) after operative treatment of isolated mandibular fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors designed and implemented a retrospective cohort study and enrolled a sample derived from patients treated for isolated mandibular fractures at Harborview Medical Center (Seattle, WA) by the oral and maxillofacial surgery service from June 2012 through December 2016. The primary predictor variable was the MISS. The primary outcome variable was postoperative complication (yes or no). Secondary outcome variables were operative time and LOS. Descriptive, bivariate, and multiple logistic regression statistics were computed to measure the association between the MISS and postoperative complications. The level of statistical significance was set at a P value less than or equal to .05. RESULTS: The study sample was composed of 415 patients with a mean age of 32.7 ± 14.3 years and 80% were men. The average MISS was 13.4 ± 3.5 (range, 6 to 25). The postoperative complication rate was 21%. The average MISS was significantly higher in patients with postoperative complications than in patients without complications (16.3 ± 3.3 vs 12.6 ± 3.1; P < .001). In the adjusted model, postoperative complications were significantly associated with an increasing MISS (odds ratio [OR] = 1.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3-1.6; P < .001) and open treatment (OR = 7.6; 95% CI, 1.6-35.6; P = .01). The MISS was positively correlated with operative time (r = 0.529; P < .001) and LOS (r = 0.114; P = .02). CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that the MISS may be a valid measurement of mandibular injury severity as evidenced by the positive correlation between the MISS and postoperative complications, duration of operation, and LOS.

Helmets Decrease Risk of Bicyclist-Related Maxillofacial Injuries But Not Severity.

PURPOSE: Given the increasing use of bicycles for local transportation and recreation, the purpose of the present study was to measure the effects of bicycle helmets on the frequency and severity of maxillofacial injuries. The specific aims were to measure and compare the frequencies and severity of maxillofacial injuries between injured bicyclists who had or had not worn helmets. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We implemented a retrospective cohort study and enrolled a sample of bicyclists who had been injured from January 4, 2012 to March 31, 2018 and had presented to Harborview Medical Center for evaluation and treatment. The primary predictor variable was helmet use (yes vs no). The primary outcome variables were 1) the presence of a maxillofacial injury (yes vs no); and 2) injury severity, measured using the Face Abbreviated Injury Scale (FAIS). The other study variables were grouped into demographic or injury-related variables. The appropriate univariate, bivariate, and multivariate logistic regressions statistics were computed, and statistical significance was set at P < .05. RESULTS: The sample included 1379 subjects, with a mean age of 39.6 ± 18.9 years (range, 1 to 91 years), and 78.4% were male. The frequency of facial injuries between the helmeted and nonhelmeted bicyclists was 17.3% and 30.6%, respectively (relative risk, 0.6; 95% confidence interval, 0.5 to 0.7; P < .0001). The protective effect held after adjusting for age, gender, and alcohol exposure. The FAIS score between the helmeted and nonhelmeted riders was 1.8 ± 0.5 and 1.9 ± 0.6, respectively (P = .8). CONCLUSIONS: The helmeted bicyclists were 40% less likely to have a facial injury from bicycle accidents. For those cyclists with a facial injury, however, the injury severity was not different between the helmeted and nonhelmeted wearers. This might have been because, that unlike American football helmets, standard bicycle helmets do not include a face mask to protect the face.

Is Gender Associated With Success in Academic Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery?

PURPOSE: Several studies of surgical specialties have shown disparities in measures of research productivity and academic rank between female and male surgeons. The purpose of this work was to measure the role of surgeon gender in academic success in oral and maxillofacial surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study of full-time academic oral and maxillofacial surgeons (OMSs) in the United States as of June 2017. The primary study variable was surgeon gender (male or female). The primary outcome variable was research productivity assessed using 2 different parameters: 1) h index (number of publications h with at least h citations each) and 2) academic rank. The other study variables were demographic characteristics potentially related to the outcome measures. Descriptive, bivariate, and regression statistics were computed. RESULTS: The study sample comprised 306 full-time academic OMSs, 53 (17.3%) of whom were women. On average, female OMSs had shorter academic careers (mean time since completion of training, 11.0 ± 8.2 years for female OMSs vs 22.0 ± 14.1 years for male OMSs; P < .001). There were no other significant differences between male and female OMSs regarding the secondary measures (P ≥ .23). Male OMSs had a higher mean h index than female OMSs (7.1 ± 8.6 vs 5.1 ± 7.9, P = .01). Academic rank was statistically significantly different between female and male OMSs, with a greater proportion of higher ranks seen in male OMSs (P = .001). After adjustment for career length and other confounders or effect modifiers, gender was not an independent predictor of the h index or academic rank (P ≥ .22). CONCLUSIONS: Although female surgeons represent a minority of full-time academic OMSs, academic success measured using research productivity and academic rank was not associated with gender.