Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the follow-up of non-muscle-invasive bladder tumors after intravesical instillations: a promising tool.

PURPOSE: The standard follow-up for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer is based on cystoscopy. Unfortunately, post-instillation inflammatory changes can make the interpretation of this exam difficult, with lower specificity. This study aimed to evaluate the interest of bladder MRI in the follow-up of patients following intravesical instillation. METHODS: Data from patients who underwent cystoscopy and bladder MRI in a post-intravesical instillation setting between February 2020 and March 2023 were retrospectively collected. Primary endpoint was to evaluate and compare the diagnostic performance of cystoscopy and bladder MRI in the overall cohort (n = 67) using the pathologic results of TURB as a reference. The secondary endpoint was to analyze the diagnostic accuracy of cystoscopy and bladder MRI according to the appearance of the lesion on cystoscopy [flat (n = 40) or papillary (n = 27)]. RESULTS: The diagnostic performance of bladder MRI was better than that of cystoscopy, with a specificity of 47% (vs. 6%, p < 0.001), a negative predictive value of 88% (vs. 40%, p = 0.03), and a positive predictive value of 66% (vs. 51%, p < 0.001), whereas the sensitivity did not significantly differ between the two exams. In patients with doubtful cystoscopy and negative MRI findings, inflammatory changes were found on TURB in most cases (17/19). The superiority in MRI bladder performance prevailed for "flat lesions", while no significant difference was found for "papillary lesions". CONCLUSIONS: In cases of doubtful cystoscopy after intravesical instillations, MRI appears to be relevant with good performance in differentiating post-therapeutic inflammatory changes from recurrent tumor lesions and could potentially allow avoiding unnecessary TURB.

Efficacy of hyperthermic intravesical chemotherapy (HIVEC) in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer after BCG failure.

PURPOSE: To evaluate hyperthermic intravesical chemotherapy (HIVEC) efficacy regarding 1-year disease-free survival (RFS) rate and bladder preservation rate in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) who fail bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) therapy. METHODS: This is a multicenter retrospective series from a national database (7 expert centers). Between January 2016 and October 2021, patients treated with HIVEC for NMIBC who failed BCG have been included in our study. These patients had a theoretical indication for cystectomy but were ineligible for surgery or refused it. RESULTS: A total of 116 patients treated with HIVEC and with a follow-up > 6 months were included in this study and retrospectively analyzed. The median follow-up was 20.6 months. The 12 month-RFS (recurrence-free survival) rate was 62.9%. The bladder preservation rate was 87.1%. Fifteen patients (12.9%) progressed to muscle infiltration, three of them having a metastatic disease at the time of progression. Predictive factors of progression were T1 stage, high grade and very high-risk tumors according to the EORTC classification. CONCLUSION: Chemohyperthermia using HIVEC achieved an RFS rate of 62.9% at 1 year and enabled a bladder preservation rate of 87.1%. However, the risk of progression to muscle-invasive disease is not negligible, particularly for patients with very high-risk tumors. In these patients who fail BCG, cystectomy should remain the standard of care and HIVEC may be discussed cautiously for patients who are not eligible for surgery and well informed of the risk of progression.

Efficacy of HIVEC in patients with high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer who are contraindicated to BCG and in patients who fail BCG therapy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate Hyperthermic-Intra-Vesical Chemotherapy (HIVEC) efficacy regarding 1-year disease-free survival (RFS) rate and bladder preservation rate in patients with High-risk Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer (NMIBC) who fail BCG therapy or are contraindicated to BCG. METHODS: Between June 2016 and October 2019, patients treated with HIVEC for mostly high-risk NMIBC who failed BCG or BCG-naive if BCG contraindicated have been included in our study. These patients had a theoretical indication for cystectomy but were ineligible for surgery or refused it. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients, median age 72 [39-93] years, were included in this study (n = 29 BCG-failure and n = 24 BCG-naive). The median follow-up was 18 months. The bladder preservation rate was 92.4%. The 12 months-RFS rate was 60.5%. The RFS rates for BCG-naive and BCG-failure groups were respectively 70% and 52.2% at 12 months. Three patients progressed to muscle infiltration, all in the BCG-failure group and all in the very high-risk EORTC group. Two of them developed metastatic disease and died from bladder cancer. CONCLUSION: Chemohyperthermia using HIVEC achieved a RFS rate of 60% at 1 year and enabled a bladder preservation rate of 92%. Given the low risk of progression in the BCG-naive group, HIVEC could be a good alternative. Conversely, for patients with very high-risk tumors that fail BCG, cystectomy should remain the standard of care and HIVEC may be discussed cautiously for patients who are not eligible for surgery and well informed of the risk of progression to muscle-invasive disease.

Could we safely omit a Repeat Transurethral Resection of the Bladder (re-TURB) after Hexaminolevulinate Photodynamic Diagnostics (PDD)-TURB?

OBJECTIVE: Bladder cancer (BC) is considered one of the malignancies with moderate-high incidence, high rate of recurrence and costly management. Diagnosis and staging are thus important for therapeutic purposes. Considering the risk of residual tumour and understaging, in specific cases, international guidelines recommend performing a second transurethral resection of the bladder (reTURB). Our study aimed to evaluate the impact of hexaminolevulinate Photodynamic Diagnostics (PDD) at first TURB on the rate of residual tumour. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analysed patients undergoing TURB in our centre between 2012 and 2020. Eightytwo patients had a re-TURB after a first complete TURB with a delay < 3 months. Patients who had an incomplete first resection were excluded. We compared patients who underwent standard white light cystoscopy/TURB and then hexaminolevulinate PDDguided reTURB (group A, n = 49) and patients with PDD-cystoscopy/ TURB at the first procedure then white light cystoscopy/reTURB (group B, n = 33). The residual tumour rate at reTURB as well as median recurrence-free survival (RFS) were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Residual tumour at reTURB was detected in 48.8% of cases in our cohort, with a significant difference between the two groups (71.4% in group A versus 12.5% in group B, p < 0.001). After a median follow-up of 22 months, the median RFS was 15 months in Group A and 32 months in Group B, but this difference was not significant (p = 0.7). CONCLUSIONS: Using PDD at the time of the initial TURB had a statistically significant impact on the rate of residual tumour at the reTURB. Nevertheless, the percentage of residual tumour even with the use of PDD does not allow for safely omitting second resection. Performing a reTURB with PDD for patients who did not have it initially, provides the same benefit in terms of recurrence-free survival.