[Bone metabolism in patients evaluated for lung transplantation]. / Metabolismo óseo en pacientes valorados para trasplante pulmonar.

INTRODUCTION: the prevalence of osteoporosis among candidates for lung transplantation is high and its pathophysiology is multifactorial. OBJECTIVES: to evaluate differences in bone mineral density, risk of fractures and bone remodeling markers in patients with terminal lung disease, at the time they are evaluated for lung transplantation, comparing two types of pathologies. MATERIAL AND METHODS: fifty-nine subjects, proposed to receive a lung transplant due to advanced lung disease, were included in this study. They were divided into two groups according to their respiratory pathology: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and diffuse interstitial pulmonary disease (ILD). Demographic data were collected and bone densitometry, blood analysis with markers of bone remodeling, spirometry, six-minute walk test (6MWT), echocardiography and cardiac catheterization were performed Results: no differences were found between the groups, regarding their age, sex, BMI or exposure to tobacco. A higher prevalence of osteoporosis and a higher FRAX were observed in the group with COPD. Regarding bone remodeling markers, higher parathyroid hormone (PTH) and higher osteocalcin were found in the COPD group. Vitamin D was lower in COPD patients. CONCLUSIONS: two out of three of the patients evaluated for lung transplantation had osteopenia or osteoporosis. The prevalence of osteoporosis and FRAX is higher in COPD patients. Vitamin D supplementation should be considered in certain patients. Differences in bone remodeling markers may be useful for suspected osteoporosis and therapeutic management.

Evaluation of a digital health system (PAHcare™) for routine care of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension: The CBS-PAH study protocol.

Introduction: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a rare, multifactorial, chronic condition that requires ongoing monitoring and assessment. PAHcare™ is a novel, patient-centered digital platform that provides software intended for use on patients' mobile phones (downloadable application) and web-based dashboards for use by physicians and health coaches (HC). We describe herein the protocol of a clinical study aimed at evaluating the clinical benefit and safety of PAHcare™ for the routine management of patients with PAH. Methods and analysis: In this prospective, single cohort, multicenter study, 50 patients with PAH will be recruited at six specialized PAH units from reference hospitals of the public Spanish healthcare system. The PAHcare™ digital health platform allows patients to log health and lifestyle information while also providing structured content for patient education, medication reminders, and behavioral and lifestyle coaching from a remote HC. Evaluation will be primarily focused on the impact of the platform use on the patient's health-related quality of life (HRQoL) via questionnaires completion through electronic patient-reported outcomes. Moreover, the analysis of the impact on the patient's functional status, signs and symptoms of PAH, patient costs and healthcare resource utilization, satisfaction, knowledge of the disease and its management, and adherence to and safety of the platform will be secondary outcomes. The clinical investigation started in July 2021 and is expected to end by September 2022. Discussion: The PAHcare™ platform is anticipated to provide direct benefits to healthcare professionals, patients, and caregivers. These include the simplification of the multidisciplinary approach needed to tailor routine PAH management, enhancement of the patient/healthcare professional interaction, patient's empowerment to become more actively involved in the management and treatment of the disease, and increase of the patient's and caregiver's knowledge on PAH.

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension in Spain: a decade of change.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) treatment has evolved in the last decade. However, there is scarce information on the long-term impact of this progress in a real-life population at a national level. This study was designed to analyze the characteristics of CTEPH patients in Spain over the last decade. METHODS: We prospectively collected epidemiological, clinical, and prognostic data from CTEPH patients consecutively included in the Spanish REHAP registry from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2018. We evaluated differences over time, establishing 2013 as the reference date for analysis. Propensity scores for interventional treatment were calculated using a multivariable logistic regression model. RESULTS: A total of 1019 patients were included; 659 (64.4%) were evaluated at a national CTEPH center. Overall, 350 patients (34.3%) were selected for surgery and 97 (9.6%) for percutaneous treatment. Patients diagnosed between 2007 and 2012 died more frequently than those diagnosed from 2013 onward (HR, 1.83; 95%CI, 1.07-3.15; P=.027). Within the subgroup of patients adjusted by propensity score, baseline pulmonary vascular resistance and the 6-minute walk test distance also determined the outcome (HR, 1.24; 95%CI, 1.15-1.33; P=.011; and HR, 0.93; 95%CI, 0.90-0.97; P=.001, respectively). High survival rates were found in patients who underwent an invasive procedure (pulmonary endarterectomy or balloon pulmonary angioplasty). CONCLUSIONS: CTEPH diagnosis and prognosis have consistently improved in the last decade. Baseline disease severity determines the risk profile. Patients who undergo pulmonary endarterectomy or balloon pulmonary angioplasty have better outcomes.