Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 28
Filtrar
Más filtros

Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
BMC Pulm Med ; 24(1): 395, 2024 Aug 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39153976

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Prompt and effective management with maintenance therapy (single or dual bronchodilator therapy) is recommended after the initial diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) to maintain lung function and prevent exacerbations. Contrary to guideline-based recommendations, most patients are not prescribed maintenance treatment at initial diagnosis. The current study assessed the pharmacologic treatment patterns and outcomes of newly diagnosed patients with COPD in the USA. METHODS: This retrospective, noninterventional study used de-identified data from the Inovalon Insights' database (Commercial, Medicaid Managed Care, and Medicare Advantage-insured individuals) between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2021. The "patient journey" from initial diagnosis was followed over a 4-year period. The primary outcome measure was the number of moderate or severe exacerbations. Secondary outcome measures included the cumulative incidence of exacerbations, mean cumulative count of moderate and severe exacerbations, rates of moderate and severe exacerbations in patients who remained untreated after diagnosis in 12-month time periods for 4 years, sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, and pharmacologic treatment patterns. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 238,158 newly diagnosed patients with COPD (female [52.9%]; mean age 63.8 years). The majority of patients with COPD had Medicaid as their primary insurance (46.2%). Overall, during the 4-year follow-up period, 32.9% of the patients had at least one moderate or severe exacerbation, and 25.8% and 13.8% experienced moderate and severe exacerbations, respectively. At diagnosis, 86.2% of the patients were untreated and most remained untreated by the end of the follow-up (63.8%). Most patients (62.0%) received long-acting beta-agonist (LABA)/inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) as their initial treatment at diagnosis, and LABA/ICS continued to be the most common initial treatment during the 4-year period (64.0% at year 1; 58.0% at year 4). CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with COPD were not treated at initial diagnosis and remained untreated during follow-up. Our data highlight a lack of adherence to recommendations for clinical practice.


Asunto(s)
Broncodilatadores , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica , Humanos , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/diagnóstico , Femenino , Masculino , Estados Unidos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Broncodilatadores/uso terapéutico , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Medicaid/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Bases de Datos Factuales
2.
J Cardiovasc Nurs ; 39(2): 128-141, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37249549

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Given the functional impairments and complex care routines associated with heart failure (HF), patients often rely on the support of informal caregivers. Although the importance of caregivers' roles is widely recognized, the intensity and time required for care duties may negatively impact caregiver health and well-being, potentially precipitating their own need for care. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to synthesize estimates of economic, clinical, burden, and health-related quality-of-life impact among caregivers of those with HF in the United States. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted to identify studies reporting estimates of caregiver impact. Abstract and full-text review as well as data extraction were performed according to established guidelines. Patient and caregiver characteristics were summarized, as well as estimates of impact of caring for those with HF. RESULTS: From 3680 abstracts, 44 studies reporting caregiver burden estimates were included. Mean caregiver age ranged from 41.4 to 71.4 years; caregivers were primarily female (range, 49%-100%) and the patient's spouse/partner (21%-100%). Time spent caregiving (6 studies) ranged from 2 to 52 h/wk, and depression was identified in up to 40% of caregivers (9 studies). Numerous instruments were used to measure burden, which consistently documented the high impact of caregiving. CONCLUSIONS: This review demonstrates the multifaceted impact of caregiving for patients with HF. Despite limited data, notable findings included the considerable burden to caregivers, variability in time spent caregiving, and frequent experience of depression among caregivers, possibly leading to increased healthcare resource use. Future research is needed to better characterize the caregiving impact in HF, including evaluating the drivers of burden.


Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Calidad de Vida , Humanos , Femenino , Estados Unidos , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Cuidadores , Estrés Psicológico , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Carga del Cuidador
3.
Diabetes Obes Metab ; 25(9): 2464-2472, 2023 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36999236

RESUMEN

AIM: To compare adverse outcomes among COVID-19 patients with pre-existing type 2 diabetes (T2D) only, T2D and cardiovascular disease (CVD), or neither. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used administrative claims, laboratory and mortality data from the HealthCore Integrated Research Database. Patients with COVID-19 were identified from 3 January 2020 to 31 May 2021 and stratified by the presence of T2D and CVD. Outcomes included hospitalization, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, mortality and complications following COVID-19 infection. Propensity score matching and multivariable analyses were performed. RESULTS: A total of 321 232 COVID-19 patients were identified (21 651 T2D + CVD, 28 184 T2D only, and 271 397 neither) with a mean (SD) follow-up of 5.4 (3.0) months. After matching, 6 967 patients were identified for each group, and residual baseline differences remained. Adjusted analyses showed that COVID-19 patients with T2D + CVD were 59% more probable to be hospitalized, 74% more probable to be admitted to the ICU, and had a 26% higher mortality risk than those with neither. COVID-19 patients with T2D only were 28% and 32% more probable to be admitted to the hospital and ICU than those with neither, respectively. Among all T2D + CVD patients, acute respiratory distress syndrome (31%) and acute kidney disease (24%) were observed. CONCLUSION: Our study highlights the incrementally poorer outcomes associated with pre-existing T2D + CVD in COVID-19 patients compared with those without T2D/CVD and suggests consideration of a more optimal management approach in these patients.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Estado Prediabético , Humanos , COVID-19/complicaciones , COVID-19/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/complicaciones , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Estado Prediabético/complicaciones
4.
BMC Med Res Methodol ; 19(1): 9, 2019 01 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30626343

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Observational burden of illness studies are used in pharmacoepidemiology to address a variety of objectives, including contextualizing the current treatment setting, identifying important treatment gaps, and providing estimates to parameterize economic models. Methodologies such as retrospective chart review may be utilized in settings for which existing datasets are not available or do not include sufficient clinical detail. While specifying the number of charts to be extracted and/or determining whether the number that can feasibly extracted will be clinically meaningful is an important study design consideration, there is a lack of rigorous methods available for sample size calculation in this setting. The objective of this study was to develop recommended sample size calculations for use in such studies. METHODS: Calculations for identifying the optimal feasible sample size calculations were derived, for studies characterizing treatment patterns and medical costs, based on the ability to comprehensively observe treatments and maximize precision of resulting 95% confidence intervals. For cost outcomes, if the standard deviation is not known, the coefficient of variation cv can be used as an alternative. A case study of a chart review of advanced melanoma (MELODY) was used to characterize plausible values for cv in a real-world example. RESULTS: Across sample sizes, any treatment given with greater than 1% frequency has a high likelihood of being observed. For a sample of size 200, and a treatment given to 5% of the population, the precision of a 95% confidence interval (CI) is expected to be ±0.03. For cost outcomes, for the median cv value observed in the MELODY study (0.72), a sample size of approximately 200 would be required to generate a 95% CI precise to within ±10% of the mean. CONCLUSION: This study presents a formal guidance on sample size calculations for retrospective burden of illness studies. The approach presented here is methodologically rigorous and designed for practical application in real-world retrospective chart review studies.


Asunto(s)
Costo de Enfermedad , Proyectos de Investigación , Tamaño de la Muestra , Humanos , Melanoma/epidemiología , Melanoma/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos
5.
J Health Econ Outcomes Res ; 11(1): 112-121, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38779335

RESUMEN

Background: The economic burden associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and concurrent cardiovascular disease (CVD) among patients with COVID-19 is unclear. Objective: We compared healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs in patients with COVID-19 and T2DM and CVD (T2DM + CVD), T2DM only, or neither T2DM nor CVD (T2DM/CVD). Methods: A retrospective observational study in COVID-19 patients using data from the Healthcare Integrated Research Database (HIRD®) was conducted. Patients with COVID-19 were identified between March 1, 2020, and May 31, 2021, and followed from first diagnosis or positive lab test to the end of health plan enrollment, end of study period, or death. Patients were assigned one of 3 cohorts: pre-existing T2DM+CVD, T2DM only, or neither T2DM/CVD. Propensity score matching and multivariable analyses were performed to control for differences in baseline characteristics. Study outcomes included all-cause and COVID-19-related HCRU and costs. Results: In all, 321 232 COVID-19 patients were identified (21 651 with T2DM + CVD, 28 184 with T2DM only, and 271 397 with neither T2DM/CVD). After matching, 6967 patients were in each group. Before matching, 46.0% of patients in the T2DM + CVD cohort were hospitalized for any cause, compared with 18.0% in the T2DM-only cohort and 6.3% in the neither T2DM/CVD cohort; the corresponding values after matching were 34.2%, 26.0%, and 21.2%. The proportion of patients with emergency department visits, telehealth visits, or use of skilled nursing facilities was higher in patients with COVID-19 and T2DM + CVD compared with the other cohorts. Average all-cause costs during follow-up were 12 324,7882, and $7277 per-patient-per-month after matching for patients with T2DM + CVD, T2DM-only, and neither T2DM/CVD, respectively. COVID-19-related costs contributed to 78%, 75%, and 64% of the overall costs, respectively. The multivariable model showed that per-patient-per-month all-cause costs for T2DM + CVD and T2DM-only were 54% and 21% higher, respectively, than those with neither T2DM/CVD after adjusting for residual confounding. Conclusion: HCRU and costs in patients were incrementally higher with COVID-19 and pre-existing T2DM + CVD compared with those with T2DM-only and neither T2DM/CVD, even after accounting for baseline differences between groups, confirming that pre-existing T2DM + CVD is associated with increased HCRU and costs in COVID-19 patients, highlighting the importance of proactive management.

6.
Respir Med ; 206: 107064, 2023 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36459955

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) may have worse coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19)-related outcomes. We compared COVID-19 hospitalization risk in patients with and without COPD. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included patients ≥40 years, SARS-CoV-2 positive, and with Kaiser Permanente Northern California membership ≥1 year before COVID-19 diagnosis (electronic health records and claims data). COVID-19-related hospitalization risk was assessed by sequentially adjusted logistic regression models and stratified by disease severity. Secondary outcome was death/hospice referral after COVID-19. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Of 19,558 COVID-19 patients, 697 (3.6%) had COPD. Compared with patients without COPD, COPD patients were older (median age: 69 vs 53 years); had higher Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (5 vs 0) and more median baseline outpatient (8 vs 4), emergency department (2 vs 1), and inpatient (2 vs 1) encounters. Unadjusted analyses showed increased odds of hospitalization with COPD (odds ratio [OR]: 3.93; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.40-4.60). After full risk adjustment, there were no differences in odds of hospitalization (OR: 1.14, 95% CI: 0.93-1.40) or death/hospice referral (OR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.72-1.27) between patients with and without COPD. Primary/secondary outcomes did not differ by COPD severity, except for higher odds of hospitalization in COPD patients requiring supplemental oxygen versus those without COPD (OR: 1.84, 95% CI: 1.02-3.33). CONCLUSIONS: Except for hospitalization among patients using supplemental oxygen, no differences in odds of hospitalization or death/hospice referral were observed in the COVID-19 patient sample depending on whether they had COPD.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica , Humanos , Anciano , COVID-19/complicaciones , COVID-19/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Prueba de COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/complicaciones , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/epidemiología , Hospitalización , Oxígeno , Comorbilidad
7.
Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis ; 10(1): 64-76, 2023 Jan 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36472621

RESUMEN

Background: It is unclear whether persistent inhaled steroid exposure in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients before coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with hospitalization risk. Objective: Our objective was to examine the association between persistent steroid exposure and COVID-19-related hospitalization risk in COPD patients. Study Design and Methods: This retrospective cohort study used electronic health records from the Kaiser Permanente Northern California health care system (February 2, 2020, to September 30, 2020) for patients aged ≥40 years with COPD and a positive polymerase chain reaction test result for COVID-19. Primary exposure was persistent oral and/or inhaled steroid exposure defined as ≥6 months of prescriptions filled in the year before the COVID-19 diagnosis. Multivariable logistic regression was performed for the primary outcome of COVID-19-related hospitalization or death/hospice referral. Steroid exposure in the month before a COVID-19 diagnosis was a covariate. Results: Of >4.3 million adults, 697 had COVID-19 and COPD, of whom 270 (38.7%) had COVID-19-related hospitalizations. Overall, 538 (77.2%) were neither exposed to steroids in the month before COVID-19 diagnosis nor persistently exposed; 53 (7.6%) were exposed in the month before but not persistently; 23 (3.3%) were exposed persistently but not in the month before; and 83 (11.9%) were exposed both persistently and in the month before. Adjusting for all confounders including steroid use in the month before, the odds ratio for hospitalization was 0.77 (95% confidence interval 0.41-1.46) for patients persistently exposed to steroids before a COVID-19 diagnosis. Interpretation: No association was observed between persistent steroid exposure and the risk of COVID-19-related hospitalization in COPD patients.

8.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm ; 29(2): 152-160, 2023 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36705285

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Value-based health care is expanding through payment models such as outcomes-based agreements between manufacturers and payers. OBJECTIVE: To describe the total-cost-of-care outcomes of an outcomes-based agreement evaluating the real-world impact of empagliflozin vs other type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) drugs among all patients with T2DM, with and without cardiovascular disease (within and beyond the requirement of the agreement). METHODS: In this prospective real-world analysis, members from the health plan of an integrated health care delivery system from the commercial and Medicare Advantage lines of business, who qualify under the confines of the contract, were included for analysis. Thus, members aged 18 years and older who were continuously enrolled in the identification (January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2018) and measurement periods (≤1 year post-index) with a T2DM diagnosis were retained. Patients using empagliflozin and empagliflozin-combination drugs constituted the empagliflozin group; those using all other antihyperglycemics, the nonempagliflozin group. Patients with type 1 diabetes, or those using metformin or insulin monotherapy, at index were excluded. Eligible members were followed for up to the earliest occurrence of disenrollment date, discontinuation (60-day medication fill gap allowed) of empagliflozin (or nonempagliflozin containing) medication, or the end of the measurement period. We compared, using Student's t-test and summary statistics (for reporting the outcomes agreement) and a propensity-matched difference-in-difference model (for the followup evaluation beyond the requirement of the agreement), the mean all-cause total cost of care (pharmacy plus medical) per patient per month (PPPM) between the 2 groups, including a subgroup of members with a baseline cardiovascular disease diagnosis. RESULTS: There were 4,577 (3,069 and 1,508 in the commercial and Medicare) and 33,712 (15,571 and 18,141 in the commercial and Medicare) in the empagliflozin and nonempagliflozin groups, respectively. The difference in mean total cost PPPM was $75 lower for empagliflozin vs nonempagliflozin groups, driven mainly by lower medical costs in the empagliflozin group (-$465 PPPM). However, the difference was not statistically significant in the propensity score-matched model. CONCLUSIONS: Although empagliflozin had higher pharmacy costs, the total cost of care for patients with T2DM and with established cardiovascular disease were comparable to the group of patients with all other T2DM, driven mainly by lower medical costs. DISCLOSURES: The authors report no conflicts of interest beyond being employees of the 2 organizations involved in this outcomes-based agreement. Ms. Palli is a former employee of Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., who was affiliated at the time of study conduct.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Medicare Part C , Humanos , Adulto , Anciano , Estados Unidos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Prospectivos , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Estudios Retrospectivos
9.
JAMA Cardiol ; 8(11): 1050-1060, 2023 11 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37755728

RESUMEN

Importance: Individually, cardiac, renal, and metabolic (CRM) conditions are common and leading causes of death, disability, and health care-associated costs. However, the frequency with which CRM conditions coexist has not been comprehensively characterized to date. Objective: To examine the prevalence and overlap of CRM conditions among US adults currently and over time. Design, Setting, and Participants: To establish prevalence of CRM conditions, nationally representative, serial cross-sectional data included in the January 2015 through March 2020 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) were evaluated in this cohort study. To assess temporal trends in CRM overlap, NHANES data between 1999-2002 and 2015-2020 were compared. Data on 11 607 nonpregnant US adults (≥20 years) were included. Data analysis occurred between November 10, 2020, and November 23, 2022. Main Outcomes and Measures: Proportion of participants with CRM conditions, overall and stratified by age, defined as cardiovascular disease (CVD), chronic kidney disease (CKD), type 2 diabetes (T2D), or all 3. Results: From 2015 through March 2020, of 11 607 US adults included in the analysis (mean [SE] age, 48.5 [0.4] years; 51.0% women), 26.3% had at least 1 CRM condition, 8.0% had at least 2 CRM conditions, and 1.5% had 3 CRM conditions. Overall, CKD plus T2D was the most common CRM dyad (3.2%), followed by CVD plus T2D (1.7%) and CVD plus CKD (1.6%). Participants with higher CRM comorbidity burden were more likely to be older and male. Among participants aged 65 years or older, 33.6% had 1 CRM condition, 17.1% had 2 CRM conditions, and 5.0% had 3 CRM conditions. Within this subset, CKD plus T2D (7.3%) was most common, followed by CVD plus CKD (6.0%) and CVD plus T2D (3.8%). The CRM comorbidity burden was disproportionately high among participants reporting non-Hispanic Black race or ethnicity, unemployment, low socioeconomic status, and no high school degree. Among participants with 3 CRM conditions, nearly one-third (30.5%) did not report statin use, and only 4.8% and 3.0% used glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, respectively. Between 1999 and 2020, the proportion of US adults with multiple CRM conditions increased significantly (from 5.3% to 8.0%; P < .001 for trend), as did the proportion having all 3 CRM conditions (0.7% to 1.5%; P < .001 for trend). Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study found that CRM multimorbidity is increasingly common and undertreated among US adults, highlighting the importance of collaborative and comprehensive management strategies.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Encuestas Nutricionales , Estudios de Cohortes , Prevalencia , Estudios Transversales , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/epidemiología
10.
Ann Hepatol ; 11(5): 623-35, 2012.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22947522

RESUMEN

Chronic infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a major and growing public health concern worldwide, including in Latin America. With more efficacious therapies becoming available, decision-makers will require accurate estimates of disease prevalence to assess the potential impact of new treatments. However, few estimates of the epidemiologic burden, either overall or by country, are available for Latin America; and the potential impact of currently-available treatments on the epidemiologic burden of HCV in Latin America has not been assessed. To address this, we systematically reviewed twenty-five articles presenting population-based estimates of HCV prevalence from general population or blood donor samples, and supplemen- ted those with publically-available data, to estimate the total number of persons infected with HCV in Latin America at 7.8 million (2010). Of these, over 4.6 million would be expected to have genotype 1 chronic HCV, based on published data on the risk of progression to chronic disease and the HCV genotype distribution of Latin America. Finally, we calculated that between 1.6 and 2.3 million persons with genotype 1 chronic HCV would potentially benefit from current treatments, based on published estimates of genotype-specific treatment responsiveness. In conclusion, these estimates demonstrate the substantial present epidemiologic burden of HCV, and quantify the impending societal and clinical burden from untreated HCV in Latin America.


Asunto(s)
Hepatitis C Crónica/epidemiología , Genotipo , Hepacivirus/genética , Hepatitis C Crónica/diagnóstico , Hepatitis C Crónica/terapia , Humanos , América Latina/epidemiología , Fenotipo , Prevalencia , Pronóstico
11.
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis ; 17: 1483-1494, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35791340

RESUMEN

Background: Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) can have low peak inspiratory flow (PIF), especially after hospitalization for acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD). Purpose: To characterize patients hospitalized for AECOPD, and to assess the prevalence of low PIF, changes in PIF after hospitalization, and the association of low PIF with healthcare resource utilization (HRU) outcomes. Patients and Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using electronic health record data of hospitalized COPD patients in the Wake Forest Baptist Health system (01/01/2017 through 06/30/2020). Patients with a first eligible AECOPD hospitalization (index hospitalization) who were discharged before 05/31/2020 were included. PIF was measured using the In-Check DIAL™ at both medium-low resistance (R-2) and high resistance (R-5) during the index hospitalization. For R-2 and R-5, PIF was divided into low PIF (< 60 L/min; < 30 L/min) and high PIF (≥ 60 L/min; ≥ 30 L/min) groups. The primary outcome was the prevalence of low PIF. The stability of PIF after hospitalization was described. Adjusted regression models evaluated associations between low PIF and subsequent 30-day readmissions, 90-day readmissions, and HRU outcomes, including hospitalizations, emergency department visits, inpatient days, and intensive care unit (ICU) days. Results: In total, 743 patients with PIF measured at R-2 and R-5 during a AECOPD hospitalization were included. The prevalence of low PIF was 56.9% at R-2 and 14.7% at R-5. PIF values were relatively stable after hospitalization. Adjusted analyses showed significant increases in HRU (all-cause hospitalizations [31%], COPD hospitalizations [33%], COPD inpatient days [46%], and COPD ICU days [24%]) during the follow-up period among patients with low PIF (< 60 L/min) at R-2. The 30- and 90-day readmission risks were similar between patients with low PIF and high PIF. Conclusion: Low PIF is common among patients hospitalized for AECOPD, relatively stable after hospital discharge, and associated with increased HRU.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica , Humanos , Pacientes Internos , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Readmisión del Paciente , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/epidemiología , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos
12.
Value Health ; 14(5 Suppl 1): S147-50, 2011.
Artículo en Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21839890

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: In Mexico, breast cancer is the second leading cause of cancer mortality among females. For patients with advanced breast cancer (ABC) resistant to anthracyclines and taxanes (AT), there are limited treatment options. There is a scarcity of data regarding clinical management of this population and treatment costs at this stage of the disease. The objective of this study was to describe the treatment patterns of care for metastatic breast cancer after AT and the associated cost from the point-of-view of the Mexican Public Health Care Sector. METHODS: Between January 1, 2004 and December 31, 2007, a retrospective cohort of adult female ABC patients resistant to AT was developed by reviewing and extracting key data from medical charts. We conducted a retrospective, transversal and descriptive analysis of the patient data. Target population data files were obtained from 414 patients from 3 public hospitals in México. RESULTS: Capecitabine, vinorelbine and cyclophosphamide were the most commonly prescribed agents, however clinical drug therapy management of the disease was different within and among the three hospitals included in the study. This difference translated into a disparity of prescription costs, ranging from an average of $122.22 pesos/patient/month (cyclophosphamide, IC 95% $94.43-$150.01) to $37,835.53 pesos/patient/month (capecitabine+trastuzumab IC 95% $34,953.18-$40,717.88) for the first treatment after AT. CONCLUSIONS: The results highlight a lack of standardized care for patients and suggest that differences in treatment patterns are not only a reflection of scarcity of scientific data and diversity of prescription preferences among physicians but also of economic restrictions. Ultimately, there is a clear unmet medical need to be addressed through evidence-based medicine alternatives that support efficacy and cost effectiveness treatments.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/economía , Neoplasias de la Mama/economía , Costos de los Medicamentos , Resistencia a Antineoplásicos , Costos de Hospital , Hospitales Públicos/economía , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/economía , Terapia Recuperativa/economía , Antraciclinas/administración & dosificación , Antraciclinas/economía , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama/secundario , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/economía , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Femenino , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/economía , Humanos , México , Modelos Económicos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Sector Público/economía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Taxoides/administración & dosificación , Taxoides/economía , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento
13.
Pharmacoeconomics ; 38(3): 307-313, 2020 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31828738

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome (aHUS) is a rare, potentially life-threatening condition caused by dysregulation of the complement pathway. Eculizumab is currently the only approved treatment for this disorder. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to investigate the impact of early administration of eculizumab on inpatient resource use and hospitalisation costs in 222 patients with aHUS. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of the Premier Perspective® Hospital Database, including patients with a diagnosis of aHUS and evidence of eculizumab use for aHUS. Early initiation was defined as having received eculizumab within 7 days of admission, with late initiation defined as starting eculizumab on day 8 or later. This date represents the average time required to obtain a specific diagnostic test to discriminate aHUS from a similar haemolytic syndrome that requires a different treatment. Outcome measures were time from first eculizumab initiation to discharge, discharge status or death, days spent in the intensive care unit (ICU), readmission indicators, dialysis indicators, and total hospital costs. Time from first eculizumab initiation to discharge was analysed using a generalised linear model with a log link and an assumed underlying negative binomial distribution. Logistic regression models were used to test the statistical significance of early versus late initiation as a predictor of the occurrence of readmissions, dialysis, and death. Total hospital costs were analysed using a generalised linear model with a log link and an assumed underlying gamma distribution. RESULTS: Before modelling, total length of stay and ICU duration were significantly longer for late initiators than for early initiators, and significantly more late initiators were readmitted within 90 days. Late initiation was associated with significantly higher hospital costs than early initiation. After multivariable analysis, late initiators were 3.2 times more likely to require dialysis. However, there was no significant association between early initiation and time to discharge, readmission, or death for any definition or early initiation after multivariable analysis. Estimated total hospital costs (year 2017 values) were $US103,557 in late initiators and $US85,776 in early initiators (p = 0.0024). CONCLUSION: Initiation of eculizumab within 7 days of hospitalisation is associated with lower dialysis rates, less time in ICU, less plasmapheresis, and lower hospitalisation costs compared with late initiation.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Síndrome Hemolítico Urémico Atípico/tratamiento farmacológico , Síndrome Hemolítico Urémico Atípico/economía , Inactivadores del Complemento/administración & dosificación , Tiempo de Tratamiento/economía , Adulto , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/economía , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Síndrome Hemolítico Urémico Atípico/diagnóstico , Inactivadores del Complemento/economía , Inactivadores del Complemento/uso terapéutico , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Bases de Datos Factuales , Diagnóstico Precoz , Femenino , Hospitalización/economía , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Diálisis Renal/economía , Estudios Retrospectivos
14.
Patient Prefer Adherence ; 14: 705-715, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32308375

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To develop a patient preference questionnaire (PPQ) assessing eculizumab and ravulizumab treatment for paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The development of the PNH-PPQ© was consistent with Food and Drug Administration guidelines for patient-reported outcome measure development, and included 1) a targeted literature review; 2) PNH expert clinician input on treatment preferences; 3) review of existing qualitative data on the PNH treatment and disease experience; 4) concept elicitation interviews with 8 PNH patients who received eculizumab and/or ravulizumab; 5) translatability review; and 6) cognitive debriefing with 5 patients. Interview participants were recruited through a United Kingdom PNH patient advocacy group and a Canadian clinical site involved in clinical trial ALXN1210-PNH-302. RESULTS: Six themes were identified as most relevant to the PNH treatment experience from the concept elicitation interviews: disease symptoms (n=8/8); treatment frequency (n=7/8); quality of life impact of treatment/disease (n=7/8); treatment burden (n=7/8); treatment efficacy (n=5/8); and treatment side effects (n=5/8). An initial list of 88 preference questions was reduced to 11 highly relevant and non-redundant questions reflecting the 6 themes. Cognitive interview participants unanimously agreed that the PNH-PPQ instructions were clear; response options were understandable, easy to use, and provided enough choices; and the questions captured the factors that inform treatment preferences. DISCUSSION: When new drugs have similar efficacy to existing medications, documenting patient preferences is important for confirming patient benefit from the new medication. Understanding what matters most to patients is essential for delivering patient-centered care and may play a particularly significant role in treatment decision making. The availability of such a tool may be especially important as new orphan drugs are developed and patients with rare diseases have more than one treatment option to consider. CONCLUSION: The PNH-PPQ provides a patient-centered approach for evaluating preferences for the treatment of PNH. The PNH-PPQ has subsequently assessed patient preference in the clinical trial sub-study ALXN1210-PNH-302s.

15.
Orphanet J Rare Dis ; 14(1): 85, 2019 04 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31023354

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Hypophosphatasia (HPP) is a rare, inherited, metabolic disease caused by tissue-nonspecific alkaline phosphatase deficiency, characterized by bone mineralization defects and systemic complications. Understanding of the clinical course and burden of HPP is limited by its rarity. This systematic literature review and synthesis of case report data aimed to determine the frequency and timing of clinical HPP manifestations and events. METHODS: Case reports and series of patients with HPP who had been followed longitudinally for ≥1 year were identified. Demographics and clinical data of interest, identified through consultation with clinical experts in HPP, were extracted. Occurrences of clinical manifestations/events of interest were categorized, classified by age at first reported occurrence of HPP manifestations and visualized over time. Clinical manifestations/events considered to contribute to the clinical burden of HPP were identified. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to estimate the median (range) age at first occurrence of the most frequently reported manifestations/events. RESULTS: From the 283 studies that met the inclusion criteria, 265 patients with HPP with ≥1 year of longitudinal follow-up were identified (median [interquartile range] age 4 [0-34] years; 45% male). The types of clinical manifestations/events of interest experienced by individuals with ≥1 such manifestation/event (n = 261) often differed between older and younger patients. Most (94%) of the 265 patients experienced ≥1 manifestation/event deemed to contribute to the clinical burden of HPP; premature tooth loss (53.5%), fractures (35.8%), pain (33.6%), and gross motor/ambulation difficulties (30.9%) were most frequently reported. The median (range) age at first reported occurrence of respiratory symptoms, cranial abnormalities, and premature tooth loss ranged from 0.3 to 10 years, whereas the median age at first reported occurrence of fractures, pain, gross motor/ambulation difficulties, and surgery ranged from 33 to 70 years. CONCLUSIONS: HPP is associated with a high clinical burden of disease, regardless of age at first reported occurrence of HPP manifestations. Over an individual's lifetime, the types of manifestations/events experienced can change and multiple HPP-related clinical manifestations/events can accumulate. These observations may reflect evolution and progression of the disease.


Asunto(s)
Hipofosfatasia/epidemiología , Hipofosfatasia/patología , Adolescente , Adulto , Fosfatasa Alcalina/genética , Niño , Preescolar , Terapia de Reemplazo Enzimático , Femenino , Fracturas Óseas/epidemiología , Fracturas Óseas/genética , Humanos , Hipofosfatasia/complicaciones , Hipofosfatasia/genética , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Dolor/epidemiología , Dolor/etiología , Adulto Joven
16.
J Clin Oncol ; 22(24): 4971-8, 2004 Dec 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15611512

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: There is limited published documentation regarding US community patterns of care for older patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database, we examined community treatment patterns for advanced NSCLC, focusing on chemotherapy. METHODS: Patients with locally advanced or metastatic (TNM system stages IIIb and IV) NSCLC diagnosed between January 1, 1994, and December 31, 1999, were stratified based on chemotherapy agents received during the first 3 months following diagnosis. Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare survival, controlling for age, sex, race, noncancer comorbidity, stage at diagnosis, SEER region, and receipt of cancer-related surgery or radiation therapy in the first 3 months following diagnosis. Lifetime medical costs were calculated for each group. RESULTS: 14,875 patients met inclusion criteria: 7,411 (49.8%) stage III and 7,464 (50.2%) stage IV at diagnosis. Thirty-one percent received chemotherapy, 8% received surgery, and 53% received radiation therapy either as initial or adjuvant treatment. Persons > or = 75 years of age, females, African Americans, and those with more than one comorbidity were significantly less likely to receive chemotherapy (P < .01). Survival was inferior for those who did not receive a platinum-containing agent (P < .01). Lifetime costs were highest for those receiving platinum + taxane combinations, exceeding other regimens by more than $10,000 USD per patient. CONCLUSION: Chemotherapy prolongs survival in community settings, but is underutilized for persons with advanced NSCLC. Reasons for lower use in minorities and variation across regions deserve further study.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/economía , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/economía , Programa de VERF/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Masculino , Grupos Minoritarios , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Pronóstico , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
17.
Health Econ Rev ; 5(1): 52, 2015 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26112219

RESUMEN

Apixaban, a novel oral anticoagulant which has been approved for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in non-valvular atrial fibrillation, reduces both ischemic and haemorrhagic stroke and produces fewer bleedings than vitamin K antagonist warfarin. These clinical results lead to a decrease in health care resource utilization and, therefore, have a positive impact on health economics of atrial fibrillation. The cost-effectiveness of apixaban has been assessed in a variety of clinical settings and countries. However, data from emergent markets, as is the case of Argentina, are still scarce.We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis of apixaban versus warfarin in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) in patients suitable for oral anticoagulation in Argentina. A Markov-based model including both costs and effects were used to simulate a cohort of patients with NVAF. Local epidemiological, resource utilization and cost data were used and all inputs were validated by a Delphi Panel of local experts. We adopted the payer's perspective with costs expressed in 2012 US Dollars.The study revealed that apixaban is cost-effective compared with warfarin using a willingness to pay threshold ranging from 1 to 3 per capita Gross Domestic Product (11558 - 34664 USD) with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 786.08 USD per QALY gained. The benefit is primarily a result of the reduction in stroke and bleeding events.The study demonstrates that apixaban is a cost-effective alternative to warfarin in Argentina.

18.
Value Health Reg Issues ; 7: 87-93, 2015 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29698157

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Despite the high prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), few data exist describing its management in Dubai. This study characterized the treatment and estimated levels of glycemic, lipid, and blood pressure control among a sample with T2DM at a large Dubai Hospital. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study systematically sampled charts from adults seeking care for T2DM from October 2009 to March 2010 until the target (N = 250) was reached. Data on patient characteristics, pharmacotherapy, complications, and laboratory testing were abstracted until September 2011. The frequency of treatments and modifications over the period was calculated, and measures of glycosylated hemoglobin A1c, low-density lipoprotein, and blood pressure control were compared with guideline targets. Frequencies of complications were compared according to treatment type. RESULTS: One-third of the cohort comprised men, and the mean age was 58 years. At enrolment, the mean time from T2DM diagnosis was nearly 15 years and 74% had received insulin. During the study period, the most common regimens were insulin + oral combinations (55%) and oral combination therapy (39%). Overall, 67% received any insulin therapy during the study; and by study end, 78% had received insulin at any time. At the most recent assessment, guideline targets for glycosylated hemoglobin A1c, blood pressure, and low-density lipoprotein were met by 23%, 29%, and 71%, respectively. Complications were more frequent among those treated with combination or insulin therapies. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides baseline data from Dubai for future comparisons of the effectiveness of new treatments, and to better understand the humanistic and economic burden of T2DM and its complications.

19.
Int J Endocrinol ; 2015: 413276, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26089885

RESUMEN

Objective. As little data are available on the quality of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) care in the Arabian Gulf States, we estimated the proportion of patients receiving recommended monitoring at the Dubai Hospital for T2DM over one year. Methods. Charts from 150 adults with T2DM were systematically sampled and quality of care was assessed during one calendar year, using a Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set- (HEDIS-) like assessment. Screening for glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), blood pressure, retinopathy, and nephropathy was considered. Patients were classified based on their most recent test in the period, and predictors of receiving quality care were examined. Results. Mean age was 58 years (standard deviation (SD): 12.4 years) and 33% were males. Over the year, 98% underwent HbA1c screening (50% had control and 28% displayed poor control); 91% underwent LDL screening (65% had control); 55% had blood pressure control; 30% had retinopathy screening; and 22% received attention for nephropathy. No individual characteristics examined predicted receiving quality care. Conclusion. Some guideline monitoring was conducted for most patients; and rates of monitoring for selected measures were comparable to benchmarks from the United States. Greater understanding of factors leading to high adherence would be useful for other areas of preventive care and other jurisdictions.

20.
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992) ; 60(3): 222-30, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25004267

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the number of hospitalizations attributable to diabetes mellitus (DM) and its complications within the public healthcare system in Brazil (SUS) and the mean cost paid per hospitalization. METHODS: The official database from the Hospital Information System of the Unified Health System (SIH/SUS) was consulted from 2008 to 2010. The proportion of hospitalizations attributable to DM was estimated using attributable risk methodology. The mean cost per hospitalization corresponds to direct medical costs in nursing and intensive care, from the perspective of the SUS. RESULTS: The proportion of hospitalizations attributable to DM accounted for 8.1% to 12.2% of total admissions in the period, varying according to use of maximum (self-reported with correction factor) or minimal (self-reported) DM prevalence. The hospitalization rate was 47 to 70.8 per 10.000 inhabitants per year. The mean cost per hospitalization varied from 1.302 Brazilian Reais (BRL) to 1,315 BRL. Assuming the maximum prevalence, hospitalizations were distributed as 10.3% as DM itself, 36.6% as chronic DM-associated complications and 53.1% as general medical conditions. Advancing age was accompanied by an increase in hospitalization rates and corresponding costs, and more pronounced in male patients. CONCLUSION: The results express the importance of DM in terms of the use of health care resources and demonstrate that studies of hospitalizations with DM as a primary diagnosis are not sufficient to assess the magnitude of the impact of this disease.


Asunto(s)
Atención a la Salud/economía , Complicaciones de la Diabetes/epidemiología , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Brasil/epidemiología , Niño , Preescolar , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Bases de Datos Factuales , Complicaciones de la Diabetes/economía , Diabetes Mellitus/economía , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Femenino , Hospitalización/economía , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA