Predictors of occlusion, long-term outcomes, and safety in a cohort of 674 aneurysms treated with the Pipeline embolization device.

OBJECTIVE: By providing a more physiological approach to the treatment of intracranial aneurysms, the Pipeline embolization device (PED) has revolutionized the endovascular treatment of aneurysms. Although there are many flow diverters on the market, the authors report their experience with the PED, the first flow diverter to be approved by the Food and Drug Administration. They aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of PED flow diversion for the treatment of a wide range of aneurysms, as well as to look at factors affecting occlusion. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of a prospectively maintained database of patients treated with the PED between January 2011 and December 2019. Charts were reviewed for patient, aneurysm, and procedure characteristics. The primary outcomes of interest were complication rates, occlusion outcomes (O'Kelly-Marotta grading scale), and functional outcomes (modified Rankin Scale [mRS]). Secondary outcomes included predictors of incomplete occlusion at 6 and 24 months of follow-up. RESULTS: The study cohort included 581 patients with 674 aneurysms. Most aneurysms (90.5%) were in the anterior circulation and had a saccular morphology (85.6%). Additionally, 638 aneurysms (94.7%) were unruptured, whereas 36 (5.3%) were acutely ruptured. The largest mean aneurysm diameter was 8.3 ± 6.1 mm. Complications occurred at a rate of 5.5% (n = 32). The complete occlusion rate was 89.3% at 24 months' follow-up, and 94.8% of patients had a favorable neurological outcome (mRS score 0-2) at the last follow-up. On multivariate analysis, predictors of incomplete aneurysm occlusion at 6 months were hypertension (OR 1.7, p = 0.03), previous aneurysm treatment (OR 2.4, p = 0.001), and increasing aneurysm neck diameter (OR 1.2, p = 0.02), whereas a saccular morphology was protective (OR 0.5, p = 0.05). Predictors of incomplete occlusion at 24 months were increasing aneurysm neck diameter (OR 1.2, p = 0.01) and previous aneurysm treatment (OR 2.3, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The study findings are corroborated by those of previous studies and trials. The complete occlusion rate was 89.3% at 24 months' follow-up, with 94.8% of patients having favorable functional outcomes (mRS score 0-2). Aneurysm treatment before PED deployment and an increasing aneurysm neck diameter increase the risk of incomplete occlusion at 6 and 24 months.

The effect of perceived weight status and BMI perception on food attitudes and food relationships.

CONTEXT: Obesity has been a national epidemic throughout the United States due to the increasingly sedentary western lifestyle, paired with calorically dense abundant low-nutritional food options. Discussing weight necessitates the conversation of not only the numerical value (body mass index [BMI]) associated with obesity but also the perceived weight or how an individual categorizes their weight, irrespective of their calculated BMI classification. Perceived weight can influence food relationships, overall health, and lifestyle habits. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to identify differences in dietary habits, lifestyle habits, and food attitudes among three groups: those correctly identifying as "obese" with a BMI >30 (BMI Corrects [BCs]), those incorrectly identifying as "obese" with a BMI <30 (BMI Low Incorrect [BLI]), and those incorrectly identifying as "nonobese" with a BMI >30 (BMI High Incorrect [BHI]). METHODS: An online cross-sectional study was conducted from May 2021 to July 2021. Participants (n=104) responded to a 58-item questionnaire regarding demographics (n=9), health information (n=8), lifestyle habits (n=7), dietary habits (n=28), and food attitudes (n=6). Frequency counts and percentages were tabulated, and analysis of variance (ANOVA) testing was conducted to examine the associations utilizing SPSS V28 at a statistical significance level of p<0.05. RESULTS: Participants incorrectly identifying as "obese" with a BMI <30 (BLI) had higher food attitude scores, indicating worse food attitudes, behaviors, and relationships with food compared to participants correctly identifying as "obese" with a BMI >30 (BC) and incorrectly identifying as "non-obese" with a BMI >30 (BHI). When comparing BC, BLI, and BHI participants, no statistically significant differences were found in dietary habit scores, lifestyle habit scores, weight change, or nutritional supplement or diet started. However, overall, BLI participants had worse food attitude scores and consumption habits when compared to BC and BHI participants. Even though dietary habit scores were not significant, an examination of specific food items revealed significant findings, in which BLI participants had higher consumption of potato chips/snacks, milk, and olive oil/sunflower oil, compared to BHI participants. BLI participants had higher beer and wine consumption compared to BC participants. Additionally, BLI participants had higher carbonated beverages, low-calorie beverages, and margarine and butter consumption compared to BHI and BC participants. BHI participants had the lowest hard liquor consumption, BC had the second lowest hard liquor consumption, and BLI participants had the highest consumption of hard liquor products. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study have shed light on the intricate relationship that exists between perceived weight status from a "nonobese/obese" perspective and attitudes toward food and the overconsumption of particular food items. Participants who perceived their weight status as "obese" despite having a calculated BMI below the CDC threshold and classification for "obesity" had poorer relationships with food, consumption behaviors, and on average consumed food items that were detrimental to overall health. Comprehending a patient's weight status perception and conducting a thorough history of their food intake could play a crucial role in addressing the patient's overall health and medically managing this population.

Comparison of Flow-Redirection Endoluminal Device and Pipeline Embolization Device in the Treatment of Intracerebral Aneurysms.

BACKGROUND: The use of flow diverters for treating intracranial aneurysms has been widely used in the past decade; however, data comparing pipeline embolization device (PED; Medtronic Inc) and flow-redirection endoluminal device (FRED; MicroVention) in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms remain scarce. OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcomes of PED and FRED in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective review of aneurysms treated with PED and FRED devices. Patients treated with PED or FRED were included. Cases requiring multiple or adjunctive devices were excluded. Primary outcome was complete aneurysm occlusion at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included good functional outcome, need for retreatment, and any complication. RESULTS: The study cohort comprised 150 patients, including 35 aneurysms treated with FRED and 115 treated with PED. Aneurysm characteristics including location and size were comparable between the 2 cohorts. 6-month complete occlusion rate was significantly higher in the PED cohort (74.7% vs 51.5%; P = .017) but lost significance after inverse probability weights. Patients in the PED cohort were associated with higher rates of periprocedural complications (3.5% vs 0%; P = .573), and the rate of in-stent stenosis was approximately double in the FRED cohort (15.2% vs 6.9%; P = .172). CONCLUSION: Compared with PED, FRED offers modest 6-month occlusion rates, which may be due to aneurysmal and baseline patient characteristics differences between both cohorts. Although not significant, FRED was associated with a higher complication rate mostly because of in-stent stenosis. Additional studies with longer follow-up durations should be conducted to further evaluate FRED thrombogenicity.

A Comparison of Outcomes Between Transfemoral Versus Transradial Access for Carotid Stenting.

BACKGROUND: The transradial (TR) approach has emerged as an alternative to the transfemoral (TF) approach in carotid artery stenting (CAS) because of its perceived benefits in access site complications and overall patient experience. OBJECTIVE: To assess outcomes of TF vs TR approach for CAS. METHODS: This is a retrospective single-center review of patients receiving CAS through the TR or TF route between 2017 and 2022. All patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid disease who underwent attempted CAS were included in our study. RESULTS: A total of 342 patients were included in this study: 232 underwent CAS through TF approach vs 110 through the TR route. On univariate analysis, the rate of overall complications was more than double for the TF vs TR cohort; however, this did not achieve statistical significance (6.5% vs 2.7%, odds ratio [OR] = 0.59 P = .36). The rate of cross-over from TR to TF was significantly higher on univariate analysis (14.6 % vs 2.6%, OR = 4.77, P = .005) and on inverse probability treatment weighting analysis (OR = 6.11, P < .001). The rate of in-stent stenosis (TR: 3.6% vs TF: 2.2%, OR = 1.71, P = .43) and strokes at follow-up (TF: 2.2% vs TR: 1.8%, OR = 0.84, P = .84) was not significantly different. Finally, median length of stay was comparable between both cohorts. CONCLUSION: The TR approach is safe, feasible, and provides similar rates of complications and high rates of successful stent deployment compared with the TF route. Neurointerventionalists adopting the radial first approach should carefully assess the preprocedural computed tomography angiography to identify patients amenable to TR approach for carotid stenting.

Acute ischaemic stroke interventions: large vessel occlusion and beyond.

Care for acute ischaemic stroke is one of the most rapidly evolving fields due to the robust outcomes achieved by mechanical thrombectomy. Large vessel occlusion (LVO) accounts for up to 38% of acute ischaemic stroke and comes with devastating outcomes for patients, families and society in the pre-intervention era. A paradigm shift and a breakthrough brought mechanical thrombectomy back into the spotlight for acute ischaemic stroke; this was because five randomised controlled trials from several countries concluded that mechanical thrombectomy for acute stroke offered overwhelming benefits. This review article will present a comprehensive overview of LVO management, techniques and devices used, and the future of stroke therapy. In addition, we review our institution experience of mechanical thrombectomy for posterior and distal circulation occlusion.

Mechanical Thrombectomy in Distal Vessels: Revascularization Rates, Complications, and Functional Outcome.

INTRODUCTION: Pivotal trials have shown the tremendous efficacy of mechanical thrombectomy in proximal occlusions. However distal occlusions involving second-order branches of the middle cerebral artery and beyond, anterior cerebral and posterior cerebral arteries were not represented. In this study, we investigated the feasibility and safety of distal circulation mechanical thrombectomy. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients presenting with distal circulation acute ischemic stroke who underwent mechanical thrombectomy 2010 and 2018. RESULTS: Of 453 patients who underwent mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke, 76 had a distal occlusion. The mean National Institute Health Stroke Scale on admission was 12. Vessels involved included second-order branches of the middle cerebral artery (89%), third- and fourth-order branches of the middle cerebral artery (5%), second-order branch of the anterior cerebral artery (3%), and posterior cerebral artery (3%). Most procedures required 1 pass to recanalize the vessel (55%, n = 42). Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score ≥IIb was achieved in 89% of subjects. Mortality rate was 8% and independent functional outcome of m Rankin score ≤2 at 3 months was seen in 64.7% with clinical follow-up. On multivariate analysis, distal circulation had a significantly shorter length of stay by about 2 days, compared with proximal circulation. Subjects with proximal occlusion were more than 5 times more likely to have a good Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score compared with the distal group. There was no significant difference in periprocedural and postprocedural complications, good functional outcome at 3 months, and mortality between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Mechanical thrombectomy procedure for distal circulation strokes is as effective and safe as a proximal group. Though distal vessels supply smaller brain area; however, when symptoms are pronounced, the benefit of the procedure outweighs the risks.