RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Contradictory results regarding the safety of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination during pregnancy have been obtained, which has cast doubt on the use of this method. This review and meta-analysis were conducted to evaluate the safety of HPV vaccination during pregnancy. METHODS: Complying with the inclusion and exclusion criteria, we searched Web of Science, Scopus, Medline, EMBASE, PubMed and Google Scholar databases for articles published in the past decade using the following keywords: 'papilloma human virus', 'HPV vaccine', 'pregnancy' and 'safety and prevention'. The minimum report quality of the articles was 16 based on the STROBE checklist. RESULTS: Seven articles were included in the study, three of which were included in the meta-analysis, and the rest were reviewed systematically. The results of the meta-analysis showed that vaccination against HPV during pregnancy or around this period does not increase the risk of miscarriage (RR=2.01; 95% CI: 0.66-6.13) and stillbirth (RR=2.02: 95% CI: 0.65-6.27). No significant difference between miscarriage and stillbirth was observed in women vaccinated against HPV versus those not vaccinated. CONCLUSIONS: The study of 1380424 individuals showed that HPV vaccination during pregnancy is better postponed until after this period. However, no significant evidence was found to indicate that vaccination was dangerous and unsafe during pregnancy. Further studies are needed to draw a more definitive conclusion.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Gestational diabetes is known as one of the diseases through pregnancy. In the present study, changes in proteinuria after atorvastatin administration among patients with history of gestational diabetes were studied. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this randomized clinical trial, 42 patients were included in the study. Atorvastatin was administered for 21 patients, and 21 patients were designated as control group. Lipid profile, protein, and 24 h urine creatinine (uCr) levels were determined in the beginning and 3 months after intervention. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Lipid profile in intervention group was enhanced; low-density lipoprotein (LDL) had decreased while triglyceride had not changed and high-density lipoprotein had been increased. There was no statistically significant change in serum Cr, serum urea, estimated glomerular filtration rate, uCr, urine volume, 24-h urine protein level, or urine protein/Cr ratio on both groups during the study; also, there was no statistically significant difference between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Although LDL level decreased after atorvastatin therapy, atorvastatin therapy had no effect on the level of proteinuria or other parameters related to kidney function.