RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine relationships between moral injury (MI), well-being, and resilience among staff nurses and nurse leaders practicing during the COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) pandemic. BACKGROUND: Attention to MI among health professionals, including nurses, increased in 2021, particularly related to the pandemic. Few studies examined MI, well-being, and resilience; even fewer provided implications for leadership/management. METHODS: The sample included 676 RNs practicing in Ohio. The electronic survey included assessments of MI, well-being, and resilience distributed via the Ohio Nurses Association and the schools of nursing alumni Listservs. RESULTS: There was a significant association between MI and negative well-being and negative association between MI and resilience. Differences were observed between staff nurses and leaders. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study relating MI, resilience, and well-bring among nurses and nurse leaders during the pandemic. There is a need for additional research to further our understanding about nurses' health and well-being during the pandemic and beyond.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Enfermeras y Enfermeros , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático , Humanos , Liderazgo , Pandemias , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
Noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) remain a growing global health issue and sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) is no exception. Using secondary data obtained from the World Bank on 48 SSA countries, we describe the trends in the proportionate mortalities attributed to NCDs in SSA between 2000 and 2016. The baseline proportionate mortalities attributed to NCDs in SSA increased from 22.49% in 2000 to 33.69% in 2016, representing about 11% increase. The trend was replicated across the low-, middle-, and high-income countries in SSA. The highest change in the NCD mortalities in low-income SSA countries was seen in Eritrea where NCD mortalities increased from 19.3% in the year 2000 to 45.2% in 2016. In Rwanda, it rose from 24.8% to 44% during the same period. Ghana, a lower-middle-income country, also witnessed an increase from 27.3% in 2000 to 42.7% in 2016. The general increasing trend in the burden of NCD mortalities in SSA implies the need for higher prioritization of NCD prevention and control initiatives. There is a need for a greater contribution of nontraditional stakeholders in health through a multi-sectoral approach. We also recommend integrating NCD prevention and control strategies into existing public health structures being used for communicable disease control.
Asunto(s)
Mortalidad/tendencias , Enfermedades no Transmisibles/mortalidad , África del Sur del Sahara/epidemiología , Bases de Datos Factuales , Humanos , Enfermedades no Transmisibles/prevención & controlRESUMEN
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. OBJECTIVE: To compare the rates of all-cause surgical complications of synthetic interbody devices versus allograft or autograft in patients undergoing 1-2 levels anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) procedures. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Cervical degenerative disorders affect up to 60% of older adults in the United States. Both traditional allograft or autograft and synthetic interbody devices (polyetheretherketone or titanium) are used for decompression and arthrodesis, with increasing utilization of the latter. However, the differences in their postsurgical complication profiles are not well-characterized. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent 1-2 level ACDFs for cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy between 2010 and 2022 were identified using the PearlDiver Mariner all-claims insurance database. Patients undergoing surgery for nondegenerative pathologies, such as tumors, trauma, or infection, were excluded. 1:1 exact matching was performed based on factors that were significant predictors of all-cause surgical complications in a linear regression model. The primary outcome measure was the development of all-cause surgical complications after 1-2 level ACDFs. The secondary outcome was all-cause medical complications. RESULTS: 1:1 exact matching resulted in two equal groups of 11,430 patients who received treatment with synthetic interbody devices or allograft/autograft. No statistically significant difference in all-cause surgical complications was found between the synthetic cohort and the allograft or autograft cohort after 1-2 level ACDFs (Relative Risk: 0.86, 95% confidence interval: 0.730-1.014, P = 0.079). No significant differences were observed regarding any specific surgical complications except for pseudoarthrosis (Relative Risk: 0.73, 95% confidence interval: 0.554-0.974, P = 0.037), which was higher in the allograft/autograft cohort. CONCLUSION: After 1:1 exact matching to control for confounding variables, the findings of this study suggest that all-cause surgical complications are similar in patients undergoing ACDFs with synthetic interbody devices or allograft/autographs. However, the rate of pseudarthrosis appears to be higher in patients with allograft/autographs. Future prospective studies are needed to corroborate these findings.
Asunto(s)
Fusión Vertebral , Humanos , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fusión Vertebral/métodos , Discectomía/métodos , Trasplante Homólogo , Trasplante Autólogo/efectos adversos , Vértebras Cervicales/cirugía , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: We sought to assess the accuracy of a novel parameter proportional to the rod shear stress (RSS) in identifying patients at risk of rod fracture (RF) after surgery for correction of adult spinal deformity. METHODS: We performed a retrospective medical record review of patients aged ≥18 years treated for adult spinal deformity between 2004 and 2014 with ≥24 months of follow-up. The primary outcome was RFs identified radiographically. Patient weight (w), number of instrumented levels (N), and minimum rod diameter (d) were recorded and used to calculate the RSS parameter (RSS=Nwd2). Receiver operating characteristic curves were produced and the area under the curve (AUC ± 95% confidence interval [CI]) was calculated to compare this parameter's discriminative accuracy to that of its constituent variables. The sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios (LRs) were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 28 RF-positive and 154 RF-negative patients were included. The average age was 59.2 ± 9.6 years, and 93.4% were women. The RSS parameter produced the greatest AUC (0.73 ± 0.11). At an RSS cutoff of 30.1, it achieved a sensitivity of 71.4% and specificity of 71.4% (LR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.8-3.5). The number of instrumented levels produced the next-greatest AUC (0.65 ± 0.12), with a sensitivity of 78.6% and specificity of 50.0% at a cutoff of 15 (LR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.2-2.0). CONCLUSIONS: The RSS is calculated using easily obtainable information and shows potential as a tool for predicting patient-specific risk of RF after spinal fusion. The number of instrumented levels also correlates strongly with the occurrence of RFs and is not significantly less accurate than the RSS. A larger sample size and prospective validation would be useful in determining with greater confidence which parameter is superior for predicting RFs after spinal fusion.
Asunto(s)
Fracturas Óseas , Fusión Vertebral , Adulto , Humanos , Femenino , Adolescente , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Falla de Prótesis , Fusión Vertebral/efectos adversosRESUMEN
STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To compare the rates of pseudarthrosis in patients undergoing 1 to 3 level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) procedures between cannabis users and noncannabis users. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Recreational use of cannabis is common, though it remains poorly studied and legally ambiguous in the United States. Patients with back pain may turn to adjunctive use of cannabis to manage their pain. However, the implications of cannabis use on the achievement of bony fusion are not well-characterized. METHODS: Patients who underwent 1 to 3 level TLIF for degenerative disc disease or degenerative spondylolisthesis between 2010 and 2022 were identified using the PearlDiver Mariner all-claims insurance database. Cannabis users were identified with ICD 10 code F12.90. Patients undergoing surgery for nondegenerative pathologies such as tumors, trauma, or infection were excluded. 1:1 exact matching was performed using demographic factors, medical comorbidities, and surgical factors which were significantly associated with pseudarthrosis in a linear regression model. The primary outcome measure was development of pseudarthrosis within 24 months after 1 to 3 level TLIF. The secondary outcomes were the development of all-cause surgical complications as well as all-cause medical complications. RESULTS: A 1:1 exact matching resulted in two equal groups of 1593 patients who did or did not use cannabis and underwent 1 to 3 level TLIF. Patients who used cannabis were 80% more likely to experience pseudarthrosis compared with patients who do not [relative risk (RR): 1.816, 95% CI: 1.291-2.556, P <0.001]. Similarly, cannabis use was associated with significantly higher rates of all-cause surgical complications (RR: 2.350, 95% CI: 1.399-3.947, P =0.001) and all-cause medical complications (RR: 1.934, 95% CI: 1.516-2.467, P <0.001). CONCLUSION: After 1:1 exact matching to control for confounding variables, the findings of this study suggest that cannabis use is associated with higher rates of pseudarthrosis, as well as higher rates of all-cause surgical and all-cause medical complications. Further studies are needed to corroborate our findings.
Asunto(s)
Cannabis , Seudoartrosis , Fusión Vertebral , Espondilolistesis , Humanos , Estudios de Cohortes , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Seudoartrosis/epidemiología , Seudoartrosis/etiología , Espondilolistesis/cirugía , Espondilolistesis/etiología , Fusión Vertebral/efectos adversos , Fusión Vertebral/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/métodosRESUMEN
Survivors of child sex trafficking (SCST) experience high rates of adverse health outcomes. Amidst the duration of their victimization, survivors regularly seek healthcare yet fail to be identified. This study sought to utilize artificial intelligence (AI) to identify SCST and describe the elements of their healthcare presentation. An AI-supported keyword search was conducted to identify SCST within the electronic medical records (EMR) of â¼1.5 million patients at a large midwestern pediatric hospital. Descriptive analyses were used to evaluate associated diagnoses and clinical presentation. A sex trafficking-related keyword was identified in .18% of patient charts. Among this cohort, the most common associated diagnostic codes were for Confirmed Sexual/Physical Assault; Trauma and Stress-Related Disorders; Depressive Disorders; Anxiety Disorders; and Suicidal Ideation. Our findings are consistent with the myriad of known adverse physical and psychological outcomes among SCST and illuminate the future potential of AI technology to improve screening and research efforts surrounding all aspects of this vulnerable population.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Navigated and robotic pedicle screw placement systems have been developed to improve the accuracy of screw placement. However, the literature comparing the safety and accuracy of robotic and navigated screw placement with fluoroscopic freehand screw placement in thoracolumbar spine surgery has been limited. PURPOSE: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials that compared the accuracy and safety profiles of robotic and navigated pedicle screws with fluoroscopic freehand pedicle screws. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Systematic review and meta-analysis PATIENT SAMPLE: Only randomized controlled trials comparing robotic-assisted or navigated pedicle screws placement with freehand pedicle screw placement in the thoracolumbar spine were included. OUTCOME MEASURES: Odds ratio (OR) estimates for screw accuracy according to the Gertzbein-Robbins scale and relative risk (RR) for various surgical complications. METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed and EMBASE for English-language studies from inception through April 7, 2022, including references of eligible articles. The search was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Two reviewers conducted a full abstraction of all data, and one reviewer verified accuracy. Information was extracted on study design, quality, bias, participants, and risk estimates. Data and estimates were pooled using the Mantel-Haenszel method for random-effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: A total of 14 papers encompassing 12 randomized controlled trials were identified (n=892 patients, 4,046 screws). The pooled analysis demonstrated that robotic and navigated pedicle screw placement techniques were associated with higher odds of screw accuracy (OR 2.66, 95% CI 1.24-5.72, p=.01). Robotic and navigated screw placement was associated with a lower risk of facet joint violations (RR 0.09, 95% CI 0.02-0.38, p<.01) and major complications (RR 0.31, 95% CI 0.11-0.84, p=.02). There were no observed differences between groups in nerve root injury (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.11-2.30, p=.37), or return to operating room for screw revision (RR 0.28, 95% CI 0.07-1.13, p=.07). CONCLUSIONS: These estimates suggest that robotic and navigated screw placement techniques are associated with higher odds of screw accuracy and superior safety profile compared with fluoroscopic freehand techniques. Additional randomized controlled trials will be needed to further validate these findings.
Asunto(s)
Tornillos Pediculares , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Robótica , Fusión Vertebral , Cirugía Asistida por Computador , Articulación Cigapofisaria , Humanos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Tornillos Pediculares/efectos adversos , Fluoroscopía/métodos , Articulación Cigapofisaria/cirugía , Fusión Vertebral/efectos adversos , Fusión Vertebral/métodos , Cirugía Asistida por Computador/efectos adversos , Cirugía Asistida por Computador/métodos , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To compare surgical and medical complications profile between neurosurgeons and orthopedic surgeons after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) procedures. BACKGROUND: Studies comparing the impact of spine surgeon specialty (neurosurgery vs. orthopedic spine) on TLIF outcomes have been inconclusive and failed to control for operative learning curves and surgical maturity. Orthopedic spine surgeons perform fewer spine procedures in residency, although these differences may be attenuated by mandatory fellowship before starting practice. Any observed differences are likely attenuated with increasing surgeon experience. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using an all-payer claims database, PearlDiver Mariner, 120 million patient records were analyzed between 2010 and 2022, to identify individuals with lumbar stenosis or spondylolisthesis who underwent index one- to three-level TLIF procedures. International Classification of Diseases-Ninth Edition (ICD-9), International Classification of Diseases-10th Edition (ICD-10) and Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes were used to query the database. Only Neurosurgeons and Orthopedic spine surgeons who had performed at least 250 procedures were included in the study. Patients undergoing surgery for tumor, trauma, or infection were excluded. 1:1 exact matching was performed using demographic factors, medical comorbidities, and surgical factors which were significantly associated with all-cause surgical or medical complications in a linear regression model. RESULTS: 1:1 exact matching created two equal groups of 18,195 patients without baseline differences who underwent TLIF procedures by neurosurgeons or orthopedic surgeons. There was no difference in all-cause surgical complications between neurosurgeons and orthopedic spine surgeons (relative risk=1.008, 95% CI: 0.850-1.195, P =0.965). All-cause medical complication rate was higher in the neurosurgery cohort (relative risk=1.144, 95% CI: 1.042-1.258, P =0.005). CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that after accounting for surgical maturity, neurosurgeons and orthopedic spine surgeons have similar surgical outcomes. However, neurosurgeons have higher all-cause medical complication rates compared with orthopedic spine surgeons. Further research is warranted to validate this relationship in other spine procedures and for other outcomes.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Obesity is a major health care concern in the United States and is associated with high rates of postoperative complications after spine surgery. Obese patients assert that weight reduction is not possible unless spine surgery first relieves their pain and concomitant immobility. We describe the post-spine surgery effects on patient weight, with an emphasis on obesity. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were systematically searched according to the PRISMA guidelines. The search included indexed terms and text words from database inception to the date of the search (15 April 2022). Studies chosen for inclusion had to have data reporting on pre- and postoperative patient weight after spine surgery. Data and estimates were pooled using the Mantel-Haenszel method for random-effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: Eight articles encompassing 7 retrospective and 1 prospective cohort were identified. A random effects model analysis demonstrated that overweight and obese patients (body mass index [BMI], >25 kg/m2) had increased odds of clinically significant weight loss after lumbar spine surgery compared with non-obese patients (odds ratio, 1.63; 95% confidence interval, 1.43-1.86, P < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in the raw weight change between BMI categories (mean difference, -0.67 kg, 95% confidence interval, -4.71 to 3.37 kg, P = 0.7463). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with non-obese patients (BMI, <25 kg/m2), overweight and obese patients have higher odds of clinically significant weight loss after lumbar spine surgery. No difference in pre-operative and post-operative weight was found, although statistical power was lacking in this analysis. Randomized controlled trials and additional prospective cohorts are needed to further validate these findings.
Asunto(s)
Obesidad , Sobrepeso , Humanos , Índice de Masa Corporal , Obesidad/complicaciones , Obesidad/cirugía , Sobrepeso/complicaciones , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Pérdida de Peso , Columna Vertebral/cirugíaRESUMEN
STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. OBJECTIVE: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis investigating the rate of adverse events after spine surgery in patients who underwent bariatric surgery (BS). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Obesity is an established risk factor for postoperative complications after spine surgery. BS has been associated with improvements in health in patients with severe obesity. However, it is not known whether undergoing BS before spine surgery is associated with reduced adverse outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Web-of-Science were systematically searched according to "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses" guidelines. The search included indexed terms and text words from database inception to the date of the search (May 27, 2022). Data and estimates were pooled using the Mantel-Haenszel method for random-effects meta-analysis. Risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute risk of bias tool. The primary outcome was an all-cause complication rate after surgery. Relative risks for surgical and medical complications were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 4 studies comprising 177,273 patients were included. The pooled analysis demonstrated that the all-cause medical complication rate after spine surgery was lower in patients undergoing BS (relative risk: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.39, 0.74, P < 0.01). There was no difference in rates of surgical complications and 30-day hospital readmission rates between the cohort undergoing BS before spine surgery and the cohort that did not. CONCLUSION: These analyses suggest that obese patients undergoing BS before spine surgery have significantly lower adverse event rates. Future prospective studies are needed to corroborate these findings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.
Asunto(s)
Cirugía Bariátrica , Obesidad Mórbida , Humanos , Cirugía Bariátrica/efectos adversos , Obesidad/complicaciones , Obesidad/cirugía , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. OBJECTIVE: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of previous studies on HbA1c in preoperative risk stratification in patients undergoing spinal procedures and provide an overview of the consensus recommendations. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Diabetes mellitus (DM) and hyperglycemia have been shown to be independent risk factors for increased surgical complications. Glycated Hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c), a surrogate for long term glycemic control, is an important preoperative parameter that may be optimized to reduce surgical complications and improve patient-reported outcomes. However, comprehensive systematic reviews on preoperative HbA1c and postoperative outcomes in spine surgery have been limited. METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Web-of-Science for English-language studies from inception through April 5 th , 2022, including references of eligible articles. The search was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Only studies in patients undergoing spine surgery with preoperative HbA1c values and postoperative outcomes available were included. RESULTS: A total of 22 articles (18 retrospective cohort studies, 4 prospective observational studies) were identified with level of evidence III or greater. The majority of studies (n=17) found that elevated preoperative HbA1c was associated with inferior outcomes or increased risk of complications. Random-effect meta-analysis demonstrated that patients with preoperative HbA1c >8.0% had increased risk(s) of postoperative complications (RR: 1.85, 95% CI: [1.48, 2.31], P <0.01) and that patients with surgical site infection (SSI) had higher preoperative HbA1c (Mean Difference: 1.49%, 95% CI: [0.11, 2.88], P =0.03). CONCLUSION: The findings of this study suggest that HbA1c >8.0% is associated with an increased risk of complications. HbA1c was higher by 1.49% on average among patients with SSI when compared to patients who did not experience SSI. These results suggest that elevated HbA1c is associated with less favorable outcomes following spine surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Humanos , Hemoglobina Glucada , Estudios Retrospectivos , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica , Factores de Riesgo , Estudios Observacionales como AsuntoRESUMEN
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. OBJECTIVE: Compare rates of all-cause surgical and medical complications between zero-profile (stand-alone) implants versus any graft type with anterior plate in patients undergoing 1-2 level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for treatment of degenerative cervical myeloradiculopathy. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Degenerative cervical myeloradiculopathy is increasingly prevalent in older adults. ACDF is a common surgical procedure for decompression of neural structures and stabilization and has been shown to have excellent outcomes. While ACDFs performed with a graft and plate has been the gold standard, more recently, zero-profile implants were developed to decrease implant related complications, such as severe postoperative dysphagia. However, there is a paucity of papers comparing the surgical and medical complications profile of zero-profile (stand-alone) implants to grafts with plating systems. METHODS: Data was extracted from the PearlDiver Mariner Database using CPT codes to classify patients into 1-level, 2-levels, and total 1-2 level ACDFs. Patients undergoing surgery for non-degenerative pathologies such as tumors, trauma, or infection were excluded. RESULTS: 1:1 exact matching created two equal groups of 7,284 patients that underwent 1-2 level ACDF with either grafting with a plate or zero-profile (standalone) implant. There were no statistically significant difference in all-cause surgical complications, pseudarthrosis rate, dysphagia or need for revision surgery between both cohorts (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.80-1.21, P = 0.95). Additionally, all-cause medical complications were similar between both cohorts (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.862-1.330, P = 0.573) or any specific surgical or medical complication included in this study. CONCLUSION: After 1:1 exact matching, the results of this study suggest that zero-profile (stand-alone) implants have similar outcomes compared to grafts with plating systems, with no observed differences in all-cause surgical or medical complications profile.
RESUMEN
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. OBJECTIVE: To compare the rate of adjacent segment disease (ASD) in patients undergoing anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for the treatment of degenerative stenosis and spondylolisthesis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: ALIF and TLIF are frequently used to treat Lumbar stenosis and spondylolisthesis. While both approaches have distinct advantages, it is unclear whether there are any differences in rates of ASD and postoperative complications. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent index 1-3 levels ALIF or TLIF between 2010 and 2022, using the PearlDiver Mariner Database, an all-claims insurance database (120 million patients). Patients with a history of prior lumbar surgery and those undergoing surgery for cancer, trauma, or infection were excluded. Exact 1:1 matching was performed using demographic factors, medical comorbidities, and surgical factors found to be significantly associated with ASD in a linear regression model. The primary outcome was a new diagnosis of ASD within 36 months of index surgery, and secondary outcomes were all-cause medical and surgical complications. RESULTS: Exact 1:1 matching resulted in 2 equal groups of 106,451 patients undergoing TLIF and ALIF. The TLIF approach was associated with a lower risk of ASD (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.56-0.59, P < 0.001) and all-cause medical complications (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.91-0.98, P =0.002). All-cause surgical complications were not significantly different between both groups. CONCLUSION: After 1:1 exact matching to control for confounding variables, this study suggests that for patients with symptomatic degenerative stenosis and spondylolisthesis, a TLIF procedure (compared to ALIF) is associated with a decreased risk of developing ASD within 36 months of index surgery. Future prospective studies are needed to corroborate these findings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level-3.
Asunto(s)
Fusión Vertebral , Espondilolistesis , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Espondilolistesis/epidemiología , Espondilolistesis/cirugía , Constricción Patológica , Fusión Vertebral/efectos adversos , Fusión Vertebral/métodos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Early initiation of breastfeeding (EIBF) is a key strategy in averting neonatal deaths. However, studies on the facilitators and risk factors for EIBF are rare in Ghana. We examined trends in EIBF and its major facilitators and risk factors in Ghana using data from Demographic and Health Surveys from 1998 to 2014. METHODS: We used complete weighted data of 3194, 3639, 2909 and 5695 pairs of mothers ages 15-49 y and their children ages 0-5 y in the 1998, 2003, 2008 and 2014 surveys, respectively. We accounted for the complex sampling used in the surveys for both descriptive statistics and multiple variable risk ratio analysis. RESULTS: The proportion of children who achieved EIBF increased by about 2.5 times from 1998 to 2003 and there was a marginal increase in the proportion of children who achieved EIBF between 2003 and 2014. Children born by caesarean section were at higher risk of being breastfed later than 1 h across all four surveys. Being born in the Upper East Region (compared with the Western Region) of Ghana facilitated EIBF in 2003 and 2008. CONCLUSIONS: The study revealed that the current estimate of the proportion of children achieving EIBF in Ghana was 55.1%, and delivery by caesarean section and region of residence consistently predicted the practice of EIBF in Ghana.
Asunto(s)
Lactancia Materna , Cesárea , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Preescolar , Demografía , Femenino , Ghana/epidemiología , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Persona de Mediana Edad , Embarazo , Factores Socioeconómicos , Factores de Tiempo , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Objectives: To assess the safety and clinical benefits of intraoperative acute normovolaemic haemodilution (ANH) in complex spine surgery. Design: Prospective comparative cohort study. Setting: A private orthopaedic hospital in Ghana. Patients: Seventy-six patients who underwent complex spine deformity surgery. Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned to two groups. 45 patients to the acute normovolaemic haemodilution (ANH) or Group 1 and 31patients to the non-ANH or Group 2. Following anesthetic administration and before incision, autologous blood was collected from patients in Group1 and was reinfused during/shortly after surgery while patients in Group2 were transfused with compatible allogeneic blood intraoperatively. Main Outcome Measures: Changes in haemodynamic parameters and incidence of allogeneic transfusions and related complications. Results: The mean age (years), gender ratio, deformity size and aetiology, fusion levels, and operative times were similar in both groups. Blood loss (ml) of patients in groups 1 and 2 were 1583ml± 830.48 vs 1623ml ± 681.34, p=0.82, respectively. The rate of allogeneic blood transfusion in groups 1 and 2 were 71% vs 80.65%, p=0.88, respectively. Haemoglobin levels (g/dL) in groups 1 and 2 were comparable in both groups at Post-operative Day (POD) 0 and POD 1. Incidence of minor allogeneic transfusion reaction was 1/45 vs 1/31, p=0.80, group-1 and group-2, respectively. Conclusion: Acute normovolaemic haemodilution can be safely performed in complex spine surgery in underserved regions. However, its use does not obviate allogeneic transfusion in patients with complex spine deformities in whom large volumes of blood loss is expected. Funding: None declared.