[Could gosereline acetate induce autoimmune-like hepatitis?]. / L'acétate de goséréline pourrait-il induire des hépatites d'allure auto-immune ?

We report a case of acute icteric hepatitis attributed to goserelin acetate, occurred during prostate cancer treatment. Gosereline acetate could induce acute hepatitis, which characteristics are close to autoimmune hepatitis type I and may require hepatic monitoring.

Evolution of HCV incidence in drug users in France.

Over the last 40 years, the dynamics of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in drug users has been affected by the illicit drug market, the health environment including the devastating impact of the HIV/AIDS epidemic which erupted in the 1980s, and the diffusion of substitution treatment beginning in 1995. The purpose of this literature review is to present the dynamics of HCV infection in drug users in France over the last 40 years. Two prevalence studies of HCV infection in the general population were conducted by the French Institute for Public Health Surveillance in 1994 and 2004 and were the touchstone data sources for this analysis. Hypotheses constructed from the findings of these two studies were examined in light of results reported by multicentre prevalence and incidence studies in drug-user populations. The incidence of HCV infection in drug users in France reached a peak in the late 1980s or early 1990s after a lengthy period of epidemic expansion. Implementation of a risk reduction policy enabled a very significant reduction in the incidence of HCV infection in drug users over the last 20 years, leading to incidence figures which are now 10-15% of the 1990 estimate.

Successful induction of tolerance to infliximab in patients with Crohn's disease and prior severe infusion reactions.

AIM: To appraise the tolerance and efficacy of an induction of tolerance protocol to infliximab permitting the re-administration of the drug to patients with Crohn's disease having had infusion reactions requiring suspension of treatment. METHODS: Fourteen patients were included in the induction of tolerance protocol. Each infusion of infliximab (5 mg/kg) was divided into 11 escalating 15 min increments over a 3-h time period. The induction of tolerance procedure was repeated for subsequent infusions. RESULTS: Ten patients (71.4%) received all the three infusions for the induction treatment. Nine (64.3%) had a significant response and six (48.8%) still benefited from infliximab infusions. Seven patients (50%) achieved a complete remission, after a mean of 2.5 (two to three) infusions. Four patients (28.6%) had no response and the protocol was stopped. Three patients (21.4%) experienced mild immediate hypersensitivity reactions, which were controlled, two patients (14.2%) experienced severe immediate hypersensitivity reactions, leading to interruption of the treatment and one patient developed a delayed hypersensitivity reaction. CONCLUSION: Our induction of tolerance protocol allows some patients who have experienced severe or repetitive infusion reactions to infliximab to be safely retreated with the drug in a hospitalized setting, with a clinical response achieved in a majority of these patients.

[Desensitisation to infliximab in patients with Crohn's disease]. / Accoutumance médicamenteuse a l'infliximab dans la maladie de Crohn.

BACKGROUND: Infliximab is a chimeric monoclonal antibody directed against tumour necrosis factor-alpha that has been shown to improve chronic refractory and fistulating Crohn's disease. Infliximab infusions have been associated both with immediate and delayed reactions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Desensitisation was performed in four patients who had experienced immediate reactions to infliximab infusions and in one who had developed a delayed reaction. No therapeutic alternatives were available for these patients. Before desensitisation, skin tests were performed. RESULTS: Skin-tests were negative for all patients. Desensitisation was performed with serial dilutions of infliximab with monitoring of vital signs before each increment. After parenteral desensitisation, all five patients were able to tolerate infliximab infusion without complications or any requirement for antihistamines or steroids. However, two patients who had initially presented with an immediate reaction to infliximab experienced arthralgia and myalgia similar to a "serum sickness-type" of reaction 6 to 10 days after desensitisation. CONCLUSION: Even if there is no evidence of an allergic mechanism in infusion reactions to infliximab, successful desensitization can be achieved for patients experiencing acute reactions. The mechanism of desensitisation remains presently unknown. It is not yet possible to say if desensitization will be effective in preventing delayed reactions.