An assessment of advance relatives approach for brain death organ donation.

BACKGROUND:: Advance announcement of forthcoming brain death has developed to enable intensivists and organ procurement organisation coordinators to more appropriately, and separately from each other, explain to relatives brain death and the subsequent post-mortem organ donation opportunity. RESEARCH AIM:: The aim was to assess how potentially involved healthcare professionals perceived ethical issues surrounding the strategy of advance approach. RESEARCH DESIGN:: A multi-centre opinion survey using an anonymous self-administered questionnaire was conducted in the six-member hospitals of the publicly funded East of France regional organ and tissue procurement network called 'Prélor'. PARTICIPANTS:: The study population comprised 460 physicians and nurses in the Neurosurgical, Surgical and Medical Intensive Care Units, the Stroke Units and the Emergency Departments. ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS:: The project was approved by the board of the Lorraine University Diploma in Medical Ethics and the Prélor Network administrators. MAIN FINDINGS:: A slight majority of 53.5% of respondents had previously participated in an advance relatives approach: 83% of the physicians and 42% of the nurses. A majority of healthcare professionals (68%) think that the main justification for advance relatives approach is the comprehensive care of the dying patient and the research of his or her most likely opinion (74%). The misunderstanding of the related issues by relatives is an obstacle for 47% of healthcare professionals and 51% think that the answer given by the relatives regarding the most likely opinion of the person regarding post-mortem organ donation really corresponds to the person opinion in only 50% of the cases or less. CONCLUSION:: Time given by advance approach should be employed to help and enable relatives to authentically bear the values and interests of the potential donor in the post-mortem organ donation discussion. Nurses' attendance of advance relatives approach seems necessary to enable them to optimally support the families facing death and post-mortem organ donation issues.

Post-Thrombolysis Recanalization in Stroke Referrals for Thrombectomy: Incidence, Predictors, and Prediction Scores.

Background and Purpose­Whether all acute stroke patients with large vessel occlusion need to undergo intravenous thrombolysis before mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is debated as (1) the incidence of post-thrombolysis early recanalization (ER) is still unclear; (2) thrombolysis may be harmful in patients unlikely to recanalize; and, conversely, (3) transfer for MT may be unnecessary in patients highly likely to recanalize. Here, we determined the incidence and predictors of post-thrombolysis ER in patients referred for MT and derive ER prediction scores for trial design. Methods­Registries from 4 MT-capable centers gathering patients referred for MT and thrombolyzed either on site (mothership) or in a non MT-capable center (drip-and-ship) after magnetic resonance­ or computed tomography­based imaging between 2015 and 2017. ER was identified on either first angiographic run or noninvasive imaging. In the magnetic resonance imaging subsample, thrombus length was determined on T2*-based susceptibility vessel sign. Independent predictors of no- ER were identified using multivariable logistic regression models, and scores were developed according to the magnitude of regression coefficients. Similar registries from 4 additional MT-capable centers were used as validation cohort. Results­In the derivation cohort (N=633), ER incidence was ≈20%. In patients with susceptibility vessel sign (n=498), no-ER was independently predicted by long thrombus, proximal occlusion, and mothership paradigm. A 6-point score derived from these variables showed strong discriminative power for no-ER (C statistic, 0.854) and was replicated in the validation cohort (n=353; C statistic, 0.888). A second score derived from the whole sample (including negative T2* or computed tomography­based imaging) also showed good discriminative power and was similarly validated. Highest grades on both scores predicted no-ER with >90% specificity, whereas low grades did not reliably predict ER. Conclusions­The substantial ER rate underlines the benefits derived from thrombolysis in bridging populations. Both prediction scores afforded high specificity for no-ER, but not for ER, which has implications for trial design.

Non-therapeutic intensive care for organ donation: A healthcare professionals' opinion survey.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Providing non-therapeutic intensive care for some patients in hopeless condition after cerebrovascular stroke in order to protect their organs for possible post-mortem organ donation after brain death is an effective but ethically tricky strategy to increase organ grafting. Finding out the feelings and opinion of the involved healthcare professionals and assessing the training needs before implementing such a strategy is critical to avoid backlash even in a presumed consent system. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: A single-centre opinion survey of healthcare professionals was conducted in 2013 in the potentially involved wards of a French University Hospital: the Neurosurgical, Surgical and Medical Intensive Care Units, the Stroke Unit and the Emergency Department. A questionnaire with multiple-choice questions and one open-ended question was made available in the different wards between February and May 2013. ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS: The project was approved by the board of the Lorraine University Diploma in Medical Ethics. RESULTS: Of a total of 340 healthcare professionals, 51% filled the form. Only 21.8% received a specific education on brain death, and only 18% on potential donor's family approach and support. Most healthcare professionals (93%) think that non-therapeutic intensive care is the continuity of patient's care. But more than 75% of respondents think that the advance patient's consent and the consent of the family must be obtained despite the presumed consent rule regarding post-mortem organ donation in France. CONCLUSION: The acceptance by healthcare professionals of non-therapeutic intensive care for brain death organ donation seems fairly good, despite a suboptimal education regarding brain death, non-therapeutic intensive care and families' support. But they ask to require previously expressed patient's consent and family's approval. So, it seems that non-therapeutic intensive care should only remain an ethically sound mean of empowerment of organ donors and their families to make post-mortem donation happen as a full respect of individual autonomy.

Impact of anxiety on verbal and visuospatial working memory in patients with acute stroke without severe cognitive impairment.

BACKGROUND: Working memory is the most impaired cognitive domain in the acute phase of stroke. In a context where anxiety is highly prevalent, close attention must be paid to anxiety which could mimic mild to moderate working memory impairments. This is the first study to assess the contribution of state anxiety (the currently experienced level of anxiety) to the working memory (verbal, visuospatial) in patients with first-ever acute stroke without severe cognitive impairment. METHODS: 28 patients with first-ever acute stroke and 41 matched control subjects were exposed to a neutral condition and an anxiogenic condition in which verbal (VWM) and visuospatial working memory (VSWM) performance and state anxiety were assessed. State anxiety was assessed before the beginning of the experiment (baseline), after the neutral condition and after the anxiogenic condition. RESULTS: The mean state anxiety score was higher in patients than in controls in the neutral (z = 1.9, p<0.05) and anxiogenic (z = 2, p<0.05) conditions despite a similar level at baseline. Multiple regression analyses with a dummy variable 'group' (patients vs controls) showed that increased state anxiety in patients contributed significantly more to both reduced VWM (ß = -0.93, p<0.05) and VSWM (ß = -1, p<0.05) performance between the neutral and anxiogenic conditions compared to controls. CONCLUSIONS: In a stressful context, the contribution of state anxiety to reduced working memory performance is more pronounced in patients with acute stroke than in controls. These results are of particular relevance for clinicians assessing patients in the acute phase of stroke in which anxiety is highly prevalent.

Cerebrovascular Events in Lyme Neuroborreliosis.

BACKGROUND: Cerebrovascular events in neuroborreliosis are a rare condition described only in isolated or small case series. No specific clinical or radiological features have been identified, and diagnosis is based on very different criteria. METHODS: We retrospectively describe cases diagnosed in the Stroke Unit of Nancy Hospital, located in the endemic area of the northeast of France. We also reviewed other cases found in the literature. RESULTS: We identified 5 cases in our center and 57 other reported cases. Mean age was 39 years (range 5 to 77). Possible previous contact with Borrelia burgdorferi (B burgdorferi) was found in about half of cases. Additional neurologic symptoms (headache, cognitive impairment, and/or gait disturbance) were found in 44% of cases. Cerebral imaging revealed both ischemic (87%) and hemorrhagic lesions (13%) with a multiterritorial aspect in 22% of strokes, and signs of vasculitis in 71%. Analysis of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) revealed lymphocytic meningitis in 90% of cases and elevated protein level in 86%. CSF/serum anti-B burgdorferi antibody index (AI) was positive in 91% of cases. Outcome was favorable after appropriate antibiotic treatment. Our 5 patients presented a modified Rankin scale score 0-1, without any stroke recurrence, after a median follow-up of 2.8 years. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnosis of Lyme neuroborreliosis should be considered for patients with cerebrovascular events without obvious cause living in an endemic area, in the presence of repeat multiterritorial strokes at short intervals, other neurologic symptoms, a history of B burgdorferi infection, and radiological signs of vasculitis. Diagnosis can be confirmed by CSF analysis with AI but with an incomplete sensitivity.

Long-term follow-up study of endarterectomy versus angioplasty in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis trial.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We aimed at comparing the long-term benefit-risk balance of carotid stenting versus endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis. METHODS: Long-term follow-up study of patients included in Endarterectomy Versus Angioplasty in Patients With Symptomatic Severe Carotid Stenosis (EVA-3S), a randomized, controlled trial of carotid stenting versus endarterectomy in 527 patients with recently symptomatic severe carotid stenosis, conducted in 30 centers in France. The main end point was a composite of any ipsilateral stroke after randomization or any procedural stroke or death. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 7.1 years (interquartile range, 5.1-8.8 years; maximum 12.4 years), the primary end point occurred in 30 patients in the stenting group compared with 18 patients in the endarterectomy group. Cumulative probabilities of this outcome were 11.0% (95% confidence interval, 7.9-15.2) versus 6.3% (4.0-9.8) in the endarterectomy group at the 5-year follow-up (hazard ratio, 1.85; 1.00-3.40; P=0.04) and 11.5% (8.2-15.9) versus 7.6% (4.9-11.8; hazard ratio, 1.70; 0.95-3.06; P=0.07) at the 10-year follow-up. No difference was observed between treatment groups in the rates of ipsilateral stroke beyond the procedural period, severe carotid restenosis (≥70%) or occlusion, death, myocardial infarction, and revascularization procedures. CONCLUSIONS: The long-term benefit-risk balance of carotid stenting versus endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis favored endarterectomy, a difference driven by a lower risk of procedural stroke after endarterectomy. Both techniques were associated with low and similar long-term risks of recurrent ipsilateral stroke beyond the procedural period. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00190398.

Report of a recurrent cerebral venous thrombosis in a young athlete.

BACKGROUND: Reports of occurrence of deep vein thrombosis during intensive sport are scarce. While a few cases have been described in the cerebral territory, these are only in the context of traumatism or anabolic agent consumption. Thus, causality with exercise remains uncertain and the mechanisms hypothetic. We present the case of a young athlete who experienced two episodes of severe cerebral venous thromboses (CVT), both during intensive training, in the absence of any other known thrombogenic factor. CASE PRESENTATION: A healthy 26-year-old man presented a thrombosis of the superior sagittal sinus during recent intensive training for a triathlon. Investigation at the time found no drug or anabolic steroid consumption, or any hematologic or coagulation disturbance. Anticoagulation therapy was initiated for 10 months with good outcome. One year later, soon after returning to intensive exercise, mainly running, the patient presented a thrombosis of the straight sinus complicated by bithalamic hyperintensities observed on T2 magnetic resonance imaging sequences. Anticoagulation treatment was reinitiated and led to repermeabilization of the cerebral vein and reversibility of thalamic abnormalities. Four months later, the patient was free of headache and had no cognitive impairment. He continues to practice intensive sport with vitamin K antagonist as preventive treatment. CONCLUSION: This is the first case report of recurrent CVT in a context of intensive sport, without any other thrombogenic features, suggesting a causal link. Intensive exercise should be considered as a potential promoting factor of CVT and investigated during routine examination.

Unilateral posterior cervical spinal cord infarction due to spontaneous vertebral artery dissection.

CONTEXT: Ischemia of the cervical spinal cord is a rare complication of spontaneous vertebral artery dissection (VAD) and usually involves the ventral portion. We describe a less evocative clinical presentation and images of unilateral posterior spinal cord infarction due to spontaneous VAD in order to facilitate early diagnosis. FINDINGS: A previously fit 30-year-old man presented with persistent headaches and proximal motor deficit of the right arm. He was diagnosed with spontaneous dissection of both vertebral arteries, with occlusion of the right one, and the right carotid artery. Neurological examination also revealed a right C2-C3 tactile sensory loss, with unilateral proprioceptive deficit below. Brain images revealed small bilateral cerebellar infarcts which could not be responsible for the clinical symptoms. Magnetic resonance imaging of the spinal cord showed a right posterior cervical spinal cord infarction. The patient achieved nearly complete recovery after several weeks of anticoagulation and rehabilitation. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Infarction of the caudal portion of the cervical spinal cord, especially unilateral, caused by spontaneous VAD, has rarely been described and is certainly under-diagnosed due to less suggestive symptoms, like unilateral and mainly sensory deficit. Nevertheless, early diagnosis of this condition is important to guide patient management and rehabilitation.

Paradoxical state anxiety and working memory in a patient with acute stroke.

OBJECTIVE: In view of the negative impact of anxiety on working memory, we induced anxiety in 26 patients with acute stroke and 33 healthy controls, and studied how the anxiety affected their emotional reactivity and how the reactivity affected their verbal and visuospatial working memory. We compared the overall findings with those in 1 of our patients (C.B.) who had presented with an abnormally high level of state anxiety. METHODS: We gave verbal and visuospatial 1-back tasks under both neutral and anxiogenic conditions, and we compared participants' working memory scores, self-reported levels of state anxiety, and electrodermal activity. RESULTS: When comparing performance in the neutral condition, the control and patient groups exhibited disrupted verbal working memory, which was associated with greater electrodermal activity and higher state anxiety during the anxiogenic condition. Although patient C.B. also had heightened electrodermal activity during the anxiogenic condition, she experienced a significant reduction in her state anxiety. Her verbal working memory was better during the anxiogenic than the neutral condition. CONCLUSIONS: Because of the phonological (subvocal speech) nature of verbal working memory, a higher level of anxious apprehension could explain the increase in state anxiety and the corresponding disruption of verbal working memory in our patient and control groups during the anxiogenic condition. C.B.'s lower state anxiety and selective improvement in verbal working memory during the anxiogenic condition suggest that she felt less anxious apprehension.

Cerebral venous thrombosis due to essential thrombocythemia and worsened by heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis.

This case describes the medical history of a 61-year-old woman treated for cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) leading to diagnosis of essential thrombocythemia (ET). During treatment with unfractionated heparin, after initial improvement of clinical state, signs of cerebral hypertension reappeared. Although the platelet count decreased, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) was only suspected 2 days later when it dropped below the standard 150 × 10(9) L(-1) threshold. HIT diagnosis was confirmed by the presence of anti-PF4/heparin IgG. This late finding was the cause of the extension of CVT with worsening of cerebral hypertension necessitating decompressive craniectomy. Elevated basal platelet count due to ET can delay diagnosis and treatment of HIT. In this case, physicians should be more attentive to platelet count variations rather than thrombocytopenia threshold.

Intravenous thrombolysis in thromboembolic occlusion of the A1 segment of the left anterior cerebral artery only.

This case describes the treatment of an 84-year-old male patient with acute bi-frontal ischemic stroke, due to thromboembolic occlusion of the A1 segment of the left anterior cerebral artery (ACA) only. The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) was 11. Intravenous fibrinolysis was performed with a good outcome. Repermeabilization of both ACA was demonstrated by imaging and, 24 h after treatment, NIHSS was 0. Although intravenous thrombolysis is mostly used for middle cerebral artery occlusion, this case emphasizes the benefit of this treatment for an ischemic stroke due to embolization of the A1 segment of the left ACA only. It is all the more original in that it describes an unusual treatment for this arterial territory, and with this anatomic particularity.

Delay in the diagnosis of cerebral vein and dural sinus thrombosis: influence on outcome.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Diagnostic delay of cerebral vein and dural sinus thrombosis may have an impact on outcome. METHODS: In the International Study on Cerebral Vein and Dural Sinus Thrombosis (ISCVT) cohort (624 patients with cerebral vein and dural sinus thrombosis), we analyzed the predictors and the impact on outcome of diagnostic delay. Primary outcome was a modified Rankin Scale score >2 at the end of follow-up. Secondary outcomes were modified Rankin Scale score 0 to 1 at the end of follow-up, death, and visual deficits (visual acuity or visual field). RESULTS: Median delay was 7 days (interquartile range, 3 to 16). Patients with disturbance of consciousness (P<0.001) and of mental status (P=0.042), seizure (<0.001), and with parenchymal lesions on admission CT/MR (P<0.001) were diagnosed earlier, whereas men (P=0.01) and those with isolated intracranial hypertension syndrome (P=0.04) were diagnosed later. Between patients diagnosed earlier and later than the median delay, no statistically significant differences were found in the primary (P=0.33) and in secondary outcomes: modified Rankin Scale score 0 to 1 (P=0.86) or deaths (P=0.53). Persistent visual deficits were more frequent in patients diagnosed later (P=0.05). In patients with isolated intracranial hypertension syndrome, modified Rankin Scale score >2 at the end of follow-up was more frequent in patients diagnosed later (P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic delay was considerable in this cohort and was associated with an increased risk of visual deficit. In patients with isolated intracranial hypertension syndrome, diagnostic delay was also associated with death or dependency.

Endarterectomy versus stenting in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Carotid stenting is less invasive than endarterectomy, but it is unclear whether it is as safe in patients with symptomatic carotid-artery stenosis. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, randomized, noninferiority trial to compare stenting with endarterectomy in patients with a symptomatic carotid stenosis of at least 60%. The primary end point was the incidence of any stroke or death within 30 days after treatment. RESULTS: The trial was stopped prematurely after the inclusion of 527 patients for reasons of both safety and futility. The 30-day incidence of any stroke or death was 3.9% after endarterectomy (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.0 to 7.2) and 9.6% after stenting (95% CI, 6.4 to 14.0); the relative risk of any stroke or death after stenting as compared with endarterectomy was 2.5 (95% CI, 1.2 to 5.1). The 30-day incidence of disabling stroke or death was 1.5% after endarterectomy (95% CI, 0.5 to 4.2) and 3.4% after stenting (95% CI, 1.7 to 6.7); the relative risk was 2.2 (95% CI, 0.7 to 7.2). At 6 months, the incidence of any stroke or death was 6.1% after endarterectomy and 11.7% after stenting (P=0.02). There were more major local complications after stenting and more systemic complications (mainly pulmonary) after endarterectomy, but the differences were not significant. Cranial-nerve injury was more common after endarterectomy than after stenting. CONCLUSIONS: In this study of patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis of 60% or more, the rates of death and stroke at 1 and 6 months were lower with endarterectomy than with stenting. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00190398 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).

Effect of general anaesthesia on functional outcome in patients with anterior circulation ischaemic stroke having endovascular thrombectomy versus standard care: a meta-analysis of individual patient data.

BACKGROUND: General anaesthesia (GA) during endovascular thrombectomy has been associated with worse patient outcomes in observational studies compared with patients treated without GA. We assessed functional outcome in ischaemic stroke patients with large vessel anterior circulation occlusion undergoing endovascular thrombectomy under GA, versus thrombectomy not under GA (with or without sedation) versus standard care (ie, no thrombectomy), stratified by the use of GA versus standard care. METHODS: For this meta-analysis, patient-level data were pooled from all patients included in randomised trials in PuMed published between Jan 1, 2010, and May 31, 2017, that compared endovascular thrombectomy predominantly done with stent retrievers with standard care in anterior circulation ischaemic stroke patients (HERMES Collaboration). The primary outcome was functional outcome assessed by ordinal analysis of the modified Rankin scale (mRS) at 90 days in the GA and non-GA subgroups of patients treated with endovascular therapy versus those patients treated with standard care, adjusted for baseline prognostic variables. To account for between-trial variance we used mixed-effects modelling with a random effect for trials incorporated in all models. Bias was assessed using the Cochrane method. The meta-analysis was prospectively designed, but not registered. FINDINGS: Seven trials were identified by our search; of 1764 patients included in these trials, 871 were allocated to endovascular thrombectomy and 893 were assigned standard care. After exclusion of 74 patients (72 did not undergo the procedure and two had missing data on anaesthetic strategy), 236 (30%) of 797 patients who had endovascular procedures were treated under GA. At baseline, patients receiving GA were younger and had a shorter delay between stroke onset and randomisation but they had similar pre-treatment clinical severity compared with patients who did not have GA. Endovascular thrombectomy improved functional outcome at 3 months both in patients who had GA (adjusted common odds ratio (cOR) 1·52, 95% CI 1·09-2·11, p=0·014) and in those who did not have GA (adjusted cOR 2·33, 95% CI 1·75-3·10, p<0·0001) versus standard care. However, outcomes were significantly better for patients who did not receive GA versus those who received GA (covariate-adjusted cOR 1·53, 95% CI 1·14-2·04, p=0·0044). The risk of bias and variability between studies was assessed to be low. INTERPRETATION: Worse outcomes after endovascular thrombectomy were associated with GA, after adjustment for baseline prognostic variables. These data support avoidance of GA whenever possible. The procedure did, however, remain effective versus standard care in patients treated under GA, indicating that treatment should not be withheld in those who require anaesthesia for medical reasons. FUNDING: Medtronic.

Induction chemotherapy does not increase the operative risk of pneumonectomy!

BACKGROUND: There is an ongoing debate whether induction therapy increases post-operative mortality and morbidity, especially when performing pneumonectomy. We therefore reviewed a consecutive series of patients having undergone pneumonectomy in a single center. METHODS: The charts of 298 patients operated on between January 1999 and July 2005 were reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups: group 1 included those who received induction chemotherapy (60 patients, 20.1%), and group 2 included those who underwent surgery alone (238 patients, 79.9%). Endpoints were operative mortality at 30 and at 90 days, and major complications such as empyema, bronchial fistula and acute respiratory distress syndrome. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 11.0 software. RESULTS: Demographic data were similar for both groups when considering side of operation, comorbidity and weaning from tobacco; patients were older in group 2 (61.83+/-9.58 years vs 57.75+/-8.94 years; p=0.003) and there were more female patients in group 2 (17.2% vs 5.0%; p=0.010). Post-operative mortality at 30 days was 6.7% in group 1 and 5.5% in group 2 (p=0.458), and 11.7% for group 1 and 10.9% in group 2 at 90 days (p=0.512). Incidence of empyema was 1.7% in group 1 and 2.1% in group 2 (p=0.652); incidence of bronchopleural fistulas was 1.7% in group 1 and 5.5% in group 2 (p=0.188); incidence of acute respiratory distress syndrome was 3.3% in group 1 and 3.4% in group 2 (p=0.675). CONCLUSION: In opposition to previous reports, induction chemotherapy did not significantly jeopardize post-operative outcome following pneumonectomy in our experience.

Lung function after lobectomy: a randomized, double-blinded trial comparing thoracic epidural ropivacaine/sufentanil and intravenous morphine for patient-controlled analgesia.

BACKGROUND: Although thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) is considered superior to IV opioids for postoperative analgesia after thoracic surgery, a few studies clearly demonstrate an improvement in pulmonary function attributable to TEA using a local anesthetic in combination with an opioid. METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, double-blind study, we compared the effects of TEA with ropivacaine and sufentanil (TEA group) to IV morphine (IV group), as they affected pain and pulmonary function after lobectomy in 68 patients. Pain intensity, forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), FEV1/FVC ratio, forced expiratory flows, and sniff nasal inspiratory pressure as a marker of inspiratory muscle strength were measured from the first to the fourth postoperative day. RESULTS: Pain relief was better in the TEA group at rest and on coughing (P < 0.001). The impairment of FVC and FEV1 was less in the TEA group when compared with that in the IV group (P < 0.001 and P = 0.003, respectively). Sniff nasal inspiratory pressure, FEV1/FVC ratio, and expiratory flow values decreased similarly in both groups. In-hospital mortality, as well as postoperative pulmonary complications, was not different between groups. CONCLUSION: After lobectomy, TEA enables a significant increase in pulmonary function concomitant with better pain relief than systemic morphine, although a modest intercostal motor block may occur.

A new bioabsorbable sleeve for lung staple-line reinforcement (FOREseal): report of a three-center phase II clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate on the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of a new bioabsorbable material for lung staple-line reinforcement. METHODS: This prospective open trial included 66 patients (mean age of 56+/-17 years) who underwent various types of lung resection using staplers with knitted calcium alginate sleeves for buttressing (FOREseal, Laboratoires Brothier, Nanterre, France) at three academic centers: 29 lobectomies, 22 emphysema surgeries, 15 wedge resections or lung biopsies. Intraoperative air leakage was assessed at a mean respiratory peak pressure of 30 cmH2O, and rated as grade 1, 2, or 3. Persistent air leakage in the postoperative course, as well as any relevant event, was assessed daily. The follow-up period was of 6 months. RESULTS: No technical problem linked to the device occurred. Hemostasis of the cutting edges was completed in all patients. Fifty-six percent of the patients had no intraoperative air leak and 27.3% had grade 1 leaks. Mean postoperative air leaks and thoracic drainage times were 1.9+/-2.3 days and 6+/-5.3 days, respectively. In-hospital mortality was nil. There was no empyema. Mean hospital stay was 9.1+/-6.6 days. At follow-up, one patient underwent lung transplantation, and pathology of the explanted specimen showed the absence of device-related foreign-body inflammation. One patient complained from metalloptysis, and another one, with a metastatic invasive aspergillosis, developed an infectious recurrence that required reoperation. CONCLUSIONS: FOREseal is an ergonomic, safe, and promising new material instead of nonabsorbable materials and xenomaterials for staple-line reinforcement. A randomized comparative study is now in progress.

Sampling or node dissection for intraoperative staging of lung cancer: a multicentric cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVE: This study compares accuracy of sampling versus formal node dissection in patients with primary lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: During a 4-month period, 208 consecutive patients (172 men, 36 women) without bulky disease underwent resection for primary lung cancer in three centers. The surgeon first sampled the main lymph node stations, and subsequently performed a radical mediastinal dissection. Endpoints were accuracy of prediction for stage N2 and radicality of node sampling compared to dissection. RESULTS: Resection consisted of 1 segmentectomy, 142 standard lobectomies, 6 bilobectomies, 14 sleeve-lobectomies, and 45 pneumonectomies. There were 108 squamous cell carcinomas, 621 adenocarcinomas, 18 bronchoalveolar carcinomas, 8 large cell carcinomas, 4 adenosquamous carcinomas and 8 neuroendocrine carcinomas. Primary tumor was stage T1 in 49 patients, T2 in 110, T3 in 43, and T4 in 6. Lymph node status (dissection) was N0 in 113, N1 in 35, and N2 in 60 patients. N2 disease concerned a single node in 16, a single node station in 19, and multiple levels in 25. Both N1 and N2 nodes were diseased in 36 patients. Sampling adequately recognized N2 disease in 31 patients (52%). Multiple level N2 was accurately identified in 10 patients (40%). Resection based on sampling would have been incomplete in 53 patients (88%). CONCLUSION: Radical mediastinal dissection is a mandatory adjunct to resection for lung cancer with curative attempt.

Bronchoplastic lobectomy: do early results depend on the underlying pathology? A comparison between typical carcinoids and primary lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluates the impact of the underlying disease upon the surgical outcome of bronchoplastic lobectomy, comparing typical carcinoid tumours with primary lung carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study includes 98 consecutive patients (78 males, 20 females). Eighteen patients had a typical carcinoid tumour (group 1), and 80 had a primary bronchial carcinoma (group2). Fifty-six patients underwent bronchoplasty with full sleeve resection (10 patients from group 1, 46 from group 2) and 42 patients had a bronchoplasty with bronchial wedge resection (8 from group 1 and 34 from group 2). Right upper lobectomy was the most common procedure. We compared demographic data, surgical indications, the type of bronchoplasty and postoperative complications. RESULTS: The average age in group 1 (38.5+/-16.3 years; range 15-77) was significantly lower than in group 2 (61.4+/-9.5 years; range 14-75) (p<0.001). There were no postoperative deaths. Procedure-specific complications (anastomotic dehiscence and atelectasis) were found in 7 patients (8.75%) in group 2 (of which, three had a combination of two of the above-mentioned complications) but none (0%) in group 1 (p=0.23). Seven patients from group 2 (8.75%) required treatment for a residual pneumothorax for none (0%) in group 1 (p=0.23). The mean duration for air leak was comparable in both groups (p=0.366). Three patients (16.67%) from group 1 had non-surgical complications compared to 17 (21.25%) in group 2 (of which, one had a combination of two non-surgical complications) (p=0.35). CONCLUSION: Bronchoplastic resection is a safe operation in patients with carcinoid tumours and should be the reference for treatment.