A sub-meniscal arthrotomy improves the medium-term patient outcome of tibial plateau fractures.

PURPOSE: This trial was conducted to determine the medium-term functional outcome of displaced tibial plateau fracture patients treated with closed fluoroscopic assisted reduction and internal fixation (CRIF) versus patients treated with standard open reduction with sub-meniscal arthrotomy and internal fixation (ORIF). METHODS: A prospective trial was conducted in adult patients with displaced AO/OTA 41 B and 41 C tibial plateau fractures. Patients were assigned to treatment based upon the standard treatment of the surgeon involved following the call schedule for the day, either CRIF or ORIF. Postoperative radiographs and CT were performed on all patients and patients were followed for a minimum of 2 years. Primary outcome measures were the KOOS, SMFA and SF-36. RESULTS: Seventy patients were recruited with 2 year follow-up on 35 patients in the CRIF group and 27 patients in the ORIF group. Postoperative CT scans showed that reductions were better with the ORIF group especially in the posterolateral quadrant as compared to the CRIF group. The frequency of mal-reductions was higher in the CRIF group. The KOOS, at two years, showed that the CRIF had significantly less good outcomes in the subcategories of SPORT (p = 0.03) and QOL (p = 0.01) measurements. CONCLUSIONS: ORIF with a sub-meniscal arthrotomy provides better quality reductions and better medium-term results as compared to CRIF for tibial plateau fractures. This may provide more long-term benefit from osteoarthritic symptoms in this patient group. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, Level 2.

Adherence to perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis among orthopedic trauma patients.

BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was to assess whether patients receive their antibiotic prophylaxis as prescribed. We also investigated what doses and durations of antibiotics are typically ordered, which patients actually receive antibiotics and factors causing the ordered antibiotic regimen to be altered. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 205 patient charts and sent a national survey to all surgeon members of the Canadian Orthopaedic Trauma Society (COTS) about antibiotic prophylaxis in the setting of surgical treatment for closed fractures. RESULTS: In all, 93% (179 of 193) of patients received an appropriate preoperative dose of antibiotics, whereas less than 32% (58 of 181) of patients received their postoperative antibiotics as ordered. The most commonly stated reason for patients not receiving their postoperative antibiotics as ordered was patients being discharged before completing 3 postoperative doses. There was a 70% (39 of 56) response rate to the survey sent to COTS surgeons. A single dose of a first-generation cephalosporin preoperatively followed by 3 doses postoperatively is the most common practice among orthopedic trauma surgeons across Canada, but several surgeons give only preoperative prophylaxis. CONCLUSION: Adherence to multidose postoperative antibiotic regimens is poor. Meta-analyses have failed to demonstrate the superiority of multidose regimens over single-dose prophylaxis. Single-dose preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis may be a reasonable choice for most orthopedic trauma patients with closed fractures.

Bridging and non-bridging external fixation in the treatment of unstable fractures of the distal radius: a retrospective study of 588 patients.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Bridging external fixation is used more frequently than non-bridging fixation in the management of unstable distal radius fractures, despite evidence from randomized controlled trials of better outcome with the latter technique. This study was designed to investigate the generalizability of the technique of non-bridging external fixation, and to define the indications for the use of each technique and their complications. METHODS: 641 patients with unstable displaced fractures of the distal radius were treated with bridging or non-bridging external fixation. Non-bridging external fixation was used where there was space for pins in the distal fragment. 52 patients were lost to follow-up, leaving 588 patients available for study. Complete data from radiographic measurements after fracture healing were available for 546 patients. 59 % of fractures were treated with the non-bridging technique. RESULTS: Fractures treated with bridging external fixation had a 6 times increased risk of dorsal malunion (p < 0.001) and a 2.5 times increased risk of radial shortening (p < 0.001) after adjusting for confounding factors (95% CI for odds ratio: 3-13 and 1.5-4, respectively) compared to non-bridging techniques. Minor pin tract infections were more common in the non-bridging group. INTERPRETATION: Non-bridging external fixation of the distal radius is a generalizable technique, and reduces the risk of dorsal malunion compared with bridging external fixation. Major complication rates are low and the technique is applicable to most unstable fractures of the distal radius. We recommend that non-bridging external fixation be used where there is space for the pins in the distal fragment.