Current management of penile implant infections, device reliability, and optimizing cosmetic outcome.

Penile implants hold a major position in the treatment algorithm for patients with erectile dysfunction who find medications and vacuum erection devices ineffective or unsatisfactory. As with any surgical procedure, adverse events may occur. The infection rate associated with implant placement has been lowered to the range of 1 % or less due to multifactorial improvements including no-touch techniques, the use of antibiotic-coated devices, and improved quality measures in the operating room. Urologists have been proactive in employing techniques and procedures which minimize loss of erectile length, hence enhancing patient satisfaction. Flat reservoirs have been developed and techniques of placing these to avoid problems in the space of Retzius have reduced complication rates as well. Device reliability has improved to the point that penile implants are among the most durable mechanical surgical products that contribute to patient and partner satisfaction, which is by far the greatest among all the treatments of erectile dysfunction.

Advancements in Performance of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Ambulatory Surgery Centers: Outcomes and Lessons From 1250+ Cases.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of routine ambulatory percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in a freestanding ambulatory surgical center. METHODS: Patients were treated between 2015 and 2022 by one of three experienced endourologists in Maryland. The surgery center is free-standing, with the nearest hospital approximately 10 minutes away. Patient characteristics and surgical datapoints, including need for transfer, were gathered prospectively at the time of surgery. Subset analyses were performed in patients with staghorn calculi or elevated body mass index, as they represent higher-risk populations. RESULTS: A total of 1267 patients underwent ambulatory PCNL with a median stone diameter of 32 mm. The average recovery time was 87 minutes, with 1.7% of patients requiring transfer to the hospital, generally for postoperative hypotension or inadequate pain control. 166 patients with body mass index >40 were safely treated, with no significant difference in transfer rate (P = .5). 2.8% of patients had a complication, with the majority being Clavien-Dindo grade I or II. 88 patients with staghorn calculi were treated, with a 6% transfer rate. Staghorn calculi were the only factor found on multivariable analysis to be a significant predictor of transfer (OR 3.56 (1.17-10.82) P < .05). CONCLUSION: Ambulatory PCNL may safely be performed in a surgery center in most patients. These outcomes reflect the real-world experience of high-volume surgeons and demonstrate a multiyear paradigm shift in PCNL from an inpatient procedure to an outpatient procedure in a surgery center.

Introduction of 1.9 mm Trilogy lithotripter in miniature percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Description of technique and case outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to evaluate the novel use of a 1.9 mm Trilogy lithotripter probe with varying locations and composition of renal stones. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled patients to undergo mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mPCNL) procedures using the 1.9 mm (instead of the standard 1.5 mm) Trilogy probe from August 2021 to April 2022. Several adjunctive irrigation measures compensated for reduced flow with the larger probe. Primary outcome was treatment efficiency. Patient demographics, preoperative demographics, and comorbidities, as well as real-time surgical data were extracted. Statistical analysis was performed using Kruskal-Wallis tests to compare stone type and location. RESULTS: A total of 110 patients were included in this study. The median total treatment time was 6.8 minutes, median lithotripsy time was 3.3 minutes, median stone treatment efficiency was 0.34 mm/min, and treatment efficacy was 50.4 (lithotripter time/treatment time). Overall median lithotripter efficiency was 104.6 mm3/min. Treatment efficiency was similar among stone composition (p=0.245) and location (p=0.263). Lithotripter 3D and 1D efficiency was also similar among stone composition (p=0.637 and p=0.766, respectively). Lithotripter 1D efficiency was nearly twice as fast in the lower pole compared to other stone locations (p=0.010). Overall broken probe rate for this procedure was 12%, mostly at the beginning, suggesting a learning curve. Five patients had minor complications, including one patient that required admission to the hospital for postoperative pain management. CONCLUSIONS: The 1.9 mm Trilogy lithotripter can be effective in mPCNL procedures with the use of easily implementable adjunctive irrigation techniques, decreasing the gap between lithotripsy time and total treatment time.

Ambulatory Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in a Free-Standing Surgery Center: An Analysis of 500 Consecutive Cases.

Introduction: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is an effective procedure for removal of large kidney stones; however, PCNL has traditionally been reserved for inpatient surgery. Certain cases are being performed entirely at an ambulatory surgery center (ASC), known as ambulatory PCNL (aPCNL). Materials and Methods: Five hundred consecutive PCNL procedures performed at a free-standing ASC between April 2015 and February 2019 were analyzed. Patient demographics, stone characteristics, operative characteristics, and postoperative data, including transfer to hospitals, 30-day readmissions, and complications > Clavien I, were recorded. Results: The mean age of patients undergoing PCNL at the ASC was 57 (range: 16-86) and body mass index 30 (16-49). American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) compositions are as follows: ASA 1 (6.5%), ASA 2 (56.2%), ASA 3 (37.2%), and ASA 4 (0. 1%). The mean stone burden was 30 mm (5-140). Standard tract dilation (24-30F) comprised 77% of cases. Ninety-two percent of cases were performed with a single tract, and 99% of cases had a ureteral stent as the only form of drainage (tubeless PCNL). The mean operative time was 104 minutes (32-305), and postanesthesia care unit time was 97 minutes (37-247). The predicted stone-free rate was 84%. Twelve patients (2.4%) required transfer to hospital, and the 30-day readmission rate was 4.2%. Conclusion: aPCNL is a safe and feasible procedure if performed by a high volume endourologist, even within the confines of a free-standing ASC. It is our opinion that the utilization of endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery facilitates high stone-free rates with minimal morbidity and low readmission rates. The institutional review board number is WIRB # 20171472.

Twitter Mentions and Academic Citations in the Urologic Literature.

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the relationship between the number of Twitter mentions and the number of academic citations a urologic publication receives. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred and thirteen papers from 7 prominent urologic journals were examined 37 months after publication. Articles were evaluated with 2 citation based "bibliometrics" (Scopus, Google Scholar) and Twitter mentions were tracked using the Altmetric Bookmarklet. The number of article citations and Twitter mentions were compared using one-way Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and bivariate fit analysis. RESULTS: Seventy-three percent of articles had at least 1 Twitter mention. Forty-two percent of Twitter mentions occurred within the first week of the online publication date. Articles mentioned on Twitter had 2.0-fold more Scopus citations (P <.01), and 2.3-fold more Google Scholar citations (P <. 01) compared to articles with no Twitter mentions. Female urologic articles had the greatest number of Twitter mentions (5.7 mentions/article) while pediatric urology had the fewest mean number of Twitter mentions (0.8 mentions/article). A total of 8.9% of papers were tweeted by their authors. Author tweeted articles were associated with a 12.3 (2.0-fold) and 15.5 (1.8-fold) mean citation increase for Scopus and Google Scholar (P <. 01 and P = . 01) compared to articles not shared by their authors on Twitter. CONCLUSION: The majority of urologic publications are being shared on Twitter. The number of citations a urologic publication receives up to 3 years after release is positively associated with the number of mentions it has on Twitter. Twitter activity may be an early indicator of ultimate academic impact of an academic urologic paper.