Colorectal cancer: chemotherapy treatment overview.

Fluorouracil (5-FU) has remained the standard therapy for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer for over 40 years. Unfortunately, only a minority of patients experience objective clinical response. Discussed herein are attempts to improve on the activity of 5-FU by biochemically modulating its action. In addition, novel agents for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer (oral fluoropyrimidines, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan) are discussed. Oral fluoropyrimidines (UFT plus leucovorin, capecitabine, eniluracil plus oral 5-FU) provide the convenience of oral delivery with a marked reduction in febrile neutropenia and mucositis. Recent randomized trials with these agents have demonstrated therapeutic activity that is comparable with intravenous schedules of 5-FU plus leucovorin. Compared to 5-FU, both oxaliplatin and irinotecan have uniquely different mechanisms of action and have demonstrated clinical activity in patients whose disease has progressed with 5-FU treatment. Combinations of either irinotecan or oxaliplatin plus 5-FU/leucovorin have demonstrated that the addition of these agents to 5-FU/leucovorin improves response rates and time to progression compared to 5-FU/leucovorin alone. Combination chemotherapy regimens with these novel agents are rapidly being introduced into the adjuvant setting.

Competitive inhibition of antigen presentation in animal models of autoimmune disease.

Competition between peptides for binding to class II major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules has been demonstrated both in vitro and in vivo. Peptide competition may provide a way to interfere with T cell activation in the treatment of autoimmune diseases. It may be possible to provide a substitute 'blocking' peptide to compete for presentation of an autoantigenic peptide to T cells. The approach described is a general one, which may be applicable to a number of T cell mediated MHC-linked autoimmune diseases, and to other undesirable immune responses. So far, peptide competitors have only been successfully used in the prevention of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE). Whether or not this approach will work in treating spontaneous disease models remains to be tested, although work in other test systems is encouraging.

A single amino acid change in a myelin basic protein peptide confers the capacity to prevent rather than induce experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis.

Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) is an experimental demyelinating disease of rodents. In (PL/J x SJL) F1 mice, it is induced by immunization with the myelin basic protein peptide Ac1-11. Ac1-11 [4A], a myelin basic protein peptide analog with a single amino acid substitution, (i) binds to class II major histocompatibility complex molecules and stimulates encephalitogenic T cells in vitro better than Ac1-11, (ii) is nonimmunogenic and nonencephalitogenic in vivo in (PL/J x SJL)F1 mice, (iii) prevents EAE when administered before or at the time of immunization with Ac1-11, and (iv) prevents EAE when administered later, near the time of disease onset. Initial studies suggest that Ac1-11 [4A] does not prevent EAE by competitive inhibition or by activation of regulatory cells. Thus, substitution of a single amino acid in a myelin basic protein peptide confers the capacity to prevent rather than induce EAE, even after peptide-specific encephalitogenic T cells have been activated.