UHPLC-MS/MS Method for Determination of Hydroxychloroquine and Its Main Metabolites in Oral Fluid and Whole Blood for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring.

BACKGROUND: Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) blood levels are used to monitor efficacy, safety, and patient adherence during treatment. Oral fluid has emerged as an alternative noninvasive, easily accessible, and low-complexity matrix for drug monitoring. However, there is no analytical method to measure HCQ in oral fluid. Therefore, we developed and validated an ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass (UHPLC-MS/MS) method for the measurement of HCQ and its main metabolites in oral fluid and compared to whole blood. METHODS: Ten microliters of matrices were used for sample preparation by protein precipitation with acetonitrile followed by online solid phase extraction. The validation process included assessment of lower limit of quantification, linearity, precision, recovery, matrix effect, interferences assessment, carryover, and sample dilution validation. RESULTS: The lower limit of quantification was 50 ng/mL for HCQ and metabolites in both oral fluid and whole blood. The calibration curve was linear from 50 to 2000 ng/mL (r2 = 0.999). The coefficient of variation for precision assay was 1.2% to 9.7% for intraday and 1.1% to 14.2% for interday for both HCQ and metabolites in oral fluid and whole blood samples at 150, 750, and 1250 ng/mL. The recovery was 85.3% to 118.5% for 150, 750, and 1250 ng/mL of HCQ and metabolites in both oral fluid and whole blood. Dilution factor up to 5-fold was validated for concentrations higher than the upper limit of quantification. CONCLUSIONS: The validated method is specific, precise, and accurate to determine the analytical range for therapeutic monitoring of HCQ and its main metabolites in oral fluid and blood.

Validation protocol for multiple blood gas analyzers in accordance with laboratory accreditation programs / Protocolo de validação de múltiplos equipamentos para análise de gases sanguíneos em conformidade com os programas de acreditação laboratorial

ABSTRACTIntroduction:The results of blood gas analysis using different instrumentation can vary widely due to the methodological differences, the calibration procedures and the use of different configurations for each type of instrument.Objective:The objective of this study was to evaluate multiple analytical systems for measurement of blood gases, electrolytes and metabolites in accordance with the accreditation program (PALC) of Sociedade Brasileira de Patologia Clínica/Medicina Laboratorial (SBPC/ML).Materials and methods:20 samples were evaluated in three ABL800 Flex (Radiometer Medical ApS, Denmark) blood gas analyzers, and the results were compared with those of the device in use, which was considered the reference. The analysis of variance (Anova) was applied for statistical purposes, as well as the calculation of mean, standard deviation and coefficient of variation.Results:The p values obtained in the statistical analysis were: pH = 0.983, pO2 = 0.991, pCO2 = 0.353, lactate = 0.584, glucose = 0.995, ionized calcium = 0.983, sodium = 0.991, potassium = 0.926, chlorine = 0.029.Conclusion:The evaluation of multiple analytical systems is an essential procedure in the clinical laboratory for quality assurance and accuracy of the results.

RESUMOIntrodução:Os resultados da análise dos gases sanguíneos utilizando diferentes equipamentos podem apresentar grandes variações decorrentes das diferenças metodológicas, dos procedimentos de calibração e da aplicação de configurações distintas para cada tipo de instrumento.Objetivo:O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar múltiplos sistemas analíticos para teste de gases sanguíneos, eletrólitos e metabólitos, em conformidade com o Programa de Acreditação de Laboratórios Clínicos (PALC) da Sociedade Brasileira de Patologia Clínica/Medicina Laboratorial (SBPC/ML).Materiais e métodos:Foram avaliadas 20 amostras em três analisadores de gases sanguíneos ABL800 Flex (Radiometer Medical ApS, Dinamarca) em relação ao equipamento em uso, que foi considerado referência. A análise de variância (Anova) foi aplicada para fins de estudo estatístico dos resultados obtidos nos quatro equipamentos, bem como o cálculo da média, do desvio padrão e do coeficiente de variação.Resultados:Os valores de p obtidos na análise estatística foram: pH = 0,983, pO2 = 0,991, pCO2 = 0,353, lactato = 0,584, glicose = 0,995, cálcio ionizado = 0,983, sódio = 0,991, potássio = 0,926 e cloro = 0,029.Conclusão:A avaliação de múltiplos sistemas analíticos é procedimento essencial no laboratório clínico para garantia da qualidade e da exatidão dos resultados.